Honing the BS detector on Karen Hudes

Response to Joel Skousen’s critique of World Bank whistleblower Karen Hudes
In response to FauxCapitalist's Joel Skousen’s critique of World Bank whistleblower Karen Hudes, dated April 5, 2014, Project Humanbeingsfirst.org submitted the following comment on May 21, 2015
Any time I hear the word "whistleblower" my mind says it's a tune played by the Mighty Wurlitzer (of which I have written about here: http://tinyurl.com/MightyWurlitzer ).
Why do I think so? Firstly, because the hard reality of statecraft is not of idiocy of the Übermensch, but of brilliant political science and state-secret silence: those who know do not speak; those who speak do not know; those who know and speak always sleep with the fishes. For a State, especially when it is a superpower state, and more especially when it is run as an oligarchy from behind the scene, as was noted by its long dead director of counter-intelligence, James Jesus Angleton, "Deception is a state of mind and the mind of the State."
Therefore, whistleblowing, unless PROVED otherwise, is only a tune played by the Mighty Wurlitzer. The burden of proof is with the whistleblower. The burden of skepticism is upon everyone else. Here I carry my share of that burden. And evidently, Mr. Joel Skousen has done the same. As has evidently the author of fauxcapitalism, Mr. Jason Erb (if that is a real name and not another nom de plume). Based on my quick perusal of the comments, some of the commenters are also not remiss in their due diligence.
Since the proof of the pudding is in its eating, as the saying goes, I subsequently look for a few things before I can be convinced of anything or anyone in this realm of statecraft, especially when one has no first hand domain or fact knowledge of what is being revealed.
1) sleeps with the fishes?
2) puts the toad in the punch bowl, or poisons her own well?
3) keeps the core axioms and presuppositions of the big lies, or of power, intact?
4) reveals something that is really new, or is really a state secret of any significant value, or is still current in its import and not already a fait accompli, and still does not sleep with the fishes, and does not poison her own well, and does not retain the core presuppositions as axioms?
In this case of Ms. Karen Hudes, she immediately struck me as a mind control candidate sent to create confusion among the idiotic dissent cadre as either a useful idiot, or Manchurian candidate who is an outright agent of deception. Which one of the two is hard to tell. But it also does not matter as the result is the same whether she is a witting agent or an unwitting useful idiot.
She is deception personified because of items 1) and 2) on the one hand, and item 4) on the other. She does not sleep with the fishes, she poisons her own well with outlandish statements, and she revealed nothing really shocking or of great significance. The 180 billion dollars in bond issue not being properly accounted in their books, true or not, pales in comparison to the tag-team raping of developing nations by the WB-IMF which has put these nations of the world in some 57 trillion dollars in debt. That number comes from John Perkins in A Game as old as Empire, pg. xx. And whether that number of 57 trillion is itself correct, the empirical fact that all developing nations are beholden to the WB-IMF in enormous debt burden which takes away from their domestic social spending creating enormous deprivation even when these nations have natural riches under their soil which is subsequently privatized in lieu of more loans for debt-servicing, is itself an empirical truth visible for all to see. The 180 billion issue raised is noise, a low order bit, and quite insignificant in the scheme of things. The world already understands how Bretton Woods has screwed the developing nations with unpayable debt just like some in the developed nations have now come to understand how private central banks coining their money as public debt has screwed them under unpayable national debt in the trillions. To use a metaphor, Ms. Karen Hudes has come to town shouting the Russians are coming the Russians are coming when all the barbers in town already know it. The fact that she is still living, and may she live long and prosper, and conveniently discredited her own self with her outlandish tales of pointy headed species wearing the Jesuit uniform running the world, is a text book template that is continually repeated.
Please permit me to reproduce below a letter I wrote to Mr. David Icke some years ago and it exactly captures this template of Ms. Karen Hudes. This is why, the skepticism betrayed by Mr. Joel Skousen is more than justified. And the most important point raised by Mr. Skousen is that there is no way Ms. Karen Hudes can know first hand many of the things she asserts, as these are above her pay grade. The fact that Ms. Karen Hudes provides no documentary evidence which can be examined, makes her akin to the tens of so called "whistleblowers" that Project Camelot loves to interview for which its interviewer Ms. Kerry Cassidy has acquired almost a fanatic following of useful idiots ( explained in my detailed report on the outlandish UFO crap: http://tinyurl.com/Alien-UFO-Agenda ; and in my letter to Ms. Kerry Cassidy http://tinyurl.com/agents-of-deception ). There is a singular purpose to all this. It was captured by Cass Sunstein in his academic paper titled Conspiracy Theories in the banal terms: "introducing beneficial cognitive diversity".
Here is my polite letter to Mr. David Icke - do examine the template of poisoning the well for yourself. I hope you will permit it to be reproduced here in full as it entirely addresses Karen Hudes

BEGIN LETTER and its Preamble
Well done David Icke - but why put the toad in the punch bowl?
Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
Friday, January 21, 2011
The only person in the West today, it seems to me, who dares to go to the “WHY” of Palestine's plight accurately, and connects it properly to the agenda for world government, laying them both correctly at the doorstep of the bankster oligarchy controlling the world's governments from behind the scene, specifically the House of Rothschild, is this British fellow David Icke.
And this gentleman too makes sure, in the same breadth, that he is not taken too seriously, by also uttering some outlandish and entertaining sci-fi on the Annunaki, global consciousness, vibrating frequencies, the moon matrix, etc., as the higher level “political truths” really running the world, of which the earthly bankster oligarchy, variously labeled as the lizard-shape-shifting bloodlines and such, themselves are just the errand boys and thus no need to focus on them!
Instead, let's focus on the aliens and their agenda for the human race....
Even Wikileaks has begun to lend credibility to the concept of extra-terrestrials poobah by making references to the UFO: “Wikileaks and the UFO: Response to Gordon Duff”.
But if one can shrewdly separate the chaff from the wheat, especially in David Icke's pitch, by acutely understanding that:
1) Machiavellian political science rather than sci-fi is running the world ;
2) myths and mantras are necessary instruments of imperial mobilization ;
3) coercing the public into accepting world government by hook or by crook for which, the new super Ali Baba++ global threat from outerspace may be the next hegelian mind-fck on the horizon, just like the mighty Ali Baba from the caves of Afghanistan seeded the first baby-step towards it ;
4) the statecraft in which “deception is a state of mind and the mind of state” must rely as much on social engineering as on guns and butter ;
5) a forensic detective will not throw the baby out with the bath water, and will instead extract the toad and all its residue from the punch bowl – sort of like signal processing to extract the signal from the surrounding noise ;
then, David Icke, like iconoclast Eustace Mullins before him, has demonstrated the singular Western guts to call a spade a spade!
David Icke uttered more useful content in his singular speech of 1996 which prompted my following letter to him, submitted to his website and acknowledged back to me in receipt, than anything ever written about on contemporary matters by any insiders and whistleblowers, former and current, in the United States of America. Judge for yourself.

Zahir Ebrahim's Letter to David Icke
From: David Icke Website seantut @ yahoo.com
Date: Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:12 PM
Subject: Copy of: Well done David Icke - but why put the toad in the punch bowl?
To: humanbeingsfirst@gmail.com
Copy of: This is an enquiry e-mail via davidicke.com from: Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
Thanks David Icke for this video:
The Turning of the Tide
What David Icke said in 1996 - recognise the world he was describing then?
How is it that you are still living – and may you live long and prosper – if you have been exposing this secret for 15 years, what has enabled you to elude “sleep with the fishes”?
Interestingly, Carroll Quigley in 1966 revealed some of it, but he deliberately downplayed the role of Rothschilds.
You seem to be yelling that name out very loud lately.
The fact that Quigley downplayed it I attribute to the quid pro quo of being able to publish his ode to the oligarchy. Or, it was a message to be only shared with the elite, not meant for us, and they know what's being omitted already and why, so that the rest of the information can be disseminated as steganography!
What is the quid pro quo for you?
How are you able to take that name, narrate of their power, etc.?
Not to be offensive, but I analyze the role of the Rothschilds myself, 0.02 cents only of course, and being an unknown I suspect is my quid pro quo.
But what is yours David Icke? The world knows your name!
Is it that you dilute your stellar analyses, with some other stuff which is at times outlandishly bizarre, like blood-drinking lizards,
and in this video the speculative latter half which enables the incredibly accurate first half to be dismissed – so that your outlandish positions provide the “toad in a punch-bowl” effect, enabling throwing the baby out with the bath water pretext if you got too much hearing, too much believability, too much accuracy?
Is that your quid pro quo?
Here is the link to my essay on the Rothschilds, actually proving their power based on evidence – and I have no outlandish material in it:
I hope David Icke you can stay on topic in your talks – because your uncanny insights of 1996 are actually coming true today as we speak.
I wish more people had paid attention at that time, built movements to counter all this since then – and perhaps the public might have paid more attention had you not been easily dismissed by your detractors based on the outlandish!
I wish you all the best Mr. Icke, and I hope more people will listen to your first half of the talk (and skip the portions they might find outlandish in the latter half if they are rubbed the wrong way by it). As for myself, I even see food for thought for me to ponder upon in your latter half as well!!
Thank you,
Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
California, United States
End Letter

--- ### ---

I hope Mr. Joel Skousen will see this comment as well. Kudos to him for his skepticism --- I have no idea who he is, never heard of him before this article.
I hope Ms. Karen Hudes also see this critique. How would she respond? Useful idiots and fabricated dissent are part and parcel of engineering consent in society. Among the mainstream it is through "United we stand". Among the skeptics of that, it is with "beneficial cognitive diversity".
My email is humanbeingsfirst@gmail.com in case Ms. Karen Hudes wishes to respond.
And good job on this website fauxcapitalist.com
Thank you.
Zahir Ebrahim
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Karen Hudes wrote back to Project Humanbeingsfirst.org on Friday, July 22, 2016
From: Karen Hudes [ h.k3511 @ gmail.com ]
To: humanbeingsfirst @ gmail.com
Date: Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:25 AM
I have stopped talking about homo capensis years ago, precisely because I had no proof and also after learning that Dr. Spencer (who told me about that theory) was working with Andre Lambremont Weber. I get alot of information from people who email me, and have improved my vetting capabilities after that experience. In the year since your comment, the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF have appointed me as Overseer Mandate Trustee of the Global Debt Facility, and in that capacity, and on their behalf, I have prevented the Network of Global Corporate Control identified by Vitali, Glattfelder, and Battiston of ETH Zurich http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1107/1107.5728v2.pdf from stealing the world's assets: https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter5.4.16.pdf

Zahir's Response, July 22, 2016:
I must either be really really dunce or missing something really really profound here --- The Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF, among the most pernicious and insidious legal instruments of usurping national sovereignty of developing nations though their lending-debt-restructuring-public-taxation-traps that force debtor nations to sell off their national assets and their public commons for a song under the neoliberal globalization one-world agenda of the financial oligarchy designed to legally steal the world's assets and put these under interlocking networks of corporate board ownerships and board controls, appoints Karen Hudes to oversee that the Network of Global Corporate Control does not steal the world's remaining assets?
Is this a joke? Or is she a fool? Or just takes me to be a fool? I am saddened for this kindly Ms. Karen Hudes, who is still nice enough to write back even if a year later despite my scathing review of her “whistleblowing” --- A real useful idiot of the oligarchy! A useful idiot is one, as the name implies, who becomes a tool in the hands of Machiavelli due to a number of human failings, the least of which is gullibility. Many honest, well-intentioned and motivated people, often the “revolutionaries” and the “malcontents”, not to forget the “activists” and the “do-gooders”, get easily harnessed for their respective causes in service of empire based on their implanted beliefs and the intensity with which they believe them.
While it is heartening to see Ms. Karen Hudes's statement that she has stopped talking about her belief in pointy headed species wearing the Jesuit uniform controlling the world, this “whistleblower” still believes the WB-IMF are among the sacred institutions of the sole superpower, the noble police-man of the world as it likes to see itself, trying to prevent the theft of the world's assets --- while those who control the superpower acquire it all under one scam or another using the superpower as their hammer unto the anvil. In the primacy landscape of international relations as we see it unfold today, the same as in yesteryear, and since time immemorial, Goethe's acuity of over two centuries ago still remains unsurpassed.
None of this is particularly a state-secret. One wonders why Ms. Karen Hudes as a preeminent legal mind appointed by the twin boards to oversee the prevention of theft of nations, remains unaware of their own real role in furthering the primacy of the Western financial elite fronted by the sole superpower, to plunder, rape and harvest the wealth of resources-rich poorer nations of the world in the guise of developmental assistance. Even former employees and consultants of these predatory lending bodies openly speak to their adverse effects upon the developing world after retiring from their posts. The most recent among them is Peter Koenig, a former WB economist, who, like his predecessor WB consultant John Perkins of the Economic Hitman fame and fortunes, stated in an interview (July 13, 2016) while commenting on the Economy of Resistance of Iran eventually making it impervious to American sanctions: “that’s how the west, Europe in particular, has enslaved, plundered and raped Asia, Africa and Latin America for centuries. So, what the World Bank does today is but a modern continuation of colonialism disguised as development assistance.”
One not completely lost in the woods like Alice in wonderland is perhaps given to ponder why Ms. Karen Hudes so carelessly substituted one false belief for another in the service of her masters!

Karen Hudes replied on July 25, 2016
From: Karen Hudes [ h.k3511 @ gmail.com ]
To: humanbeingsfirst @ gmail.com
Date: Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:00 AM
You are confusing the Board of Governors that is responsible for the world's assets and the state-captured secretariat of the World Bank. https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/general+assembly3.pdf

Zahir is not persuaded, August 01 2016
The document you cite in your reply is just WWF wrestling, a public relations scam. At best, controlled opposition, aka manufactured friendly opposition that fulminates with bold rhetoric in order to forestall any real opposition from among the plundered nations of the world. At worst, to indirectly push the oligarchy's agenda to return the international monetary system to some sort of Gold standard, as was even openly advocated by the head of the World Bank in 2010 before the G20 summit. The text of the letter is itself a public relations con game retaining all the presuppositions behind the creation of these Bretton Woods institutions as the monetary muscle of empire to make preeminent its own currency for international trade and to control the lesser developed nations of the world, backed by its vast military-industrial complex under the new pax Americana, exercised through the newly formed United Nations to give legal legitimacy to American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives now thinly disguised as international relations. In a nutshell, to own the world in the guise of protecting it – be it from terror, financial collapse, or other natural and unnatural, real and imagined catastrophes. Are you even aware of who donated the precious parcel of land in Manhattan for the UN building to move the UN location closer to the center of power of what some call the Eastern Establishment? The empire and its financial oligarchy drive on the same Hard road to world order. Under that reality, what value whatsoever is your cited letter written to the UN? Your being employed by the WB-IMF Board as a feel-good useful idiot in the dissent role, I am sorry to say, makes little difference to how the WB-IMF system operates in the greater scheme of empire as the tag-team duo that pillages and plunders the nations of the world under the auspices of the United Nations' legal framework of international treaties and the like.
What gives your play completely away Karen, is this simple fact: the same pay-masters! You ostensibly draw your paycheck, as do the Boards, as do the heads of these international institutions and their employees that you refer to as “the state-captured secretariat of the World Bank”, from the same treasury of the empire! Despite their being setup as “independent” international institutions with their own diplomatic passports and international budgets to which the member states presumably pay their dues (at the UN, except of course the United States, it does not have to pay as it makes all the rest pay). Dissent has a fundamental role to play in the expeditious running of Pax Americana on the hard road to world order. It has a coherent theory of statecraft, and its many players.
I remain un persuaded by the document link you sent me. But thank you for writing Karen.
More important, thank you for caring. I believe you are being taken for a ride by the magic of Machiavellian statecraft. I hasten to presume that you write in utmost sincerity, or else an important person such as yourself, employed at the highest echelons of financial power, would not have even bothered to reply twice to some unknown fellow in cyberspace. But dig deeper, away from the standard presuppositions and the standard narratives of both engineered consent and engineered dissent that diabolically underlie today's WWF theatrics and Hegelian Dialectics, if you care to interdict empire's drive to a dystopic master-slave one-world. You serve your paymasters and that's just a cold fact. How you serve them perhaps you do not see through their fog of deceit. You have shown yourself publicly to be most gullible previously, and you have courageously also admitted to that fact in your letter, indicating that you have now improved your vetting capabilities. Of course we must all continually strive for that, especially in the age of universal deceit that we live under. Don't fool others and don't be fooled by others is a well-worn cliché in virtually every language. But don't fool oneself surely trumps it in every language.

- ### -

First published as comment May 21, 2015 | Last updated Tuesday, August 2, 2016 3717

Honing the BS detector on Karen Hudes By Zahir Ebrahim 12/12

The Plebeian antidote to Hectoring Hegemons

Home is Humanbeingsfirst.org

INDEX here.

Okay to copy, print, or post this document; verbatim reproduction only.
here. Full Copyright Notice

Reprint License

All material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety, unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, granted in perpetuity, provided the source URL sentence and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part of this restricted Reprint License, along with any embedded links within its main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images, quotations and excerpts, are used without permission based on non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research use only in the greater public interest, documenting crimes against humanity, deconstructing current affairs, and scholarly commentary. The usage by Project Humanbeingsfirst of all external material is minimally consistent with the understanding of "fair use" laws at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. Project Humanbeingsfirst does not endorse any external website or organization it links to or references, nor those that may link to it or reprint its works. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”.