Response
to Joel Skousen’s critique of World Bank whistleblower Karen
Hudes
Zahir
Ebrahim | Project
Humanbeingsfirst.org
May
21, 2015 | Karen
Hudes' Letter July 22, 2016
| Zahir's
Response July 22, 2016
| Zahir
is not persuaded August 01, 2016
In
response to FauxCapitalist's
Joel Skousen’s critique of World Bank whistleblower Karen
Hudes,
dated April 5, 2014, Project Humanbeingsfirst.org submitted the
following comment
on May 21, 2015
Hello.
Any
time I hear the word "whistleblower" my mind says it's a
tune played by the Mighty Wurlitzer (of which I have written about
here: http://tinyurl.com/MightyWurlitzer
).
Why
do I think so? Firstly, because the hard reality of statecraft is not
of idiocy of the Übermensch, but of brilliant political
science and state-secret silence: those who know do not speak;
those who speak do not know; those who know and speak always sleep
with the fishes. For a State, especially when it is a superpower
state, and more especially when it is run as an oligarchy from behind
the scene, as was noted by its long dead director of
counter-intelligence, James Jesus Angleton, "Deception
is a state of mind and the mind of the State."
Therefore,
whistleblowing, unless PROVED otherwise, is only a tune played by the
Mighty Wurlitzer. The burden of proof is with the whistleblower. The
burden of skepticism is upon everyone else. Here I carry my share of
that burden. And evidently, Mr. Joel Skousen has done the same. As
has evidently the author of fauxcapitalism, Mr. Jason Erb (if that is
a real name and not another nom de plume). Based on my quick perusal
of the comments, some of the commenters are also not remiss in their
due diligence.
Since
the proof of the pudding is in its eating, as the saying goes, I
subsequently look for a few things before I can be convinced of
anything or anyone in this realm of statecraft, especially when one
has no first hand domain or fact knowledge of what is being revealed.
1)
sleeps with the fishes?
2)
puts the toad in the punch bowl, or poisons her own well?
3)
keeps the core axioms and presuppositions of the big lies, or of
power, intact?
4)
reveals something that is really new, or is really a state secret of
any significant value, or is still current in its import and not
already a fait accompli, and still does not sleep with the fishes,
and does not poison her own well, and does not retain the core
presuppositions as axioms?
In
this case of Ms. Karen Hudes, she immediately struck me as a mind
control candidate sent to create confusion among the idiotic dissent
cadre as either a useful idiot, or Manchurian candidate
who is an outright agent of deception. Which one of the two is hard
to tell. But it also does not matter as the result is the same
whether she is a witting agent or an unwitting useful idiot.
She
is deception personified because of items 1) and 2) on the one hand,
and item 4) on the other. She does not sleep with the fishes, she
poisons her own well with outlandish statements, and she revealed
nothing really shocking or of great significance. The 180 billion
dollars in bond issue not being properly accounted in their books,
true or not, pales in comparison to the tag-team raping of developing
nations by the WB-IMF which has put these nations of the world in
some 57 trillion dollars in debt. That number comes from John Perkins
in A Game as old as Empire, pg. xx. And whether that number of 57
trillion is itself correct, the empirical fact that all developing
nations are beholden to the WB-IMF in enormous debt burden which
takes away from their domestic social spending creating enormous
deprivation even when these nations have natural riches under their
soil which is subsequently privatized in lieu of more loans for
debt-servicing, is itself an empirical truth visible for all to see.
The 180 billion issue raised is noise, a low order bit, and quite
insignificant in the scheme of things. The world already understands
how Bretton Woods has screwed the developing nations with unpayable
debt just like some in the developed nations have now come to
understand how private central banks coining their money as public
debt has screwed them under unpayable national debt in the trillions.
To use a metaphor, Ms. Karen Hudes has come to town shouting the
Russians are coming the Russians are coming when all the barbers
in town already know it. The fact that she is still living, and may
she live long and prosper, and conveniently discredited her own self
with her outlandish
tales of pointy headed species wearing the Jesuit uniform
running the world, is a text book template that is continually
repeated.
Please
permit me to reproduce below a letter I wrote to Mr. David Icke some
years ago and it exactly captures this template of Ms. Karen Hudes.
This is why, the skepticism betrayed by Mr. Joel Skousen is more than
justified. And the most important point raised by Mr. Skousen is that
there is no way Ms. Karen Hudes can know first hand many of the
things she asserts, as these are above her pay grade. The fact that
Ms. Karen Hudes provides no documentary evidence which can be
examined, makes her akin to the tens of so called "whistleblowers"
that Project Camelot loves to interview for which its interviewer Ms.
Kerry Cassidy has acquired almost a fanatic following of useful
idiots ( explained in my detailed report on the outlandish UFO crap:
http://tinyurl.com/Alien-UFO-Agenda
; and in my letter to Ms. Kerry Cassidy
http://tinyurl.com/agents-of-deception
). There is a singular purpose to all this. It was captured by Cass
Sunstein in his academic paper titled Conspiracy Theories in the
banal terms: "introducing beneficial cognitive diversity".
Here
is my polite letter to Mr. David Icke - do examine the template of
poisoning the well for yourself. I hope you will permit it to be
reproduced here in full as it entirely addresses Karen Hudes
BEGIN
LETTER and its Preamble
Well
done David Icke - but why put the toad in the punch bowl?
Zahir
Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
Friday,
January 21, 2011
Preamble
The
only person in the West today, it seems to me, who dares to go to the
“WHY” of Palestine's plight accurately, and connects it
properly to the agenda for world government, laying them both
correctly at the doorstep of the bankster oligarchy controlling the
world's governments from behind the scene, specifically the House of
Rothschild, is this British fellow David Icke.
And
this gentleman too makes sure, in the same breadth, that he is not
taken too seriously, by also uttering some outlandish and
entertaining sci-fi on the Annunaki, global consciousness, vibrating
frequencies, the moon matrix, etc., as the higher level “political
truths” really running the world, of which the earthly bankster
oligarchy, variously labeled as the lizard-shape-shifting bloodlines
and such, themselves are just the errand boys and thus no need to
focus on them!
Instead,
let's focus on the aliens and their agenda for the human race....
Even
Wikileaks has begun to lend credibility to the concept of
extra-terrestrials poobah by making references to the UFO: “Wikileaks
and the UFO: Response to Gordon Duff”.
But
if one can shrewdly separate the chaff from the wheat, especially in
David Icke's pitch, by acutely understanding that:
1)
Machiavellian political science rather than sci-fi is running the
world ;
2)
myths and mantras are necessary instruments of imperial mobilization
;
3)
coercing the public into accepting world government by hook or by
crook for which, the new super Ali Baba++ global threat from
outerspace may be the next hegelian mind-fck on the horizon, just
like the mighty Ali Baba from the caves of Afghanistan seeded the
first baby-step towards it ;
4)
the statecraft in which “deception is a state of mind and the
mind of state” must rely as much on social engineering as on
guns and butter ;
5)
a forensic detective will not throw the baby out with the bath water,
and will instead extract the toad and all its residue from the punch
bowl – sort of like signal processing to extract the signal
from the surrounding noise ;
then,
David Icke, like iconoclast Eustace Mullins before him, has
demonstrated the singular Western guts to call a spade a spade!
David
Icke uttered more useful content in his singular speech of 1996 which
prompted my following letter to him, submitted to his website and
acknowledged back to me in receipt, than anything ever written about
on contemporary matters by any insiders and whistleblowers, former
and current, in the United States of America. Judge for yourself.
Zahir
Ebrahim's Letter to David Icke
From:
David Icke Website seantut @ yahoo.com
Date:
Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:12 PM
Subject:
Copy of: Well done David Icke - but why put the toad in the punch
bowl?
To:
humanbeingsfirst@gmail.com
Copy
of: This is an enquiry e-mail via davidicke.com from: Project
Humanbeingsfirst.org
Thanks
David Icke for this video:
The
Turning of the Tide
What
David Icke said in 1996 - recognise the world he was describing then?
How
is it that you are still living – and may you live long and
prosper – if you have been exposing this secret for 15 years,
what has enabled you to elude “sleep with the fishes”?
Interestingly,
Carroll Quigley in 1966 revealed some of it, but he deliberately
downplayed the role of Rothschilds.
You
seem to be yelling that name out very loud lately.
The
fact that Quigley downplayed it I attribute to the quid pro quo of
being able to publish his ode to the oligarchy. Or, it was a message
to be only shared with the elite, not meant for us, and they know
what's being omitted already and why, so that the rest of the
information can be disseminated as steganography!
What
is the quid pro quo for you?
How
are you able to take that name, narrate of their power, etc.?
Not
to be offensive, but I analyze the role of the Rothschilds myself,
0.02 cents only of course, and being an unknown I suspect is my quid
pro quo.
But
what is yours David Icke? The world knows your name!
Is
it that you dilute your stellar analyses, with some other stuff which
is at times outlandishly bizarre, like blood-drinking lizards,
and
in this video the speculative latter half which enables the
incredibly accurate first half to be dismissed – so that your
outlandish positions provide the “toad in a punch-bowl”
effect, enabling throwing the baby out with the bath water pretext if
you got too much hearing, too much believability, too much accuracy?
Is
that your quid pro quo?
Here
is the link to my essay on the Rothschilds, actually proving their
power based on evidence – and I have no outlandish material in
it:
I
hope David Icke you can stay on topic in your talks – because
your uncanny insights of 1996 are actually coming true today as we
speak.
I
wish more people had paid attention at that time, built movements to
counter all this since then – and perhaps the public might have
paid more attention had you not been easily dismissed by your
detractors based on the outlandish!
I
wish you all the best Mr. Icke, and I hope more people will listen to
your first half of the talk (and skip the portions they might find
outlandish in the latter half if they are rubbed the wrong way by
it). As for myself, I even see food for thought for me to ponder upon
in your latter half as well!!
Thank
you,
Zahir
Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
California,
United States
Source
URL:
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/01/david-icke-why-toad-in-punch-bowl.html
End
Letter
---
### ---
I
hope Mr. Joel Skousen will see this comment as well. Kudos to him for
his skepticism --- I have no idea who he is, never heard of him
before this article.
I
hope Ms. Karen Hudes also see this critique. How would she respond?
Useful idiots and fabricated dissent are part and parcel of
engineering consent in society. Among the mainstream it is
through "United we stand". Among the skeptics of
that, it is with "beneficial cognitive diversity".
My
email is humanbeingsfirst@gmail.com in case Ms. Karen Hudes wishes to
respond.
And
good job on this website fauxcapitalist.com
Thank
you.
Zahir
Ebrahim
Project
Humanbeingsfirst.org
California
Comment
submitted May 21, 2015 1:30 pm for article:
http://fauxcapitalist.com/2014/04/05/joel-skousens-critique-of-world-bank-whistleblower-karen-hudes/
From:
Karen Hudes [ h.k3511 @ gmail.com ]
To:
humanbeingsfirst @ gmail.com
Date:
Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:25 AM
I
just reread the comment you posted here:
https://fauxcapitalist.com/2014/04/05/joel-skousens-critique-of-world-bank-whistleblower-karen-hudes/
I
have stopped talking about homo capensis years ago, precisely because
I had no proof and also after learning that Dr. Spencer (who told me
about that theory) was working with Andre Lambremont Weber. I get
alot of information from people who email me, and have improved my
vetting capabilities after that experience. In the year since
your comment, the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF have
appointed me as Overseer Mandate Trustee of the Global Debt Facility,
and in that capacity, and on their behalf, I have prevented the
Network of Global Corporate Control identified by Vitali,
Glattfelder, and Battiston of ETH Zurich
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1107/1107.5728v2.pdf
from stealing the world's assets:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter5.4.16.pdf
Best,
Karen
I
must either be really really dunce or missing something really really
profound here --- The Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF,
among the most pernicious and insidious legal instruments of usurping
national sovereignty of developing nations though their
lending-debt-restructuring-public-taxation-traps that force debtor
nations to sell off their national assets and their public commons
for a song under the neoliberal globalization one-world agenda of the
financial oligarchy designed to legally steal the world's assets and
put these under interlocking networks of corporate board ownerships
and board controls, appoints Karen Hudes to oversee that the Network
of Global Corporate Control does not steal the world's remaining
assets?
Is
this a joke? Or is she a fool? Or just takes me to be a fool? I am
saddened for this kindly Ms. Karen Hudes, who is still nice enough to
write back even if a year later despite my scathing review of her
“whistleblowing” --- A real useful idiot of the
oligarchy! A useful idiot is one, as the name implies, who
becomes a tool in the hands of Machiavelli due to a number of human
failings, the least of which is gullibility. Many honest,
well-intentioned and motivated people, often the “revolutionaries”
and the “malcontents”, not to forget the “activists”
and the “do-gooders”, get easily harnessed for their
respective causes in service of empire based on their implanted
beliefs and the intensity with which they believe them.
While
it is heartening to see Ms. Karen Hudes's statement that she has
stopped talking about her belief in pointy headed species wearing the
Jesuit uniform controlling the world, this “whistleblower”
still believes the WB-IMF are among the sacred institutions of the
sole superpower, the noble police-man of the world as it likes to see
itself, trying to prevent the theft of the world's assets --- while
those who control the superpower acquire it all under one scam or
another using the superpower as their hammer unto the
anvil. In the primacy landscape
of international relations as we see it unfold today, the same as in
yesteryear, and since time immemorial, Goethe's acuity of over two
centuries ago still remains unsurpassed.
None
of this is particularly a state-secret. One wonders why Ms. Karen
Hudes as a preeminent legal mind appointed by the twin boards to
oversee the prevention of theft of nations, remains unaware of their
own real role in furthering the primacy of the Western financial
elite fronted by the sole superpower, to plunder, rape and harvest
the wealth of resources-rich poorer nations of the world in the guise
of developmental assistance. Even former employees and consultants of
these predatory lending bodies openly speak to their adverse effects
upon the developing world after retiring from their posts. The most
recent among them is Peter
Koenig,
a former WB economist, who, like his predecessor WB consultant John
Perkins
of the Economic Hitman fame and fortunes, stated in an interview
(July 13, 2016) while commenting on the Economy of
Resistance of Iran eventually
making it impervious to American sanctions: “that’s
how the west, Europe in particular, has enslaved, plundered and raped
Asia, Africa and Latin America for centuries. So, what the World Bank
does today is but a modern continuation of colonialism disguised as
development assistance.”
One
not completely lost in the woods like Alice in wonderland
is perhaps given to ponder why Ms. Karen Hudes so carelessly
substituted one false belief for another in the service of her
masters!
From:
Karen Hudes [ h.k3511 @ gmail.com ]
To:
humanbeingsfirst @ gmail.com
Date:
Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:00 AM
You
are confusing the Board of Governors that is responsible for the
world's assets and the state-captured secretariat of the World Bank.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/general+assembly3.pdf
Zahir
is not persuaded, August 01 2016
The
document you cite in your reply is just WWF wrestling, a public
relations scam. At best, controlled opposition, aka manufactured
friendly opposition that fulminates with bold rhetoric in order to
forestall any real opposition from among the plundered nations of the
world. At worst, to indirectly push the oligarchy's agenda to return
the international monetary system to some sort of Gold
standard, as was even openly advocated by the head
of the World Bank in 2010 before the G20 summit. The
text of the letter is itself a public relations con game retaining
all the presuppositions behind the creation of these Bretton Woods
institutions as the monetary muscle of empire to make preeminent its
own currency for international trade and to control the lesser
developed nations of the world, backed by its vast
military-industrial complex under the new pax Americana, exercised
through the newly formed United Nations to give legal legitimacy to
American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives now thinly
disguised as international relations. In a nutshell, to own the world
in the guise of protecting it – be it from terror, financial
collapse, or other natural and unnatural, real and imagined
catastrophes. Are you even aware of who donated the precious parcel
of land in Manhattan for the UN building to move the UN location
closer to the center of power of what some call the Eastern
Establishment? The empire and its financial oligarchy drive on
the same Hard
road to world order. Under that reality,
what value whatsoever is your cited letter written to the UN? Your
being employed by the WB-IMF Board as a feel-good useful idiot in
the dissent role, I am sorry to say, makes little difference to how
the WB-IMF system operates in the greater scheme of empire as the
tag-team duo that pillages and plunders the nations of the world
under the auspices of the United Nations' legal framework of
international treaties and the like.
What
gives your play completely away Karen, is this simple fact: the
same pay-masters! You ostensibly draw your paycheck, as do
the Boards, as do the heads of these international institutions and
their employees that you refer to as “the state-captured
secretariat of the World Bank”, from the same treasury of the
empire! Despite their being setup as “independent”
international institutions with their own diplomatic passports and
international budgets to which the member states presumably pay their
dues (at the UN, except of course the United States, it does not have
to pay as it makes all the rest pay). Dissent has a fundamental role
to play in the expeditious running of Pax Americana on the hard road
to world order. It has a coherent
theory of statecraft, and its many players.
I
remain un persuaded by the document link you sent me. But thank you
for writing Karen.
More
important, thank you for caring. I believe you are being taken for a
ride by the magic of Machiavellian statecraft. I hasten to presume
that you write in utmost sincerity, or else an important person such
as yourself, employed at the highest echelons of financial power,
would not have even bothered to reply twice to some unknown fellow in
cyberspace. But dig deeper, away from the standard presuppositions
and the standard narratives of both engineered consent and engineered
dissent that diabolically underlie today's WWF theatrics and Hegelian
Dialectics, if you care to interdict empire's drive to a dystopic
master-slave one-world. You serve your paymasters and that's just a
cold fact. How you serve them perhaps you do not see through their
fog of deceit. You have shown yourself publicly to be most gullible
previously, and you have courageously also admitted to that fact in
your letter, indicating that you have now improved your vetting
capabilities. Of course we must all continually strive for that,
especially in the age of universal deceit that we live under. Don't
fool others and don't be fooled by others is a well-worn cliché
in virtually every language. But don't fool oneself surely trumps it
in every language.
-
### -
Source
URL:
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2015/05/honing-bs-detector-on-karen-hudes.html
First
published as comment May 21, 2015 | Last updated Tuesday, August 2, 2016
3717
Honing the BS detector on Karen
Hudes By Zahir Ebrahim 12/12
