Introduction Project Humanbeingsfirst


“Aspire to be like Mt. Fuji, with such a broad and
solid foundation that the strongest earthquake
cannot move you, and so tall that the greatest
enterprises of common men seem insignificant
from your lofty perspective. With your mind as high
as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly.
And you can see all the forces that shape events;
not just the things happening near to you.” — Japanese Wisdom

Caption A Gestalt Shift in perspective is required to understand the worldview presented by Project (Image courtesy of Desiree L. Rover)
Caption A Gestalt Shift in perspective is required to understand the worldview presented by Project (Image courtesy Desiree L. Rover)

BETWEEN TWO AGES Is The Only Transformative Process:

“Human life is reduced to real suffering, to hell, only when two ages, two cultures and religions overlap. . . . There are times when a whole generation is caught in this way between two ages, two modes of life, with the consequence that it loses all power to understand itself and has no standard, no security, no simple acquiescence.”

Zbigniew Brzezinski so quoted Hermann Hesse from Steppenwolf in the opening pages of his 1970 book, Between Two Ages.

That's what we humankind find ourselves in today, merely caught between two ages – the transition epoch to the new age. It isn't rocket science, only political science. An engineered state-craft perversely seeded in the atheistic “Noble Lies” of the Straussian 'Ubermensch' who feel compelled to guide mankind as its self-proclaimed enlightened shepherds. “Hegemony is as old as mankind” is their primacy bible; one-world government, their categorical imperative.

Their calculus of global primacy principally entails Machiavellianly seeding “revolutionary times” all across the “global zone of percolating violence” – the 'war on terror' – while simultaneously precipitating the global financial collapse, global pandemics, and other global catastrophes, positing only global solutions able to solve these global problems to diabolically create:

“an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece”.

By their own admission of the inevitable practice of scholarly deceit in statecraft in The Secret Team:

“Certainly, history teaches us that one truth will add to and enhance another; but let us not forget that one lie added to another lie will demolish everything. This is the important point. Consider the past half century. How many major events -- really major events -- have there been that simply do not ring true? How many times has the entire world been shaken by alarms of major significance, only to find that the events either did not happen at all, or if they did, that they had happened in a manner quite unlike the original story?”

And by their own admission of their divine right to exceptionalism as vouchsafed by Justice Vinson, U.S. Supreme Court, in 1951:

“Nothing is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only when associated with the considerations which give birth to nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we must reply that all concepts are relative.”

And by the repeated admission of their own hubris, as was for instance so boldly proclaimed by Carroll Quigley in Tragedy and Hope, in 1966:

“The destructive impact of Western Civilization upon so many other societies rests on its ability to demoralize their ideological and spiritual culture as much as its ability to destroy them in a material sense with firearms.”

The motivation and purpose of that destruction in today's modernity was most perceptively spelled out by Edwin C. Knuth in The Empire of 'The City' , in 1944:

“Geopolitics, the study of the struggle for space and power, forms a well-developed science with an extensive bibliography, which conclusively impeaches the superficial fabrication, with which the American people in particular have been implanted with consummate cunning, that the great World Wars are caused by brutal attacks upon world law and order, instead of being the fully anticipated consequences of the most diabolical double dealing and planning by the secret 'One World' order of 'The City.' ... 'It is the destiny of the pure Aryan Anglo-Saxon race to dominate the world and kill off or else reduce to a servile status all other inferior races.'”

In order to instrument that self-proclaimed divine destiny, the ultimate in the white man's burden shall we say, the devil's apprentices have cleverly perceived of a gullible irrational public mind, so kept preoccupied with 'bread and circuses', that it will accept under times of 'catastrophic terrorism', uncertainty, chaos, crises, world wars, and apocalyptic stress, what no sensible mind would willingly accept under normal times:

“What is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times; and if at this time the opportunity is missed and what is possible at such great hours is not carried out – a whole world is lost.”

Ergo, the best way to transform a people, a nation, a society, a civilization, or the entire world, is to plague them with a lifetime of manufactured “revolutionary times”. Under the pretext of dealing with it, the transformative processes are unleashed upon the unsuspecting public which systematically enact one fait accompli after another, in baby-steps, to reach the end goal of the irreversible hard reality of legally enacted Global Governance. This herding of mankind is expertly performed through full perception management of the public mind, by the finest Jewish and Anglo-Saxon Superman minds.

Edward Bernays openly bragged of this mind manipulation in his confessional memoir Propaganda, in 1928:

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.”

The visionary essayist Aldous Huxley examined the reach of its diabolical pinnacle while commemorating the 30th anniversary of his famous fable towards which, from the dizzying heights of the tiniest ant hill, that is, rising even slightly above the flatlands, humankind can be seen hurtling today at breakneck speed faster than a breakaway train going downhill:

“If you are going to control any population for any length of time you must have some measure of consent. It's exceedingly difficult to see how pure terrorism can function indefinitely. It can function for a fairly long time, but I think sooner or later you have to bring in an element of persuasion. An element of getting people to consent to what is happening to them. Well, it seems to me that the nature of the Ultimate Revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this: that we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably always will exist, to get people actually to love their servitude! This is the, it seems to me the ultimate in malevolent revolution shall we say.”

It is only our transitional generations, caught Between Two Ages, who are experiencing the manufactured birth-pangs of the New Age of Global Governance. The ultimate in malevolent revolution is today, as should be self-evident, most successful in getting the majority of the world's public to accept these birth-pangs without a murmur of discontent. Indeed, In the New World Order of one-World Government, all the world's civilizations, might finally overcome their respective discontents under the iron clad regimentation of a unified global police state, run from behind the scenes by the ruling oligarchy.

As was convincingly argued by Bertrand Russell in Impact of Science on Society, in 1951, and as is also empirically visible today as the actual dystopic direction of global governance, world government can only be kept in being by force (of both the physical persuasion type as per George Orwell's fable, and mental persuasion, as well as biological and chemical tampering of the human being itself, as per Aldous Huxley's fable):

“There is, it must be confessed, a psychological difficulty about a single world government. The chief source of social cohesion in the past, I repeat, has been war: the passions that inspire feeling of unity are hate and fear. These depend upon the existence of an enemy, actual or potential. It seems to follow that a world government could only be kept in being by force, not by the spontaneous loyalty that now inspires a nation at war.”

“Fichte laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. ... Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so.”

The grotesque reality of engineering society, moving from the pen of philosophers and the laboratories of researchers in behavior control, to social empiricism, was openly admitted by Zbigniew Brzezinski in Between Two Ages, in 1970, obliterating any difference between dystopic fables and reality. As the soon to become National Security Advisor of the United States of America under President Carter, and the first executive director of the Trilateral Commission which was soon to be founded by David Rockefeller, the grandmaster of the grand chessboard wrote for those who bother to read:

“Life seems to lack cohesion as environment rapidly alters and human beings become increasingly manipulable and malleable. Everything seems more transitory and temporary: external reality more fluid than solid, the human being more synthetic than authentic. Even our senses perceive an entirely novel "reality"—one of our own making but nevertheless, in terms of our sensations, quite "real." More important, there is already widespread concern about the possibility of biological and chemical tampering with what has until now been considered the immutable essence of man. Human conduct, some argue, can be predetermined and subjected to deliberate control. Man is increasingly acquiring the capacity to determine the sex of his children, to affect through drugs the extent of their intelligence, and to modify and control their personalities. Speaking of a future at most only decades away, an experimenter in intelligence control asserted, 'I foresee the time when we shall have the means and therefore, inevitably, the temptation to manipulate the behaviour and intellectual functioning of all the people through environmental and biochemical manipulation of the brain.'”

The Machiavellian dynamics of latter day social engineering which relies almost exclusively on methods of the Hegelian Dialectic, is such that it naturally leads to fait accompli, after which nothing can be done about the new reality that gets constructed except to study it ex post facto as history. This omnipotent power to engineer reality unfettered is bragged about with open chutzpah. As was brazenly done by the Bush White House aide to the New York Times in 2004, after the civilization of Iraq had been decimated under the false pretense of WMD with American bombs:

“We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”

That is precisely how world order is being engineered by history's actors --- one fait accompli at a time. While the desire for full spectrum dominance of the planet isn't all that new – it has been the ultimate political prize for hectoring hegemons from time immemorial – the pace of global governance by behind the scenes secretive cabals who enact public policies favorable to their own private objectives through their control of state actors, has visibly accelerated in our generation. This specific momentum for Global Governance, a marketing euphemism advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations for their oligarchic World Order, has been in continuous mobilization for several generations of history's actors. But it always comes wrapped in layers of deceit and camouflage where the lips say something entirely different from what the hands actually do. This is openly admitted.

Here is historian Arnold Toynbee in 1931:

“We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local nation states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or publicist can perhaps not quite be burned at the stake but certainly be ostracized or discredited.”

Here is a Council on Foreign Relations member in 1974:

“In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”

Here is David Rockefeller in 2002:

“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

Last but not least, here is the European Union president in 2009, reconfirming the use of latter day crises as pretexts to finally begin to realize the fruits of the long years of craftily hoeing the hard road to world order:

“We are living through exceptionally difficult times. Financial crisis and its dramatic impact on employment and budgets, the climate crisis which threatens our very survival --- a period of anxiety, uncertainty, and lack of confidence. Yet these problems can be overcome, by a joint effort, in and between our countries. 2009 is also the first year of Global Governance with the establishment of the G-20 in the middle of financial crisis. The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the Global Management of our Planet. Our mission, our presidency is one of hope, supported by acts, and by deeds.”

Knowing how to do arithmetic is the sine qua non of instilling the desire to break all unseen strings of manipulation. As George Orwell observed in his fable 1984, even in the age of universal deceit and at the sharp point of the bayonet, all will naturally follow so long as man can courageously retain his natural ability to add two plus two correctly. But as Aldous Huxley observed in his own fable Brave New World, and which both Bertrand Russell and Zbigniew Brzezinski underscored as the natural propensity of the modern scientific era when ubermensch rulers behind the scenes have acquired full social control, that natural ability for discontentment can itself be eliminated from the human species. The global societies are scientifically arranged in some kind of caste system in which man happily slaves away for his unseen masters with as much thought to discontentment as the sheep exhibit against the habit of mutton eating.

We increasingly observe this sheepish behavior pattern across the board not just in the United States of America – the one and only truly global superpower in all of recorded history of civilizations whose public is the most dumbed down – but all across the globe. Just witnessing the “United We Stand” with absurd narratives worldwide, or the indignities sheepishly accepted by both the American as well as the world public traveling through US airports, is priceless empirical data for social scientists studying behavior control on a mass scale to gauge the success of their soft persuasion schemes. Hard schemes, biochemical tampering, may well be in field trials if not already in staged covert deployment across the globe. Vaccines as delivery agents of targeted biological warfare on specific populations, have been determined to be a most potent modality for such covert tampering of human beings – and it also leaves no provable causal trail behind with the passage of time and generations.

Any adverse visible effects of human tampering, such as induced sterility in high population regions of the Global South, or induced obedience training through “kool-aid” chemicals in the more preferred populations of the Global North, is blamed upon nature, happenstance, and in the worst case, on accident. The Mighty Wurlitzer's well-oiled machinery ensures just enough desensitization to such covert eugenist agenda of World Order through fictionalization in Hollywood movies that, inevitably, even the most grotesque reality loses its shock effect. Any premature exposure of premeditation becomes easy to dismiss as mere “conspiracy theory” under the well-worn doctrine of “Plausible Deniability”, which, as the choicest Machiavellian tool of superpower statecraft and its Allies, permits pursuing covert and false-flag operations without any public repercussion to the political and military leadership who order or execute it.

Ex post facto “oops”, mea culpae, and declassified narratives of history have as much potency in reversing the fait accompli as the ubiquitously teaching today to sixth graders in elementary schools of the United States of America, how the indigenous populations of the Americas were diabolically and mercilessly killed off by the superior Anglo-Saxon white man to resettle their lands. Not a single American child is ever known to shed any tears of innocence at the crimes against humanity purveyed by his or her own ancestors. This author has volunteered in public school in America when his own children were attending elementary grades, and he observed that emotional as well as intellectual detachment from history being inculcated with his own eyes. Neither the teachers nor the students are ever in angst for what is already history. The same children grow up as adults to exhibit more of the same. That psychological and emotional detachment from crimes past, and the ex post facto irreversibility of new realities constructed by “history's actors” already examined above for their bold declaration, enable awarding grand prizes and accolades to historians and intellectuals for their plentiful narratives across the board of what is already fait accompli.

This is how and why the most prominent moral detractor of his own American nation today, Professor Noam Chomsky of MIT, for instance, gets anointed “arguably the most important intellectual alive” by the empire's own mouthpiece, the New York Times. This intellectual who boldly teaches others the responsibilities of intellectual, rehearses at great length in his prolific writings past crimes and past lies of the American empire for which nothing much can be done today. But for matters current affairs not fully driven to their intended fait accompli, such as the imperial mobilization to world government under the catastrophic terror event of September 11, 2001 as pretext, and which can effectively be derailed in a public chain reaction if the most prominent intellectuals of America boldly stood up and called the Big Lie for what it is, Dr. Noam Chomsky assiduously totes the establishment's own absurd line on who dunnit. The fine moral intellectual shows no inclination to challenge the imperial core lie whatsoever. Instead, strangely for someone billed as the most important dissenting intellectual, finds specious arguments to support the empire's core lie. His stock following of dissenting rebels, as well as other nations who look up to him for guidance, lap it up convinced that when the most strident detractor of empire also agrees with the empire's blaming of 9/11 exclusively on Islamofascist terrorist, then it must be so.

This highly venerated scholar of America known throughout the world as America's left-liberal conscience, whose many books sell worldwide just with his brand name affixed to them, and even get waived from the high podium of the United Nations by presidential figurine condemning the excesses of American hegemony, also behaved in an analogously unforgivable manner when president John F. Kennedy was assassinated. The brilliant moralist of America, employed for lifetime in America's most prominent high technology educational institution which gets virtually all of its research funding and operating budget from America's vast military-industrial complex as the natural extension of the American national security state, had, at the very inception of his scholarly career, dutifully parroted the establishment's absurd narrative of the “lone gun-man” dunnit.

At that time in the 1960s and 1970s, just as in this generation in the aftermath of 9/11, the American public was in great moral angst to learn who really was responsible for that catastrophic terrorism on their beloved soil. The public behavior was fully controlled by the state's full spectrum control of the narrative then, just as it is today. It was accomplished then, just as it is today, with copious help from the full gamut of manufactured respectability from left to right. All intellectuals echoed the core narrative of empire then, just as they do today when it is of utmost urgency to immediately analyze, question, and publicly challenge the dubiousness of state narratives before the hidden motivations behind the crime get fully actualized into fait accompli by the public's acceptance of the core narrative.

The public's easy acceptance of any tortuous past without any great pangs of guilt, as well as any abhorrent present without any great murmur of protest, with the Superman intellectuals of empire engineering both consent and dissent to govern the public mind, is the brilliant success of Mephistopheles in mass behavior control. Today, that control is global.

It is not mere sanguinity to assert that globalization's only truly global success is indeed this planetary level rapid deployment of sophisticated technological methods for the elimination of discontents by the new Superman gods of earth.

But I pray that my progeny will always be counted among the discontented, the mal adjusted. Echoing Martin Luther King Jr.'s words of moral courage for breaking all bonds of servitude, both physical and mental, which he uttered at the time of his resistance to his nation's most cruel and inhuman war in Vietnam:

“There are some things in our society and some things in our world, which I am proud to be mal adjusted. And I call upon all men of goodwill to be mal adjusted to these things until the good society is realized.”

In these web pages, you are invited on such a journey of mal adjustment. Become part of this extraordinary voyage – on the path least taken, and it may yet make all the difference.

Welcome, bienvenue, welcome, to the one-world of Hectoring Hegemons! – Please click here to read my welcome letter first.

Introduction to The Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity explains in a nutshell, our dystopic modernity and the forces, both near and far, and visible like the tip of the iceberg and hidden from view like the rest of the iceberg, that drive it. The rest, as they say, is mere detail --- as are the million plus words of Project Humanbeingsfirst analyses listed in this Index that dissect and dismantle some of the major behavior control mind-fcks, ahem, rape of the public mind, being employed to construct world order.

These methods and techniques of mass behavior control span the gamut of sociopathic ingenuity to keep mankind in a perpetual state of fear and anxiety under the duress of which, as astute psychologists and savvy political scientists ably understand, people willingly consent to all draconian counter-measures presented to them in the name of allaying their fears. Before long, the public has given up its normal state of existence and become adjusted to a new state which they would never accept under normal circumstances, and still really ought not to accept even now. The truth of this dystopic reality may be gauged from
The Barometer of Reality-Check, which accurately assesses where mankind has been forcibly brought to today in the name of fighting this and that crisis – to the cusp of fait accompli of constructing world order with the consent of the people.

To be certain, to step back from this cusp of global transformation towards global governance in a police-state one-world government, will take far more than reading internet websites during one's burst of internet-jihad and rising consciousness. But perceptively understanding how we have been so Machiavellianly brought to this zeitgeist and by whom, is surely a baby step in that direction.

In order to prepare our stodgy mind for becoming receptive to seeing the world from the eyes of the sociopathic predators, we have to follow the following advice:

“Aspire to be like Mt. Fuji, with such a broad and solid foundation that the strongest earthquake cannot move you, and so tall that the greatest enterprises of common men seem insignificant from your lofty perspective. With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things happening near to you.”

You may rightly ask that how can you know that the view afforded from “Mt. Fuji” you will glimpse here is not disinformation, misinformation, or sophisticated mind-fck composed of core lies sandwiched between half truths and three quarter truths, delicately wrapped in layers of plausible sounding beliefs thought to be true but not known to be true for certain?

You Don't!

I do not claim to bring “All the News that's fit to print” unlike the New York Times. Instead, I claim to bring all that which you cannot read in the NYT because it has been deemed by its owners NOT FIT TO PRINT.

Make up your own damn mind whether or not you wish to be convinced of it.

“Agree with me if I seem to you to speak the truth; or, if not, withstand me might and main that I may not deceive you as well as myself in my desire, and like the bee leave my sting in you before I die. And now let us proceed.”

As Socrates might have presented his case in his own defence at his trial for “corrupting” the mind of the Athenians with perceptive reality-checks in that Golden Age of Hellenic Civilization, which, absurdly enough, equally suffered from a surfeit of myths and their own pantheon of gods. (The quote are the words of the late classicist Edith Hamilton, via the late Eustace Mullins' reproduction of it in his book: The World Order).

Zahir Ebrahim

April 2003 to September 2016

Last Updated Monday, September 26, 2016 11:20 am 5601

Introduction Project Humanbeingsfirst 19/19

The Plebeian antidote to Hectoring Hegemons

Home is

INDEX here.

Okay to copy, print, or post this document; verbatim reproduction only.
here. Full Copyright Notice

Reprint License

All material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety, unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, granted in perpetuity, provided the source URL sentence and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part of this restricted Reprint License, along with any embedded links within its main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at All figures, images, quotations and excerpts, are used without permission based on non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research use only in the greater public interest, documenting crimes against humanity, deconstructing current affairs, and scholarly commentary. The usage by Project Humanbeingsfirst of all external material is minimally consistent with the understanding of "fair use" laws at Project Humanbeingsfirst does not endorse any external website or organization it links to or references, nor those that may link to it or reprint its works. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”.