Experts Speak Out
9/11 Conspiracy (Undeniable Old Evidence) (Part One of Two)
9/11 Conspiracy (Undeniable Old Evidence) (Part Two of Two)
Zahir's take: Wonderful stuff! The technical analysis will surely continue to be rehashed for another two hundred years. However, the political analysis trumps it – just like Machiavelli trumps a thousand brilliant scientists and engineers in every era – a prima facie “Operation Canned Goods” to launch “imperial mobilization”.
That half sentence worth of political analysis was done within the first day by this scribe, and confirmed to his own conviction by re-reading 'The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich' and 'Mein Kampf', followed by 'The Grand Chessboard – American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives' and 'The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order', starting the very first week of 911. As he wrote in the Foreword of Prisoners of the Cave:
“How did I learn about these plans? I actually only uncovered PNAC, JV2020, and the Wolfowitz’s chauvinist doctrines of preemption that he had supposedly been pushing since 1990, after 911, when I started scratching my head at the inexplicability of it all the moment some 19 Muslim hijackers’ names were announced, and the public was informed that they had learnt flying on flight simulators and had told their instructors that they weren’t interested in learning how to land! If Bin Laden was so smart at having planned such an outrageous attack and counted on such brilliant executioners who did it so flawlessly after only learning to fly on simulators, he was pretty stupid at having enlisted idiots who would deliberately leave such a trail of evidence behind, including statements that they weren’t interested in landing – so that either they would risk being uncovered before the attack, or their attack foiled while in progress, or after a successful attack, America would know exactly whom to go bomb in retaliation!
Only one of these aspects could be true, either they were brilliant military tacticians and strategists, or nincompoops from a three stooges movie who succeeded despite themselves, but the incongruence could not exist simultaneously on this large scale military style invasion project, except in a Hollywood spoof.
Having already read Brzezinski’s Grand Chessboard and Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations several years earlier, I immediately grasped the new pearl harbor concept the moment America deployed to bomb Afghanistan without adequately explaining or investigating any of the events of 911. ...
I started to reread Brzezinski and Huntington very carefully once again, then reread the entire voluminous Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, and the Mein Kampf of Hitler. The similarities between the rising crescendo of WMDs and the propaganda that William Shirer had recorded as having transpired in the Third Reich, and the similarities between ZB’s and Hitler’s descriptions of their respective imperatives and how to get them, were ominous, except that ZB’s were more polished and more sophisticatedly put. I got really paranoid as many more light bulbs went on in my head which had not gone on when I had originally read them. I had just taken Brzezinski’s book as theoretical, as being from the pen of a Cold War warrior now retired and indulging in some arm chair warrior fantasies. I didn’t understand that hectoring hegemons never retire until they are six feet under. I had also dismissed Huntington’s book as an ignoramus's work not to be taken seriously, as it was replete with obvious disinformation and tortuous conclusions that were easy to spot by anyone who knew anything about the subject. Now both were being egregiously put into practice, and the latter’s book did not appear so silly anymore, but rather shrewd and calculated.
The first time I had read Huntington with the lens of ‘here is an interestingly titled book from a prominent Harvard professor, let me see what he has to say’; the second time I read it with the lens ‘let me understand how deception is created and its seeds planted in a free society that is not too knowledgeable about the rest of the world’. The second reading showed that the obviousness of his distortions, coming from a top branded American University like Harvard, had some deeper strategic thinking behind it. Huntington is also involved in national security and other strategic studies as a prominent professor and intellectual at Harvard, and couldn’t be just a simple moron like Harvard’s President, Lawrence Summers, who recently claimed women were inherently not as smart as men. I was wondering how people like that become president at prestigious American universities, until once again I uncovered during my research that the same Harvard President had also written how the industrialized nations should dump their waste in developing nations while he was at the World Bank in the 1990s. With Wolfowitz now as the head of the World Bank, it is only shortsightedness to underestimate the power of the dark side, or the people who wield it. Huntington’s theme from portions of his book relevant to the topic at hand is systematically dismantled in Chapter 9. Based on this new found respect of the doctrinal scholars for their craft, and realizing that we were entering a phase with the hastily approved Patriot Act I that could only lead to the Fourth Reich in America, I started attending antiwar teachins and protest marches with my family, and began talking to prominent Vietnam war dissenters about governmental lies.
And that is when I first heard about the PNAC – from antiwar teachins. Ordinary people like me, engagingly concerned about what was happening, had uncovered more material from public sources and the analysis of history, than the entire mainstream scholarship and media apparatus in the United States of America.”
At least now, 12 years later, get your collective heads out of your brilliant technical analyses! Develop some political wherewithal of hegemonic statecraft: could any nation, let alone ordinary people, during the Third Reich, do anything about its Operation Canned Goods to launch its quest for their Lebensraum, except to militarily confront the Third Reich?
Why do you think it is different for confronting the Fourth Reich; for their new “Lebensraum” of world government?
Oh, but the same guy who explains the legal definition of “conspiracy” in the documentary above will rush to call that quest for world government a “conspiracy theory” – but hopefully not ( See Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory http://tinyurl.com/anatomy-of-conspiracy-theory ).
Here is a funny fact: The same fellow who started the World Trade Center project is also the exponent of world government. He is also the former head of the Council on Foreign Relations which is driving the agenda of Global Governance by open declaration of its modus operandi: “an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece”.
And here is another funny fact: No military interdiction to counter that revived quest for a global “Lebensraum” is possible today. World Government is a macro fait accompli.
A few more “Operation Canned Goods” will surely be required to incrementally induce micro fait accompli in baby steps, to piece meal cement the journey in its each successive stage to make turning back impossible or impractical from that stage, which brilliant people will also continue to talk about for many more decades to come.
That's the great brilliance of the ever sleeping American mind chasing its American Dream – never the ability to preempt abhorrence by learning from history; only the belated “wakeup” to continue talking about history, ex post facto, for years and years to come. It is an entire industry.
Well, guess what? Machiavelli knows that too: Convince People of Absurdities and get them Acquiescing to Atrocities – the first rule of hegemony when “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization”. Afterwards, if the public ever wakes up (when their own burden becomes too high), its enlightened scholars, scientists and historians, and the odd ball rebel of conscience can study the fait accompli all they want:
“We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.” — Senior Bush Advisor, The New York Times, October 17, 2004
Focus on the political science – not the technical science! The political science is ancient, the technical science is rapidly evolving. It will continually create new technological demonstrations and most imaginative catastrophes to shock and awe the public mind, to repeatedly herd its instinct for self-preservation into the same 'United We Stand' state as was done on September 11, 2001. And you, all of you, will be left to just study what they do. Sun Tzu captured the obviousness of it with remarkable eloquence when defining the characteristics of a true warrior in the Art of War 2500 years ago:
“To lift an autumn hair is no sign of great strength; to see the sun and moon is no sign of sharp sight; to hear the noise of thunder is no sign of a quick ear.”
The shrewd public warrior now finally awake from the American Dream and into the American Nightmare, anticipates, prepares, calculates, and preempts, rather than narrate after the fact sheepishly clamoring for “New Investigation” from the same wolves who slaughtered the lamb in the first place! He astutely comes to understand the “forces that drive them” and formulates strategies to counter that, instead of chase their myriad effects. As Bernard Lewis of Princeton University had explained in his propaganda manual 'The Crisis of Islam – Holy War and Unholy Terror' to reinvigorate the “doctrinal motivation” for America's war on terror:
“Terrorism requires only a few. Obviously the West must defend itself by whatever means will be effective. But in devising means to fight the terrorist, it would surely be useful to understand the forces that drive them.”
So what's next that “will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison” (Bush, Feb. 13, 2008) --- How can you preempt it?
Caption The Next Global Threat? A Super Ali Baba Plus Plus to Terrify Mankind With? (Click image to see what's that all about)
9/11 Firefighters Reveal Bombs Destroyed WTC lobby
9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out
See Zahir Ebrahim's 2008 Letter to Editor – Journal of 911 Studies On how does their focus on 911 deter a nuclear attack on Iran?
Dr Judy Wood at New Horizons Where Did The Towers Go 24 Oct 2011
Where Did the Towers Go – One Step Beyond 25 Oct 2011
Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura - Season 3, Episode 2 -- Death Ray
Jesse interviews Dr. Judy Wood & John Hutchison
See Zahir Ebrahim's Why is Judy Wood poisoning her own well? The New Hiroshima Part-3 -- Examining Judy Wood's appeal to a psy-ops victim and his dubious science to explain her own 9-11 theories - 'The Hutchison Effect'
Here is Dr. Judy Wood's book: Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11
Susan Lindauer, former CIA Insider Tells 9/11 truth. Time to re-examine your World-view, America!
See Zahir Ebrahim's Dismantling the Fiction of ‘Former’ and ‘Ex’ Intelligence: ‘What a Limited Hangout’
7/7 Terror on the Tube Revisited: Al Qaeda Recital in London Bombings
See Zahir Ebrahim's straightforward take on the 'Why': The Hard Road to World Order – Motivations that are egregiously not explored in the otherwise stellar documentary on 7/7, as in all the other 9/11 'How' documentaries.
Alternate URL: http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2013/01/08/911-revisited-2013-the-evidence-once-again/
First Published January 08, 2013 | Last Updated Tuesday, February 5, 2013 06:37 am
911 Revisited 2013 - The Evidence Once Again By Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org