Open letter to Pervez Hoodbhoy – Why do you hide under the imperial skirt?

From: Project
Date: Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:37 AM
Subject: Teach me!
To: Pervez Hoodbhoy
Cc: [ ]
Dear PH: The following is my [latest] work which has [once again] challenged the world view of which you are a part. Your contribution to that world view is captured in the following paragraph in item-1:
Why do pious people continually make “World War IV” out to be about Islam and Muslims? They either see it as being a war on Islam and apologetically argue that Islam is benign and that “The detractors of Islam fail to see all this” as Ramzy Baroud does in 'Muslims Must Not Pay Price for Europe’s Identity Crisis'; or see it as there being something inherently wrong with an antediluvian Islam which needs to be overhauled to bring it in line with modernity as Daniel Pipes and Bernard Lewis et. al. do in their doctrinal craftsmanship such as 'Crisis of Islam – Holy War and Unholy Terror' and in propagandist statements like it's “Not a Clash of Civilizations, It's a Clash between the Civilized World and Barbarians”; or see it as something wrong with the Muslims who need a reformation from their Dark Age as Pakistani native informant par excellence, Pervez Hoodbhoy does in his atheistic zealotry to reform the Muslim mind. In all cases, they calculatingly distract attention from the blatant fact of the matter that hectoring hegemons are engaging in demonization and false-flag operations to “goosestep the Herrenvolk across international frontiers” in their age old quest for Lebensraum, euphemistically called Global Governance.
And that contribution of yours is validated, as well as shown in its proper relative bit position in reference cited in item-2.
Let me know where I might be wrong. I'd like to be wrong - because otherwise the conclusion is rather bleak for you despite your backing from empire and your untouchability at this time.
You know you are their shill playing noora-kushti. I know it. Looking in the mirror you can't escape it. Since this is unsettling for me for someone of your stature, even if not for you, I hope I have only mis-perceived. Since you and your published detractors have carved out the WWF forum to stage their own main-event, I have no venue to offer my views publicly - which suits you just fine apparently. I'd say that's intellectual cowardice, hiding behind the skirt of empire which has entirely book-ended the discourse space including its dissent. Just like Chomsky had himself put it, and which he subsequently himself employed to his own advantage, just as you are doing:
'This "debate" is a typical illustration of a primary principle of sophisticated propaganda. In crude and brutal societies, the Party Line is publicly proclaimed and must be obeyed -- or else. What you actually believe is your own business and of far less concern. In societies where the state has lost the capacity to control by force, the Party Line is simply presupposed; then, vigorous debate is encouraged within the limits imposed by unstated doctrinal orthodoxy. The cruder of the two systems leads, naturally enough, to disbelief; the sophisticated variant gives an impression of openness and freedom, and so far more effectively serves to instill the Party Line. It becomes beyond question, beyond thought itself, like the air we breathe.'
'Democratic societies use a different method: they don't articulate the party line. That's a mistake. What they do is presuppose it, then encourage vigorous debate within the framework of the party line. This serves two purposes. For one thing it gives the impression of a free and open society because, after all, we have lively debate. It also instills a propaganda line that becomes something you presuppose, like the air you breathe.'
'The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.'
You are, after all, a Chomsky student, or confrere. You claim the mantle of an intellectual. Yet you shy away from debate outside the "debate" spectrum. Don't you think you are greater than that? Be a teacher Pervez - teach me. As Socrates may perhaps have asked of his own teacher, just as he asked of the people about to administer him the Hemlock:
'Agree with me if I seem to you to speak the truth; or, if not, withstand me might and main that I may not deceive you as well as myself in my desire, and like the bee leave my sting in you before I die. And now let us proceed.'
And I cc a few who apparently hold you in very high esteem. They share with you one thing – their silence on modernity.

Best Regards,
Zahir Ebrahim
only a plebe

- ### -

Links fixed February 25, 2018

Open letter to Pervez Hoodbhoy – Why do you hide under the imperial skirt? By Zahir Ebrahim

Editorial – Another Hegelian Mind Fck: 'Muslims Must Not Pay Price for Europe’s Identity Crisis'

Another Hegelian Mind Fck: 'Muslims Must Not Pay Price for Europe’s Identity Crisis'

Zahir Ebrahim | Project | PDF

December 26, 2009

It is not European woes nor its Identity Crisis, and nor any 'shortcomings' of Islam that is causing Muslims to be demonized in the Western World. It is also not very obtuse. Why are brilliant social scientists and academics like Ramzy Baroud getting confused about it: “Unearthing the reasons behind the disturbing phenomena is hardly an easy task, for it arguably requires a greater examination of the political, economic and social woes of European states than it does of the ‘shortcomings’ of Islam.”?

It has neither anything to do with “political, economic and social woes of European states” nor with Islam. Why do brave people continually rise to defend Islam as if the world's great religion of more than 1.5 billion people needs their pathetic defense, that it can't stand on its own without their guarded fig leaf: “Islam is a great religion in many respects; it has endured for over 1400 years. Its membership is never confined by skin color, culture, political ideology or geographic boundaries. Its views of antiquity, on equality, women rights and peace are considered progressive even by today’s standards. The detractors of Islam fail to see all this.”

The foundations of what is courageously not stated however is actually rather easily visible for anyone well versed in political and social sciences in the “doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment” designed to sustain “imperial mobilization” as a Hegelian Dialectic to raise the phoenix of the new Atlantis from the ashes of the Old Order: a One-world government. Is this so very profound to comprehend?

Why do pious people continually make “World War IV” out to be about Islam and Muslims? They either see it as being a war on Islam and apologetically argue that Islam is benign and that “The detractors of Islam fail to see all this” as Ramzy Baroud does in 'Muslims Must Not Pay Price for Europe’s Identity Crisis'; or see it as there being something inherently wrong with an antediluvian Islam which needs to be overhauled to bring it in line with modernity as Daniel Pipes and Bernard Lewis et. al. do in their doctrinal craftsmanship such as 'Crisis of Islam – Holy War and Unholy Terror' and in propagandist statements like it's “Not a Clash of Civilizations, It's a Clash between the Civilized World and Barbarians”; or see it as something wrong with the Muslims who need a reformation from their Dark Age as Pakistani native informant par excellence, Pervez Hoodbhoy does in his atheistic zealotry to reform the Muslim mind. In all cases, they calculatingly distract attention from the blatant fact of the matter that hectoring hegemons are engaging in demonization and false-flag operations to “goosestep the Herrenvolk across international frontiers” in their age old quest for Lebensraum, euphemistically called Global Governance.

A similar demonization was employed against the communists not too long ago, and even backed by wanton acts of terrorism upon the civilians in Western Europe – see Operation Gladio, NATO's Stay-Behind Armies which did more than just fight the communists with their false-flag operations – to convince an ever growing skeptical European public of the communist threat.

From Kawther Salam's coverage of “the referendum in Switzerland on banning the construction of minarets” to Ramzy Baroud's: “targeting of Muslims and Islam has become a kind of national theater in France”, is entirely along that very political science axis.

It is crafting a broad spectrum public enemy to rally the masses against in a lifetime of “World War IV” – from cultural to militant – in order to engage in a social transformation that is to take a lifetime to accomplish. That requires a sustained “doctrinal motivation” to fuel the global transformation-inducing World War for that duration. It makes it possible for the public to pay its full price in the “economic self-denial (that is defense spending), and the human sacrifice (casualties even among professional soldiers)” including exchanging their “essential liberties for some temporary safety”, all of which is otherwise “uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.”

As was noted in the minute books of the Carnegie Endowment for Peace in 1909 and discovered by the Congressional Reece Committee's lead investigator in 1954, Norman Dodd: 'The question is: “Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?” And they conclude that no more effective means than war to that end is known to humanity.'

Only through that transparent standard 50 mm lens of Machiavellian political science does the reality imaged on a 35 mm film plane, as the observation made by Mr. Ramzy Baroud, becomes correctly captured without inducing perspective distortion: “what is most alarming about the anti-Muslim measures is that they are largely led by the government itself, rather than a fanatical group of disenchanted ideologues”.

Further elaboration was already penned in response to Kawther Salam's coverage of Islamic minarets despoiling the beautiful scenic views of the Swiss Alps. See 'Minarets blocking the view of the Swiss Alps'.

Unless one calls a spade a spade ab initio beginning at the first cause, starting at some intermediate effect and getting lost in the carefully crafted 'Hegelian mind fcks' which are calculatingly manufactured to “look like a 'booming buzzing confusion'” as the CFR author Richard Gardner put it in 1974, is apparently trivial for even the most brilliant and/or pious of observers.

But start ab initio at the gates of political science, namely, with “Hegemony is as old as mankind” and “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization”, even a lowly plebeian can straightforwardly get it right, that: “In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.” All that remains if one starts ab initio, is to boldly traverse the poisonous tree of hegelian dialectics in a depth-first search and systematically unravel the multi-spectrum, deception-laden, and blood-drenched diabolics crafted to achieve that first-principle.

Or does it actually take a wholly un-pious and non-academic conspiratorial mind to penetrate the depths of moral and intellectual depravity of the realpolitik of hectoring hegemons?

Or is it perhaps only the co-opted mind working on fabricating dissent which fails to see the obvious? Or is it merely the fools who fail to see it? Indoctrination I fear is oversold in the psycho-babble of erudite learning and makes a convenient excuse for not exercising one's commonsense, one's gift of thought and reflection, one's gift of being human. All of us have it – why do only a handful use it? Intellectuals like Noam Chomsky would of course argue 'indoctrination'. But Chomsky does not finger the puppetmasters either, and like the rest of the progressive, and/or liberal, and/or left-wing, and/or right-wing truth-tellers, hectors the empire in much lauded and passionate dissent while still echoing its message. An entire book can be written on how that is accomplished!

A people can suffer its traitors but not its fools, as a wise man once put it. When humanity is being systematically enslaved across the world at the altar of “imperial mobilization” into a one-world government of the banksters' making, and the most pious of truth-tellers refrain from expressing the puppetmasters and instead concentrate on their puppetshows, the biggest impediment to checking the Hectoring Hegemons becomes the fabricated dissent and the countless type-1 and type-2 fools (see Hitler's classification in Mein Kampf) who respectively follow them. And they thus detract from forming a cohesive and focussed alliance against the singular enemy of mankind which seeds all corruption and is entirely responsible for “all the evil that follows”.


1: Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard, 1997.

2: Zahir Ebrahim, Prisoners of the Cave, 2003,

3: Papers and policy prescriptions of the Council on Foreign Relations, and its Foreign Affairs.

4: Nuremberg Transcript, Closing speech of Robert H. Jackson.

5: Ramzy Baroud, 'Muslims Must Not Pay Price for Europe’s Identity Crisis',

6: Kawther Salam, 'Swiss Govt Unhappy With Minaret Referendum',

7: Zahir Ebrahim, 'Minarets blocking the view of the Swiss Alps',

8: Zahir Ebrahim, 'War on Terror' is not about 'Islamofascism' – Please get with the real agenda you people!

9: Zahir Ebrahim, Between Imperial Mobilization and Islamofascism: Bribing the Maggots and the Soul Extractor,

10: Hegelian Dialectics Tutorial

11: Norman Dodd, 'The Hidden Agenda of Tax Exempt Foundations for World Government', interview G. Edward Griffin,

- ### -

Source URL:

Another Hegelian Mind Fck: 'Muslims Must Not Pay Price for Europe’s Identity Crisis' By Zahir Ebrahim

Waging false-peace by sporting symbolic arrests vs. waging political science to bring real peace!

Letter to Editor: Waging false-peace by sporting symbolic arrests vs. waging political science to bring real peace!

December 25, 2009

Apropos of the article “Waging Peace: Mass Arrests at White House Antiwar Rally” floating on the web, as an 'untermensch' whose people are suffering the brunt of “imperial mobilization”, I humbly say thank you to the courageous handful of conscionable American people, all 61 of them who offered their arrests to make a profound statement of conscience. Of the 200-plus million American people, that even 61 would feel the pain of “freedom” that the world is being subjected to is still a statement of conscience.

Having said that, symbolism is no match for political science.

None of the people mentioned above, including authors of books, who have so courageously stood up for the minimal decency that none of the rest of us seem to have, have apparently penetrated that fact in their speeches, writings, and in offering their ownselves for arrest. Do they seriously thinks that previously Mr. Bush, and now his successor Mr. Obama, are following their own agendas? If the answer is yes, then perhaps addressing them as these courageous people are doing is the right approach.

But if the answer is no, then what are these people doing remaining abjectly silent on the real puppetmasters for whom these errand boys are working? Just as Mr. Bush was replaced by Mr. Obama with entirely predictably no policy change ( ), the cycle will continue – yet the people who bring it all on for their own agendas for world government, well, they remain out of the spotlight.

To put efficacy into symbolism, shine light on the puppetmasters ( ).

Go for arresting the occulted bats, indicting them for crimes against humanity, for orchestrating all the world wars, for orchestrating all the global pestilences, from global financial collapse, to global warming, to global pandemics, and soon global food crisis, to be perhaps followed by global alien sightings.... for as they themselves acutely forecasted: “In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”, instead of offering yourselves for arrest.

Unless 10 million people offer themselves for arrest, such symbolism has no meaning for the hectoring hegemons: “It's like deciding – well I am going to decide policy based upon a focus group”!

But even 61 people filing cases in all 50 states and in federal court, and in the EU, UK, just as Jane Burgemeister has done ( ), and as Kawther Salam has done ( ), and focussed on the behind the scene oligarchs and in unraveling their overarching criminal conspiracy for world government, can put some real teeth into not only bringing your troops home, but also ending the global pestilences.

Zahir Ebrahim


Source URL:

Letter to Editor: Waging false-peace by sporting symbolic arrests vs. waging political science to bring real peace! By Zahir Ebrahim

The Brilliant Construction of World Order – Or a children's bedtime story

Tutorial: The Brilliant Construction of World Order – Or a children's bedtime story

Zahir Ebrahim | Project

“In international conflicts the truth is hard to come by, because most nations are deceived about themselves. Rationalizations and the incessant search for scapegoats, are the psychological cataracts that blind us to our sins. But the day has passed for our superficial patriotism. He who lives with untruth lives in spiritual slavery. Freedom is still the bonus we receive for knowing the truth. 'Yee shall know the truth', says Jesus, 'and the truth shall set you free.'”

Mocking the American Goy As Candidate Obama:

Obama Promise To End The War, 2007 - You Can Take That To The  Bank

and winning the Nobel Peace Prize as President!


Anything is possible in America – the land of fools, pirates and riches...

“We are gonna spread happiness,

we are gonna spread freeeeedom,

Obama's gonna change it,

Obama's gonna leeeeead em,

we're gonna change it,

and re-arrange it,

we are gonna change the world!”

Read the Prince's own Nobel words: A Just and Lasting Peace.

And contrast with JFK's and MLK's to appreciate why their brains had to be blown out, while Obama's was anointed as the savior:

Dr. Martin  Luther King Jr., 1967 Sermon at the Ebenezer Baptist Church  'Why I  oppose the War in Vietnam' 42 minutes

Thank you Mr. President Barrack Obama for the everlasting peace which is finally to be had in our new world government.

All the fabricated crises, as in the Foundation Trilogy (Isaac Asimov), have provided the outstanding pretexts.

While it is true that none are more hopelessly enslaved in perpetual war than those who are falsely led to believe they do so for peace:

It is also a fact that no empire in the history of mankind has accomplished what is being achieved with these endless manufactured crises and the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to solve them.

The poor Conservative guy voiceover-ing the new EU Council President heralding the good news ahead of the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony, apparently either doesn't fathom the meaning of fait accompli, or is too darn used to the free-world order to appreciate the desirability of a Boot stamped on the human face in the one-world order – what a slop:

So, is it the savior President of the United States who is really running the show from the White House? Is it he who decides when to wage war, when to wage peace?

Who really runs America? Who fashions the United States Government policies by way of open policy recommendations from un-elected private foundations which are so obediently implemented by the elected Representatives of the People?

How comes President Obama is carrying on the same war-mongering policies of President George W. Bush – wasn't there a change in the Office, even a change in political party? Why is there no change in policies?

Let's permit Zbigniew Brzezinski and Hillary Clinton to answer those Questions!

CFR - A Conversation with U.S. Secretary of  State Hillary Rodham Clinton July 15, 2009  Also at

Now Click Here to Read What These Private Un-Elected Policy Constructers Have Openly Stated About World Order!

And observe the real godheads of hegemony, those who fund these private foundations from their magnificent unaccountable gains on the public's debt, in full action:

And these very people transformed America into a Police State while the idiots stupidly cheered 'United We Stand' against Islamofascism

So why are uber-intelligent people ignoring the godfathers of war-mongering policies and instead trying to arrest merely their errand boys, and former ones at that?

See Hyperinflation in Financial Terrorism Reports of January-February 2009 and November–December 2008 to acutely appreciate why the Private and Un-Elected Federal Reserve System is blithely printing money and for what purpose!

And this is why JIHADI proclamations like: Abolish the Fed and Return Money Creation Power to Congress are quixotic because firstly, there is no 'Jesus' today to cleanse the Congress of the Moneychangers! See The Missing Link of Monetary Reform: How? A challenge to monetary reformers. And secondly, because the Global Governance agenda of one-world is greater than the sum of each individual Hegelian dialectic as an all encompassing assault on mankind. The Council on Foreign Relations even has a Global Governance Monitor to gauge progress! Just look how easily the Federal Reserve Chairman was trivially confirmed by the US Senate after the brief show of false bravado and public relations lip service to the contrary in the Senate. And with sufficient chutzpah in reserve to even put Al Capone to shame!

Whereas, the poor monetary reformer fighting the fabricated financial crisis, already the underdog and resourceless in going against an entrenched financial oligarchy with infinitely deep pockets, is also outwitted by the sheer magnitude of the Hegelian design for Global Governance. The momentum created by the disparate crises spanning the gamut of global financial meltdown, global warming, global pandemic, global war on terror, is insurmountable enough. Imagine if the next global crisis after global food panic and global crop failure, is alien sightings and landings!

It will be the coup de grace for bringing the fractious humanity finally together in one-world government “if suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species from another planet.” As President Ronald Reagan had read out loud from his script at the United Nations podium in 1987: “we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world”:

Coming soon to your local friendly skies, complete with the 'messiah' and the 'mahdi' descending from the heavens on the wings of dove, or the chariots of fire, in their final return to save the now united mankind against the common threats. Maybe there is something to this 'dajjal' story, the 'false messiah' lore after all! Brought to you courtesy of NASA's Universal Holographic Satellite Projection System.

Also see Tutorial: The Un-Hidden Agenda for World Government

Source URL:

Letter to Editor Defending Science: Truly, the “hegelian mind fck” is endless!

Letter to Editor Defending Science: Truly, the “hegelian mind fck” is endless!

To: 'Defending Science' Editors

From: “Project”

In Ref. To:

In Ref. To:

In Ref. To: Jeff Masters' “The Manufactured Doubt industry and the hacked email controversy

Original Submission Date: December 08, 2009 6:15 PM PST (read here)

Revised Submission Date: December 10, 2009 5:00 PM PST

Dear 'Defending Science' Editors,

Truly, the “hegelian mind fck” is endless!

Witness the headline on your website of December 04, 2009 (cached): Senate Confirms David Michaels, author of “Doubt is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health”, to Head OSHA.

What is the new dialectical rabbit hole? It is the book, the appointment of its author, the book review article by Jeff Masters, and the amazing composition based on specious connections to demonstrate by an establishment author that the only enemy of science is that other fella from whom science must be defended. There is no Assault on Science from the establishment itself.

In the list of references provided for each chapter in David Michaels' book comprising a voluminous 1182 total citations (cached), there are some egregious omissions. The name “Edward Bernays” does not appear even once! Hmmm.

The fact that the art of Public Relations was originated by Edward Bernays based on the science of behavior modification discovered by Sigmund Freud, and was dutifully employed by President Woodrow Wilson's handlers before, during, and after the culmination of World War I to manufacture the messianic image of Wilson as the Savior of Europe in justification for an agendists' war that saw countless millions barbarously butchered but for which, even today, no one in the establishment can coherently argue the raison d'être that can withstands any forensic scrutiny, appears to be missing. The case study of one of the most egregious health-impacting events of the twentieth century as a direct consequence of the manufactured product of social engineering and establishment's own psy-ops upon the world's peoples, is omitted in favor of highlighting the abuse of too much Laissez-faire in the industry. Need more governmental regulations! Americans need more protection!

First there was the infernal terrorist. Then the greedy banking shysters. Then the filthy swines. Then too much CO2 emissions in cow farts! Now it's the damn capitalism itself. We need universal central control under the ubermensch's enlightened planning in order to protect mankind from itself! Damn it, we need Big Brother to manage humanity! A rather transparent use of Hegelian Dialectics to justify the solutions proposed for establishment's own manufactured/fabricated problems to service the globalist's long term agenda of centralizing more and more powers into bigger and bigger government, to eventually become the world government! And not the least of which is establishment's own Assault on Science of climate-change to diabolically usher in the architecture of 'carbon credits' as its solution.

So, Edward Bernays other client's abuse, the Tobacco industry for whom he very cleverly got American women to smoke, is highlighted but only with reference to a much later PR agency without mentioning the pioneering work of Bernays himself which the late inventor of the very field of Public Relations wrote about in his famous 1921 autobiographical classic “Propaganda”. Thus, of course Edward Bernays' ominous opening passage from his own book would characteristically be omitted too: “THE conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.” And surely too any reference to the more ubiquitous doubt, consent, and dissent manufacturing machinery of the “Mighty Wurlitzer” which has at least since World War II, entirely impacted the health of the entire world's peoples. Its own egregious open Assault on Science to absurdly fabricate how the WTC towers collapsed on 911 cannot obviously make it into any establishment author's narrative either when it is conveniently being “utilized to goosestep the Herrenvolk across international frontiers.” No, that's not establishment's “junk science”, but its fabled Global War on Terror. The art and science of the “Mighty Wurlitzer” can be appreciated here:

The very notion, that Science is always, first and foremost, in the Service of Empire is absent from the problem formulation. This is the classic example of what is illustrated in

'It is also very convenient for the learned to mix up the 'highest order bit' with 'lower order bits' of a complex matter – irrespective of deliberately or inadvertently – for the plebes can hardly tell the difference. And that's just wonderful for creating clever red herrings when the latter are emphasized, and the former is ignored! Surely whatever one comes up with is always a solution to something, and that's just as undeniable as any pathetic tautology. But is it a solution to the 'most significant bit'? Has the problem itself been accurately diagnosed, and the systemic multi-lateral illness accurately mapped out to its very DNA? Not when the sacred-cow axioms remain untouchable! And this is indeed how one wins a Nobel Prize and lucrative appointments. [a30] In some cases, even stays alive.

To explain the commonsense concept of 'bit' drawn from electrical engineering, it's like having a "one" in the 7th decimal place, and also in the 2nd decimal place, to create the total amount One million and Ten dollars, $1,000,010, and while auditing the books, focussing on the digit position which identifies the Ten dollars and not the one which identifies the Million! The significance of this is not lost to the banksters!'

If one reads the article by Jeff Masters which reviews David Michaels' book, one sees that it is partly playing WWF wrestling in the “hegelian mind fck”, and masking out the highest order bit to falsely project that it is the “Ten dollars” that's the problem and not the “One million” that has been craftily omitted from the book-keeping.

And so too in the following review description by 'Defending Science'. It outright omits the reality of the facts of the matter of how control is interlockingly administered. It ignores the fact that the military-industrial-academe complex, and the political as well as the bureaucratic establishment (whether elected, selected, or appointed as the Board of Governors and Chairman of the Federal Reserve System), are all rooted in serving the same nexus of financial elite's interests. It pretends that there is no revolving door among governmental-industry-financial-military-lobby-regulatory positions, and that there is no complicated and often opaque interlocking of board memberships and ownership across industries and corporations:

“The Orwellian strategy of dismissing research conducted by the scientific community as "junk science" and elevating science conducted by product defense specialists to "sound science" status also creates confusion about the very nature of scientific inquiry and undermines the public's confidence in science's ability to address public health and environmental concerns Such reckless practices have long existed, but Michaels argues that the Bush administration deepened the dysfunction by virtually handing over regulatory agencies to the very corporate powers whose products and behavior they are charged with overseeing.”

So, according to that quoted passage, there is no “junk science” research conducted by the scientific community! And the fault is in the watchdog being asked to watch its owners. The choice of phraseology “Orwellian strategy” is almost Kafkaesque were it also not so transparently pathetic. Half-truths are terrific for any full blown “hegelian mind fck”! It isn't me saying it, but the name who might know more about George Orwell than anyone else in the world observing it, Aldous Huxley:

“Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth. By simply not mentioning certain subjects... totalitarian propagandists have influenced opinion much more effectively than they could have by the most eloquent denunciations.” -- Aldous Huxley

I hope you can reference the following pertinent works of Project Humanbeingsfirst in your future updates to 'Defending Science' to more accurately, and indeed more perceptively portray the obvious facts of the matter that 1) “politics out of science” is impossible when politics, as well as for-profit research, entirely funds science in the vast interlocking military-industrial-academe complex of not just America but of the entire West; that 2) all hectoring hegemons' Assault on Science Threatens Your Health as an instrument of “full spectrum dominance” and social engineering, and not just the “Industry's Assault on Science” for petty profiteering; and that 3) science is perpetually in the service of empire because “Hegemony is as old as mankind.”








Thank you

Zahir Ebrahim


Source URL:


Letter to Editor Defending Science: Truly, the “hegelian mind fck” is endless! By Zahir Ebrahim 5/5

Morality derived from the Intellect leads to Enslavement!

December 09, 2009 | Extended Monday, March 30, 2015
Caption Morality Derived From Intellect Leads To Enslavement
This is Project Humanbeingsfirst's response to the moral reflections of an anonymous ordinary mortal using the nom de plume 'lwtc247' on the web, in “The importance and benefits of self honesty”. The writer mused:
'When you stand before God to be judged, do you really think at that time you will be able to enter a debate with God about your behavior? Playing with or bending some words to cover-up or justify your bad deeds? Perhaps a little “white lie” here and there? Do you really think you can deceive God?' [1]
This problem was solved by Nietzsche a long time ago!
There used to be a prominent T-Shirt worn around campus when I was an undergrad, it said in bold:
God is Dead --- Nietzsche
(of course I am not going to provide the punch-line that was printed in very fine letters just underneath that, at least not just yet!)
The German philosopher found God dead for the more keen of intellect among mankind, the superman, Übermensch, über alles; Plato's philosopher-king no longer bound by God but his own “will to power” to become his own god. [2]
As god, the superman is beyond the confines of good and evil, beyond the calculus of conventional morality, and thus is freed to redefine what the word “morality” means with his own superior intellect for the rest of mankind, the untermensch, who have not yet evolved, or refuse to evolve, to that higher state of intelligence that only evolution can bestow. Hoi polloi being in the majority, hamper the evolution of man and his societies with their superstitions and must therefore be led and guided by the intellect of the superman. This line of reasoning is the foundation of modern secularism and its new religion, Secular Humanism, the worship of reason instead of some unseen God.
In this missive, I advance the commonsense observation that morality and intellect are two separate things. It is mixing them where people become misled!
Intellect cannot confer upon morality any view other than subjective, and hence relative and arbitrary. The following statement from an 'uber intellect' is a good evidence of this:
“Nothing is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only when associated with the considerations which give birth to nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we must reply that all concepts are relative.” -- Justice Vinson, U.S. Supreme Court, 1951 AD
However, the following algorithm is not just evidence of what I say, but its outright proof. This proof is furnished by the 'uber uber' atheist of the 20th century, i.e., the most fanatical God is Dead exponent, Mr. Bertrand Russell. I can't recall the exact chapter and verse, but it goes something like this.
Bertrand Russell's morality synthesis exclusively from the intellect:
~'Maximize individual happiness (pleasures) while minimizing social conflict (not hitting on another's spouse) to optimize the overall happiness of the people composing the social unit who agree to live by the set of laws which implement this operations-research calculus.' -- Bertrand Russell also noted some caveats for protection of minors and those unable to make choices so that one could not maximize one's pleasures upon them without some institutional safeguards.
Using that highly intellectual morality equation – and I will confess that I have not encountered a more profound synthesis of morality and law anywhere, and which, on the surface at least, appears rather full of brilliance and minimalism – it would be perfectly acceptable, for instance, to spread Black-death every other generation for population control among other 'untermensch' societies. Or, to create a draconian police-state by re-defining what individual happiness might mean, and conditioning the people to get used to it. As Goethe had observed, “none are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free”. In such a society, the people could be kept quite content in their voluntary servitude thus leaving no social conflict whatsoever – and thus culminating in a perfectly stable and rational society.
In this highly intellectual system, also euphemistically called Secular Humanism, enslaving the populace by a bunch of wily 'ubermensch' who have craftily chosen not to be constrained in the “semantic strait-jacket” alluded to by Judge Vinson quoted above and who accept “that all concepts are relative”, that state of affairs would be a perfectly moral outcome. It certainly satisfies Bertrand Russell's intellect-derived morality calculus. And if someone thinks I am making all this up, Bertrand Russell himself concluded in his epiphany to 'uber' intellectual morality, in his 1952 book “Impact of Science on Society”, that a Scientific Society, meaning one built on intellect – as obviously imbeciles can't do high-tech science – will automatically culminate in “World government [which] could only be kept in being by force”.
Bertrand Russell's superior intellect finds the stability of the global police state desirable as it would also have the other wholesome characteristic that any superior intellect running the world with unlimited force at its disposal would always demand from hoi polloi: absolute obedience! The tools to finally achieve that long held dream to control all human beings on earth by its supermen, only made available in the scientific age.
Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski, America's National Security Advisor and the author of the Carter Doctrine that gave to the USSR its Vietnam War in Afghanistan in Muslim blood, wrote in his own seminal 1970 book “Between Two Ages” of the advent of the scientific society and what that new age portends:
“Life seems to lack cohesion as environment rapidly alters and human beings become increasingly manipulable and malleable. Everything seems more transitory and temporary: external reality more fluid than solid, the human being more synthetic than authentic. Even our senses perceive an entirely novel "reality"—one of our own making but nevertheless, in terms of our sensations, quite "real." More important, there is already widespread concern about the possibility of biological and chemical tampering with what has until now been considered the immutable essence of man. Human conduct, some argue, can be predetermined and subjected to deliberate control. Man is increasingly acquiring the capacity to determine the sex of his children, to affect through drugs the extent of their intelligence, and to modify and control their personalities. Speaking of a future at most only decades away, an experimenter in intelligence control asserted, "I foresee the time when we shall have the means and therefore, inevitably, the temptation to manipulate the behaviour and intellectual functioning of all the people through environmental and biochemical manipulation of the brain."” (pg. 12)
Novelist George Orwell depicted that re-semantification of words and language for the full spectrum control of the human mind as “Newspeak” in his famous 1948 dystopian fable “Nineteen Eighty-four”. Aldous Huxley introduced the “Soma” and being happy in voluntary servitude by the very design of the human beings without the need for overt jackboots on the face of humanity, in his 1931 dystopian fable “A Brave New World”. All dystopias fundamentally brought on by the superior intellect of the Übermensch.
Books of atheist philosophers and social scientists aside, we can brazenly observe this exercise of the 'uber' intellect not just in the world government under construction which of course no one believes is happening, but in the Talmud among its own very moral followers which too no one can ever deny unless their lips are moving in chutzpatic confabulations. The Ten Commandments of Moses are intellectually particularized from their universal moral form, by adding an implied “Jew” at the end. Thus, as has been amply exposed by many recovering Jews themselves, “Thou Shall Not Kill” is read by many an adherent Talmudic Rabbi as: “Thou Shall Not Kill [a Jew; killing goy is OK]”.
And as evidence that this “hegelian mind fck” isn't just some historical baggage which happened in the Dark Ages with no bearing to modernity, here is the latest version of the Law Book of Israel: 'The King's Torah'! [3]
For additional examples of this ongoing “hegelian mind fck”, please see From Genesis to Genocide in Palestine. [4]
Fundamentally, the questions probed by the anonymous writer lwtc247 have been long solved philosophically, i.e., by using the intellect. Here is a short passage from Leo Strauss which shows just how remarkably easily it has been solved:
'Political Zionism has repeatedly characterized itself as the will to normalize the existence of the Jewish people, to normalize the Jewish people. By this self-definition it has exposed itself to a grave misunderstanding, namely, the misunderstanding that the will to normality was the first word of political Zionism; the most effective criticism of political Zionism rests on this misunderstanding. In truth, the presupposition of the Zionist will to normalization, that is, of the Zionist negation of galut [exile], is the conviction that "the power of religion has been broken". Because the break with religion has been resolutely effected by many individual Jews, and only because of this reason, it is possible for these individuals to raise the question on behalf of their people, how the people is to live from now on. Not that they prostrate themselves before the idol of normality; on the contrary: they no longer see any reason for the lack of normality. And this is decisive: in the age of atheism, the Jewish people can no longer base its existence on God but only on itself alone, on its labor, on its land, and on its state. ...' -- page 202, Leo Strauss, The Early Writings 1921-1932
See its fuller exposition at the link below, but here is the core essence of that morality:
'In simple language which peels off the philosophical-gibberish of “will to normality” and such, straightforwardly speaking: god gave the Jews the land grants, anointed them as the 'chosen peoples', and then Nietzsche killed god, and now it's up to the Jewish people who “can no longer base its existence on God but only on itself alone, on its labor, on its land, and on its state”, in order to construct their own future “because the break with religion has been resolutely effected by many individual Jews” who must now lead their flock!!!' [5]
See how wonderful a solution it is mes amis? I hope no one is too sarcasm impaired here.
Not to be outdone by atheists in defining their own super-morality with their uber-intellect, god's chosen theists can even outdo that with learned confabulations – become god themselves:
'... The point is that a Jew has strength, ability and power to create the desire within G-d to accept and become King over the entire creation.
It's understood, that the existence of the entire creation, in truth, is brought about by the Jew's coronation of G-d, and through which He becomes a King over the entire creation, which ultimately results in the fact that all of creation comes from the Primary being, G-d.
It's obvious that since every Jew, men and even women and children, brings about the existence of the entire creation, they become masters over the world, and thus every single creation owes them recognition for this good.
Being that through the Jew, all beings were created, he therefore becomes the master over all of them.
This is especially so in regards to what needs to be accomplished on erev [every?] Rosh Hashana.
Since the judgment of Rosh Hashana is primarily regarding physical matters, as explained in Likutei Torah, therefore the Jew is in complete control, particularly over physical matters.
The physicality of the world itself has to recognize the good that the Jew has accomplished.
Through the Jews they came into being, and their true existence is through their unity with the True Being.
Since G-d and the Jews are one, each Jew becomes a True Being, and is thus able to bring about all of creation.
He therefore has control over all of creation and not only that, but they owe him thanks and are indeed thankful, for being provided with abundance in physical and especially spiritual matters.' -- Translation of Talmudic reading by a Rabbi, The Coronation of Hashem [6]
Such is the natural culmination of morality when the superior intellect is put in charge of its direction! The sociopaths will always justify the Übermensch. Nietzsche of course called it “will to power” of the superman; the only way for man to evolve into a higher rational being. As we have unfortunately witnessed time and again however, it has become the favorite expression of both social Darwinian philosophers and war-mongers of all stripes who remorselessly employ “end justify the means” paradigm for exercising their primacy upon fellow man. The primacy entitlement felt to be innate to the “survival of the fittest” philosophy, is cunningly disguised in Newspeak which the ill-informed public is unable to parse until it is already fait accompli.
Here is President George W. Bush Jr. employing it in his Speech before a Joint Session of Congress on September 20, 2001. The speech writer used Nietzschean allusions to announce the unfettered rise of the new superman mandarins of earth in the aftermath of 9/11. Only those well read of classical literature, mostly the elites themselves, likely understood its implications even before the first bombs were dropped on Afghanistan. One wonders whether even the chief executive mouth-piece of the superpower nation who famously uttered these scripted words in the US Congress like a puppet on a string, and which were duly televised live to the shocked world, fully understood it himself:
“We have seen their kind before. They are the heirs of all the murderous ideologies of the twentieth century. By sacrificing human life to serve their radical visions, by abandoning every value except the will to power, they follow in the path of fascism, nazism, and totalitarianism. And they will follow that path all the way to where it ends. In history's unmarked grave of discarded lies. Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.” [7]
We have of course seen the actual results of that pious ultimatum and who abandoned, and continues to abandon, “every value except the will to power” by their massive military invasions under false pretenses, DU bombings of civilians in defenseless nations, and police-state at home.
A shortlist of examples of significant Newspeak by the superior intellect which has altered our world is given in Footnotes [a] through [h] below. These examples empirically illustrate the vast distance between pious language and the actual reality of their diabolical subversion or their intended meaning by the superman. The pious verbiage mainly serve the interest of perception management of hoi polloi so that the “history's actors” can carry on accomplishing their Übermensch agendas without interference from the public, often willingly acquiring the public's consent under the right set of “doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification” continually fed them by intellectual experts. The Übermensch create their own hard reality as “history's actors” while the rest of the world is caught up in their pious platitudes and propaganda warfare. And, after the inevitable fait accompli, is merely left to study it ex post facto, when the deeds are already cast in stone:
'“We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”' [8]
Morality is only Newspeak for public consumption to buy time and to induce compliance when the Übermensch is the history's actor. The dystopias of the twentieth-century fables have quite escaped from the library into the reality created by these history's actors. Newspeak is now so ubiquitous that we are even unconscious of its presence, like the air we breathe, but it cradles our thoughts, feelings, actions as well as inactions. It is the gift to mankind of will to power.
It would of course be a travesty of thought to end this missive without giving the punch-line that was printed on the T-Shirt noted above. I wish I had bought one – at the time it was only humorous. It read:
Nietzsche is Dead --- God!
I can hear someone laughing...
Because I can actually feel that laugh down my spine without any physical sound waves impinging upon my eardrums from across the ethernet, it shows me that, inter alia: Morality likewise is naturally felt, not naturally thought.
Morality originates from the heart where feelings reside, not the mind – Plato's virtuous philosopher-king notwithstanding. Such abstract intellectualism, including his Shapes, appear to reside in the vast immanent-space of the philosopher's mind alone since they can find no empirical verification in the far more constrained existential reality-space. The only morality that the intellect is empirically shown to beget from time immemorial, is the Nietzschean-Hegelian variety explored above, of might has rights! It is also known as the divinely ordained law of the jungle to some. To others, it constitutes the categorical imperatives of primacy for the superior intellect, superior power, superior race, superior civilization, which are always cast as exceptional, beyond good and evil, as uber alles, above all others. To still others, it is simply the amoral precision of “military-style objectivity” to achieve any agenda, public or covert, national or international. The actual mindset behind “military-style objectivity” in the pursuit of policy planning or achieving political agendas without being hampered by any conventional moral calculus or preconceived value judgments, is most straightforwardly dignified in the 1967 book Report from Iron Mountain. [9]
It is that Übermensch mindset which came to underwrite the Truman Doctrine, the policy of engaging the newly created USSR in a Cold War. The key Policy Planning Study, PPS No. 23, February 28, 1948, Top Secret until Declassified June 17, 1974, written by George F. Kennan as Head of the US State Department Policy Planning Staff, straightforwardly articulated that mindset lest some of its implementers started believing their own propaganda of high-minded “altruism and world-benefaction” devised for engineering the public's consent for the Cold War:
“We have about 50% of the world's wealth, but only 6.3% of its population .... In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. To do so, we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and day-dreaming, and our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives. We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford today the luxury of altruism and world-benefaction .... We should cease to talk about vague and – for the Far East – unreal objectives such as human rights, the raising of living standards, and democratization. The day is not far off when we are going to have to deal in straight power concepts. The less we are then hampered by idealistic slogans, the better.”
When morality is not based on the subjective intellect which, when left to its own devices, by its very nature, inevitably pursues objectives with the amoral precision of “military-style objectivity”, but on actual moral standards of which the world's wisdom traditions and holy scriptures have spoken of, we get something entirely different. We get an objective absolute. For instance, let's just take the oldest well-known morality of the Western tradition itself. The Old Testament's Mosaic law. It lays down the first principle of morality called the Golden Rule. It is golden because from it all else follow:
“Do unto others as you have others do unto you”
No superman would like that prescription of morality as the principal basis for devising laws, human rights, foreign policies, and settling disputes among men and nations. For it predicates absolute fairness, that no one shall take undue advantage of another. The superior intellect of the Übermensch simply cannot accept that hoi polloi and they are equal. Nature is not a relationship of equals. And man is a product of nature like all of existence. Since man is not seen to have a spiritual essence, and he is deemed to be made only of material substance, therefore the laws of nature equally apply to it as to space-time. Heart-felt and spiritual sentiments are deemed mere superstitions or human weaknesses and better made subservient to the power of reason and the intellect. Ergo, the law of the jungle where only unequals live, is inevitable. The superman spearheading the path to further evolution through social Darwinian primacy, its only rational outcome. What is frightening to realize here is that there can be no other logical outcome when the heart is made subservient to the intellect. Social Darwinianism and Secular Humanism are conjoined twins from birth. They cannot be separated by the same yardstick of reason which gave birth to these constructs. Thus that logical outcome has to be cunningly disguised from its victims. Thus Newspeak is invented.
Whereas, interestingly, as in all lovers' happy or tragic tales also since time immemorial, the Heart also is where the Almighty resides! Read both the Qur'an and the Bible and one sees references to the heart as the container for morality, for spiritual eyes, for cleanliness of the heart begetting the cleanliness of the soul, for cognitively incomprehensible admonitions of none shall approach the truth unless they approach it with a cleansed heart, for there being a seal put on the heart of those who are heedless and who are the purveyors of falsehoods, who bring misery upon mankind by their 'uber' clever planning, etceteras. I have yet to recall knowing anyone who fell in love through their mind as opposed to through their heart. Or even recall reading any literature, sacred or divine, and I am an indefatigable reader, that alluded to the mind for matters of love, faith, courage, self-sacrifice, and yes, the notorious jihad – jihad-un-nafs – the primordial inner struggle of the soul to overcome the “banality of evil” only upon the conquest of which, the sword of resistance is automagically both found and comes unsheathed! And when I used to read comparative religions, I recall also the case of appeal to the heart being true of Hindu scriptures as well as others.
The twentieth century poet-philosopher of Muslims from the Indian subcontinent, “Sir” Allama Iqbal, [10] surely only endeavored to free man from the shackles of intellectual servitude when he too deemed the heart enslaved by the mind unworthy:
صبح ازل یہ مجھ سے کہا جبرئیل نے
جو عقل کا غلام ہو ، وہ دل نہ کر قبول
'Subh-e-Azal yeh Mujh Se Kaha Jibraeel Ne
Jo Aqal Ka Ghulam Ho Woh Dil Na Ker Qabool'
“Gabriel on the Morning of Creation a piece of useful counsel gave:
Accept not the heart from a beloved whose mind enslaves it”
-- Allama Iqbal, Zarbe-e-Kaleem, [11]
(Sir) Rabindranath Tagore who, unlike his separatist compatriot “Sir” Allama Iqbal, expressing his heart-felt moral outrage at the 1919 Jallianwala Bagh massacre by the British troops returned his own title to the Crown, put the limitations of one sided use of the intellect thusly:
“A mind all logic is like a knife all blade. It makes the hand bleed that uses it.”
In conclusion, “Cogito Ergo Sum” might have taken a tiny lesson from Zen were it not so imbued in its own arrogance of the intellect and so blinded by its own brilliance to actually have missed the commonsense. Watch Zen Master Bruce Lee so simply teach it here:
Bruce Lee teaching the Tao of Reflection, the Zen of Martial Arts, to a younger apprentice in the movie Enter the Dragon.

Caption Quote Bruce Lee: “We need emotional content. Don't think, feeeel; it is like a finger pointing away to the moon. Don't concentrate on the finger or you will miss all that heavenly glory”!
It should now be patently obvious to anyone that an intellect voluntarily serving under the command of morality can be the only possible solution for equitable and peaceable “Cogito Ergo Sum” for all mankind, rather than for the 'uber' few when it's put the other way around.
I will humbly further suggest that the clincher empirical proof that morality and intellect are separate entities, that morality is primarily rooted in feelings rather than in the intellect, is that had ordinary people simply retained even an iota of humanity in them, even a tiny feeling of empathy for the suffering of fellow man, for their own natural tribe of mankind, then, instead of intellectually watching the decimation of their own kith and kin all unfold on television looking from the side, [12] at best going tsk tsk, and at worst cheering, [13] we would have collectively marched in formation and forcibly neutered all the hectoring hegemons now so boldly munching on their victims no differently than the lowly wildebeest and buffaloes do against the hectoring hegemons of their jungle!
And no scientist in the universe can argue with a straight face that the poor buffaloes who feel the pain so immensely for their own humble kith and kin as depicted in the video below, are a very cognitive species – a fact also brazenly recognized by our own hectoring hegemons which is perhaps why they work so assiduously on desensitizing our feelings of empathy for our fellowman, including for our own selves, by continually bringing us all the manufactured Hollywood violence and other baser entertainment:
Battle At Kruger

Caption Battle at Kruger Park --- taking on the hectoring hegemons of their jungle in defense of their own species, a natural behavior that has evidently been culled from the human species.

Continue to Part2

[6] Transcription from a video of Talmudic reading by a Rabbi, The Coronation of Hashem:
[7] Transcribed from president Bush's televised speech. Full speech transcript:
[8] President Bush's senior White House advisor quoted by Ron Suskind, New York Times, Oct. 17, 2004,
[10] “Sir” Allama Iqbal Introduced the antithesis of the superman as the Islamic “marde-momin”, see Sacred Cow: Allama Iqbal - marde-momin or superman?, ( )
[11] English translation and verse from Kalam-e-iqbal by Rahat Fateh Ali, Sanam Marvi (Virsa heritage revived)- Sultan Tipu ki wasiyat,
[12] John Pilger, 18 January 2007, Looking to the side, from Belsen to Gaza
[a] An example of cunning wordsmithing in superman scholarship is the Balfour Declaration which gave real political rights to the Jews while giving some abstract civil and religious rights to the Palestinians. The actual result is quite visible today. The underlying legalism which led to it is visible in the deconstruction of its diabolical wordsmithing in: The Illusion of Power and the Calculus of Palestinian Dispossession,
[b] The clever wordsmithing of the EU Constitution which has cunningly caveated the loftily worded public Rights to limit them in practice by law, or by executive order, under the rubric of national security and expediency, much like the United States Constitution and its Bill of Rights have been trumped by the Patriot Acts for instance, is examined in an analysis that I once found on the web but don't have a citation for it at this time. Virtually every public Right in the EU Constitution has the caveat that it can be “lawfully” restricted! When the king makes the laws, whatever the king decides is the law. The same with the Parliament which often enact and implement laws handed them by forces unseen by the public mind. The National Security State and those controlling it are one such unseen force.
[c] The clever wordsmithing of the American Constitution which has cunningly subverted it in actual practice is examined in Cracks in the Constitution by Ferdinand Lundberg,
[d] The reality of “Democracy” as it actually played out while being layered upon that brilliantly worded US Constitution was also briefly analyzed by Carroll Quigley in THE MYTHOLOGY OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY, a presentation to the Industrial College of the Armed Forces on August 17, 1972,
[e] See more reality of “Democracy” in Unequal Protection: The Rise of Corporate Domination and the Theft of Human Rights By Thom Hartmann, Rodale Inc., 2002.
[f] See more reality of “Democracy” in The United States Isn't a Country — It's a Corporation! By Lisa Guliani, February 2004, at published Jan 15, 2009. Project Humanbeingsfirst's comment for this article extending it with additional material is archived at:
[g] Even the United Kingdom is not a country. It is also a Corporation, controlled by another supra-national private Corporation, the real financial capital of the world, the City of London, or just “the City” for short. It is what H. G. Wells was referring to in his rallying call in his 1940 book New World Order: “And if we, the virtuous democracies, are not fighting for these common human rights, then what in the name of the nobility and gentry, the Crown and the Established Church, the City, The Times and the Army and Navy Club, are we common British peoples fighting for?”
[h] See the meticulous research unveiled by John Harris of the UK also being a Corporation, in the Lawful Rebellion Conference, January 24, 2009, titled: It's an illusion, .

First Published December 09, 2009 | Updated Friday, October 29, 2010 | Extended Monday, March 30, 2015 for inclusion in the 2015 Second Edition of Hijacking Holy Qur'an And Islam 5263 | Links fixed January 25, 2016 | Links fixed October 03, 2018

Morality derived from the Intellect leads to Enslavement! By Zahir Ebrahim 15/15