“That's
the great brilliance of the ever sleeping American mind chasing its
American Dream – never the ability to preempt abhorrence by
learning from history; only the belated “wakeup” to
continue talking about history, ex post facto, for years and years to
come. It is an entire industry. ... Focus on the political science – not the technical science!
The political science is ancient, the technical science is rapidly
evolving. It will continually create new technological demonstrations
and most imaginative catastrophes to shock and awe the public mind, to
repeatedly herd its instinct for self-preservation into the same 'United
We Stand' state as was done on September 11, 2001.
”
Experts
Speak Out
9/11
Conspiracy (Undeniable Old Evidence) (Part One of Two)
9/11
Conspiracy (Undeniable Old Evidence) (Part Two of Two)
Zahir's
take: Wonderful stuff! The technical analysis will surely
continue to be rehashed for another two hundred years. However, the
political analysis trumps it – just like Machiavelli trumps a
thousand brilliant scientists and engineers in every era
– a prima facie “Operation Canned Goods” to
launch “imperial mobilization”.
That
half sentence worth of political analysis was done within the first
day by this scribe, and confirmed to his own conviction by re-reading
'The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich' and 'Mein Kampf',
followed by 'The Grand Chessboard – American Primacy And Its
Geostrategic Imperatives' and 'The Clash of Civilizations and
the Remaking of World Order', starting the very first week of
911. As he wrote in the Foreword
of Prisoners of the Cave:
“How
did I learn about these plans? I actually only uncovered PNAC,
JV2020, and the Wolfowitz’s chauvinist doctrines of preemption
that he had supposedly been pushing since 1990, after 911, when I
started scratching my head at the inexplicability of it all the
moment some 19 Muslim hijackers’ names were announced, and the
public was informed that they had learnt flying on flight simulators
and had told their instructors that they weren’t interested in
learning how to land! If Bin Laden was so smart at having planned
such an outrageous attack and counted on such brilliant executioners
who did it so flawlessly after only learning to fly on simulators, he
was pretty stupid at having enlisted idiots who would deliberately
leave such a trail of evidence behind, including statements that they
weren’t interested in landing – so that either they would
risk being uncovered before the attack, or their attack foiled while
in progress, or after a successful attack, America would know exactly
whom to go bomb in retaliation!
Only
one of these aspects could be true, either they were brilliant
military tacticians and strategists, or nincompoops from a three
stooges movie who succeeded despite themselves, but the incongruence
could not exist simultaneously on this large scale military style
invasion project, except in a Hollywood spoof.
Having
already read Brzezinski’s Grand Chessboard and Huntington’s
Clash of Civilizations several years earlier, I immediately grasped
the new pearl harbor concept the moment America deployed to bomb
Afghanistan without adequately explaining or investigating any of the
events of 911. ...
I
started to reread Brzezinski and Huntington very carefully once
again, then reread the entire voluminous Rise and Fall of the Third
Reich, and the Mein Kampf of Hitler. The similarities between the
rising crescendo of WMDs and the propaganda that William Shirer had
recorded as having transpired in the Third Reich, and the
similarities between ZB’s and Hitler’s descriptions of
their respective imperatives and how to get them, were ominous,
except that ZB’s were more polished and more sophisticatedly
put. I got really paranoid as many more light bulbs went on in my
head which had not gone on when I had originally read them. I had
just taken Brzezinski’s book as theoretical, as being from the
pen of a Cold War warrior now retired and indulging in some arm chair
warrior fantasies. I didn’t understand that hectoring hegemons
never retire until they are six feet under. I had also dismissed
Huntington’s book as an ignoramus's work not to be taken
seriously, as it was replete with obvious disinformation and tortuous
conclusions that were easy to spot by anyone who knew anything about
the subject. Now both were being egregiously put into practice, and
the latter’s book did not appear so silly anymore, but rather
shrewd and calculated.
The
first time I had read Huntington with the lens of ‘here is an
interestingly titled book from a prominent Harvard professor, let me
see what he has to say’; the second time I read it with the
lens ‘let me understand how deception is created and its seeds
planted in a free society that is not too knowledgeable about the
rest of the world’. The second reading showed that the
obviousness of his distortions, coming from a top branded American
University like Harvard, had some deeper strategic thinking behind
it. Huntington is also involved in national security and other
strategic studies as a prominent professor and intellectual at
Harvard, and couldn’t be just a simple moron like Harvard’s
President, Lawrence Summers, who recently claimed women were
inherently not as smart as men. I was wondering how people like that
become president at prestigious American universities, until
once again I uncovered during my research that the same Harvard
President had also written how the industrialized nations should dump
their waste in developing nations while he was at the World Bank in
the 1990s. With Wolfowitz now as the head of the World Bank, it is
only shortsightedness to underestimate the power of the dark side, or
the people who wield it. Huntington’s theme from portions of
his book relevant to the topic at hand is systematically dismantled
in Chapter 9. Based on this new found respect of the doctrinal
scholars for their craft, and realizing that we were entering a phase
with the hastily approved Patriot Act I that could only lead to the
Fourth Reich in America, I started attending antiwar teachins and
protest marches with my family, and began talking to prominent
Vietnam war dissenters about governmental lies.
And
that is when I first heard about the PNAC – from antiwar
teachins. Ordinary people like me,
engagingly concerned about what was happening, had uncovered more
material from public sources and the analysis of history, than the
entire mainstream scholarship and media apparatus in the United
States of America.”
At
least now, 12 years later, get your collective heads out of your
brilliant technical analyses! Develop some political wherewithal
of hegemonic statecraft: could any nation, let alone ordinary people,
during the Third Reich, do anything about its Operation Canned Goods
to launch its quest for their Lebensraum, except to militarily
confront the Third Reich?
Why
do you think it is different for confronting the Fourth Reich; for
their new “Lebensraum” of world government?
Oh,
but the same guy who explains the legal definition of “conspiracy”
in the documentary above will rush to call that quest for world
government a “conspiracy theory” – but hopefully
not ( See Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory
http://tinyurl.com/anatomy-of-conspiracy-theory
).
Here
is a funny fact: The same fellow who started the World Trade Center
project is also the exponent of world government. He is also the
former head of the Council on Foreign Relations which is driving the
agenda of Global Governance by open declaration of its modus
operandi: “an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it
piece by piece”.
And
here is another funny fact: No military interdiction to counter that
revived quest for a global “Lebensraum” is possible
today. World Government is a macro fait accompli.
A
few more “Operation Canned Goods” will surely be required
to incrementally induce micro fait accompli in baby steps, to piece
meal cement the journey in its each successive stage to make turning
back impossible or impractical from that stage, which brilliant
people will also continue to talk about for many more decades to
come.
That's
the great brilliance of the ever sleeping American mind chasing its
American Dream – never the ability to preempt abhorrence by
learning from history; only the belated “wakeup” to
continue talking about history, ex post facto, for years and years to
come. It is an entire industry.
Well,
guess what? Machiavelli knows that too: Convince People of
Absurdities and get them Acquiescing to Atrocities – the first
rule of hegemony when “democracy is inimical to imperial
mobilization”. Afterwards, if the public ever wakes up (when
their own burden becomes too high), its enlightened scholars,
scientists and historians, and the odd ball rebel of conscience can
study the fait accompli all they want:
“We’re
an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while
you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will —
we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can
study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re
history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to
just study what we do.” — Senior Bush Advisor, The
New York Times, October 17, 2004
Focus
on the political
science –
not the technical science! The political science is ancient, the
technical science is rapidly evolving. It
will continually create new technological demonstrations and most
imaginative catastrophes to shock and
awe the public mind, to repeatedly herd its instinct for
self-preservation into the same 'United We
Stand' state as was done on September 11, 2001. And
you, all of you, will be left to just study what they do.
Sun Tzu captured the obviousness of it with remarkable eloquence when
defining the characteristics of a true warrior in the Art of War 2500
years ago:
“To
lift an autumn hair is no sign of great strength; to see the sun and
moon is no sign of sharp sight; to hear the noise of thunder is no
sign of a quick ear.”
The
shrewd public warrior now finally awake from the American Dream and
into the American Nightmare, anticipates,
prepares, calculates, and preempts, rather than narrate
after the fact sheepishly clamoring for “New
Investigation” from the same wolves who slaughtered
the lamb in the first place! He astutely comes to understand the
“forces that drive them”
and formulates strategies to counter that, instead of chase their
myriad effects. As Bernard Lewis of Princeton University had
explained in his propaganda manual 'The Crisis of Islam –
Holy War and Unholy Terror' to reinvigorate the “doctrinal
motivation” for America's war on terror:
“Terrorism
requires only a few. Obviously the West must defend itself by
whatever means will be effective. But in
devising means to fight the terrorist, it would surely be useful to
understand the forces that drive them.”
Caption
The Next Global Threat? A Super Ali Baba Plus Plus to Terrify Mankind
With? (Click image to see what's that all about)
9/11
Firefighters Reveal Bombs Destroyed WTC lobby
9/11:
Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out
Dr Judy Wood at New Horizons Where Did The Towers Go 24 Oct 2011
Where Did the Towers Go – One Step Beyond 25 Oct 2011
Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura - Season 3, Episode 2 -- Death Ray
Jesse interviews Dr. Judy Wood & John Hutchison
Susan Lindauer, former CIA Insider Tells 9/11 truth. Time to re-examine your World-view, America!
7/7 Terror on the Tube Revisited: Al Qaeda Recital in London Bombings
Alternate
URL:
http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2013/01/08/911-revisited-2013-the-evidence-once-again/
First
Published January 08, 2013 | Last Updated Tuesday, February 5, 2013
06:37 am
911
Revisited 2013 - The Evidence Once Again By Zahir Ebrahim | Project
Humanbeingsfirst.org
