Zahir Ebrahim Responds to Gilad Atzmon's 'In Defence Of Larry David'

Response to Gilad Atzmon's 'In Defence Of Larry David' : Don't see the courage or the genius in pissing and spitting on others' sacred things, pee and spit on your own!

Zahir Ebrahim | Project

November 16, 2009

In Ref To:

In Ref To:

Project commented on AtlanticFreePress (comment removed, cached here):

Don't see the courage or the genius in spitting on others' sacred things, spit on your own!

Thin ice, poor spin!

Why did the “TV Genius” not try that peeing wisdom on the portrait of Elie Wiesel if he is so courageous?

Why did he pick on someone else's heritage to show the depravity of his own people?

Tomorrow to show the criminality of the atheist-Jewish-nihilists shared ethos of 'uber' morality, he will trying pissing on what's sacred to Muslims. And when there will be riots and protests worldwide, the glib essayist Mr. Gilad Atzmon will suggest that the Muslims are not understanding the profound courage of this criminal moron? Will Mr. Gilad Atzmon then assert that in fact, the Muslims are the “spiritually suppressed, silenced, robbed and indoctrinated by different enlightened rational ‘Davids’..”

Mr. Gilad Atzmon: if you love such courage so much, get him to spit on the Jews if he wants to make fun of the Jews. I do not advocate anyone to spit on anyone, but if someone dare's to spit on things or symbols important to me, I don't let them get away with it regardless of how intellectually profound the act is supposed to be, or how much good it's supposed to be for me. Please come around to my home and do it in front of me to see the result – for if it's so courageous, one should be able to do it right in front of the Christian, the Muslim, and anyone else whose sacred items one is spitting on, right (?) all the while explaining to them that they are only making fun of the Jews (!) and it's good for them to receive this spit?

Thin ice, poor spin. I expect better from the mighty pen of Gilad Atzmon. And after reading this article, I am now wondering why did I expect anything better from Gilad Atzmon. Just because he critiques the crimes of his own peoples upon another innocent people? So I should now accept his making fun of what's sacred to me because he opposes my enemy? He does, after all, define himself: “secular Israeli Jew”.

And for the purpose of this response, do think of me as a Christian. I am bloody offended, but perhaps by Mr. Atzmon justifications more, mainly because I used to respect this chap (before I had read this essay). And I know precisely what will come next.

Christians may have become an easy target to make fun of at the hands of some Jews; it causes no riots in the streets. But not the Muslims. Hurling such abuses at the Muslims is a great way to show how barbarian and unsophisticated we are when we don't appreciate these finer points of satire when spit and shit and canons are hurled at us and at our Prophets, Jesus being a Prophet of Islam – and Daniel Pipes and his confreres printing offensive cartoons have a field day inciting riots and calling it “[It is] Not a Clash of Civilizations, It's a Clash between the Civilized World and Barbarians”.


Thank you.

Zahir Ebrahim


Source URL:

Source Comment:

Zahir Ebrahim Responds to Gilad Atzmon's 'In Defence Of Larry David' November 16, 2009