Introduction to Foster Gamble's Documentary THRIVE

May 15, 2014 | Last updated Sunday, May 18, 2014 09:00 pm
For those in medical school studying to be doctors, their parents, and also those who are already in the medical profession, please watch the 15 minute segment of this two hour documentary from time 42:45 to 57:45
What is interesting in this 15 minute must-watch segment is that its distinguished compere, Foster Gamble, a Princeton University graduate and its student body president, direct descendant of one of the founders of Proctor and Gamble, groomed to be a leader in the establishment but choosing to walk away from his inherited power legacy to instead become a responsible activist for humanity, takes on the real power behind the world today - the banking cartel which owns and/or controls medicine, agriculture, pharma, not to mention central banking and coining national money out of thin air! This is the first time I have seen a notable insider from the elite corporatocracy take on this prime-mover of social and political control in our era. There have been others in the past but I don't immediately recall anyone contemporary. Please watch that short segment which pertains to medicine, food, education and fractional reserve lending --- in that 15 minutes this documentary summarizes what I have researched and restated time and again which no one pays any attention to. Whereas, coming from an insider of real power and pelf, I think this exposé of the banking cartel's role in controlling medicine, food, and big pharma from one among the elite themselves, is more compelling!
However, also note that in earlier segments of the documentary (if you have time to watch the whole thing), Foster Gamble evidently falls into the same trap as I have noted many prominent activists uncannily seem to also fall into --- the UFO rubbish of Steven Greer et. al., and other similar speculations of free energy brought to us by the aliens which I can only call "gibberish". Ignore that crap, or, take the pseudo science gibberish with a pinch of astute political science salt. Bizarrely salted to Hegelian proportions by intelligence ops as I have already deconstructed in the case study of Steven Greer's Disclosure Project, [1] do note that even in these outlandish and speculative segments there are many kernels of hard scientific and political truths wrapped in garbage --- the calculated suppression of science such as Nikola Tesla's work for instance, shrewdly accompanied by UFO exponents. Why rational, well referenced, empirical, verifiable, factual expositions of any of these topics pertaining to the role of omnipotent banking power in orchestrating society and politics, are almost always accompanied by outlandish gibberish and speculations is explainable, at least to my mind.
It appears to be a calculated self-defense mechanism of brilliant people based on the idea of poisoning their own well. Whenever they speak some verifiable truth, they also seem to utter some unverifiable and outlandish rubbish --- which is so incongruent to their other factual and verifiable words that only the foolish masses would either accept it all or reject it all; the smarter handful among the public would know to discern rationally and to throw away the poisonous shell carefully protecting the fruit within. Because I have seen this pattern repeat time and again, such as David Icke who is also featured later on in the documentary speaking on the banking cartel but who also speaks the "UFO" and "shape-shifting reptile" gibberish elsewhere, [2] that I can only sensibly conclude that it is a self-defense mechanism for some genuine activists to calculatingly appear "nutty" when speaking the whole truth against the most powerful prime-movers on earth! Others may well believe that gibberish, I don't know. There are of course a whole sleuth of Machiavellian techniques of cognitive infiltration available to the intelligence apparatuses and its Mighty Wurlitzer for putting dissent on treadmills which go nowhere. [2a] [2b] The discerning mind must forensically analyze all matters, and all interconnections among them, to synthesize the whole picture which is often larger than the sum of its parts. The Japanese wisdom admonishes: “Aspire to be like Mt. Fuji, with such a broad and solid foundation that the strongest earthquake cannot move you, and so tall that the greatest enterprises of common men seem insignificant from your lofty perspective. With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things happening near to you.”
In any case, the segment I draw your attention to is 100% accurate and anyone can verify its factual basis. I have done so time and again and even written about it. The subsequent segments on the control of the world by the banking cartel is also on the mark --- as I have researched and concluded the same. I also know of the deliberate suppression of alternate medicine by associating it with quackery. Not to say that quackery in medicine does not exist, but not all alternate ways of looking at the healing arts and science are quackery! To assert it is so is clearly the obvious motivation of entrenched power not just protecting its own economic turf, but also its cunningly weaved fabric of human control --- and the fact that an insider is highlighting these matters so boldly is something to pay attention to. I think.
That segment on medicine is also important because foolish doctors today are not only prescribing poisons under AMA licensing, but also cheer leading advocacy of social evils at national levels as PR spokesman of big medicine --- case in point: the recent WHO directive for polio vaccination in Pakistan, Syria, and Cameroon. If I was in any policy making position in Pakistan, my take would be that a) our scientists will research it ourselves, and b) if deemed necessary, our nation will manufacture our own vaccines ab initio so that we know exactly what we are putting in them --- a position Iran has wisely taken! This is quite a separate question from the efficacy of vaccines in the first place which I am not addressing here. Science reveals to me that vaccines are efficacious for delivering payloads into the biological systems. Whether it is good for the human beings is a separate issue. Not addressed today. Please don't go off wandering into a red herring. The discussion here is of what is --- and that in itself is inimical.
Also pay attention to the quote by Henry Kissinger in 1973 reproduced in that segment at time 46:45 - here is what Kissinger repeats in the style of George Orwell from "1984" ("who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past" ), combining the saying of Rothschild from 1800s ("give me control of a nation's money supply and I care not who makes its laws") with Thomas Malthus from 1798 ("I do not know that any writer has supposed that on this earth man will ultimately be able to live without food. ... Had population and food increased in the same ratio, it is probable that man might never have emerged from the savage state."), to come up with the following brilliant formulation of empirical fact now observable by anyone with even half a brain functioning:
Who controls the food supply controls the people;
who controls the energy can control whole continents;
who controls the money can control the world.”
Fools die many deaths, the valiant die but once --- a lesson unlearned by the twelve years of obedience training in K-12 that the segment refers to!!!
Judge for yourself how much you obey authorities yourself --- to the point that you take their gospels as religion, especially in medicine where you follow the AMA, WHO, FDA, blindly.... “Primum non nocere”: “First, do no harm" has evidently been given a new Orwellian cover. It is repeated by every physician and surgeon just like "freedom is slavery" is repeated in Orwell; freedom to obey the AMA, the WHO, and Authority edicts without question! That obedience training obviously also includes faithfully echoing who dun 9/11.
This is Foster Gamble's website:
The jury is still out on Foster Gamble as far as I am concerned ---- I don't know if he is for real or fake opposition. Nothing Gamble has stated is new. 9/11 would once again be the key litmus test I suppose [3] --- a test that is by now failed by many among the most lauded in preeminent dissent. [4] But at least in that medical segment, and in the Federal Reserve and banking segments that follow, Foster Gamble using words like "tape-worm" and "parasites" to refer to the banking cartel, does sound like Eustace Mullins as in that late scholar's seminal 1984-85 book "The World Order - A study in the Hegemony of Parasitism", and his 1952 classic: "The Secrets of the Federal Reserve". It is strange though that while Foster interviews G. Edward Griffin and features Griffin's book titled "The Creature from Jekyll Island", Gamble inexplicably ignores Eustace Mullins' much earlier work which ostensibly seeded all others including Griffin's narrative. Mullins was the first one after WW-II to dive deep into the shenanigans behind the founding of the Federal Reserve by the money trust at Jekyll Island, under the guidance of the famous political prisoner Ezra Pound and paid the heaviest price of any living researcher of the subject. None of the later authors who followed Eustace Mullins, and almost all of them greatly benefitted from his original research whether or not they have acknowledged that fact, have paid such a high price. It is also revealing that virtually all of them, including G. Edward Griffin the last time I checked, also fail the 9/11 test just like former long-time congressman Ron Paul who also most carefully likes to challenge the banking cartel but manages to also echo the establishment's narrative of 9/11, just as Noam Chomsky does, all of them calling it “blowback” while retaining the who dunnit narrative of the same establishment they so vigorously claim to dissent with. The documentary features several speakers who have precisely held up that Big Lie over the years since 9/11 (as far as I am aware).
After all their astuteness displayed in the video to standup to the global elite on so many diverse matters covered in the documentary, are they simultaneously so stupid that they cannot add two plus two? In the anemic coverage of 9/11 in the documentary, Foster Gamble only makes a passing reference to “false flag operation” with the statement: “an increasing number of people believe that 9/11 was a false flag operation by the global elite in order to set the stage for taking over middle east oil and dismantling US constitutional protection.” (at time 1:31:00). I would have liked to hear what Foster Gamble himself believed and planted his own stake in the ground for, and not what other “nut-jobs” believed! To the extent that this respected scion of the notable Proctor and Gamble family does not come out as forcefully on 9/11 as he has demonstrated the courage to come out on the rest of the matters in the documentary, I would argue that Mr. Gamble is tugging on the same tenuous safety-line as poisoning his own well by showcasing UFO con-artists who rehearse their specious and unproven free energy mantra before an ignorant and unscientific public. And ultimately, whether wittingly or unwittingly, still contributing to the sanctification of the Big Lie. [5]
Nevertheless, I do applaud Foster Gamble, and his wife Kimberly Gamble co hosting the documentary, for stating many of the verifiable facts as boldly as they have done. Their distinguished Gamble name standing up to the tyranny of the banking cartel I imagine will be far more effective than many others I can think of. Specifically, for the focus of this introduction, none in the medical profession can really afford to ignore that segment on medicine in their own good conscience. The budding doctors in training aspiring to join the world's noblest profession should be made aware that they are committing to a life on the elite's chessboard on which they each shall remain pawn in the hands of the global medical trust, which in turn is controlled by the global money trust. And that money trust is driving the one-world government agenda with its attendant policy prescriptions as is accurately portrayed in the documentary. They may well be administering the shots for population reduction someday, a topic only just touched upon by Foster Gamble in the final segments of the documentary. No one in the medical profession really believes that. Therefore, well done there, Gambles!
If I were to edit this documentary to make a more rational cut, I would be presumptuous enough to cut out all the gibberish in the early section up to the medical segment starting at minute 42:45, and selectively incorporate only those portions from the earlier segments that contain the verifiable facts of the same banking cartel controlling all aspects of the energy sector and thus having little natural incentive to entertain any alternatives that can challenge their monopoly. The editing out of gibberish would of course also undo the deliberate poisoning of the well, now wouldn't it? Well, why the hell not? This stellar documentary needs no crutches --- the topics are well documented in officialdom's own handwritings. I have studied many of these documents myself. There is no reason for the spirit of moral courage demonstrated in this documentary by Foster Gamble and his wife to be contaminated by any frog crapping in the punch bowl. A clean separation of both science and political science which factually explains the making of the public mind, from the idle speculation of “toruses” and the energy mantras drawn from ancient and New Age religions, will help convince many rational people of the verifiable facts of the matter who would otherwise not get past the first ten-twenty minutes of its gibberish, if that! Which is why I suggest you start watching from that medical segment onward.
The rest of the segments in the documentary (except the solution space and periodic regression into poisoning the well) are simply excellent, and indeed also mostly verifiable! Every factual topic covered in the documentary I have had the opportunity to study myself and I have also written much about these same topics on my own website. However, the presumption speciously advanced in this documentary is that scarcity of resources is the first cause of problems and abundance of free energy would solve it. I do not believe that the principal problem has anything to do with scarcity of energy or scarcity of natural resources, and the free energy mantra is like the Irish gnome --- never quite sure when it might pop up in your bed.
The principal problem is PRIMACY. Not SCARCITY!
Primacy is an imperative as old as hegemony, as old as mankind. No civilization in the past has escaped its lure. Today, it is directly manifested in the inequitable distribution of whatever resources and energies and wealth the world does possess. The documentary even brings on John Perkins, the infamous Economic Hitman, to confirm how international primacy works in practice. For its policy underpinnings, see for instance the text of George F. Kennan's Policy Planning Study PPS 23 from 1948. That text, we are informed, fashioned what popularly came to be known as the Truman Doctrine. But its precepts, as one can see, have continued as the core policy construct in every US Administration without fail, just as these precepts remained the cornerstone of every empire in every age before the rise of latter day Pax Americana in the mid twentieth century: “We have about 50% of the world's wealth, but only 6.3% of its population .... In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. To do so, we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and day-dreaming, and our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives. We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford today the luxury of altruism and world-benefaction .... We should cease to talk about vague and – for the Far East – unreal objectives such as human rights, the raising of living standards, and democratization. The day is not far off when we are going to have to deal in straight power concepts. The less we are then hampered by idealistic slogans, the better.” [6]
The ubermensch philosophy which guides the creed and primacy instincts of the modern parasites is Bernard de Mandeville's, called the “fable of the bees”. The following veritable statement made in 1705 AD by the man who it is claimed inspired Adam Smith's the Wealth of Nations, can always find newer contrivances to enslave mankind just as easily: “The economic well-being of the nation depends on the presence of a large number of men who are content to labor hard all day long. Because men are naturally lazy they will not work unless forced by necessity to do so.” Voluntary servitude is part and parcel of the human condition even when they have every material thing. [7]
The solution to freedom from tyranny is not in material things; neither in its abundance, nor in its scarcity. But intellectual and moral freedom lies in spiritual courage. It is the principal foundation of all resistance to falsehoods. Thusly, as the noted German philosopher Goethe had timelessly observed: “None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free”. And Aldous Huxley demonstrated one fast path to the scientific implementation of that enslaving ideology in his seminal fable: Brave New World. Huxley noted on the occasion of the thirtieth anniversary in a talk given at the University of California, Berkeley: “You can do everything with bayonets except sit on them! If you are going to control any population for any length of time you must have some measure of consent. It's exceedingly difficult to see how pure terrorism can function indefinitely. It can function for a fairly long time, but I think sooner or later you have to bring in an element of persuasion. An element of getting people to consent to what is happening to them. Well, it seems to me that the nature of the Ultimate Revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this: that we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably always will exist, to get people actually to love their servitude! This is the, it seems to me the ultimate in malevolent revolution shall we say.” [8]
If there was an abundance of everything as this simplistic documentary postulates, and if we had the voluntary self-sustaining libertarian Austrian systems of Mises as imagined in the final segment, the global elite will find newer ways to induce deprivation to control man.
The instinct for primacy of man upon fellow man is not taken away by its satiation – for the goal is not satiation, but SOCIAL CONTROL.
The Pollyanish advocacy in the documentary of Gandhian non-violence as the primary method of global resistance sounds really great on paper. It can even make a great undergraduate thesis in social sciences I am sure. Revealingly though, and unfortunately not mentioned by Foster Gamble as he rambled on about non-cooperation in the last segment, that wonderful high-minded principle was most brilliantly adduced from logic alone by a 22 year old in 16th century France. His name was Etienne de La Boétie. This young fellow explained non-cooperation most eloquently in 1552 AD in his treatise to end voluntary servitude: “The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude”. It hasn't happened yet!
If lofty platitudes could modulate greed and lust for power, then the Ten Commandments would surely have created heaven on earth by now --- 3000 years and still waiting. Just witness what's happening in Palestine with the First Commandment – and its harbingers are the wielders of the same power nexus outlined in the documentary! What has the spectating world been able to do about interdicting that cultural and physical genocide of a living people? A big fat ZERO. The troubling question to me for the concluding segment of this otherwise brilliant documentary is this: Why present such wishful platitudes for the solution space which betray little or no comprehension whatsoever of the diabolical forces of social engineering and human psychology that are at play worldwide? [9]
Getting the public mind to live on false hopes after describing the real problems to them could be construed as a red herring by the skeptic, but I am trying hard not to be one. Rational analysis of a battle to be of any benefit must be rooted in reality and empiricism of the situation, not mysticism, hope, and wishful thinking. As Sun Tzu noted in the Art of War 2500 years ago, self-delusion isn't a very productive winning strategy in any battle, the superfluous references to martial arts and Aikido in the documentary, of using the opponent's own strengths against him, notwithstanding: “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.” Indeed, what specific strengths of the ruling oligarchy to deploy against their primacy in the Aikido match with hoi polloi is not identified in the documentary.
Foster Gamble's platitudinous recipe for how to Thrive has made no immediate impression on me. Any two bit pulpit can sell the same mirage. Deepak Chopra, also featured in the documentary, does it routinely on American public television --- and laughs his way to the bank selling his books. But I am sure it could still be awarded a Ph.D. for New Age thinking in America's Ivy League. These lofty academies of higher learning often do craft the most clever doctrines for social engineering, and for manufacturing the public's consent for untenable agendas. One such doctrine to fabricate “doctrinal motivation” for launching “imperial mobilization” I have already deconstructed at length under the heading “Taking a Deeper Look into the Dynamics of Mantra Creation: Islamofascism”. [op. cit, 9] That diabolical ingenuity for making the public mind in preparation for the catastrophic terror of 9/11 was most eruditely engineered in the 1990s at both Princeton and Harvard – the two highest ranking Ivy League Universities of the United States. And it was easily swallowed up by the American and Western public under the expert guidance of their learned intellectuals as the principal explanation for 9/11. It cemented the fait accompli of imperial mobilization --- now backtrack and lament all you want, it does not and cannot roll back time. The time lost in running on treadmills living on in feel-good false hopes while bonded in servitude, is also like that. Time deliberately lost chasing dreamy sounding mirages by hoi polloi, while hard new realities are irreversibly fashioned on the ground by history's actors: '“We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”' [op. cit, 9]
The hard political fact of the matter is that the common man, perpetually caught between bread and circuses, and perpetually manipulated with behavior control, cannot take the powers away from the oligarchy with platitudes of non-violence and non-cooperation --- and that realization has evidently not sunk in among the well-intentioned, well-groomed, and well-fed activists of the West. Especially if they have attended an Ivy League! While they live on in relative comfort and abundance, they advocate for others to deny cooperation with power? How will hoi polloi even eat then, or make a living in the modern world? The stomach tends to come before high mindedness, not just among the masses but for anyone, including the tallest intellectual who cannot get two square meals a day. And that is never understood by the noble revolutionaries who often themselves emerge from among the elite, and have never suffered for the want of bread. A French revolution of the hungry only culminates in more tyranny by hoi polloi upon hoi polloi. It was most ably captured in Charles Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities. The rise and fall of Napoleonic history does not contradict that Dicken's fable at all.
What such platitudinous talk of wishful hope and dreamscape thinking does perform in practice is the complementary part of social engineering: it provides the outlet for the pressure cooker to prevent its bursting. But the same letting off of steam can perhaps someday in the future, when man has evolved himself spiritually, command an avalanche of real global resistance. That is the thinking of these brilliant intellectuals. Human action is non-linear after all, or so I am told. The butterfly flapping its wings in India can change the weather in the United States, as some idealists love to advance as the primary evidence for their wishful thinking. It does sound nice, appears empowering, even compelling. Perhaps just that faith alone, of sounding nice, and hopeful, has to be kept alive for the actual reality of the transition to the epoch when rising spiritualism, a quest for self-directed search for answers and to make change happen with considerable personal sacrifice, would start driving global consciousness. Recorded history, including the legacy of the great prophets of mankind who brought great moral spiritualism as the principal antidote for primacy of man against fellow man, does indicate though that only tyranny has thus far successfully countered tyranny, not hoi polloi who have only slaved in servitude to every master. Perhaps we will witness a surprise development at the new Dawn of the Age of Aquarius – but not in my lifetime. We live in an epoch when we can't even affect the most obvious first change that the documentary advocates and which everyone in the world even actually agrees upon: freedom from debt enslavement to the banksters. [10]
Man is today more in chains in the scientific dictatorship of modernity than ever before in the entire history of mankind. He does not even know how to grow a grain of bread anymore --- food suddenly removed from the ubiquitous Safeway supermarket shelves will reduce the American hoi polloi to rubble in less than a week! To cannibalism in less than two. And to complete tear down of its advanced society in less than a month! And that, is the hard reality of the matter at this moment in our existence. To craft a different future takes a lot more --- a transformation which is nothing less than a gestalt shift in the stance against primacy. The fable of the two scorpions held in a perpetual stalemate in a bottle easily comes to mind for surviving ubermensch predators in a jungle of depravity and primacy. [10a] The desire for self-sufficiency at every level, from individuals to nations, is pragmatically impossible today in the more advanced and industrialized nations of the Global North. It is still a practical possibility for the lesser industrialized Global South however, if we can only learn to eject our house niggers and uncle toms who rule by proxy for the same enslaving forces of colonization today in the name of neoliberalism whose ancestors had previously enslaved entire nations in the name of the white man's burden. But as the recent event in Pakistan for instance indicates, just the unilateral demand from WHO for three nations to vaccinate for polio, and the Pakistani officialdom immediately declaring that they will prevent anyone leaving her airports without first forcibly vaccinating them, sums up the twisted reality of imposed servitude upon the masses. We even witness this servitude daily at US airports ourselves. I would like to ask Mr. Foster Gamble how many times he has voluntarily denied permission to the TSA to have his and his wife's private parts examined either through X-ray machines or by gloved hands and still traveled to their destination? Perhaps he flies a private airliner from a private airport.
The fundamental first cause of global deprivation and the crises of inequitable distribution of wealth plaguing mankind being Primacy and not Paucity, is so painstakingly obvious that it beggars the imagination how any brilliant mind groomed at Princeton would not recognize it as such. Why has Foster Gamble so transparently misdiagnosed the first cause as scarcity of resources instead of primacy of the oligarchy? It misdirects attention in solving an entirely different class of problems than the ones which actually need to be solved first! The systemic disease then continues to lurk unattended regardless of how many layers of bandages are put on the patient. This modus operandi of dissent by brilliant savants once again ties in with poisoning the well idea explored at the very beginning of this Introduction.
I challenge the Gambles to stop using that feeble-minded crutch if they are indeed genuine. I would like to assume that they are --- for I see no obvious motivation for anyone so well established in the elite establishment to directly play in what is only bread and butter for COINTELPRO agents: infiltrate by gaining trust which is done by affirming what the groups already believe, then misguide, mislead, make patsies, in order to deflate opposition. In fact, I am excited that finally someone who is indeed a somebody, is challenging the real base of power of Western civilization: its hidden in plainsight oligarchy. Under that presumption, separating personal beliefs and mysticism from what is factually verifiable to create a rational cut of this documentary, is the honest intellectual recipe for gaining traction in the mainstream, in academe, and in effectively countering the making of the public mind by the social engineers. Point out the documented facts, analyze and deconstruct the interconnection of its tentacles so that the public can understand just how deep the rabbit holes go, and leave out what the public should do about it to their own organic self realization. It will come organically once they accurately understand the whole picture of their enslavement and who participates in it. That will immediately bring the entire world together on the common understanding of the common problem domain which equally plagues both the East and the West. Just accomplishing that much in a single lifetime would be a remarkable achievement for any individual --- for the solution space is indeed organic and multi-generational; it cannot be forced with platitudes. It must be left to the peoples' own creative energies and their situations.
In conclusion, and more to the point of this Introduction, if you are studying to become part of the medical profession, or you are a parent of someone who is, or you are yourself part of that profession, you need to really think about what you will hear in that segment. Then go research it yourself. Do you really want to be part of that banking cartel's control game? How can you avoid it if you join the medical profession? How can you change it? The professional practice of medicine, a matter not to be treated as merely an entertaining philosophical question for gossip in sleep-corners during nap breaks, is explored further in my little study: What's the truth about modern medicine? [11] You are invited to better that study.
Homework: Begin with trying to answer the fundamental question: Who is AMA (The American Medical Association) and why must it control and legislate the practice of medicine of the medical professionals? On what scientific and technical basis, let alone moral basis, can this organization claim to know better than the medical practitioners who have trained for their profession? On what basis whatsoever can this organization dictate to the professional doctors what is and isn't “kosher” medicine? The same question must be extended to WHO (The World Health Organization) – a supra national body that can declare pandemics at will and dictate what sovereign nations can and cannot do in their own countries? [12] Whom does this organization principally work for? [13] Who pays for its “oops” as was witnessed in the Swine Flu debacle of 2009 in which WHO forcibly tried to push its ad hoc global vaccination protocol with the active collaboration of virtually the entire American medical establishment, the CDC, the many tax-exempt foundations and think-tanks led by the CFR, and the establishment's mighty superpower muscle? What if that “oops” is a premeditated genocide of targeted populations, just as the so called “intelligence failure” for the premeditated invasion of Iraq was subsequently dismissed as mere “oops”? As a medical practitioner, how will you make the call on your better judgment: to follow the AMA, CDC, and WHO diktats and mandates, or to use your own counsel under your own professional Hippocratic Oath and refuse that which does not conform to it?
See: Author John Robbins, Other Progressives Denounce ‘Thrive’, Santa Cruz local newspaper story by Eric Johnson, April 10, 2012. I am unimpressed. It is not only consistent with my analysis in the text above of Foster Gamble gratuitously poisoning the well and deliberately (or foolishly) making it easy to attack and discredit his documentary, but backlash is only to be expected when you take on real power and the public starts paying attention.
See Part-II: The Road to No Where

First Published May 15, 2014 | Last updated Sunday, May 18, 2014 09:00 pm 5932

Introduction to Foster Gamble's Documentary THRIVE: What On Earth Will It Take? By Zahir Ebrahim