Response to Nariman House of Confusion - Great Game India 26/11

 
Friday, Jan 10, 2014
The website Greatgameindia in its survey article of November 26, 2013 reviewed the news reports published in the mainstream news media pertaining to the 26/11/2008 terrorist event in Mumbai, India, explaining the “method to the madness”. The analysis observed in its concluding passages that:
All these and more unanswered questions about the Nariman House of Confusion lead to another very crucial question.
Was Nariman House another of Mossad Safe House ?
Indian journalists are urged to dig into this story with their very lives, because the life of our nation is at stake.'
The factual analysis, inter alia, also spotlighted the bizarre reported fact that the Israeli government some how managed to prevail upon the Indian government to not perform autopsies on those found shot dead at Nariman House:
'NO AUTOPSIES ON ISRAELI BODIES ?
Israel has requested India not to conduct post-mortems on its nationals killed in the Nariman House siege, citing what it said were “privacy and religious reasons”.
The request for not doing the post-mortem is based on privacy as well as some religious reasons,” an official of the Israeli embassy here said. According to the information with the mission, seven of the nine killed in the attack were Israeli nationals, all of them Jews.”'
The analysis on Greatgameinda unfortunately did not attempt to explain why or how the Indian government was so easily prevailed upon to not conduct autopsies on these dead bodies merely on the request of the Israeli government --- despite the Indian security forces reportedly having shot them at Nariman House:
Haka Head: Indian forces may have killed some hostages:
The Indian commando raid launched to save the lives of Jewish and Israeli hostages at Mumbai’s Chabad House may have inadvertently ended the lives of one or more of the hostages, the head of a six-man ZAKA team in the terror-stricken Indian city told The Jerusalem Post on Sunday”.'
For a most shocking and deadliest terrorist event to transpire on India's soil since its independence, the Indian state appears entirely disinterested in conducting autopsies on these innocent souls in Nariman House that its own security forces have shot dead! Perhaps they were indeed the innocent hostages as the Jerusalem Post claimed. Or perhaps they were the terrorist themselves as this analysis on Greatgameindia shrewdly asks as the unanswered question of India's 9/11.
Regardless, why does Israel so easily prevail upon India in the name of “privacy as well as some religious reasons,” to get these Israeli dead bodies evacuated to Israel without further forensic examination of 26/11?
This uncanny power appears to be eerily similar to how the Israeli government prevailed upon the United States government to have the “dancing Israelis” evacuated to Israel after America's 9/11. And how the national security state of the United States prevailed upon America's own 9/11 Commission to omit any reference to the catastrophic collapse into its footprint of the third tower WTC-7 on that same day in infamy. And how the normal criminal investigative procedures for any crime scene were suspended for the 9/11 terrorism site and the entire crucial evidence of its debris field carted away in absolute haste to China and other remote geographies for immediate permanent disposal.
How can such suspension of well established normal operating procedures of the state itself take place so universally?
How can such egregious omissions, and the visible “Laissez-faire” attitude in the immediate aftermath, on the otherwise rational questions that might normally be asked in the forensic examination on any other crime scene, be so universally held in abeyance on these most catastrophic terrorism acts that bring the entire state apparatus down to its knees and create police-state instead?
The analysis on Greatgameinda does not address these questions. The analysis however concluded with the prescient warning:
Unless young India wakes up and come forward to take responsibility for their careers, security, secular administration, balanced development and future of this diverse country we will slide in to a state from a beacon of civilization in to some thing like balkanized Afghanistan.”
Project Humanbeingsfirst responded in its comment on Jan 10, 2014
Indeed. But only as a necessary intermediate stage to tear apart India, as all other nation-states, to enable global governance of the oligarchy in a world government. That is the primary agenda behind it all, at least in my view. And evidently, from your other articles on this website, including on the Rothschilds, and by the very choice of name for your website, you perhaps have the same overarching perspective.
Just FYI, here are references to two articles I had written at the time when the Mumbai terror event was being blamed upon various actors, primarily Islamofascism, militant Islam, even "Muslim Revolution". Your summation article and your quoted statement above, both underscore the truth of the observations made in December 2008.
Just to add some additional thoughts to your summation (in green font), the agenda upon India is no less nefarious, and pernicious, than upon Pakistan. This agenda has to be understood forensically and it cannot necessarily be discovered by examining the effects, the puppet shows, and the images on the screen in Plato's allegory of the cave.
First, both India and China were economically built up by off-shoring American manufacture and industry in order to weaken the industrial base of the United States, and to destabilize the domestic base of the sole superpower nation-state by making it interdependent upon other nations for domestic sectors in which it was previously both entirely self-sufficient and mostly an exporter.
Second, those nations used for this purpose, primarily as catalyst, are also to be destabilized lest they raise themselves beyond control due to this gratuitous gift, more like a Trojan Horse than a gift.
The Technetronic and Information industry which has fueled India's temporary economic rise on the world scene as an exporter of cheap labor and services, obviously creating in its wake a tiny new millionaire class entirely servile to, and fully invested in, their new riches, and hence also invested in the massa's narratives and its self-interests no differently than how Lord Macaulay fashioned the Indian babu ab initio in his Indian education policy ---
We must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern, --a class of persons Indian in blood and colour, but English in tastes, in opinions, in morals and in intellect.”, Lord Thomas Babington Macaulay, Minute on Education, 2nd February 1835
--- has also reduced the Indian national policy-making to the state of near-serfdom to the massa's interests.
These global interests only begin with neo-liberalism and privatization, a necessary step in order to wrest control away from the state. But these will visibly culminate in exactly the same sort of full spectrum domination upon nation-sates as was witnessed during the reign of the East India Company, and then some!! Your articles clearly betray your astute awareness of all this, and I only wish there were more people harboring this awareness.
Most are only floundering in the sea of narratives, deception, and end up being useful idiots for the massa despite their best intentions rather than an effective force against their own destruction.
And as you rightly note, unless this process is interdicted with more than narrow self-interests by the young and brave at heart new generation of Indians, it will reduce India first to some balkanized form, perhaps resembling Afghanistan, but more likely resembling Pakistan and Iraq with manufactured internecine warfare percolated among its multicultural natives, enroute to direct supra-national full spectrum control of all its laws --- that is global governance.
All nation-states of the world are to be “handed” this fate. Just that each nation will perhaps be "taken" there differently based on their natural condition. This objective the rulers of the world openly speak about. It is not particularly a secret, except from those who are un-inclined to read what the massa themselves announce openly in their own documents and instead choose to get their daily dose of “koolaid” from the media [and increasingly, almost exclusively from Facebook and Twitter]:
In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.” --- CFR's Foreign Affairs magazine April 1974 article “The Hard Road To World Order” by Richard N. Gardner
The danger of that “end run around national sovereignty” is now not just pending, but actually staring at us in the face. The Mumbai terrorist act must principally be viewed from that overarching perspective. And the WHY of it cleanly separated from the HOW of it, and from the WHO of it. The latter, WHO of it, has many tiers in its “compartmentalized” and “cellularized” execution hierarchy. To identify the entire chain of command and handlers is not necessary, nor feasible for intelligence covert operations which are designed with precisely such “deniability” by their very design of being compartmentalized where none participating in the project really know the entire score, except at the very top of the Mighty Wurlitzer's machinery. What is necessary however is to get to the root puppetmasters behind the visible trigger-pullers. For that, the WHY is necessary to comprehend because it clearly identifies them despite their “clean” hands and the layers of deniability pretexts fashioned for them by the degrees of separation. The Mighty Wurlitzer is examined here.
In conclusion, I must say well done Shelley Kasli. Incidentally, I would like to note that I arrived at your website from a link on Lila's website mindbodypolitic.com and spent considerably more time here to my advantage. Your articles, like Lila's, are refreshingly perceptive. Some have brought me up to date on many breaking matters since I don't much follow the news any more. [Added: The world news, to me at least, appears to be all the same, day in and day out; almost all of it enacted by merely new actors using minor variations to a well-worn script, each having their own peculiar exits and entrances that continually dish new Hegelian mind-fcks to the public getting even the most thoughtful people numbed, disillusioned, and ultimately getting the masses to United We Stand to collectively acquiesce to new absurdities --- under all that “madness”, “terrorisms”, “catastrophes”, and “happenstances”, inching the world towards one-world government one day at a time! What's there to read in the news when one knows the entire baseline script? ]
The travesty experienced by the poor Indian Consulate's Dr Devyani Khobragade in NY is atrocious. I hope that you continue on to a Part-V of your series exposing the agendas behind this ugly puppetshow. Clearly there is a lot more to it as both you and Lila are pointing out. The typical behavior of the Indian Uncle Tom prosecutor of New York was analyzed in one of my FAQ's on Pakistani House Niggers. India evidently has more than its fair share of Uncle Thomasses (perhaps only due to its larger size I imagine, and not particularly due to any additional proclivity to brown-nose the white man compared to the Pakistanis). At least, there are some, or perhaps many, Indians of integrity, even in India's officialdom as noted in your article, who were made to “sleep with the fishes”, surely only for their due diligence, otherwise why are they dead like the investigators on JFK assassination?
I imagine that there are also such good people of uncompromising integrity in Pakistan, as among every self-respecting nation. But if they exist in Pakistan, they are presently below the public radar and choose to mostly remain publicly silent. Only useful idiots, and mercenaries, ubiquitously abound no matter where you look in Pakistan. The Pakistani new generation shoulder the same moral and national responsibilities as you have so eloquently articulated for Indians. Indeed, this calling is incumbent upon all self-respecting nations, and I suspect that many are eager to shoulder such responsibilities. Many are searching for ways and means to be effective. That is the crux of the real problem.
How to be effective, to the level that one can actually change the dystopic outcome planned for mankind! I fail there ... (see Realpolitik What's to be done)
Perhaps the astute Indians have some ideas?
Best wishes,
Zahir Ebrahim
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
California,
Friday, Jan 10, 2014




Response to Great Game India '26/11 – What really happened at Nariman House of Confusion' By Zahir Ebrahim

The Plebeian antidote to Hectoring Hegemons

Home is Humanbeingsfirst.org

INDEX here.

Okay to copy, print, or post this document; verbatim reproduction only.
Comment
here. Full Copyright Notice
here.


Reprint License

All material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety, unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, granted in perpetuity, provided the source URL sentence and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part of this restricted Reprint License, along with any embedded links within its main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images, quotations and excerpts, are used without permission based on non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research use only in the greater public interest, documenting crimes against humanity, deconstructing current affairs, and scholarly commentary. The usage by Project Humanbeingsfirst of all external material is minimally consistent with the understanding of "fair use" laws at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. Project Humanbeingsfirst does not endorse any external website or organization it links to or references, nor those that may link to it or reprint its works. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”.