Zahir
Ebrahim | Project
Humanbeingsfirst.org
April
09, 2013
Part
V of Raahe-Nijaat (the way out) series on Pakistan
Part-I,
Part-II,
Part-III,
Part-IV,
Part-V,
Part-VI,
Part-VII,
Part-VIII,
Part-IX,
Part-X,
Part-XI,
Part-XII
In
order to perceptively comprehend some of the dynamics behind the
latter day Shia Killings in Pakistan, it is pertinent to read the
very insightful report convened by the Government of Pakistan for the
yesteryear Ahmadiya killings in 1953,
titled: The
Ahrar-Ahmadiya controversy Munir Report of the Court of Inquiry 1954 (https://tinyurl.com/Munir-Report-1954).
This
report which came to be called the Munir
Report, sheds a great deal of light on present matters pertaining to
the movement toward Shia kafirdom in Pakistan. The methods used
against the Ahmadiyas by the
almost exactly 60 years ago is a mirror image of the methods being
used today by the Tafriki-Lej-alphabet-acronym-soup
(enumerated in my article: Some
Context for What's Transpiring in Pakistan and What Not to do in the
Upcoming 2013 Elections) against the largely
defenseless and unarmed Shia Muslims of Pakistan.
The
key difference to me between then and now is exactly one (apart from
the palpable fact that it was Ahmadis then
and Shias now):
- Then the government was incapacitated into taking no action against the Ahrar's terrorism due to political considerations in the fragile new Pakistan, and inadvertently let the conditions between 1948-1952 exacerbate by wavering in its determination to curb the politically motivated religious fanaticism of the Ahrar leading to the riots of 1953 in Punjab against the Ahmadis and the concomitant declaration of Pakistan's first martial law in Punjab. In other words, then, as is evident from the Munir Report, the situation was created due to political incompetence and political calculus of the political officialdom in the new Pakistan that the law and order deteriorated to that extent. Meaning, the officialdom did not want it, and the Ahmadiya killings occurred because of keeping political stability was deemed more important than immediately curbing the law and order situation with a just but unflinching hand and possibly exacerbating the situation.
- Whereas today, virtually all the power-wielders in Pakistan, some within the govt., both federal and state, I am sure also district down to the local thaana (police station) level, and some within the Military and nearly all of the intelligence apparatuses, and some within the media, I would say all the media both local and foreign, and also big businesses (including enterprises like Nestle Pakistan that has been supplying water to the occupation troops in Afghanistan for the past 12 years and part of officialdom in no less a measure than those officially drawing a salary from the national treasury), comprise the 'new Ahrar'. And, therefore, unlike what one sees in the Munir Report of repeated governmental officials writing memos to senior administrators and leaders to take stern action against the Ahrar, one will surely find no such memos in today's government as all the officialdom is together the 'new Ahrar'. I have already analyzed why I think the officialdom of Pakistan is the 'new Ahrar' under the title 'The New SAVAK in Pakistan'.
And
all indications continue to pile up that the Shias are being goaded
into militantly rising up (by killing a sufficient number of them) to
create a full scale internecine war in
Pakistan; Muslims killing Muslims once again to fertilize the “shia
crescent”. This is beyond any proxy
warfare between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and while its seeds are surely
planted in the deep seated shia-sunni differences, these spate of
shia killings and the accompanying propaganda warfare upon the Shia
Muslims of Pakistan is not due to Shia Sunni issue which is fourteen
centuries old.
Both
of those aforementioned factors that the media harps about, and the
politicians variously draw upon with approaching elections in
Pakistan, are misleading and calculated red herrings to disguise the
real purpose behind this warfare. Unfortunately, due to the media
participation in the New SAVAK project,
more and more Shia and Sunni public are both getting confused about
it.
Don't
get confused ---- it is a fabricated war along the Hegelian Dialectic
that I have by now surely explained to death on my website and have
now stopped explaining altogether. It's like kicking an already dead
dog to death.
But
if you do not understand Hegel, you cannot possibly make sense of any
of the apparent insanity in Pakistan. It is not insanity, but a
calculated game-theory laced warfare being waged upon Pakistan to
create a perpetual enemy for the West.
In
the next five years, there will likely arise a "Hezbollah"
Pakistan in reaction to the oppression by the New SAVAK
in Pakistan, and that is more than arm chair prediction. It is an
inevitability if the oppression upon the Shias of Pakistan continues.
One
can see that the Shias of Pakistan have been the most docile of
communities in Pakistan, largely self-obsessed in their rituals and
silently minding their own business amidst all the war on terror
being waged upon the world by the mightiest tyrants in the world
despite their lofty principled sloganeering that has defined the shia
ethos for fourteen centuries. One is forced to wonder why Shia
militancy is being “tickled” into existence if not to
bring to fruition the long awaited "shia
crescent".
Two
matched and armed to the teeth nemesis will paint Lahore to Karachi
more red than Peshawar to Quetta have been painted thus far
unilaterally by the "new Ahrar" and the "new SAVAK".
A
smart self-respecting people will surely always rise to defend
themselves --- but simultaneously, also refuse to be used as stooges
and patsies by declining to become the West's perpetual enemy.
To
not make the same national suicidal mistake as Iran takes a lot more
wherewithal, national sha-oor, than has
been publicly displayed by even the finest in Pakistan. For a nation
not known for either the abundance of its intellectual prowess, or
the superfluity of its noble integrity, it is not hard to perceive
that Pakistan was stochastically designed to be DOA
(dead on arrival) into this world.
I
will end by quoting the last paragraph of the Munir Report, and if
what it says was true then at the very inception of Pakistan, only
the janaza (funeral) remains to be recited
(I hope of course that I am wrong and persons of great commonsense
will miraculously come to the forefront of national leadership to
untie the Gordian knot so craftily tied on Pakistan's destiny on the
Grand Chessboard):
"And
it is our deep conviction that if the Ahrar had been treated as a
pure question of law and order, without any political considerations,
one District Magistrate and one Superintendent of Police could have
dealt with them. Consequently, we are prompted by something that they
call a human conscience to enquire whether, in our present state of
political development, the administrative problem of law and order
cannot be divorced from a democratic bed fellow called a Ministerial
Government, which is so remorselessly haunted by political
nightmares. But if democracy means the subordination of law and order
to political ends—then Allah knoweth best and we end the
report."
Source
URL:
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2013/04/memo-ahrar-ahmadiya-controversy-of-1953.html
Faith-Politico
URL:
http://faith-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2013/04/memo-ahrar-ahmadiya-controversy-of-1953.html
Pak-Politico
URL:
http://pakistan-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2013/04/memo-ahrar-ahmadiya-controversy-of-1953.html
Memo: The
'Ahrar-Ahmadiya controversy' of 1953 and Shia Killings today in 2013
By Zahir Ebrahim