Bottom line: Avoiding vaccination for swineflu is commonsensical rationalism under the present circumstances!

Bottom line: Avoiding vaccination for swineflu is commonsensical rationalism under the present circumstances!

Response by Project to article on AFP: Rebuttal to Stephen Lendman's Vaccine Hysteria by James Secor, September 17, 2009


I imagine that the purpose of the plethora of 'against the grain' analyses by many a courageous people, of the WHO determined "pandemic", whether it is deemed by them to be primarily:

a) a secret "mandemic" (man-made epidemic for population reduction);

b) a secret "psydemic" (psy-ops epidemic, a psychological conditioning of the public with 'sky is falling' to create a boogieman for quite another agenda using a real deadly biowarfare trigger, just like 911 was the real deadly trigger for launching "imperial mobilization" in response to the "new pearl harbor");

c) genuinely the "swidemic" (a naturally occurring as in the pig, or manmade as in the lab, swineflu viral infection for which vaccination may or may not be useful primarily depending on the question of the medical efficacy of the vaccine in question, and for some, the very concept of vaccination, the agenda in either case largely being driven by the unbridled profit motivation of bigPharma);

d) or a combination of all the above, with the overarching agenda not being what is publicized;

is mainly to endeavor in unraveling it all in the best public interest. Some of course may be the proverbial "COINTELPRO" agents to spread disinformation, but let's ignore that bunch here.

I don't speak for the courageous author Steve Lendman, nor have I ever met him, but his more than half a dozen essays on swine flu touch upon one or more of the aforestated items, and I presume largely in the public interest. Sometimes one aspect is taken in isolation, as this present article which aimed to challenge the dangers of both vaccines and vaccination (item c above), and other articles on his website touch on other aspects.

Most 'against the grain' analysts, credentialed with medical degrees or laity (like this lowly scribe), I imagine are really spending time on this matter because of fear of immediate impact on our peoples and upon those whom we love, and want to know how to protect from this new scourge. We often searchingly ask: should we follow the wisdom of the CDC, WHO, NIH, EU equivalents, and big Pharma, of conventional practice of medicine and the advice of our mainstream doctors, or should we use some commonsense, some rational wisdom, some study of the hectoring hegemons tactics and ideologies, and some history to guide us?

We are certainly not perfect in our analysis, and the risk-analysis we do is laden with ambiguities and uncertainties because we do not possess all the secretive information that goes into the decision making behind WHO's public pronouncements. So we try our best to connect the dots. I think Steve Lendman is only doing that, connecting the dots, perhaps a bit imperfectly as pointed out by the author, and I am sure that the author too in turn does so with the same motivation when he challengingly asks: “So, Mr. Lendman, what is it to be? A few failures, as it were, or hundreds of thousands of successes?”. Because I presume that we are all trying to make some sense of it all with the best of intentions and with our own limited abilities and short-comings, this is a gratuitous compliment: “Bad boy, Mr. Lendman.”

My summary conclusion on this pandemic lays it out thusly, and I believe no one will have trouble with this conclusion or how it was derived except the big Pharma, and the ideological interests pushing the vaccines. And this conclusion is the bottom-line for me personally in the digital cacophony of analyses, rebuttals, claims, counterclaims, etc., all of which indeed make it all “look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality,”:

H1N1 Conclusion: Whether or not there is a real Swine Flu pandemic raging, whether or not it may be real biowarfare, or mainly psyops being waged upon the unsuspecting world's public in combination with other fabricated global threats, I am saying 'NO' to Swine Flu Vaccination. All this heavy-handed hullaballoo appears to me to be yet another “war on terrorism” to fabricate a global pretext for quite a different agenda from the publicized one. The real agenda this time around being to inoculate the world public with something inimical in the guise of fighting the pandemic. This is more than simply an attempt to sell vaccines of dubious efficacy for hefty corporate profiteering. It suspiciously appears to be the new “imperial mobilization” of the long wished for population reduction agenda, 'to “prime” populations worldwide'. The threat of the A/H1N1 virus killing some (or many) people may well be real even if manufactured, just like 911 – the “new pearl harbor” – was a real demonstration of fabricated threat by controlled demolition which killed many thousand people. But under these dubious 'sky is falling' conditions made to “look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality,” the most rational and commonsensical course of action under conflicting claims of vaccine safety and efficacy backed by draconian 'police-state' policies to forcibly administer it: 1) take one's statistical chances with the “pandemic” rather than with its forced “cure”; 2) permit the human body's own natural defenses to fight the disease if infected, rather than be aided into oblivion by its purported helper, the vaccine! Read the analysis upon which this opinion is based in the Swine Flu Chronicles 2009:

Thank you.

Zahir Ebrahim


Bottom line: Avoiding vaccination for swineflu is commonsensical rationalism under the present circumstances!