Jewish State - Quid Pro Quo Of World War1

Oligarchic Primacy and Zionism Part-2
The Endgame Hegelian Dialectic
Independent forensic scrutiny of the international shenanigans surrounding World War I based on empirical evidence (as opposed to accepting established narratives written by the fiat of power) reveals the global conflagration to have been an altogether in-house exchange of favors. A quid pro quo among the oligarchic peers of the root secret society who have for a long time wanted to rule the world, as disclosed in Cecil Rhodes' Will. It was principally an exchange of favors which led to the infamous Balfour Declaration being issued by the British aristocracy in the name of the Jewish branch of the Oligarchy, the House of Rothschild, in return for the Jewish branch of the same Oligarchy orchestrating the entry of the United States into World War I on the side of beleaguered England to support the Anglo-Saxon branch of the Oligarchy, when topdog Germany up to that time had all but won the European war, without a single bullet being fired on German soil.
That power to bring America into the predominantly Christian killing Christian world war in Europe, while a Jewish dominated atheists killing Christians was being orchestrated in Russia in the name of the Communist revolution, was craftily pre-invested in the election of Woodrow Wilson who was the puppet president and errand boy for the bankster oligarchy. Wilson not only signed on the dotted line presented to him to create the Federal Reserve System to hock America to the international bankers in perpetuity and to secure that national debt by levying income tax upon the American public, but to also enter America into World War I despite Wilson's 1916 re-election campaign slogan of “he kept us out of the war”. To bring America into the European war to get rid of the then existent empires was a diabolically premeditated design. The lead investigator in 1953-54 for U.S. Congressman B. Carroll Reece's Special Committee on Tax Exempt Foundations (the Reece Committee), Norman Dodd, revealed in a private interview in 1988 the following bizarre dialectic inquiry:
'We are now at the year 1908, which was the year that the Carnegie Foundation began operations. In that year, the trustees, meeting for the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed throughout the balance of the year in a very learned fashion. The question is: “Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?” And they conclude that no more effective means than war to that end is known to humanity. So then, in 1909, they raised the second question and discussed it, namely: “How do we involve the United States in a war?”
Well, I doubt at that time if there was any subject more removed from the thinking of most of the people of this country than its involvement in a war. There were intermittent shows in the Balkans, but I doubt very much if many people even knew where the Balkans were. Then, finally, they answered that question as follows: “We must control the State Department.” That very naturally raises the question of how do we do that? And they answer it by saying: “We must take over and control the diplomatic machinery of this country.” And, finally, they resolve to aim at that as an objective.' (See Norman Dodd, The Monetary Conspiracy for World Government)
Whatever the truth of that motivational construct, the manufacturing and control of Woodrow Wilson's presidency is an empirical and historical fact to ultimately involve America into a world war, but only after the tall industrious nation had been brought to heel to the voice of the oligarchy with the founding of the private Federal Reserve Bank for the third time in its short history. This third time around it has endured for more than a hundred years without any significant challenge. All roads to effective challenge were calculatingly closed off. But before then, in the nineteenth century going back to the very moment of founding of the United States, a great deal of resistance was put in its path by the handful of independent US presidents like Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson. After 1913 however, the resistance of leading politicians and intellectuals was entirely obliterated by acquiring full control of both the domestic narrative, and the domestic and foreign policy apparatus. Today, the raison d'être for America's private central bank run secretly and independently by the same banking oligarchy with a nod to US Treasury, is not even talked about. The Anglo-Saxon Oligarchy on both sides of the Atlantic ocean is driving for home run on the hard road to world order in our very generation.
The control of Woodrow Wilson's presidency and its brazen justification was depicted in a fictionalized format by the actual handler who managed Woodrow Wilson as the front-man for the banking oligarchy, Col. Edward Mandell House, titled “Philip Dru: Administrator, A Story of Tomorrow 1920-1935”. This fictional narrative, like Machiavelli's The Prince, and the anonymous Protocols of the Elders of Zion, hides some deep political truths as political treatise which have been enacted, and are being enacted, repeatedly on world stage. This is not just empirical history, but also “contemporary history” in the making, none of which is evidently taught in the academe or exposed by professional historians and intellectuals regurgitating controlled narratives and being rewarded for their silence on truth. But it is an empirical history which is also staring any thoughtful analyst in the face daring enough to want to comprehend all the players, their core motivations, and the forces they bring to bear which construct the pretexts and “happenstances” from behind the scenes that move international affairs to war and peace, hegemony and surrender, all under the facade of elected representatives making reactionary decisions to happenstances in the name of national interest and world peace.
Now the secret motivations behind the scenes of the British Empire gratuitously granting the Balfour Declaration, land to the Jews on another's soil, begins to make any sense – the quid pro quo for bringing the United States into World War I. The fact that the Balfour Declaration is directly addressed to Lord Rothschild, is prima facie and open evidence of the hand of Jewry behind the quid pro quo. No official history book of Europe and the United States taught to generations of their most precious students, ever exposes this unhidden reality which is even brazenly open for all to see the moment one steps out of narrative control.
Caption The Balfour Declaration November 2nd 1917
Caption The Balfour Declaration November 2nd 1917
Dear Lord Rothschild, 'His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavor to facilitate the achievement of this object. it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.'
Most “learned” gentry in the world living off of the largesse of empire and toeing the standard narrative, tend to remain unaware of, or pretend to the non-existence of, these very real behind the scenes oligarchic forces who manipulate national destinies towards international one-World Order. These forces cunningly enact legalisms during their own manufactured “revolutionary times”, which subsequently confer international legitimacy to even the most abhorrent and distorted outcomes in international affairs and on the grand chessboard. Both the World Wars of the twentieth century are empirical evidence of this tortuous fact. It led to the premeditated creation of the Jewish State in Palestine: “In Basle I founded the Jewish state . . . Maybe in five years, certainly in fifty, everyone will realize it.”
Theodor Herzl hath proclaimed so in 1896-97 at the unveiling of his Der Judenstat before the Jewish financial oligarchy in the banking capital of Europe, where they subsequently also headquartered their BIS (Bank for International Settlements, in the aftermath of World War I. BIS was created for extracting war reparations from Germany back to the Allies while England, who previously had shown no love lost for the rank and file of Jewry, was pledging them land grants in Palestine in gratitude. Which is how England came into the possession of Palestine at the Treaty of Versailles in the first place, as war booty from the dismembered Ottoman empire, to be in the eventual position to graft it to the Jews under the pretext of the next “revolutionary times”. It was already being churned in the cauldron of Europe by the pound of flesh being forcibly extracted from the defeated Germany by the Jews.
Without these “revolutionary times” of the two World Wars piggy-backing upon each other, and without their adept harvesting by the Jewish oligarchy and its propaganda machinery churning the HolocaustTM narrative, this abhorrence of the creation of the Jewish state in Palestine would simply not have been possible: “What is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times; and if at this time the opportunity is missed and what is possible at such great hours is not carried out – a whole world is lost.” David Ben-Gurion called that modus operandi for what it is far more honestly than most modern Jewish intellectuals who berate the “excesses” of the Jewish state in sympathy with the Palestinians.
While all this historical analysis should be self-evident to at least the “learned” in the West, if not to its rank and file, it is unfortunately not. Apart from narrow self-interests including the demands of soaring careers making cowards of even the most valiant who often find it easier to be “innocent of knowledge” when on sacred grounds, it is the great success of perception management that has come to rival the simile of Plato's cave. The Hegelian Dialectic mechanisms employed for the diabolical theft of Palestine to synthesize the Jewish state from the ashes of two World Wars under the charter of international legitimacy, cannot be understood, let alone undone, without first acquiring that forensic perspective of the primacy of secretive cabals who rule by the fiat of absolute power on the backs of elected representatives of powerful nations playing “democracy” and “international relations” game before the public. The politicians, statesmen, and state institutions remain powerless before them when their wills do not coincide, as was demonstrated to the world in the 2008 banksters' bailout bill. Instead of unraveling the source of all that hidden power exercised upon Western democracies against the will of its people, they now even confer advanced academic degrees from prestigious universities in these subjects carefully omitting any reference to oligarchic powers behind the scene orchestrating global events through control of the national security state and its apparatuses, and manufacturing the policies to handle those events in their privately funded think-tanks and foundations in a self-supporting positive feedback loop. The study of international relations today, as in yesteryear, is exclusively relegated to the negotiation of state power projection by the political representatives of the states.
Click to Download PDF: The Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity  By Zahir Ebrahim | Project Revised and Expanded 9th Edition, September 11, 2015
The fact that politicians and statesmen remain the errand boys of the brotherhood of death driving global events for world government behind all these puppet shows of “international relations”, has been carefully omitted from the script. The success of this narrative control can be judged by the bizarre absence of this forensic perspective among even Palestine's most ardent exponents in the West, both Palestinian and the White man championing their cause. Ask even educated Palestinians in Diaspora today often sporting degrees in political science and history, to whom the Balfour Declaration is addressed, and they give you a blank stare, followed by “it is addressed to someone?”
Click to Download PDF: Undoing The Theft Of Palestine - From Genocide to Genesis in Zero Compromise By Zahir Ebrahim | Project
The omission of this simple fact from public discourse that both Arthur James Balfour and Lord Rothschild were part of the same secret cabal who merely exchanged favors at the expense of the “lesser people's” blood, and the careful occulting of the role of the House of Rothschild and their secretive financial cabal before whose invisible powers all the Western capitals bow, creates a bizarre comedy of errors in which none see the elephant in the bedroom that has created the impenetrable “iron wall” around their monster planted in the Muslim midst in the Middle East. If the criminal tragedy of the theft of Palestine wasn't so filled with the blood and dispossession of its innocent victims who have been taken hostage for generations, it could easily be called the greatest comedy of errors of modern times.

First Published in the Modernity Reader 2015, The Poor-Man's Guide To Modernity, September 2015 | Last updated Sunday, September 20, 2015 02:00 am 2171

Oligarchic Primacy and Zionism Part-2: Jewish State - Quid Pro Quo Of World War I