Zahir
Ebrahim | Project
Humanbeingsfirst.org
September
06, 2009 | Related
Excerpts Appended November 14, 2009
Oligarchic
Primacy and Zionism Part-1
The
Endgame Hegelian Dialectic
Just
like Brzezinski's “The
Grand Chessboard” [1] now appears to be a
fantastic red herring to bankrupt the United States and create the
right pretexts and ripe conditions to present a NAU to its public as
the only panacea enroute to the international banksters'
world government, is it possible that Zionism too was/is a phantasmic
red herring to set the stage for Albert Pike's World War III in order
to drive the final nail into the coffin of all nationalism and
sovereign nation-states?
The
fact that the harbingers of all wars and world government are also
the prime supporters of Zionism means little, for just as they were
once prime supporters-bankrollers of the USSR and Nazi Socialism
before destroying them, the Hegelian Dialectics of conquest require
credible enemies, or rather credible opposites to achieve the
synthesis of the desired agenda - global communism to be centrally
controlled by a hierarchy at whose apex sit the all-seeing eye!
Is
it at all possible that the modern Jews themselves were calculatingly
setup with the mal construct of Zionism and
entirely brainwashed/enticed into nurturing/supporting it with the
introduction of Reform Judaism? Empirically, just as the Grand
Chessboard initially appeared to be the blueprint for all the wars of
conquest since 911 as the Trilateralist Zbigniew Brzezinski
deceptively pitched the believable “democracy is inimical
to imperial mobilization” mantra and showed how that
could be subverted with a “new pearl harbor”
in order to perpetuate “American Primacy and Its
Geostrategic Imperatives”, Zionism too appears as the
believable blueprint for Eretz Yisrael that Jews must pursue as their
'divine imperative'. But is that the real planned endgame? Is that
what Theodor Herzl,
a secular atheistic ideologue, really after as he spun his 'Der
Judenstadt' for the hidden hand of the international banksters who
almost entirely bankrolled Zionism through their many vassals
throughout the 19th and 20th century?
Notice
that in any
critique of Zionism or Israel, [2] the names of
International bankers is seldom uttered. And yet, the Balfour
Declaration was issued to Lionel Rothschild, and Moses Hess, the
reformer of Messianic Judaism who ushered in the notion that Jews
don't have to wait for a Messiah in order to return to their Promised
Land, was presumably bankrolled by the Rothschilds.
Today,
these banksters and their offspring control all the world's private
central banks as well as most of the world's debt, and through the
infinite monies they rake in through usury, control all the
foundations, think tanks, global governing-lending-financial
institutions, including the United States Congress and its
military-industrial complex, and through them all the political
bases, and through them all the world events including its media
coverage. Thus, not only is our condition of voluntary servitude, but
also our perception of our own zeitgeist,
entirely and completely in these oligarchs' Orwellian hands!
Is
Zionism merely a tool in their hands too, just like the venerated
Mujahideens once were for taking down the USSR, and the despised
'militant Islam' now is to perpetuate the manufactured 'war on
terror'? The real unhidden agenda of free-market capitalism
to be so egregiously maligned for its unbridled
greed and unbridled conquest, and
subsequently, as a solution to that problem, replaced by a centrally
managed world communism with these banksters consolidating all the
world's assets, properties, land, natural wealth, and
legal-political-financial-economic-military power into their own
private grubby little hands? And their Hegelian Dialectical
brainchild of Zionism merely being essential to fighting another
World War that will destroy it as well as all the remaining vestiges
of the “old world order”? Is the famous neocon quip “Zion
that will light up all the world” the banksters'
ephemeral ploy of the Straussian vintage to malign Godly Judaism
just as much as they malign the other Godly religions of antiquity?
For
Secular Humanism is indeed the modern religion of conquest, and
Nietzsche
their god. [3] That god killed off absolutes and
ushered in relativity of morality whereby ends justify the means.
Humanity in this new religion is merely sheep to by guided by the
illuminated ones, utilized for their benefit, and when necessary,
population controlled as in any natural wildlife preserve. The human
rights in this modernity are relative to an agenda, and as Justice
Vinson of the U.S. Supreme Court had candidly opined in 1951:
“Nothing
is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are
no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only
when associated with the considerations which give birth to
nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face
of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we
must reply that all concepts are relative.”
[4]
If
all this grotesque perversion is indeed true as empiricism suggests
it to be, and not merely a tin-hatted
conspiracy theory, [5] then, instead of focussing on
Zionism which will be destroyed in time by the oligarchs anyway
along with most
of humanity, [6] is it perhaps high time the
spotlights from all directions get focussed on the real roothead
of oppression?
The
ones who nurture not only this mal construct
abhorrence among a beleaguered
humanity in Palestine, [7] but are also the
prime-movers behind all the abhorrent wars
orchestrated by their glorified
'errand boys'? [8]
The
ones who use their dialectical instruments for one-world government
to piece-meal enslave us all using multifaceted fabricated
pretexts [9] in the best mold of Hegelian Dialectics?
Who
can deny with a straight face that their diabolical “end
run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece [has not
already] accomplish[ed] much more than the
old-fashioned frontal assault” [10] ever could have!
But
wait – let's just keep talking of one-state vs. two-state
solution as Jimmy Carter just did in his Washington
Post article today. [11]
Footnotes
[1]
http://prisonersofthecave.blogspot.com/2007/04/chapter-1.html
[2]
http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/11252-zionism-an-abnormal-nationalism-.html
[3]
https://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/02/letterto-dalitvoice-which-god.html
[4]
http://humanbeingsfirst.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/cacheof-a-brief-chronology-of-collectivism-samuelson1997.pdf
[5]
https://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/04/some-dare-call-it-conspiracy-garyallen.html
[6]
See analysis of NSSM 200 in
https://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/09/capitalist-conspiracy-world-government.html
[7]
https://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/01/from-genesis-to-genocide-in-palestine.html
[8]
https://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/04/vanilla-or-chocolate-icing-ondevilscake.html
[9]
https://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/12/responseto-ft-gideon-rachman-worldgov.html
[10]
Richard N. Gardner, “The Hard Road To World Order”, April
1974, Foreign Affairs, Council on Foreign Relations.
http://www.thepowerhour.com/articles/HardRoadtoWorldOrder.pdf
[11]
https://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/09/response-to-carters-elders-view-me.html
---
end
[R1]
From Delusion to Vindictiveness by Gilad Atzmon, October 8, 2009
http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/from-delusion-to-vindictiveness-by-gilad-atzmon.html
Excerpt:
Interpreting
the Zionist Dream
“The
socio-economic structure of the Jewish people differs radically from
that of other nations. Ours is an anomalous, abnormal structure.”
(Ber Borochov – The Economic Development of the Jewish People
1917)
“You
[Jews] lack the right notion of honour, feeling for duty, morality,
patriotism, idealism….” (Max Nordau – Address
at the 1st Zionist Congress 1897)
“But
labour is the only force which binds man to the soil… it is
the basic energy for the creation of national culture. This is what
we do not have, but we are not aware of missing it. We are a people
without a country, without a national living language, without a
national culture. We seem to think that if we have no labour it does
not matter - let Ivan, John or Mustafa do the work…”
(A.D. Gordon, "Our Tasks Ahead" 1920)
Early
Zionism was indeed a cheerful dream, it was all about the
transformation of the ‘Jew’ into a ‘civilised,
respectful and authentic human being’. The founders of Zionism
were inspired by the notions of ‘people like any other people’
and ‘nation amongst nations’. Reading early Zionists
such as Nordau, Borochov and Gordon provides us with some very
contemptuous references to Jewish character and identity that would
make Nazi ideology look mildly liberal.
However,
one is advised to take a short break for a second and to contemplate
critically over the above Zionist dream. One may wonder what kind of
people dream of ‘becoming human beings’. Can anyone
imagine a French, English or Chinese man or woman who dreams of
becoming an ordinary ‘human’? We can easily think of
oppressed human beings who demand to be treated as humans
(Palestinians, Civil Rights movements, anti Apartheid and so on).
Yet, the Zionist dream is rather different. It is not just about the
desire for recognition or equality, it is not just about being
treated appropriately, it is also a dream of ‘self-transformation’.
In fact, it is all about a miraculous metamorphosis from a morbid
‘abnormal’ state of being into an acceptable decent human
form.
Within
the context of a fictional fable we can easily imagine a cow that
fantasises to become a dairy farmer, a pig who ‘dies to’
become a Kosher schnitzel, a snake who aspires to take over the
Labour party and then to launch a new Zionist illegal war. And yet,
it is pretty unusual to think of people who have managed to develop
an aspiration to become ‘ordinary humans’.
An
intelligible way to explain or interpret that very unusual dream is
probably to assume that those who succumb to the Zionist dream are
those who happen to believe that, as far as their natural state of
being is concerned, they are indeed remotely human. One would rightly
assume that those who dream to become humans must be convinced that
humanity is somehow not exactly a characteristic that they happen to
possess.
Yesterday
during a talk at Librairie Résistances, Paris (a fund raising
event for Gaza) I was asked for my interpretation of Israeli
‘evolving barbarism’, how is it possible that 84% of the
Israelis supported the IDF genocidal crime in Gaza last December. “In
order to understand how these Israeli murderous practices emerged”
I said, “all we have to do is to trace back and reread the
early Zionist ideologists.” We can easily learn from
Zionist thinkers about their ‘dream’ and their vision of
their fellow brothers. They, the founders of modern Jewish
nationalism happened to admit somehow that something was totally
corrupted within the Jewish identity, culture and character. However,
they genuinely believed that it was amendable.
Zionism
was there to bring about a new Jew, a civilised productive human
being. It was indeed a very wet and epic dream. As an Israeli
youngster I myself succumbed to this dream. I tended to believe that
Israel was ‘my’ historic land, I regarded the Biblical
protagonists as my direct ancestors. I was sure that, at least in the
case of the so called ‘first Israelis’, the ideological
transplant operation was a great success. We, the young Israeli
natives tended to believe that we were all nothing less than a
success story of ‘modified-civilised-humanist-secular-beings’.
Needless
to say that the history of Palestine, the Palestinians and the Nakba
was totally hidden from us. We didn’t see the Palestinians
around us either, we were hardly aware of their suffering not to say
their cause. We were in fact totally blind. We tended also to believe
that our army was the ‘most humanist army around’. We
grew up with the ‘1967 Victorious Diary’, a legendary
chunky photo album every Israeli held in a prominent location on his
book shelve. There in that glossy propaganda book an Israeli soldier
was giving his water to an Egyptian prisoner. We regarded him as a
symbol of our people’s endorsement of universal humanism. We
were obviously not aware of the horrendous fact that the Sinai Desert
was actually a slaughter field for hundreds of Egyptian POWs. Why
didn’t we know? This in itself is a very good question. Our
fathers who fought in this war must have known something but they
kept quiet. Our parents who witnessed the 1948 convoys of
Palestinians refugees should have known something about the Nakba but
they somehow kept quiet. Interestingly enough, it wasn’t just
our parents, we followed the exact same pattern. Once we ourselves
matured into IDF soldiers, we did exactly the same, we turned a blind
eye (1982 in Lebanon). And this has never changed. The Israeli moral
awakening has never happened. By now I allow myself to argue that it
won’t happen. The Zionist dream is just too comfortable. After
more than one hundred years of moral phantasmic delusion the Israelis
are deeply stuck in an ethical coma.
[R2]
Israel/Palestine: How to End the War of 1948 by Tanya Reinhart
October 1, 2002
http://www.amazon.com/Israel-Palestine-How-End-1948/dp/1583225382
Excerpt:
“The
state of Israel founded in 1948 following a war which the Israelis
call the War of Independence, and the Palestinians call the Nakba -
the catastrophe. A haunted, persecuted people sought to find a
shelter and a state for itself, and did so at a horrible price to
another people. During the war of 1948, more than half of the
Palestinian population at the time - 1,380,000 people - were driven
off their homeland by the Israeli army. Though Israel officially
claimed that a majority of refugees fled and were not expelled, it
still refused to allow them to return, as a UN resolution demanded
shortly after 1948 war. Thus, the Israeli land was obtained through
ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Palestinian inhabitants. This is
not a process unfamiliar in history. Israel's actions remain
incomparable to the massive ethnic cleansing of Native Americans by
the settlers and government of the United states. Had Israel stopped
there, in 1948, I could probably live with it. As an Israeli, I
grew up believing that this primal sin our state was founded on may
be forgiven one day, because the founder's generation was driven by
the faith that this was the only way to save the Jewish people from
the danger of another holocaust.” -- Pg. 1
Subtitled
for Modernity Reader 2015, The Poor-Man's Guide To
Modernity, Sunday, September 20, 2015
02:00 am
Links fixed September 01, 2016
Is
Zionism a sophisticated Hegelian Dialectic?
