Zahir Ebrahim's response to James Petras' The US and China: One Side is Losing, the Other is Winning

Zahir Ebrahim's response to James Petras' The US and China: One Side is Losing, the Other is Winning

China is only the template for central planning in One-world Government

Friday, January 08, 2010

In China, it all started with a revolution…” -- backed by the same financiers who took American jobs offshore and replaced its real industrial production base with fictitious financial base - doing the opposite for China. And why would they do that? Why would they want to make America bankrupt and shore up the communist state with their new penchant for state-capitalism? Have you studied their overarching agenda? Erosion of the sovereignty of nation-states, ushering in one-world government, world communism under the control of the handful of capitalist oligarchy?

Have you seen this interview with Norman Dodd: is he to be believed for his revelations to the Congressional Reece Committee and to G. Edward Griffin who recorded the interview:

Is this book by W. Cleon Skoussen to be believed: The Naked Capitalist, in which Skoussen quotes the head (or prominent worker) of the Communist part in the US receiving her instructions for the USSR from the Waldorf Astoria, and USSR subsequently confirming those instructions - all at the height of the Cold War?

Is this book by Carroll Quigley to be believed: "Tragedy and Hope"?

Is the data and analysis provided by Antony Sutton in his Wall Street related books of their role in financing Hitler and other boogieman to be believed?

Is the role of the international banksters in the running the major macro affairs of the world, creating world wars, providing passage to Communist leaders to reach Russia at the beginning of their communist revolution, to prop up both the warring Chinese leaders, one became Taiwan, one the “revolution” you speak off?

Is the role of Hegelian Dialectics to raise the phoenix from the ashes of global conflicts empirical?

The examination of these questions can lend some insight into why the Chinese experiment is being conducted. China is pegged to the US dollar. And bound to it by the backing of the militarist state whom you speak of. When currency collapse is orchestrated to create global currency, all are in the same boat.

Just as once upon a time Berlin was at the top of the world with perhaps the fastest trains, then NY (and Japan), now Chinese cities - and all laid to waste, and to be laid to waste, by the same common godfathers of International finance whose primal agenda appears to be population Reduction, which includes China, if NSSM 200 is to be believed.

But why would one believe any of this - it all sounds such fantastical nonsense. It is surely by accident and sagacious policies alone that China came about.

Howsoever one may view history, as being orchestrated or accidental, forensic empiricism indicates that China is only a grand experiment of state managed production, central planning, and big government, and that experiment is being conducted by the same financial oligarchy which is making America bankrupt.

China is being held up as the model of success in their own Mighty Wurlitzer rag - and that's why the Financial Times is presenting matters in this way. The International banksters are orchestrating the recipe for global governance, and selling it to the public. They made that fact abundantly clear one year ago in the same Financial Times of Dec 08, 2008:

Wouldn't you say that Mr. Karl Marx is sitting pretty in his grave just about now? His communist manifesto coming to life with a twist!

Thank you.

Zahir Ebrahim, Project

Comment for: James Petras

Source URL:

Zahir Ebrahim's response to James Petras' The US and China: One Side is Losing, the Other is Winning