Counterpoint: Boston Marathon False Flag Operation

May 11, 2013
Caption Deputy Administrator of FEMA since October 2009, Richard Serino, while Chief of Department, Boston EMS and Asst. Director, Boston Public Health, architected the disaster preparedness integrated drill plan for Boston and its surrounding region which is documented in his 2008 public report for the City of Boston: Marathons – A Tale of Two Cities and the Running of a Planned Mass Casualty Event (source )
Caption Deputy Administrator of FEMA since October 2009, Richard Serino, while Chief of Department, Boston EMS and Asst. Director, Boston Public Health, architected the disaster preparedness integrated drill plan for Boston and its surrounding region which is documented in his 2008 public report for the City of Boston: Marathons – A Tale of Two Cities and the Running of a Planned Mass Casualty Event (click on link to download report: )
There is no implied question mark at the end of the article title. It is not a tentative statement. It is an emphatic statement without equivocation. From the limited data compiled by Project Humanbeingsfirst scouring the public sources, and with no knowledge from any insider source of information – but with at least a modicum of sophisticated understanding of the history of “imperial mobilization”, political science, fear psychology, voluntary servitude, and the engineering of consent to accomplish unpopular agendas when “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization” – it is now apparent beyond the shadow of a doubt to this author that the Boston Marathon criminal event was a staged false flag operation ab initio.
The data indicates that it was a complex operation and not a straightforward terrorist act reminiscent of Operation Gladio in Western Europe during the Cold War.
This compiled data and its attendant analysis is available for the public's and the worldwide law enforcement and juristic personals' inspection in the full 62 page report dated May 11, 2013, Domestic Terror and Police-State (PDF) (
This article summarizes the key findings and conclusions as of this writing, namely, that:
  • a covert planned propaganda psy-ops exercise was camouflaged as disaster preparedness drill with the blessings of the duly elected officials of the City of Boston, the State of Massachusetts, and the Federal Government of the United States of America;
  • it was was staged by actors hired to simulate injuries under the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) on explosion site one, and was initiated with a pyrotechnic explosion in front of 671 Boylston Street, shattering the Lens Crafters' windows onto the outside pavement;
  • the covert propaganda exercise went live in a second explosion on event site two at 755 Boylston street, a mere 183 meters and 12 seconds distant from the event site one, causing what appears to be real injuries and damage to the inside the Forum restaurant building as well as to spectators on the outside pavement.
The two events together comprise the diabolical Operation Gladio Boston. These two separate events, treated as a single event by the officialdom and newsmedia, though linked under the architecture of Operation Gladio, are in fact very distinct and separate sub-events:
  • The first sub-event, a staged production to simulate a terrorist act with simulated injuries, perhaps orchestrated as a “legal” event – by the enactment of appropriate laws, statutes, and the blessings of elected officials in the name of greater public good to deceive the public for their own protection by enacting a realistic drill with simulated injuries without the public's knowledge and without incurring legal culpability – but nevertheless a camouflaged covert exercise drill. It was intended to be entirely harmless to the actors beyond a pyrotechnic performance worthy of a permanent stage show exhibit at Marine World USA in California. It was designed for propaganda purposes only, to refresh the threat of “domestic terrorism” in the public mind. The Boston EMS, EMT, police, fire and other officialdom's integrated participation at this event was fully in the know, that it was a staged production with only simulated injuries. Only the public did not know.
  • The second sub-event, ostensibly a very tiny, but a very real explosion. It reportedly killed 3 civilians and injured a large number of bystanders enjoying the Boston Marathon finish on that Patriots day in America. That casualty number is variously claimed by the press to be somewhere between 100 and 280, with varying levels of lower extremity injuries spanning the gamut of real pain from lacerations to a few amputations. None of these facts have been independently verified by anyone other than being reported by the same officialdom and their partners in this drill, but one may tentatively accept this report of injuries and fatalities at face value as it does not alter the analysis one bit even if these numbers later turn out to untrue or boldly exaggerated. Also to footnote that there cannot have been any fatalities on explosion event site one as it was entirely staged. Any fatalities claimed for event site one can only be fictitious, or occurred on event site two, or elsewhere.
Who actually architected, planned, and carried out this combined Operation Gladio in Boston is unknown at this time. Who carried out the drill component is in plain-sight. It was the integrated execution by the City of Boston as outlined in the public documents listed below – except that it was to execute covertly, and for a political agenda rather than as a training event.
What the overarching motives were are also in plain-sight, as is the most obvious question asked in any criminal situation: cui bono – who benefits? The whodunit question however, meaning, which supra-terrorist intelligence organization, and their collaborating proxy assets in the know, directly planned and executed Operation Gladio Boston of which the disaster drill conducted by the City of Boston was but one small component, will surely never be known. It is indeed quite likely that many among those who participated in the covert drill component thinking they were only doing their patriotic duty, are just as shocked by their covert drill going live on event site two. No deepthroat will reveal anything substantive until perhaps the day when the obvious motives behind all these false flag terror events on American soil, are a complete fait accompli. Meaning, irreversible new realities on the ground have been constructed whereby the scholarly, the journalistic, and any whistle-blowing disclosures of what was previously a closely held secret and very effectively “plausibly denied”, can do nothing to alter these new hard realities and the public's notion of justice becomes obsolete or irrelevant.
Just as we now presume to know, ex post facto, at least something about Operation Gladio that was conducted in Western Europe of yesteryear when the USSR no longer exists today. Therefore, what's administering justice to the criminals in that situation mean? It is now not only a moot, but entirely meaningless construct.
This is Machiavelli at its utmost best. This modus operandi is even openly admitted by the White House, and with irresolute chutzpah worthy of its owners, also openly printed by the New York Times whose own motto, “All the news that's fit to print”, makes such bold admission of Machiavellian statecraft public knowledge:
We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.” (Ron Suskind, quoting George W. Bush's senior White House Advisor, New York Times, Oct. 17, 2004)
The following official public documents created by the Federal government of the United States and the City of Boston, are crucial in understanding the theory behind the first drill event. These are labeled by Exhibit number, as is everything else of evidentiary nature.
The following video depicts how trained amputee actors sporting moulage injuries are used for realistic exercise drills and synthetic training exercises for the American military fighting the terrorists overseas:
Video Image Amputee Actors Train Soldiers For Combat - Boston Bombing Hoax looks real with Amputee actors help image1Video Image Amputee Actors Train Soldiers For Combat - Boston Bombing Hoax looks real with Amputee actors help image2
Caption Amputee actors in role playing in the name of “national security” and for “saving American lives”. Click on video image to watch Americans soldiers in full military gear train for catastrophic injuries in the field in the simulated environment of a realistically staged exercise drill.
The following documentary by BBC Timewatch is crucial in understanding Operation Gladio of yesteryear:
Click to watch: Operation Gladio - BBC Time Watch 3 Part Series June 1992
Caption “Deception is a state of mind and the mind of the State” James Jesus Angleton, Head of CIA Counter Intelligence 1954-1974
The following short video news bulletin highlights what was achieved in the immediate aftermath of the Boston Marathon Operation Gladio:
The following short commentary by a former session court judge makes the point of synthetic terror to catch the terrorists in an entrapment scam rather obvious when put in context of staging a diabolical Operation Gladio. Using dupes and patsies in FBI entrapment exercises which, when they go live for real enactment of terror rather than for averting the terror which is how these entrapments are legally justified before the American public by the blessings of the juristic fraternity, provide convenient patsies to hang the blame upon:
Finally, following is the image broadcast by Fox News on worldwide television of the rescue of one named “Jeff Bauman” by Boston EMT, EMS, and the man in the cowboy hat named Carlos Arredondo. The photographs that captured that absurd scene are shown underneath.
Caption Superman victim identified as Jeff Bauman Jr., holding both his blown-up legs sitting upright and looking alert being rescued on wheelchair by a Boston EMT, Boston EMS, and man in cowboy hat identified as superhero Carlos Arredondo, about 6 minutes and 43 seconds later in the theatre of the most absurd (Image from Fox News footage, April 15, 2013)
Meet Miracle-man Mr. Jeff Bauman - Boston Marathon bombing victim Image via
Enlarge frames to high resolution images: E10-1, E10-2, E10-3
Caption Superman victim identified as Jeff Bauman Jr., holding both his blown-up legs while sitting upright and looking alert, being rescued on wheelchair by a Boston EMT, Boston EMS, and man in cowboy hat identified as superhero Carlos Arredondo, about 6 minutes and 43 seconds after the first explosion in the theatre of the most absurd (Image Fox News footage, April 15, 2013, photographers unknown for other images. Open Letter URL:
We can see that for event site one, none of the recommendation in E1 were actually followed. The emergency response evacuation was done in the most absurd manner. This implies that all those participating on event site one were in on the drama that these were only simulated injuries and their purpose was photo-ops.
We can also observe from the evidence of photographs of event site two (not included in this article but publicly available, including professional photographer brianjdamico's photostream on Flickr titled “Boston Marathon 2013 Bombing - Full Set of Images” taken at 755 Boylston street), that proper emergency response procedures were followed. Fire trucks and ambulances, the real emergency response, immediately arrived at the scene. The injured were properly handled, correctly immobilized and strapped on gurneys, and transported in ambulances. The area of event site two also appears to have far fewer people congregating, and professionally managed, in stark contrast to event site one only 183 meters away on the same street, which clearly has the appearance of a mêlée.
Exhibit E6, the video of amputees with simulated moulage injuries training American soldiers for overseas combat operations against the “Islamofascist terrorists”, is most revealing of the dysfunctional psychology behind that holy endeavor.
These American amputees train American soldiers to go kill "terrorists" in Muslim nations, and are even happy doing so in the name of “war on terror”. They feel gratified, as admitted by themselves in the above video, simulating moulage injuries for the sake of saving American lives. It is their thespian profession, their bread and butter, and also their two-bit patriotic flag-waiving contribution to American civilization and patriotism. What does it matter to them where their theatrical production is staged, or which American combat troupe goes through their training facility – the ones serving overseas fighting international terrorists, the likes of Al Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden, Sadaam Hussein, militant Islam, and Pakistani loose nuke's threat to American soil from across the ocean. Or the dedicated domestic EMS teams across American cities fighting the domestic terrorists? The 'War on Terror' after all is everywhere, the terrorism threat real. And now that Osama Bin Laden has mercifully been laid to rest, the threat is surely increasing in its domestic tenor as continually reported in the news media. What if the armed right-winger militias, internet bloggers, skeptics, and constitutionalists alarmed at what's happening to their beloved nation and almost willing to take matters into their own hands, have their rising discontent harvested by Al Qaeda? That is a pretty powerful motivation to join in any staged drill across the United States – and the video is proof that such people exist to fill all the job advertisements by HSEEP and FEMA.
It is more empirical than just speculatively imaginable that amputee actors were engaged for the Boston Marathon to enact the theatre of the absurd. From that staged act was broadcast the propaganda scene of the legless victim Jeff Bauman Jr. being rescued on wheelchair by Boston EMT and Boston EMS on worldwide television to play on public sympathies worldwide. It is for certain that no real injured victim exhibits such behavior medically as the actor in wheelchair, and no real EMT and EMS rescue operation behaves in that asinine manner unless they have been sold on the project that it is a Planned Mass Casualty Event exercise drill for a good cause, that it is to be a photo-ops, and is not a real event. No EMT and EMS will behave that way in a real emergency for fear of having their professional licenses revoked, and being held criminally negligent in the exercise of their trained, checklisted, and strictly laid out duties on how to handle such emergencies.
Therefore, as the inevitability of sound and rational logical reasoning always condemning the indefensible and the guilty, since this first event was a Planned Mass Casualty drill, the poor Muslim patsies, the Tsarnaev brothers, were also just innocent stooges setup in the usual manner by the FBI (Exhibit E9 Judge Napolitano) to take the fall for a realistic enactment of practicing Martial Law in Boston. The real criminals are at this time most certainly doubling up with laughter at the American people's expense, and at their own brilliance for once again having successfully got away with scapegoating Islam and Muslims.
However, if the officialdom of City of Boston will insist that this first event was real in order to save face in public because the Planned Mass Casualty Event actually went live and there were real casualties by their own admission and statistics, then the images shown on worldwide television of the legless victim in a wheelchair are outright fake.
No trained EMS and EMT will rescue someone whose legs have been blown up in that absurd way as is obvious from how the second sub-event was handled where the injuries were deemed real and it was known by the EMT and EMS to not be an exercise drill. The images show real fire brigade trucks and ambulances handling the injured in a completely different and commonsensical evacuation protocol than was observed at the first site where the simulation was known to being enacted. Therefore, they would have to accept that the broadcasting of the absurd rescue of Jeff Bauman Jr., on wheelchair on mainstream television news worldwide was faked, if they would insist that the first event itself was not a fake.
That double jeopardy, Mr. and Mrs. Law enforcement and rapidly atrophying legal minds of America, namely,
  • either the acceptance that event one was a covert HSEEP Planned Mass Casualty Event instead of the overt exercise drill as per their own planning documents, and the victims were only simulating moulage injuries,
  • or the acceptance that the images broadcast on television were faked (as no real EMT and EMS operation is trained to perform rescue in that absurd way, and were they to respond in that fashion they would be immediately held liable for criminal negligence in this most litigative nation where lawyers abound),
is the checkmate!
This checkmate, with expert testimony by medical and EMT practitioners of just describing their own normal procedures from their own textbooks and emergency procedure manuals, can stand in any court of law. It is not obvious for what precise charges however; perhaps minimally to publicly admit the truth as stated above, and as future hazard mitigation of drills inexplicably going live, to legally put a blanket moratorium on all such Planned training exercises by the executive branch of any administration, whether local, state, or federal, in which the pubic is not a priori informed – the way they were repeatedly informed of the planned Operation Shield 2012 Boston exercise much in advance.
As documented in the public documents above, the hiring of actors and amputees for disaster preparedness exercise drills is a Homeland Security and FEMA operational fact, not speculation. And so is actual conducting of Mass Casualty Event drills for which these stage-hands are routinely hired and asked to sign non disclosure agreement on national security grounds. These drills are used to rope unemployed people as well as pertinent officialdom into role play as their patriotic duty in the 'war on terror' preparedness; to officially stand down any real emergency services as responsible people think this is only a drill and only those participating in the drill from officialdom are on stage and scripted into the act; and subsequently, these drills are easily turned into a false flag operation either by collusion of all concerned, or solely by a supra covert agency of the national security state conducting a compartmentalized covert-ops terroristic act with “camouflage, patsies taking the blame, and deception” for which the drills provide the most excellent official cover and stand-down of real response.
That happened on the 9/11 catastrophic terrorism event (no NORAD response to the supposed airliner hijackings as the entire air defence system of the United States was standing down thinking it was the pre-planned exercise drills many of which were simultaneously in progress on that date). And we can see this same scenario in action replay in the Boston Marathon refresher small-terrorism event, where no ambulances or fire engines showed up for a long time, and the actors sporting moulage injuries were evacuated in wheelchairs for media photo-ops. The frightening thing to observe here is the level of complacency of the Boston citizens. A medical city, none of its doctors and professors of medicine have risen up to assert their expert testimony that these images of injuries and the emergency response of licensed and trained EMTs appears to be a spoof movie rather than something that they as professors of medicine either teach or practice in their own hospitals.
As we see transpiring in Boston and explained above, this drills method for overlaying Operation Gladio covert-ops also easily co-opts the officialdom and actors who were only participating in the drills part, into adopting stoned silence given the real destruction, and real fatalities and injuries, for fear of criminal culpability for deceiving the public – not to mention the non disclosures they already signed any violation of which they minimally risk legal charges if not outright assassination by the same national security state apparatus which carried out the Operation Gladio death operation on the unwary public.
This diabolical modus operandi of training drills going live, is one up on the more primitive Operation Gladio in Western Europe. The false flag events there were not necessarily assisted by their officialdom, and was conducted by NATO intelligence principally to convince both the state's elected officialdom and the public electing them, of the fictitious threat of Communist invasion of Western Europe. The difference with the latter day Operation Gladios anywhere in the Western world, including in the United States, is that the national state machinery is already a part of the Hegelian Dialectic of 'War on Terror'. It is mainly their respective public that needs periodic convincing why they should be better off living in a police-state in order to protect them from an equally fictitious threat from domestic terrorists --- a Machiavellian modus operandi for the construction of a global police state piece-meal with the active connivance of officialdom under the cover of “plausible deniability”.
Once again, all matters current already presaged by Bertrand Russell in the Impact of Science on Society in 1951:
There is, it must be confessed, a psychological difficulty about a single world government. The chief source of social cohesion in the past, I repeat, has been war: the passions that inspire feeling of unity are hate and fear. These depend upon the existence of an enemy, actual or potential. It seems to follow that a world government could only be kept in being by force, not by the spontaneous loyalty that now inspires a nation at war.”
Who those overarching planners are who continue to hijack drills and training exercises to make them go live, is unknown. The masterminds can never really be pinpointed – unless under a victor's justice as witnessed at Nuremberg Military Tribunals where the Nazi's 'Operation Canned Goods' was easily apprehended as the diabolical pretext “to goosestep the Herrenvolk across international frontiers” (Justice Robert H. Jackson), and for which many among the surviving Nazi leadership were hanged. I desist from speculating without hard evidence, except to state the obvious fact of the matter. That, whichsoever this supranational organization is, and whosoever its real leaders, planners, controllers and field agents are who have repeatedly carried out Operation Gladio on both American and international soil with brazen impunity, can only be a secretive and highly compartmentalized part of officialdom space of the supranational security state that controls not only the sole superpower, but also many Western nations.
Without officialdom's active and tacit quid pro quo protection of this supranational security state apparatus within the facade of elected governance, this criminal enterprise running Operation Gladios worldwide cannot ever succeed.
Since the overarching motivation of officialdom – who are already known to merely be the elected front faces for the oligarchy that rules the United States with complete control – is known to be global governance in a global police state, therefore, all methods and modus operandi which take the world there, by hook or by crook, by the straightforward logic of the matter, are also its own.

Credits: This report is indebted to the tireless labors of many an unknown activist worldwide who researched and gathered the raw data from videos and photographs making these invaluable resources available to other researchers for analysis. A special hat tip to Marlena Doucette in Boston who also contributed to some of the research and analysis. This report is a testimony to the power of the internet and its ability to facilitate the distributed cooperation across the globe among non potted plant human beings actively sharing in the same common aspiration for truth, justice, and peace.

The author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley ( ), and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden 2003 book was rejected by numerous publishers and can be read on the web at He may be reached at Verbatim reproduction license at

First Published May 11, 2013 06:05 pm | Links fixed January 22, 2016 11:00 am 4115

Counterpoint: Boston Marathon False Flag Operation 13/13

The UK Indian Independence Act 1947

The UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947
Discovering The “Divine Destiny” of Pakistan
May 11, 2013 | Last Updated Friday, April 10, 2015
If you ask an Israeli Jew (of any nationality actually) who gave them Palestine to create their state based on religion, the answer ultimately reduces to “God”. If you ask a Pakistani Muslim who gave us Pakistan (I being a Pakistani) to create a state based on religion, the answer ultimately reduces to “God”. Even when each of these two very different peoples might be very secular and have little else in common culturally, they have that sense of divine exceptionalism in common. The blood-partition of Palestine and the Indian sub-continent also have a great deal of other things in common as well. Today Pakistan is perched at the brink of existentialism with “revolutionary times” visiting its shores once again and there is a resurgence to believe that God will come save us as Pakistan was brought about by God. The Israelis routinely experience this sentiment in their conquest of the Palestinians as well, atheist or not. When the Jewish army had marched into Jerusalem in 1967 to claim it as theirs by divine promise, it was surely only the divine promise fulfilled. What are the actual forces on the ground that do this God's miraculous work on earth? A glimpse is afforded by The UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947.
This charter known as the Indian Independence Act, 1947, is a declaration by a King to create Pakistan as a separate independent nation-state by the fiat of royal power:
“An Act to make provision for the setting up in India of two independent Dominions, to substitute other provisions for certain provisions of the Government of India Act, 1935, which supply outside those Dominions, and to provide for other matters consequential on or connected with the setting up of those Dominions. [18th July 1947.]
Be it enacted by the King’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: -
1. As from the fifteenth day of August, nineteen hundred and forty-seven, two independent Dominions shall be set up in India, to be known respectively as India and Pakistan. ...”
It is not a declaration of independence by the indigenous peoples like the Declaration of American Independence by “We, the People”. There is no “We, the People” in the very foundational Act of the King of England. An imperial decree that carved Pakistan and India from the Indo-subcontinent along with their arbitrary and perpetually quarrelsome borders in the blood of both the indigenous Muslims and the Hindus!
As the subsequent Pakistan's Objectives Resolution of 1949 [1] proclaimed, the creation of Pakistan was by divine sanction (by the divine right of kings it would appear if one reads this Act carefully, rather than by Will of Muslims' Almighty God). Most Pakistanis have never been introduced to this foundational document which carved Pakistan out of India by the royal proclamation of the British Empire. See the analysis of Sir Allama Iqbal's role [2] in serving the British imperial interests for which the poet of the British Empire was awarded knighthood of its Dominions. No knighthoods were awarded for the founding of the United States of America to the signers of its Declaration of Independence. In fact, many of its founders were hounded to death by the British empire. Why was the British Empire so agreeable on dividing the Indo-subcontinent. That land wasn't theirs to divide to begin with! They were the brute-force occupiers for two hundred years as the colonial raping and ravaging empire who ruled by deception, by conniving, by divide and conquer. And they maintained their legacy even in their reluctant departure.
The British acted in exactly the same manner in Palestine as well, after acquiring the temporary mandate on the heels of the Balfour Declaration. See the deconstruction of the Balfour Declaration [3] and the Pamphlet: How to Return to Palestine. [4]
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page1
Caption The UK Indian Independence Act 1947, 18th July 1947 – 'Be it enacted by the King’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1. As from the fifteenth day of August, nineteen hundred and forty-seven, two independent Dominions shall be set up in India, to be known respectively as India and Pakistan.'
Once again, Palestine was not their land to partition, and in a much greater travesty that they gratuitously gave it away to European Jewry. Palestine was a war booty along with the rest of the Middle East for the victors of World War I, and the British were only its temporary custodians without any right to play the divine right of kings. In both cases, what was not theirs to divide, the British Empire wrecked this cataclysm upon the indigenous peoples of these lands. Clearly, the British empire during their retrenchment on the heels of imperial losses in two world wars, foresaw to safeguard their own economic, military, and security interests, as well as the interests of the international bankers in whose name the Balfour Declaration was issued by the British Empire, in both these partitions. See the uncovering of historical facts which continue to languish in international obscurity [5] and the Pamphlet: The Invisible House of Rothschild. [6]
Caption The Balfour Declaration November 2nd 1917 - Dear Lord Rothschild
Caption The Balfour Declaration November 2nd 1917 – Dear Lord Rothschild, 'His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavor to facilitate the achievement of this object. it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.'
This international cabal of private financiers, who, as owners of European and Anglo-American private central banks, have controlled the issuance of national currency in nearly all of Westerndom for over a hundred years, created the political instruments of The Round Table, and The United Nations, to orchestrate their global primacy. Their principal legatees today are the private Council on Foreign Relations in New York and The Royal Institute of International Affairs in London, both financed from private tax-exempt foundations controlled by the same cabal. Their main asset, institutionalized intellectual capital, is distributed among a thousand Western think-tanks, universities, and non-governmental organizations which today fashion key global policies for governments to blindly legislate behind their carefully maintained facade of electoral politics. [7]
To think otherwise, that the British as the great benefactors of the conquered peoples, generously gave in to popular sentiments emanating from among the natives that led to both partitions of such monumental cataclysm as to rival the something that was revealed on the Sinai, is to be most naïve of international power on the grand chessboard. Ordinary public play minimal if any role in international politics except as putty to engineer consent in order to continue the illusion of popular mandate in democratic modernity's conception of state power. [8]
The dividing of India along religion lines was the watershed event of the twentieth century. It lay the international precedent for the subsequent division of Palestine --- for now the racial Jews-only Jewish State could easily claim the Muslim precedent of a “religion only” basis for the separation of a people from their land in the blood-soaked creation of Pakistan that preceded the partition of Palestine by exactly 9 months, August 15, 1947 and May 15, 1948. Uncannily the same duration as the gestation period for the human race.
Consent was engineered for this orchestration among the Muslims of India and to this day, Pakistanis, patricians and plebeians alike, continue to fool themselves with a distorted view of how they came into being. It is taboo in Pakistan to question the official version of state-sanctioned history of the creation of Pakistan --- not much different from the taboo among the Jews, and indeed the entire Western world which is even legally enforced in the European Union and Canada, and only punitively by witch-hunting Ashkenazi Jewry in the United States of America. To even academically question the officially sanctioned narrative of the Jewish HolocaustTM employed for harvesting the Jewish state in Palestine, never mind politically questioning it to effectively counter the propaganda warfare inflicted upon the entire world to bring all public into compliance with the Jewish narrative, is to become persona non-grata pretty much in every nation on earth that is part of the Western alliance or member of its economic bloc. The Jews themselves aren't allowed to question that narrative without being called “Judenrat” and other derogatory appellations.
The proud Indian public hasn't fared much better either. They continue to extol the virtues of their own heroes as having defeated the British Raj with such great courage and tenacity. It is virtually a taboo in mainstream India to question their own sanctioned narrative of history. The facts on the ground however suggest that the role of the pious intransigence of the Indian nationalists many of whom were jailed by the British for wanting to keep India united, was the necessary Hegelian Dialectic: the demand for United India of the Hindustan to conflict with the demand for a separate homeland for the Muslims. Otherwise the fire could not be lighted without two intransigent opposites coming into mortal conflict with each other, each believing fervently in their mission, and fervently enough to die for.
Perceptive understanding of political theories betray that the intransigence on the nationalist Hindu side was equally necessary, their leadership equally complicit and equally participant, perhaps unwittingly as puppets on a string which is what game-theory sets up all pawns to play, to enable fomenting and fueling the agitation by the Muslims.
The engineered Hindu-Muslim communal riots was in play for over 50 years, and at least from the moment Allama Muhammad Iqbal was given representation of the Muslims in the Round Table, before it was eventually brought to fruition as a convincing demand for separation by the Muslims that the two people could no longer live together. Perhaps it was in play even longer, ever since 1857, when the Hindu-Muslim united rebellion forced the British conquerors to recognize the necessity of driving an irrevocable permanent wedge between the two indigenous peoples to prevent any future united insurrection against the British Raj in the Indo-subcontinent which they had come to claim as “British India”. The persistence of this chauvinism is gleaned even during their retrenchment from the clause 2. (1) on page one of the Act of 1947, where the wording refers to the King's dominion being partitioned into two independent dominions thusly. What better method than using religion as the divisive factor to foment a believable reason for partition?
The fact that the empire has long understood at least the Muslim cracks and lacunas, understood the weaknesses as well as the strengths of the ethos of the main people who posed a great impediment to their unfettered expansion from the seventeenth century onwards, with the warrior Ottoman Turks ruling virtually all of the Middle East and North Africa on the one side, and the warrior Mughals, descendants of the same Mongol race, ruling territories even larger in South Asia on the other, is easily gleaned from the political novel, “Memoirs Of Mr. Hempher, The British Spy To The Middle East”. [9] Like Machiavelli's The Prince is a most perceptive treatise on the methods of deception employed by rulers from time immemorial, this is an equally perceptive treatise on how to co-opt the infantile Muslim mind using their religious ethos toward the same purpose. It is cited here to merely give an indication of the vast arsenal of Machiavellian understanding of peoples and cultures available to predators to pick and choose from for the meal du jour being cooked. This understanding of how the massa class employs all the cracks and lacunas of a people to control their behavior, is not available to the public. Indeed, those bringing it to them are often burned at stake, or forced to drink the hemlock. But the inconvenient facts, and inconvenient observations linking these inconvenient facts, continue to speak for themselves even if they takedown the sacred cows of people.
In the twentieth century with global visions of world government already in political play in the Round Table which was also hosting the India partition plans, without the Hindu leadership’s participation at the highest levels, perhaps wittingly, perhaps unwittingly, but nevertheless necessarily, in the Hegelian Dialectic of “United India” vs. “Partitioned India”, no “revolutionary times” could have been engineered in the Indian subcontinent. And as the famous statement by David Ben-Gurion for conquering Palestine goes:
“What is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times; and if at this time the opportunity is missed and what is possible at such great hours is not carried out – a whole world is lost.” — David Ben Gurion
The communal partition of the Indian subcontinent was arguably an absolute necessity for the British imperial interests during their retrenchment back to their tiny island — so that their famous “Jewel in the Crown” is never able to rise to its fullest potential as a truly independent and sovereign nation-state and thus come to play havoc with the oligarchy's long range imperial planning. That en passant abstraction, sovereign nation-state, being only a temporary staging process before the eventual transition to global governance, a one-world government of the Anglo-Saxon race led by its financial elite who controlled the empire. Well before the partition of India in 1947, that diabolical endgame was already being pursued by the Round Table interests openly. How could it have been a secret from either the Muslim or the Hindu leadership all of whom were educated in England and were eating off of the same English tables? It is plainly evidenced by the statement of the famous British historian Arnold Toynbee in 1931:
“We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local nation states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or publicist can perhaps not quite be burned at the stake but certainly be ostracized or discredited.” — Arnold Toynbee, The Trend of International Affairs Since the War, International Affairs, November 1931, page 809
Why were the British carving India into smaller nation-states while they were simultaneously conniving to “wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world.”? Is that not an obvious question to ponder for the politically savvy mind possessing even a modicum of intellect that is willing to rise above the sanctioned narrative?
What is even more shocking is that there is no mention of this conflict, or whether any shrewd consideration was even given to it by the prominent leaders on both sides in recognition to their being played, in the vast treasury of documents and speeches left behind on the subject of partition in both India and Pakistan national archives. At least, in the books after books written on the subject that have used these archives, the silence is notable.
Not perceptively understanding the diabolical and sophisticated methods of empire has been the greatest failing of the simplistic-minded spiritually inclined peoples of the subcontinent both pre and post partition, continuing to today. A perceptive understanding of Machiavelli in history helps one perceptively understand Machiavelli in the present. See for instance: Operation Gladio Yesterday and Worldwide Terrorism Today – Identifying the Enemy. [10]
But in colonies and slave nation-states where the tradition of studying social sciences and political theories was never permitted to take root, the mind remains enslaved to the narratives of the massa designed for engineering the public's consent for what's happening to them. The role of house niggers [11] in cementing that engineered consent in massa's dominions is still most poorly understood in both India and Pakistan. These psychological assets of empire who are cunningly brought into national prominence have kept both nations victims of Occidentosis [12] in their national policy prescriptions even today, just as Lord Macaulay [13] had masterfully envisaged in the nineteenth century for its most precious jewel in the crown:
“We must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern, --a class of persons Indian in blood and colour, but English in tastes, in opinions, in morals and in intellect.”Lord Thomas Babington Macaulay, Minute on Education, 2nd February 1835
The legacy continues:
“Today's Uncle Tom doesn't wear a handkerchief on his head. This modern, twentieth-century Uncle Thomas now often wears a top hat. He's usually well-dressed and well-educated. He's often the personification of culture and refinement. The twentieth-century Uncle Thomas sometimes speaks with a Yale or Harvard accent. Sometimes he is known as Professor, Doctor, Judge, and Reverend, even Right Reverend Doctor. This twentieth-century Uncle Thomas is a professional Negro ... by that I mean his profession is being a Negro for the white man.” — Malcolm X, The Autobiography of Malcolm X, 1964, 1999 hardcover edition, Chapter Black Muslims, page 265
“The white establishment is skilled in flattering and cultivating emerging leaders. It presses its own image on them and finally, from imitation of manners, dress, and style of living, a deeper strain of corruption develops. This kind of Negro leader acquires the white man’s contempt for the ordinary Negro. He is often more at home with the middle-class white than he is among his own people. His language changes, his location changes, his income changes, and ultimately he changes from the representative of the Negro to the white man into the white man’s representative to the Negro. The tragedy is that too often he does not recognize what has happened to him.” — Martin Luther King Jr., A Testament of Hope, page 307
Not in the slave colonies bestowed “freedom” by the King's benevolence, but in the singular colony that forcibly extracted her liberation from the King's tyranny, that such wisdom and perceptive understanding born! Both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr., each assassinated, were made in the US of A, not India, and not Pakistan. Why not? Her peoples have all the riches of the world underneath their soil. They have all the brainy peoples of the world who come to America to create its Technetronic revolution. All that remains is some manly courage to face the facts of history and why it has been so easy to colonize vast nations of earth. Now accelerating towards world government!
If “imperial mobilization” was so simplistic and reductionist as its publicly advertised banner of Divide et Imperia, which even elementary school children in fifth grade history class first learn about in both India and Pakistan, the Indian subcontinent would have long been free of the yolk of colonialism. What most Indians and Pakistanis never learn, even when they get a foreign education, is the Hegelian Dialectic. For their higher education is primarily to become part of the Western economic system, to maintain its status quo by being indoctrinated into its virtues, and finding suitable rewards in its whole hearted participation. This is by design, and not just happenstance. For otherwise, no empire can flourish. Were that not the case, the conquered people would have shrewdly protected themselves from both the blood partition, and the subsequent faux freedom flags hoisted upon their nations by Western trained Hindu and Muslim lawyers on foundations which were entirely foreign to the genius of the indigenous peoples. To this day even the main body of laws in the partitioned states is almost entirely based on the pioneering British Penal Code, written in the nineteenth century for governing the remote and altogether alien colonies of the British empire!
A careful read of this imperial document divining the partition of the Indo-subcontinent leaves no room for speculation that the British engineered the policy of partition independent of the indigenous Muslim public's demand in accordance with their own imperial calculus. The popular sentiment among the Muslims was an exercise in demand creation using the British empire trained assets. It was a top-down demand sown by the patricians and not an organic demand which was seeded naturally among the plebeian people. The demand was fertilized with riots and bloodshed to engineer consent for the imperial project. And the King was all too willing to comply with the “demand” presented to him in the name of the Muslims by the British empire's own trained minds. It is perhaps only a remarkable coincidence that it is difficult to identify a single key founder of Pakistan among the Muslim League leadership in the ten-twenty years preceding the creation of Pakistan, who spent any time in a British jail for actively opposing the British empire. Unlike those Indian nationalist leaders who were principally engaged in the Quit India Movement and as far as they were concerned, most fearlessly gave up their freedom to the British jailers to get rid of the colonial masters in a united India. It is of course only attributed to the genius of the Muslim League leadership that they did not forsake their freedom, as the famous American biographer Stanley Wolpert of UCLA asserts in his book: Jinnah of Pakistan (1984). (This fact is noted from memory as I read this work decades ago.)
It is also difficult to identity any prominent Muslim separatist leadership who at any time loudly condemned the Jallianwala Bagh massacre (also known as the Amritsar massacre), which took place in the Jallianwala Bagh public garden in the northern Indian city of Amritsar on 13 April 1919, unlike among the Hindu nationalists. Their most famous poet laureate, Rabindranath Tagore, immediately repudiated his knighthood in protest after that episode, while the most famous poet laureate who is called the intellectual father of Pakistan for calling for a separate nation for Muslims, Sir Allama Muhammad Iqbal, evidently did not bat an eyelid, steadfastly holding on to the British knighthood until his death.
These same British trained assets who never actively or publicly opposed any British cruelty wrecked upon the Muslims beginning with the dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire, became the first Government of Pakistan after the partition. It is also just a coincidence of course that from the very inception of the Government of Pakistan on August 15, 1947, the pre-partition feudal power class in the Indian subcontinent which was cultivated and coddled by the British Empire, was retained in Pakistan by these British assets – unlike by the Indian nationalists who came to power in post-partition India! That feudal power class created by the British empire to serve their imperial interests still flourishes in Pakistan, even into its 65th year of existence. It has continually been augmented by other feudals arising, spanning the gamut from the military praetorian guard class which has come to own most of Pakistan's economy and its real-estate to the industrialist class many of whom have British titles. This includes Mr. Syed Babar Ali, head of Nestle Corporation Pakistan supplying water to the foreign occupation troops in Afghanistan, who has appointment to the Order of the British Empire, OBE.
Finally, the mind disturbed by reading this Act and the preceding deconstruction of imperial history might begin to ponder whether these separatist Muslim leaders were mere mercenaries for hire, or Nietzsche's superman exercising “will to power”, or were they merely dupes and stooges flattered, cajoled, cultivated and knighted by empire to serve its interests. It is now hard to tell which is which, but it also doesn't really matter ex post facto, because their behavior and the favors that were granted them by empire is what speaks loudly on their behalf through the events of history once we change the lens focus from narrow to wide, from local to global. The worrisome dilemma for those living in the present should instead be the uncomfortable recognition that these sacred leaders were used by empire for primacy on the grand chessboard of their time, wittingly or unwittingly, and that indeed little has changed in the modus operandi of primacy on the grand chessboard of our time.
The UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, Dated 18th July 1947, is reproduced below. It is the grotesque testimony in plain-sight of the precedent-setting engineered partition of a land, and the precedent-setting engineered forced separation of a people who had hitherto lived together for a thousand years on that land, in the name of religion! Apart from the engineered American “War on Terror” in the name of perpetually fighting “militant Islam” which has now been legislated in nearly all nations of the world as the inevitable harbinger of one-world government, the UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, is the most humiliating example of the devilish hijacking of the religion of Islam willingly bought into by Muslims – a people who have remained malleable putty in the hands of successive empires since the very inception of Islam! Not only has “Islam” become the opiate of the plebeians, but history now bears incontrovertible testimony that the abuse, distortion, and mis-representation of the religion of Islam before the public mind for self-serving political agendas of the patricians, has been an effective instrument for extracting voluntary servitude from the masses. [14]
All pages from The UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947, are reproduced below.
[7] For those poorly read of Western hegemonic literature and unfamiliar with its extensive bibliography, this perspective can be quite alien. See for instance Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope - A History of the World in Our Time, 1966. PDF link to copy on
[8] Research for instance the openly stated purpose and openly visible institutional power of The Council on Foreign Relations in New York, The Royal Institute of International Affairs in London, both offshoots of the Round Table that was set up by Cecil Rhodes under Alfred Milner; and who funds and controls these privately funded tax-exempt organizations today along with the myriad think-tanks and supra-national organizations like the United Nations, World Bank, IMF, WTO, that define the global policies of not just the superpower state and many other Western nations, but of all nations, friendly and unfriendly, developed and undeveloped. The famed electorate as well as the celebrated elected representatives play minimal role in it apart from the former lending legitimacy to the notion of “democracy”, and the latter lending their signature to enact the private interests of the ruling oligarchy into the “legalism” of the state. Partition of India and Palestine are examples of that fiat of power exercised through the ruling-state by the forces that control it from behind the facade of public will. That will is at times synthetically manufactured, at other times is organically present by the nature of prevailing human conditions where the response is predictable when properly cultivated. In all cases the conditions are continually fertilized until ripe for harvesting. This is why think tanks like the Rand Corporation exist. Set up by the United States government, the new ruling state after World War II, it is predominantly staffed with mathematicians and other political and military experts in game theory who divine war and peace games during all hours of the day and night, for that purpose. None of this information is state secret. Only the public awareness is lacking. And for good reason. The bread and circuses of the Roman empire have also been upgraded for modernity. More one is invested in one's success, career, business, the “American Dream”, more there is motivation to remain ignorant of the real forces of social engineering governing one's society lest one is deprived of the spoils of the good life. See The Art and Science of Co-option,

First Published May 11, 2013
Updated July 11, 2013
Links fixed March 22, 2014
Updated Friday, April 10, 2015 09:00 pm 5247

UK Indian Independence Act, 1947
18th July 1947
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 pagei
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 01
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 02
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 03
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 04
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 05
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 06
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 07
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 08
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 09
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 10
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 11
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 12
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 13
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 14
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 15
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 16
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 17
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 18
UK Indian Independence Act, 1947, 18th July 1947 page 19
- ### -

First Published May 11, 2013 | Updated Friday, April 10, 2015 09:00 pm 5247 | Links fixed April 04, 2016

About The Author
The author, an ordinary justice activist, formerly an ordinary engineer in Silicon Valley, California (see engineering patents at ), founded Project in the aftermath of 9/11. He was, mercifully, most imperfectly educated in the United States of America despite attending its elite schools on both coasts. This might perhaps explain how he could escape the fate of “likkha-parrha-jahils” (educated morons) mass produced in its technetronic society with all his neurons still intact and still firing on all cylinders. He is inspired by plain ordinary people rising to extraordinary challenges of their time more than by privileged and gifted people achieving extraordinary things. He chose his byline to reflect that motivation: The Plebeian Antidote to Hectoring Hegemons. Bio at Email: Verbatim reproduction license for all his work at

The Search for Historical Truth: Partition of India and Palestine – The UK Indian Independence Act, 1947 15