Critique
of Imran Hosein's 'An Islamic View of
Gog and Magog in the Modern World' – Waiting
for Allah is anything but Islamic!
Gog and Magog in the Modern World' – Waiting
for Allah is anything but Islamic!
Overview
The
phrase “Waiting for Allah” is the title of roving Foreign
Affairs Correspondent for the Sunday Times, Christina Lamb's 1992
book on Pakistan. Revealingly, the title captures in one short phrase
the entire state of the Muslim polity worldwide, and not just in
Pakistan. Evidently, no one is able to escape that state in which the
public mind voluntarily accepts what it really ought not to accept if
one were to look at the situation objectively. “Waiting for
Allah” is just one of the many methods and techniques of
inducing voluntary servitude in the public mind. Its overarching
purpose in modernity, of getting people to love their own servitude,
was explained most eloquently by essayist Aldous Huxley in his short
talk at the University of California, Berkeley. [A] The specific
technique of “Waiting for Allah” towards the same general
purpose outlined by Aldous Huxley, has been in use from time
immemorial. In fact, since the very invention of the clergy and the
notions of god, karma, destiny, and the like to explain away all
injustices in the world. Pakistan today is captured in its web little
differently from the ancient man, and evidently even more so than the
rest of the Muslims worldwide. [B] Un-strangely enough (if one
understands social engineering that is), despite the bright
information age of the twenty-first century with smart phones,
facebook and twitter, the entire world is more and more beholden to
some technique of behavior control as is best suited to the
respective cultural and social genius of its diverse peoples. Few can
escape its web of control as is captured in the report on The Mighty
Wurlitzer. [C] Islam's singular directive for liberating oneself
from its clutches is in the oft recited but evidently most poorly
understood Surah Al-Asr. [D] Fourteen centuries into its existence,
and the public mind is still beholden to the gods of tyranny who
alone benefit from the people Waiting for Allah! Those given
to reflection and not satisfied attributing tyranny to God, sometimes
meander from Waiting for Allah to questioning the justice and mercy
of Allah. [E] We however begin with surely the most diabolical idea
ever invented for inducing voluntary servitude in mankind in the
realm of religion: Waiting for Allah; and it is for the common man to
help Allah shorten that Waiting – Eschatology, the Last Days,
and what is metaphorically labeled 'Gog and Magog' in the Christian
tradition, and 'Hajuj and Mahjuj' in the Holy Qur'an.
Letter:
'Gog and Magog' lend new meaning to 'opiate of the peoples' as
Pakistan is destroyed in its name!
April
23, 2009 | Last Updated November 01, 2016
If
you are a Pakistani, this letter is addressed to you. If you are a
Muslim sitting on the fence, this letter is still addressed to you. I
hope it reaches you some how through the unfathomable magic of the
internet. Anyone just a 100 years ago would surely have thought this
instant communication system as magic, of divine origin, and some
fulfillment of the signs of the 'Last Days'. I assure you that I have
some tiny role in making it happen as the proverbial cog in the giant
wheel of Silicon Valley (see my patents),
like tens of thousands of my other fellow engineers and scientists
who have slogged day and night in the pursuit of 'American Dream' for
so many years and have made many things happen – from telephone
to television to cellphone to the Four galloping Horsemen of the
Apocalypse – all instruments of instant communication, and also
cataclysmic destruction.
Imran
Hosein, the scholar-preacher extraordinaire of Pakistani origin and
the enigmatic author of Last Days of Gog and Magog, is on the mark
on his analysis of 9/11 as an inside job and part of a long running
conspiracy by the international banking cabal to take over the
world. His advocacy however based on his gog and magog gibberish, to
disengage completely from this world like the 'people of the cave'
of Surah Al Kahf, to do nothing until the promised salvation of the
'Last Days' arrives, puts him squarely in the camp of supporters of
tyranny. What a shame!
Surah
Al Kahf, Chapter 18 of the Holy Qur'an, is likely the most
allegorical, metaphorical, and speculation-rife Chapter in the
entire Good Book whose meaning can only be known to the Author of
the Holy Qur'an, or to those designated in the Good Book as
“rasikhoon-fil-ilm”, as in verse 3:7. For anyone else,
whether he wears a sanctioned turban or a western academic gown, to
speciously speculate upon metaphorical verses to advance the
argument of “disengagement” and to leave the world wide
open for the harvest of tyranny, can only be the work of a very
simpleton fool, or a very sophisticated social scientist finding new
ways to induce voluntary servitude among the masses.
And
none of us builders of modernity are really divine, trust me, except
perhaps that occasional gorgeous unapproachable ... so moving right
along, can we fallible creatures construct or orchestrate something
that is divine in its purpose? Something useful(?), maybe. Something
destructive(?), always. Evil(?), surely. But divine? Perhaps that
ought to be capitalized as Divine, as it is speaking of the idea of
man being the instrument of God. But I'll continue to use the lower
case form because the notion can hardly be imputed to God. It is man
made and traces to all the mythical gods of antiquity who played
their divine games at the expense of man, from Ram and Vishnu et. al.
in the ancient Indian civilization which still informs the cultural
and religious ethos of modern India, to Zeus and Apollo on Mount
Olympus in the Hellenic civilization of the ancient Greeks and Romans
whose legacy of intellectual thought informs the West.
Simple
logic reveals the absurdity of this notion which is why I persist in
the lower case usage of divinity to reflect my analysis of its human
origins. If a divine needs evil mortals to do its dirty work to
fulfill its divine plan, then the creation must possesses powers
greater than its creator! The creator can't do its own dirty work and
relies on us to do it – then on what basis of justice would it
hold the creation accountable for fulfilling its own divine plan?
Never mind that why should we worship it if we have greater powers.
And therein lies a logical conundrum as old as mankind for all the
divinely-learned on the planet who have had people do god's evil work
in the name of their gods. Today these divinely-learned pulpits
continue their absurdity by announcing the final unleashing of 'Gog
and Magog' and the 'Last Days' based on how humanity has progressed
into abject corruption and slavery to money and power in this
Technetronic age, that in fact, it is all god's work. See “Last
Days of Gog and Magog”
( http://imranhosein.org/media/books/ivgmmw.pdf ).
( http://imranhosein.org/media/books/ivgmmw.pdf ).
Yes,
I too think it is gods', and not God's.
When
the dogmatic, more interested in the immanent metaphors of
eschatology than the more mundane matters of the here and the now –
such as the empirical, to be dealt with today, with perhaps the
straightforward Commandments like that expressed in Surah Al-Asr
(Chapter 103 in the Holy Qur'an), or the straightforward Biblical
Golden Rule expressed in the New and Old Testaments (Do unto
others as you have them do unto you, The Holy Bible: Matthew
7:12, Luke 6:31; Old Testament Mosaic Law;) – preach to their
faithful choir that the corruption on earth is in fulfillment of some
divine prophesy so that god can finally bring justice to a suffering
humanity at the End of Time, then they are effectively arguing that
the corrupters are really doing the divine's work! And the public
should not interfere with it, that if anything, as some religious
fanatics among all three Abrahamic religions proclaim, they should be
aided and abetted to hasten that outcome. How convenient for the
hectoring hegemons that they are now doing “divine work”
with the pulpits' blessings from two of the largest religions of man!
Furthermore,
imagine being sold on the idea that all those wonderful Platitudes
and Commandments in all those treasured Holy Books which none could
enforce because the hectoring hegemons throughout the ages usurped
peoples' rights and enslaved them, could in fact only be implemented
by some awaited savior to be sent down by god. For indeed, it
is but a truism, as Aldous Huxley had put it, that “nothing
is easier than to formulate high ideals, but few things are more
difficult than to discover the means for by those ideals might be
implemented, and the categorical imperatives which spring from them
can be a pain. This is the real problem”. Thus imagine this
problem of impracticality being solved eschatologically, in a
self-perpetuating, self-fulfilling prophecy:
(1)
don't even bother resisting evil because you will fail, since it's
all happening by divine decree ;
(2)
thus don't challenge your rulers and their oppressions even while you
recognize them as oppressors, they rule as god's vicegerent on earth
;
(3)
it's all written in the Good Book (“Obey Allah and obey the
Messenger and those charged with authority among you” –
Qur'an Surah An-Nisa, Chapter 4, verse 59) , can't you read you
heathens, that Muslim tyrants are a mercy from god as they hasten
mankind towards the 'Last Days' when justice will finally reign
supreme, and so we must not resist ; not to ignore the pious
Christians' Holy Book (“I am free to submit to authority. I
am free to make myself a slave. My friends, you are free, you are
free to respect and appreciate the authority of the government that
god gives to you - Honor the King! The way you talk about your
government, it's so easy to complain isn't it? It is so easy to
criticize, it is so easy to find fault. Honor the King. Do it anyway,
whether the king deserves it or not. All authority, all authority is
an extension of god's authority!” – from the sermon
outlining the New
American Theology of Civil Submission,
April 14, 2008, watch)
;
(4)
for the 'Last Days' prophesy to be fulfilled, the whole world must
become filled with injustice and oppression, and only then will the
Mahdi, and/or the Messiah, shall be made to return by the Will of God
to fashion a new righteous world army which will fight tyranny to end
all injustice on earth once and for all ;
(5)
until then, since any battle with tyrants is futile, just work on
saving your imaan (beliefs) ; focus on personal piety ; go back to
the basics to being 'good Muslims' ; spiritually prepare to be
eligible to join the Army of the Mahdi/Messiah in the unknown
tomorrow whose numbers will be limited and only those of the highest
spiritual merit will be accepted ; for today be content with
purifying your hearts and controlling your carnal desires as you
continue to “Render unto Caesar the things which are
Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s”
(New Testament, Matthew 22:21) ; etceteras.
(6)
It would be a travesty to neglect to mention the most remarkable
gibberish among that set, what the newest preacher to burst onto the
internet-scene preaches in polished English vernacular : disengage
from this world entirely like the 'people of the cave' of Surah Al
Kahf until the promised salvation of the 'Last Days' arrives.
I
have heard this convoluted logic in several variations since 911 when
the mosques in the United States suddenly became full of the pious
trying to be 'good Muslims' who 'United We Stand' with empire as
heathens like me took to the streets protesting the impending
destruction of innocent civilians in Iraq. Please see Chapter
8
of my 2003 book [1].
The
logic method known as Reductio ad absurdum (Latin, literally:
reduction to the absurd; a method of disproving a proposition by
showing that its inevitable consequences would be absurd, or lead to
self-contradiction; conversely, also a method of indirectly proving a
proposition by assuming its negation to be true and showing that this
leads to an absurdity), applied rigorously to the above observations
demonstrates all these to be based on the absurd premise of “God's
Will” for some “Divine Plan” which requires tyranny
to become ubiquitous before God Shall intervene to end it.
Let's
dissect this premise and see what happens if it is presumed to be
true:
(1)
If God needs evil men and women to implement its divine plan, then
creation becomes more enabled than the creator and the creator
depends on its own creation, and thus the key abstract philosophical
attribute of God being Self-sustaining; Self-sufficient;
Self-consistent; Free from contradiction; Free from defects; Not
dependent on anyone or anything; Omnipotent, “kun fa-ya-kun”
(Be, and it is); etc., is thrown out the window ; the question is
akin to the logical fallacy “can God create a stone which he
cannot lift”, meaning, if God can do anything, if God is
defined as Omnipotent, then can God limit himself to become dependent
on its own creation to do its bidding, similarly, can God put the
unjust in heaven and the just ones in hell contrary to his own prime
directive on supreme justice and his own attribute of being the Most
Just, etceteras., all these creating
irreconcilable contradictions among the attributes themselves thus
making for a defective God who is not free from contradictions ---
So, either the God premise is false, the attributes ascribed to God
are false, or the premise being tested is false, and for those who
accept the God premise on faith (as it is un-falsifiable and
therefore in the realm of faith), and accept by way of reasoning the
philosophical attribute that a God must be free from all defects and
perfect in all his attributes without contradictions among them or
else He is not Divine, the only remaining choice is to reject the
premise in question ;
(2)
failure of the lofty moral platitudes in the Holy Books, the Bible,
the Qur'an, the Ten Commandments, not to neglect other moral
scriptures sacred to man in other civilizations, in accomplishing
man's spiritual guidance for a moral existence, thus necessitating
Divine Intervention in the form of the Eschatology of the Last Days,
a Mahdi, a Messiah, to finally bring justice to mankind
by breaking its bonds of servitude to fellow man as man couldn't live
up to the Divine Guidance himself to accomplish it himself ; the very
concept of Divine Intervention of the Last Days presupposes that
Divine Guidance failed in its Categorical Imperative to reform man by
giving him the choice to establish justice among themselves but man
failed to live up to the Divine Guidance and it will be forced onto
man by Divine Intervention of the Mahdi, the Messiah in
the Last Days ---- so what was the point of that entire
exercise of Divine Guidance? So either the Guidance is Divine in
which case it cannot fail not only because God understands both the
Guidance and the target of that Guidance since He created them both
and coupled them together, but also because of the fact that God is
free from defects and cannot fail, and therefore the presupposition
is false; or it was not divine and failed because it did not
understand the nature of man and its primacy as well as its sheep
instincts, in which case the outcome is already predictable ; but it
cannot be both Divine and fail in its own stated purpose (see the
Dialog on the Creation of Adam in Surah Al-Baqara) ;
(3)
evil triumphing becoming the pre-requisite for justice and peace
among mankind pushes the Mephistophelian end justify the means
dogma of expediency and military style “objectivity” to
achieve any target as morally legitimate, which is antithetical to
the moral codes of not just all three Abrahamic religions, but all
theistic moral philosophies and traditions creating a
self-contradiction of monumental proportions if then God Himself
indulges in it to achieve His Divine Plan ; and
(4)
a catch-22 in Accountability on the Day of Judgment is created for
the religions which proclaim Heaven and Hell in an Afterlife as
reward or punishment --- what punishment if the evil was necessary
part of the Divine plan and consequently its vile purveyors the
Divine instruments?
As
we see, absurdities pile up upon each other very quickly with even a
modicum of analytical thought if we accept the premise underlying the
Eschatology being taught mankind from virtually all Abrahamic
pulpits, of all sectarian flavors. By the logical reasoning method of
reductio ad absurdum, the premise stands rejected because it leads to
absurdities if presumed true.
It
is reasonable to inquire whether there is any explicit reference to
such “savior cometh”, or to such an absurd Eschatology,
in the categorical and foundational verses of the Holy Qur'an?
Admittedly, I am not a scholar of the scriptures, let alone of the
most profound world religion. Nevertheless, as a thinking student of
scriptures interested in uncovering what the Good Book itself says
rather than what the pen of man says it says, a diligent study of the
singular scripture of Islam, the Holy Qur'an, reveals that all the
“Mahdi and Messiah returning to free mankind from its
bondage” type beatitudinous concepts of Eschatology
appear to be entirely from pages outside the Holy Qur'an itself.
It
is noteworthy that: (1) these ideas are prevalent in the Biblical
literature, and arguably, somehow crept into the Muslim literature of
antiquity penned by the Muslim holy scribes and narrators of Islamic
history; and (2) that these ideas are, at best, based on wholly
speculative interpretations of the metaphorical and allegorical
verses of the Holy Qur'an to suit one's own fancy, ethos,
inclination, and socialization bias in which one can impute
pretty much any meaning to these metaphorical verses based on how
much one believes in one's own holy books outside the pages of the
Holy Qur'an. In other words, apart from any subversive agenda to
wittingly put religion in the service of empire, innocent
confirmation bias and unwitting incestuous
self-reinforcement appears to have led to interpreting the
speculative verses of the Holy Qur'an on these Eschatological
matters! Who is to say who has got the right interpretation? The
right ijtihad? Are the verses of the Holy Qur'an poetry that
one can imagine them to mean whatever one fancies? Or are the verses
of the Holy Qur'an a specific guidance unto mankind from its Author?
Witness the unequivocal warning in the Holy Qur'an to refrain from
such gratuitous interpretations, and who specifically have the right
to interpret the metaphorical verses of the Holy Qur'an, in verse 3:7
of Surah Aal-'Imran.
For
the Shia Muslims for instance, Imam Mahdi is as fundamental a
construct of faith as the Prophet of Islam is, but unfortunately
derives virtually its entire body of beliefs exclusively from pages
outside the Holy Qur'an. [2a] Among all the Muslim sects, the Shia
Muslims, like the early Christians, are most profoundly awaiting the
return of the Savior, Imam Mahdi, to whom allegiance and
obedience is pledged in daily ritual prayers. Iran has extended that
obedience to the valih-e-faqih, an
ayatollah who rules the public in Imam Mahdi's name in
his absence as his self-proclaimed temporal lieutenant (wali),
imam, under the rubric of yet another religious dogma of obedience to
authority prevalent among the Shia Muslims called “taqlid”.
[2] Iran of course presents itself as the greatest antagonist of the
oppressive West today. But even as she boldly articulates Ayatollah
Khomeini's conception of the “Great Satan” in her
national and international proclamations, her religious and political
leadership under the valih-e-faqih
[3] remain rather timid in calling 9/11 the 'operation
canned goods' that it is. One can only imagine that they are also
waiting for Imam Mahdi to call out that assessment.
Whatever
the actual religious reality of the return of Imam Mahdi and
Messiah may be (a point which is orthogonal to the one being made
here), the empirical and unarguable fact of the matter is that the
concept of “Waiting for Allah” (which includes waiting
for any Savior, Mahdi, Messiah when such beliefs defer mobilizing
resistance against systems of tyranny and oppression until their
arrival in the 'Last Days') forms a most powerful opiate for inducing
voluntary servitude as “karma” (as among the Hindu caste
system): a bold and voluntary resignation to fate as divinely
ordained inevitability. What a powerful opiate!
But
now imagine layering upon these mechanistic systems of inducing
servitude, an even more diabolical system in which a new type of
slavery is created for which Goethe, the German philosopher, stated:
“None
are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are
free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by
masters who rule them with lies. They feed them on falsehoods till
wrong looks like right in their eyes.”
Modernity
is run by superman intellectuals; they are its principal
architects ahead of politicians who merely serve their interests.
Both work for the same unaccountable powers behind the scenes who
harvest man's discontent, his suffering, at times inducing it with
systems of oppression, at times aiding and abetting it by imposing
proxy situations, for an onslaught on all social and moral order for
their agenda of world government. This is done by creating
“revolutionary times” of one type or another, sometimes
as bloody revolutions, like the French and Russian revolutions, other
times as crises, catastrophes, world wars, pestilences, and the new
“democracy revolutions” we are experiencing today, to
create the conditions which enable enacting that which is greater
than the temporal human conditions which gave birth to these
“revolutionary times”. This is how all the global
police-state laws, greater and greater powers invested with
supra-national governing bodies like the UN, BIS, WB, IMF, come
about.
Those
who control these supra national institutions from the dark shadows
as the root godhead of the financial oligarchy, control the world.
But despite the past two centuries of development to first
systematically destroy existing world order through revolutions and
world wars, surely there hasn't been in the history of thought a more
diabolical and multi-faceted Hegelian Dialectic enacted on the
world stage than is being enacted today between the Waiting for
Allah and Helping Allah. At times goaded on by crafty
slogans of “liberation” with “God
is on your side”
[4] and at other times by actively engaging in empire's own creation
of the trifecta of “militant Islam” vs. “moderate
Islam” vs. “revolutionary Islam” to serve the same
“imperial mobilization” agenda for world government.
Religion in the hands of superman remains the ultimate tool of
primacy for mass behavior control. The superman can make
ordinary man enthused with spirit fight for or against anything, for
or against any ideology, and he can make the rest of the spectating
bystanders quietly accept the frightful conditions imposed upon them
while patiently “Waiting for Allah” to rescue them. And I
include in that group all believers of all faiths and religions who
are fed on hope of a better future by getting them to accept the
tortuous present with quiet resignation. This condition of voluntary
servitude Aldous Huxley termed the “Ultimate Revolution”:
“Well,
it seems to me that the nature of the Ultimate Revolution with which
we are now faced is precisely this: that we are in process of
developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the
controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably always
will exist, to get people actually to love their servitude! This is
the, it seems to me the ultimate in malevolent revolution shall we
say.”
Their
new age religion on the horizon intended to replace all religions
that are based on ancient Holy Books, is called Secular Humanism,
the religion of reason of the superman, and underwritten entirely in
modern Orwellian Newspeak whereby morality is relative, expediency is
law, and state is supreme. The state no longer exists on the will of
man to serve his interests, but man exists on the will of the state
to serve its interests. A world constitution is being underwritten by
default by the fiat of global laws already in the making with these
underlying premises. To officially layer platitudinous wording over
it once the structures are in place has been in draft-mode for a
while. As for instance, in his 1940 book “New World Order”,
H. G. Wells even outlined a manifesto, the “Declaration of the
Rights of Man”, which when I first read it I also thought was a
most sensible 10-point seeding Articles for drafting a planetary
level equitable 'social contract' for all the peoples of the planet.
Wells wrote in 1940 just as Nazi victories were piling up at the
onset of World War II:
“And
if we, the virtuous democracies, are not fighting for these common
human rights, then what in the name of the nobility and gentry, the
Crown and the Established Church, the City, The Times and the Army
and Navy Club, are we common British peoples fighting for?”
And
Wells most artfully extended that “virtue” in the Tenth
Article of the “Declaration of the Rights of Man”. Its
wording is so damn sharp that it even had me perplexed whether it was
a noble vision for “universal law” like Lord Tennyson's
in his 1842 poem “Locksley Hall”, or vile propaganda for
imposing tyranny as can be seen in my report: The
Enduring Capitalist Conspiracy For World Government
[5], where I had observed:
“If
H. G. Wells was a devious Orwellian character, there really would
have been no reason for creating the inordinately commonsensical,
rational, fair, and very moral Declaration of the Rights of Man which
immensely empower breaking all bonds of voluntary servitude!”
Here
is the brilliant verbiage of H. G. Wells' Tenth Article of
Universal Declaration of Human Rights for you to examine
yourself:
“No
treaty and no law affecting these primary rights shall be binding
upon any man or province or administrative division of the community,
that has not been made openly, by and with the active or tacit
acquiescence of every adult citizen concerned, either given by a
direct majority vote of the community affected or through the
majority vote of his publicly elected representatives. In matters of
collective behaviour it is by the majority decision men must abide.
No administration, under a pretext of urgency, convenience or the
like, shall be entrusted with powers to create or further define
offences or set up by-laws, which will in any way infringe the rights
and liberties here asserted. All legislation must be public and
definite. No secret treaties shall be binding on individuals,
organisations or communities. No orders in council or the like, which
extend the application of a law, shall be permitted. There is no
source of law but the people, and since life flows on constantly to
new citizens, no generation of the people can in whole or in part
surrender or delegate the legislative power inherent in mankind.”
As per
the United States' National Security Strategy Memorandum NSSM-200
written by the then Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in 1974 and
presented to president Gerald Ford for his signature which the
president signed as the National Security Decision Memorandum NSDM
314
in 1975, agreeing to the population control agenda for world's most
populous Least Developed Countries outlined by Kissinger. See a
brief examination of the section titled “An Alternative View”
in NSSM-200, in this scribe's report on Capitalist
Conspiracy for World Government.
Lovely
verbiage? While searching to resolve that irksome question, it
occurred to me that perhaps like the lofty US Constitution, built
upon the systematic genocide of ten million native inhabitants of
that land without shedding a tear, which gave the wonderful
Declaration of its Bill of Rights to only those of the right race and
heritage who were deemed “legitimate” human beings to
have natural “inalienable rights”, and so are these
lovely platitudes for only those who survive the pious culling of the
untermensch in the New World Order (this concept of semantics
of words having narrower or different meanings from what they are
deceptively made to appear to the public mind, George Orwell termed
“Newspeak”).
This
culling of the untermensch for population reduction is to be
variously blamed upon nature, and/or upon the Four Horsemen of the
Apocalypse, the “revolutionary times” so to speak,
that is necessary in order execute on the genocidal agenda. A glimpse
into that underlying twisted villainy of the Ubermensch
mindset in which the people of the right race and heritage are
permitted all the rights of man, including to procreate at will, to
go forth and multiply, while the untermensch as the useless
eaters are to be population controlled and/or reduced for the
threat of the have-nots to the national security of the haves in a
global police-state is afforded in Bertrand Russell's 1952 book:
Impact of Science on Society. A book which few people appear
to have read but must read. In addition to advocating birth-control
of the lesser humanity who haven't contributed anything to
world civilization while permitting the white races to procreate at
will, Lord Bertrand Russell philosophically reasoned for global
police-state being the only effective and practical means of
maintaining world government:
“There
is, it must be confessed, a psychological difficulty about a single
world government. The chief source of social cohesion in the past, I
repeat, has been war: the passions that inspire feeling of unity are
hate and fear. These depend upon the existence of an enemy, actual or
potential. It seems to follow that a world government could only
be kept in being by force, not by the spontaneous loyalty that now
inspires a nation at war.”
And
world police-state is what we have today, driving global governance
in stages towards the fait accompli of one world. Well, evidently, it
is easier to maintain police-state with Newspeak under
Orwellian cover in which people are brought to love their own
servitude than just at the point of the hard bayonet as in vanilla
military dictatorships. One can witness the platitudinous
wordsmithing in the UN docs, in the EU constitution, etc., which
underwrite the nihilist world order all of which are layered upon the
premises outlined above. All are connivings to take away real
individual rights in practice under the pretense of giving some
abstract universal rights to man, while the superman will
always retain all the real rights because he defines what those are.
The superman exercises those rights through its control of the
state and its legal authority to legislate any abhorrence and call
that law. The superman increasingly exudes that power through
the supra-national world governing bodies who today implement those
laws with the acquiescing of all nations in the name of international
law. The superman declares wars whenever he wants, makes peace
whenever he wants, imprisons whomsoever he wants, makes heroes and
villains of whomsoever he wants and labels all that justice. He
weaves a web of deceit and calls it truth. And he gets the common
mind to accept his brilliant arithmetic of two plus two make five as
he inches the world rapidly towards global police-state with
incremental body of oppressive laws in the name of national and world
security. While all can see the heinous acts of the superman
conducted in the name of security, the common herd, like the
three wise monkeys, almost always hears no evil, speaks no evil, and
sees no evil.
Despite
Orwell's attempt to explain the use of language for oppression with
the Newspeak dictionary in his fable Nineteen eighty-four,
and Huxley's attempt to explain the same in his fable A Brave New
World in which the real knowledge in possession of the elite is
carefully segregated from what is taught to the public mind, even
intelligent well-read people don't seem to realize that language is
the first weapon of conquest and remain caught in its sophisticated
multifaceted trappings. Newspeak is the very foundation of the
new age religion of Secular Humanism for the New World Order. [6]
Is
courage so cheap, and shame so rare, that we forsake one and gather
the other as we build lies upon lies and create apathy upon apathy?
If only scholars had instead forsaken their pen and taken up the
sword – their crimes could have been [relatively] trivially
dealt with. They have completely changed night into day and day into
night, just like the controllers in Plato's Myth of the Cave.
Each of those 'prisoners of the cave', from time immemorial, feeling
the whip on their back and the sword on their neck, must surely have
thought the 'Last Days' is at hand, that resistance today is futile,
that to save their souls for the morrow when the savior cometh
is their only way out! Sounds like it could be a remarkable scene in
the remake of 1984! I copyright that Idea! Hollywood/Bollywood if you
read this, make sure you send me a check – for I am rather
broke as layoffs and industry shutdowns are taking over as America's
new paymasters while the gog and magog du jour laugh their way
to the bank!!
The
following illustrative passages of what's to come and how it might be
unveiled to the public mind are excerpted from my report: Financial
Terrorism April 2009 – Financial News Analysis in Context.
[7]
Please
do share this letter with your own circle of friends if you find any
merit in it. If it only wins me scorn from the 'uber pious', the
'uber intellectuals', and hemlock be the only wages of my sins, that
hemlock is more tasteful to me as my prize than all the riches and
ego inflation the native-informants accumulate as their prize.
Begin
Excerpt
“The
Day After – American Agenda for Pakistan”
is so palpably visible that only fools
and shills
among the Westerners, and native-informants
among the victims, will continue to bleat Alice's
'War On Terror'
instead of getting
the prime-movers behind the 'merchants of death'!
And
many, drowning in a surfeit of faith from ear to ear, are simply
“waiting
for Allah”
thinking it is the “Last
Days of Gog and Magog”
(see http://imranhosein.org/media/books/ivgmmw.pdf
) that no mere mortals may withstand. For, it is argued before them,
an “indestructible power” the almighty creator
hath himself calculatingly fashioned to fulfill his own (murderous)
prophesies in order to finally rain divine justice upon the Earth –
right after he hath rained phosphorous bombs upon children, women,
men, the elderly, and destroyed their innocent civilizations at the
very hands of his own “indestructible” hectoring
hegemons to bring all that planned divine justice to fruition! What
an idiotic and cruel god whose imagination only extends from genesis
to genocide
in order to fashion creation. And while that is merely immanent, far
more grotesque is the idiotic imbecilic mass of followers who malign
their own Almighty Creator whom they daily aver to believe in, Who
repeatedly describes Itself in the very Book they hold most sacred as
“the Beneficent, the Merciful”! How can both be
true simultaneously – unless it is a Zeus like fickle-minded
god who enjoys games of cruel self-indulgence at the expense of his
creation?
Can
learned people not think with some rational logic, even when they be
spiritually inclined, that any earthly devil couldn't wish for a
better neutralization of any impediment emanating from the masses for
its own “imperial mobilization” agendas? Give
people their opiate in their right hand, while enslaving them with
the left! Give them what they believe is divinely ordained –
the majority will remain occupied in their pious and pecuniary
pursuits believing it is all the 'will' of their god(s)! And more
apropos to modernity, inculcate a trust in so called “experts”
so that one may be convinced to suspend one's own commonsense and
rational judgment. Witness the events of 911 where the catastrophic
mode of failure of the tall buildings preclude all and sundry from
even thinking that it could have been an “inside job”!
Why? because the “experts” say 19 jihadis did it!
Woe
be to them all who manufacture pretexts and justifications to not
side with the truth, who lead people astray to make it appear that
the helpless screaming victims is god's own work as destined which
none may alter, who remain busy in pious interlocution in their
mosques, churches, temples while cataclysmic 'Shock and Awe' is
continually visited upon innocent civilian populations. There is none
on planet earth who can claim they haven't witnessed the preying of
the vultures and vampires for which, surely, the Creator too must
curse its own creation for their apathy despite plentiful guidance to
every peoples! What will thee, Oh people of the cloth, take to thine
grave – a barrel full of gold and a ledger full of piety while
God's creation was burned and starved at the hands of the hectoring
hegemons right before thy twirling rosaries? Many an atheist show far
greater moral acumen and disquiet in their actions when they rush to
the aid of suffering humanity – for indeed, a moral compass
appears to be built into us human beings, we who can reason, and we
who can reflect, all killed by the eschatological gibberish fashioned
by priests shilling for the enemies of mankind! While the
misanthropes remain busy building corrupting institutions and
instruments of co-option to create 'one-world'
government,
the sheeples are kept busy chasing absurdities.
At
the intersection of political science and religion, whereby the
latter is used in the most sophisticated and devilish of ways to
server the former (as in client-server computing), such
as, for example: (1) to both subvert and incapacitate political
activism in its most efficacious dimension while simultaneously
promulgating “imperial mobilization” by fashioning
the perpetual enemy of “Islamofascism”
; (2) to devilishly fashion 'freedom
fighters'
with “God
is on your side”
; (3) to return the Jews to Zion by killing off god and selling the
'ubermensch' concept of the Jewish peoples themselves being their own
Messiah (see Letter
to Editor: Dalit Voice's 'Which god?' February 08, 2009)
; etc., 'religion' is today as much a part of the Machiavellian
instrument of hegemony, as it was in antiquity when the rather banal
'divine sanction' was invoked for imperial legitimacy!
Muslims
today, being among the most intellectually challenged peoples on the
face of the earth, are even encouraged to once again dream of
'khilafat', as that strain conveniently adds to the phobia of the
“Triumphalism of Islam” (see Bernard Lewis, Crisis
of Islam – Holy War and Unholy Terror, 2001).
Between
the sedation of Aldous Huxley's ethereal 'Soma' and the fatigue of
the treadmill of the 'American Dream', the plebeians are led to the
slaughter – all throughout the ages, since time immemorial.
Latter day modernity is no different, only more Machiavellian! With a
deception so Technetronic, and mind manipulation so ubiquitous, that
it should not surprise anyone if they see their god's names spelled
in the sky and 'Jesus' descend on the 'wings of angels' at the
respective GPS coordinates of each peoples' holy predictions! Coming
soon to the pious neighborhoods of the (Abrahamic) world. Thousands
of visitors have been nightly entertained in Disneyland by
holographic image projection's progressive development for at least
two decades, and it must surely be ready by now for introducing new
convoluted twists to “imperial mobilization”!
And
Pakistan is next! A “Kosovo” is being orchestrated in
Pakistan and matters have maddeningly been brought right on the verge
of fait accompli. All for the meager want of a handful of courageous
men and women of national prominence to simply have called 'a
spade a spade'!
Unlike Palestine, Pakistan was destroyed, first and foremost, by her
own treasonous mercenary peoples! The United States to follow suit,
for
the exact same reason!
End
Excerpt
Zahir
Ebrahim
April
23, 2009
References
[A]
Aldous Huxley's 1962 talk given to the students at the University of
California, Berkeley on the Ultimate in Malevolent Revolution,
titled: The Ultimate Revolution,
http://archive.org/download/AldousHuxley-TheUltimateRevolution/AldousHuxley-TheUltimateRevolution_64kb.m3u
Footnotes
[2a]
An nquiry into the concept of Imam Mahdi as understood from the verses of
the Holy Qur'an is in Zahir Ebrahim, What does the Holy Qur'an say about The Mahdi - The Awaited Savior of Mankind?
http://faith-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-mahdi-letter-to-young-muslim-scholar.html
[2]
The concept of “taqlid” as understood from the verses of
the Holy Qur'an is in Zahir Ebrahim, What does the Holy Qur'an say
about Taqlid - Blind Following the Non-Infallible?
http://islam-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2013/08/what-does-quran-say-about-taqlid.html
The
concept of “imam” (any leader) vs “Imam”
(Leader which the scripture asserts is only appointed by God) as
understood from the verses of the Holy Qur'an is explained in Zahir
Ebrahim, Islam: Why is the Holy Qur'an so easy to hijack? Part-III,
http://faith-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/08/islam-why-is-quran-easy-to-hijack-pt3.html
[3]
The concept of “valih-e-faqih” is expounded in Ayatollah
(imam) Khomeini's series of sermons given in Najaf during his exile
years and compiled in his book after the Revolution: “Islam and
Revolution” (translated in English by Hamid Algar, 1981),
https://web.archive.org/web/20130616014122/http://humanbeingsfirst.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/cacheof-islam-and-revolution-writings-and-declarations-of-imam-khomeini-translated-by-hamid-algar-1981-mizan-press.pdf
The
concept of Divine Rule by Valih-e-Faqih as understood from the verses
of the Holy Qur'an is examined in Zahir Ebrahim, What does the Holy
Qur'an say about Vilayat-i Faqih?
http://islam-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2015/03/what-does-quran-say-about-vilayat-faqih.html
[6]
The use of language for colonization is best illustrated by Lord
Macaulay's Minute on Indian Education presented to the British
Parliament in 1835 (
http://columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00generallinks/macaulay/txt_minute_education_1835.html
) cached at
http://pakistan-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/p/macaulay-minute-on-indian-education-2nd.html
Begin
Excerpt Lord Macaulay, Feb 02, 1835, Minute on Indian Education:
“What
then shall that language be? One-half of the committee maintain that
it should be the English. The other half strongly recommend the
Arabic and Sanscrit. The whole question seems to me to be-- which
language is the best worth knowing?
I
have no knowledge of either Sanscrit or Arabic. But I have done what
I could to form a correct estimate of their value. I have read
translations of the most celebrated Arabic and Sanscrit works. I have
conversed, both here and at home, with men distinguished by their
proficiency in the Eastern tongues. I am quite ready to take the
oriental learning at the valuation of the orientalists themselves. I
have never found one among them who could deny that a single shelf of
a good European library was worth the whole native literature of
India and Arabia. The intrinsic superiority of the Western literature
is indeed fully admitted by those members of the committee who
support the oriental plan of education. ...
In
one point I fully agree with the gentlemen to whose general views I
am opposed. I feel with them that it is impossible for us, with our
limited means, to attempt to educate the body of the people.
We
must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters
between us and the millions whom we govern, --a class of persons
Indian in blood and colour, but English in tastes, in opinions, in
morals and in intellect.
To
that class we may leave it to refine the vernacular dialects of the
country, to enrich those dialects with terms of science borrowed from
the Western nomenclature, and to render them by degrees fit vehicles
for conveying knowledge to the great mass of the population.”
End
Excerpt Lord Macaulay
Justifying
the bequeathing of English language to the natives of British India
and removing their own civilization's indigenous languages from the
lingua franca of success in empire's favorite colony, Lord Macaulay
laid out the premise for the subsequent Indian Education Policy whose
impact still resonates in the British-partitioned India and Pakistan.
Arguably, not as much in Bangladesh which purposefully reverted to
her singular native language Bengali quite successfully
nation-wide, perhaps due to her more uniform linguistic composition,
and thus was able to reconnect to her intellectual and cultural
history in her own native language. A feat which neither India nor
Pakistan have been able to accomplish nationally. Occidentosis,
the plague from the West
continues to be most profoundly held as the choicest passport to
modernity in most former colonies of the British empire –
largely due to their education policy of grooming the “brown
sahib” who have remained the elite in the post-colonial era,
https://web.archive.org/web/20130603042500/http://humanbeingsfirst.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/cacheof-occidentosis-a-plague-from-the-west-by-jalal-ali-ahmad-translated-by-rcampbell-introduction-by-hamidalgar.pdf
.
[a]
An example of cunning wordsmithing in superman scholarship is
the Balfour Declaration which gave real political rights to the Jews
while giving some abstract civil and religious rights to the
Palestinians. The actual result is quite visible today. The
underlying legalism which led to it is visible in the deconstruction
of its diabolical wordsmithing in: The Illusion of Power and the
Calculus of Palestinian Dispossession,
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/07/response-to-alan-hart-by-zahir-ebrahim.html
[b]
The clever wordsmithing of the EU Constitution which has
cunningly caveated the loftily worded public Rights to limit them in
practice by law, or by executive order, under the rubric of national
security and expediency, much like the United States Constitution and
its Bill of Rights have been trumped by the Patriot Acts for
instance, is examined in an analysis that I once found on the web but
don't have a citation for it at this time. Virtually every public
Right in the EU Constitution has the caveat that it can be “lawfully”
restricted! When the king makes the laws, whatever the king decides
is the law. The same with the Parliament which often enact and
implement laws handed them by forces unseen by the public mind. The
National Security State and those controlling it are one such unseen
force.
[c]
The clever wordsmithing of the American Constitution which
has cunningly subverted it in actual practice is examined in Cracks
in the Constitution
by Ferdinand Lundberg,
http://amazon.com/Cracks-Constitution-Ferdinand-Lundberg/dp/0818402792
[d]
The reality of “Democracy” as it actually played
out while being layered upon that brilliantly worded US Constitution
was also briefly analyzed by Carroll Quigley in THE MYTHOLOGY OF
AMERICAN DEMOCRACY, a presentation to the Industrial College of
the Armed Forces on August 17, 1972,
http://www.carrollquigley.net/lectures.htm
[e]
See more reality of “Democracy” in Unequal
Protection: The Rise of Corporate Domination and the Theft of Human
Rights By Thom Hartmann, Rodale Inc., 2002.
[f]
See more reality of “Democracy” in The United
States Isn't a Country — It's a Corporation! By Lisa
Guliani, February 2004, at
http://wariscrime.com/new/the-usa-isnt-a-country-its-a-corporation/
published Jan 15, 2009. Project Humanbeingsfirst's comment for this
article extending it with additional material is archived at:
https://sites.google.com/site/humanbeingsfirst/download-pdf/cacheof-wariscrime-the-usa-isnt-a-country-its-a-corporation-jan152009.pdf
Begin
Project Humanbeingsfirst's comment, January 16, 2009 at 21:13
'There
is a much longer history of coup d'état by central banksters
to which the Congressional ACT of 1871 appears to be another pivotal
link. After setting the UNITED STATES up as a ‘federal
corporation’ in 1871, a supreme court decision was orchestrated
in 1886 to give the status of ‘personhood’ to the entity
called ‘corporation’. Before 1886, “until the
bizarre Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Supreme Court
case in 1886 – only humans are entitled to human rights in
their community.” Thom Hartmann stated it this way, also in his
2002 article: “Americans Revolt in Pennsylvania – New
Battle Lines Are Drawn”,
http://commondreams.org/views02/1219-06.htm
Begin
excerpt from Thom Hartmann
The
implications of this are staggering. For example:
Before
1886, it was a felony in most states for corporations to give money
to politicians or otherwise try (through lobbying or advertising) to
influence elections. Such activity was called “bribery and
influencing,” and the reason it was banned was simple:
corporations can’t vote, so what are they doing in politics?
Their concern is making money, and they don’t need clean air to
breathe or fresh water to drink; leave them to making money and leave
the administration of the commons to We, The People.
Before
1886, it was a crime in most states for corporations to own others of
their own kind. The need to keep corporations from becoming so large
that they could usurp democracy was so clear to the Founders that
Jefferson and Madison proposed an 11th Amendment to the Constitution
that would have banned “monopolies in commerce,”
restricting each company to performing a single purpose, making it
responsible to its local community, and barring it from owning other
corporations. The amendment didn’t pass because everybody at
the time knew that the states already had such laws in place.
Before
1886, only humans had full First Amendment rights of free speech,
including the right to influence legislation and the right to lie
when not under oath. Now corporations have claimed that they have the
free speech right to influence public opinion and legislation through
deceit, and a case based on a multinational corporation asserting
this right is poised to go before the Supreme Court as you read these
words. That corporation reserves the right to fire and even prosecute
human employees who lie to it, however.
Before
1886, only humans had Fourth Amendment rights of privacy. Since then,
however, corporations have claimed that EPA and OSHA surprise
inspections are violations of their human right of privacy, while at
the same time asserting their right to perform surprise inspections
of their own employees’ bodily fluids, phone conversations, and
keystrokes.
Before
1886, only humans had Fifth Amendment rights against double jeopardy
and the right to refuse to speak if they’d committed a crime.
Since 1886, corporations have asserted these human rights for
themselves: the results range from today’s corporate scandals
to 60 years of silence about the deadliness of tobacco and asbestos.
Before
1886, and following the Civil War, only humans had Fourteenth
Amendment rights to protection from discrimination. Since then,
corporations have claimed this human right and used it to stop local
communities from passing laws to protect their small, local
businesses and keep out predatory retailers or large corporations
convicted of crimes elsewhere.
End
excerpt from Thom Hartmann
The
following Article-15 US Code is all revealing :
( From the US Code collection Definitions, http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00003002----000-.html )
( From the US Code collection Definitions, http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00003002----000-.html )
(15)
“United States” means—
(A)
a Federal corporation;
(B)
an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the
United States; or
(C)
an instrumentality of the United States.
This
is a set pattern, interestingly. In continuation of the scheme to
take over the financial control of the United States, the 1910
Federal Reserve ACT got enacted in 1913 to create our beloved Federal
Reserve System. It is as much federal, as federal express.'
End
Project Humanbeingsfirst's comment, January 16, 2009 at 21:13
[g]
Even the United Kingdom is not a country. It is also a
Corporation, controlled by another supra-national private
Corporation, the real financial capital of the world, the City of
London, or just “the City” for short. It is what H. G.
Wells was referring to in his rallying call: “And if we, the
virtuous democracies, are not fighting for these common human rights,
then what in the name of the nobility and gentry, the Crown and the
Established Church, the City, The Times and the Army and Navy
Club, are we common British peoples fighting for?”
[h]
See the meticulous research unveiled by John Harris of the UK
also being a Corporation, in the Lawful Rebellion Conference, January
24, 2009, titled: It's an illusion,
http://bbc5.tv/eyeplayer/articles/john-harris-its-illusion
.
These
examples in [a] to [h] empirically illustrate the vast distance
between pious language on lofty parchments and the actual reality of
their diabolical subversion by the ruling oligarchy. The pious
verbiage mainly serve the interest of perception management of the
public mind so that the history's actors can carry on
accomplishing their Übermensch agendas without
interference, often willingly acquiring the public's consent under
the right set of “doctrinal motivation, intellectual
commitment, and patriotic gratification” fed them by
experts. This is Orwellian Newspeak at its best. This
technique of mind manipulation and behavior control has advanced far
beyond Lord Macaulay's imperial plan of separating a people from
their civilizational heritage with the imposition of an alien culture
and foreign language so that the process of colonization of the
conquered people is not impeded. Newspeak is now so ubiquitous
that we are unconscious of its presence like the air we breathe, but
it cradles our thoughts, feelings, actions as well as inactions.
[7]
See The Final Waging Global War By Way of Deception Report,
DIGEST Financial and State Terrorism, November 2008 to May 2009,
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/05/digst-fin-and-state-terrorism-may2009.html
Source URL:
http://faith-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2014/03/waiting-for-allah-by-zahir-ebrahim.html
On Islam URL:
http://islam-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2015/03/waiting-for-allah-by-zahir-ebrahim.html
Print URL:
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/04/god-is-running-theworld-let-him-run-it.html
Source PDF:
http://sites.google.com/site/humanbeingsfirst/download-pdf/waiting-for-allah-by-zahir-ebrahim.pdf
First
written April 2009 | Revised Monday, March 9, 2015 to incorporate the
previously unpublished longer version written April 23, 2009 9195 |
References updated March 23, 2015 9025
Links
fixed, bookcover, subtitle and footnote [2a] added Tuesday, November 1, 2016
02:00 pm
9168
Waiting
for Allah By Zahir Ebrahim 22/22