RebelNews – A genuine Crypto Mossad Asset Unearthed?
Uncovering another Trojan Horse like the Jew-bashing Wikileaks-loving Israel Shamir[1], and Alien-seeking Iran-bashing Steven Greer[2]
Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
Sunday, July 24, 2011 | Last updated July 25, 2011 8:00 PM
Dear Reader, what do you make of this outfit rebelnews.org?
I am curious about their psychology. I am a nobody here at Project Humanbeingsfirst.org (as we all already know), an ordinary plebeian; a Muslim; a Pakistani; an accomplished Electrical Engineer by profession (see bio); an in your face field Negro by preference; a permanent resident in the United States for three decades (green card); and one who boldly stood up to the FBI as they came knocking twice at his front door in the Silicon Valley California looking for “Muslim terrorists” (see account in Prisoners of the Cave), and yet, for almost six months now, this so called “Rebel Media Group” rooted in the website rebelnews.org has been running on their frontpage (cached), continuously, their gratuitous editorial calling this largely unknown fellow, Zahir Ebrahim, a "Mossad agent"?
What do you think is going on?
My crime, as I humbly see it, is excerpted below from my article The White Man's Burden appears Uniformly Distributed – but had that earned me the title of “most rebellious on earth”, or, even “most disrespectful of every pig's eye on earth”, it could have made a tad more sense, but "Mossad agent"?
I fail to see the logic of running on their front-page for almost six months that label. I must be doing something right for sure, but why that specific accolade, the Hegelian twin of “anti-Semite”?
My theory is that this “Rebel Media Group” which also runs the vitriolic Jew bashing “Ziopedia”, is itself a Mossad front playing controlled dissent, and running articles in sympathy of Palestinians and much vitriolicism against Jews. They foment "anti-Semitism" and Jew-hatred among the public with inciting statements like “There are no good Jews”, and then go running claiming there is “anti-Semitism”!
This is how Theodore Herzl founded Zionistan, stating, “The antisemites WILL BECOME our most loyal friends, the antisemites nations will become our allies”. Israeli historian Benny Morris wrote in Righteous Victims: “Herzl regarded Zionism's triumph as inevitable, not only because life in Europe was ever more untenable for Jews, but also because it was in Europe's interests to rid the Jews and relieved of anti-Semitism: The European political establishment would eventually be persuaded to promote Zionism. Herzl recognized that anti-Semitism would be HARNESSED to his own—Zionist-purposes.” This is all just too well-known. And of course, who hasn't heard of the contemporary “Holocaust Industry”? Nothing is evidently sacred to the Jews – from Yitzhak Shamir's “Neither Jewish morality nor Jewish tradition can be used to disallow terror as a means of war,” (see below for full quote) to the memory of their own dead which has been mercilessly milked, and is still being milked without compunction. So, reviling their ownselves on the internet if it is to their advantage, is hardly a big deal.
Thus, I arrive at that conclusion of a hegelian Mossad front, further based on “thou protests too much by baseless and false accusations”. That is the Jews' forte, the labeling technology, from “anti-Semitism” to “Mossad Agent”. As dialectics go, it is still only a rather vanilla accusatory hegelian dialectic. We have seen fare worse in history from Communism to Nazi Socialism being funded by the same banksters and Wall Street (see Antony C. Sutton). Whatever works for milking the goyem, is always as tasty as freshly squeezed mother's milk. When “thou protests too much”, one has typically unearthed the guilty, like the proverbial 'chore ki darri mein tinka' ('caught with hand in the cookie jar and blaming the sibling' variant for those who don't speak Urdu, my mother tongue). At such times, typically, 'ulta chore kowtwal ko dante' ('the pot calling the kettle black') is the norm. No?
Rebel News' prime and much vaunted author, John Kaminski, in the guise of tirading against the Jews: “There are no good Jews”, is really tirading against the Muslims calling my religion, Islam, “fetid and toxic dogma” while paying token homage to the Christians just to be fair all around: “Christians and Muslims are trapped in the same delusional mindlock as the Jews,”. That's considered objective, and thus fair if Islam too, the real intent, is included in that equal denigration of all religions. I caught John Kaminski, and outright unmasked him without mincing words, initially very politely and with great humility two years ago when I first encountered him gratuitously denigrating Islam without having any knowledge of the subject whatsoever (see excerpt from September 2009 letter). And when the irrational vitriolicism persisted as an almost psychopathic bashing of theism and scapegoating of all Jews, getting suspicious that I was in fact dealing with a crypto Jew with a pernicious agenda.
John Kaminski happens to be the greatest posterchild of “Secular Humanism” on that “rebel” website, and also among other anti-religion but spiritual mumbo-jumbo camp. I am not sure but I think he might also be a natural favorite of the white supremacist crowd. I know though that he is often featured by the same patriotic gentry who stood by silently spectating, even cheering, while their nation bombed the Muslim nations of Afghanistan and Iraq to kingdom come. Now, suddenly awakened because their own country is clearly going bankrupt, the jobs are drying up, the American Dream is turning into the American Nightmare, and many are losing their shirt and their skirt to the banksters whom all clearly recognize to be Jews, they are presumably seeing blood against the Jews – all Jews – their longtime nemesis who killed their “god”, resisted their god's message for 2000 years as a persecuted and reviled minority among them, and is now out to extract its “pound of flesh” in spades! See Rise of the Fourth Reich in America – Revenge of the Zionofascist–Judeofascist cabal against Christendom for 2000 years of persecution. Thus fomenting natural anti-Semitism by Jews bashing themselves, bashing their enemies, leads to several ripe harvests simultaneously in a self-sustaining loop.
And I, in turn, demonstrated in the White Man's Burden article and in my copious writings cited therein, how, as the 'untermenschen', i.e., the 'lesser people', it was all just a family squabble among the white man. That it didn't matter if the 'untermenschen' were reviled, demonized, killed, slaughtered, by the white man of any shade, any race, any religion, whether atheist, Jew, Christian, or alien, or by their Negroid-slave brown henchman of any shade – we were just as much dead or reviled in all cases.
Therefore, I argued, that I didn't, and couldn't, differentiate among the many carriers of the white man's burden as we are their common victim over the past several centuries. Below is an excerpt from my article: The White Man's Burden appears Uniformly Distributed among Jews Christians and Atheists – how can one tell the difference?.
To understand the pernicious Trojan Horse of Secular Humanism disguised as “Human Rights” and other appealing mumbo jumbo in well-chosen platitudinous Newspeak, see letter to Muslims which examines Islam as the last effective obstacle to Secular Humanism, the new religion of world government. And who wants to pitch secular humanism to the world? The Jews of course! They are the biggest financiers of all campaigns to separate the rest of the world, the “goyem”, from their respective heritage, culture, civilization, and history, while retaining their own as “god's chosen peoples”. Jews are deemed to the the only natural people on earth, past and present, the rest are identified only as some secondary “non-Jewish people”. That superiority complex is even visible in the Balfour Declaration of 1917. Read its deconstruction in my response to Alan Hart to understand the many multi-faceted dynamics which go on into making the “Zion that will light up all the world.” (see Shadia Drury)
But, I don't condemn all the Jews (collectively) for it. I condemn the criminals among them who are indeed Jews. In fact, in the overarching scheme of history, the Jews have been the greatest mass murderers. One need only look at Russia yesterday and Palestine today to confirm that between the “god's chosen peoples” and their Zionist supporters, the pious Jews have slaughtered more innocent people than the good Catholic Christians of the Third Reich in all their gas chambers combined. And today, the Jews are the biggest cheerleaders for the crimes against humanity and genocide being visited upon the beleaguered Muslims from Palestine to Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Iran is already in the Jewish guns-sights. All these victims are Muslim nations, my peoples. The Jews today are killing the Muslims in whose lands they had found shelter when the Christians were persecuting them for 2000 years. They say, that victims have very long memories. The Jews are evidence of that. And they have now teamed up with their former enemies to scapegoat the Muslims for “imperial mobilization” enroute to world government which is entirely dominated by the Jewish interests, from banksters to think-tanks to foundations to world's private central banks. All owned, controlled, or financed, by Jews. They shy not from using terror and deception as their weapon of choice. Here is Yitzhak Shamir openly proclaiming it (we all know the motto of Mossad so well that it's now a cliché not worth mentioning):
'In 1943, current Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir wrote an article entitled “Terror” for the journal of the terrorist organization he headed (Lehi) in which he proposed to “dismiss all the 'phobia' and babble against terror with simple, obvious arguments.” “Neither Jewish morality nor Jewish tradition can be used to disallow terror as a means of war,” he wrote, and “We are very far from any moral hesitations when concerned with the national struggle.” “First and foremost, terror is for us a part of the political war appropriate for the circumstances of today, and its task is a major one: it demonstrates in the clearest language, heard throughout the world, including by our unfortunate brethren outside the gates of this country, our war against the occupier.”' (Noam Chomsky, Western State Terrorism, chapter 2)
And yet, I do not think all Jews are criminals. And I condemn the criminals among them far more boldly than most Muslims from Pakistan, in exactly the same tenor as I condemn Muslim criminals, atheist criminals, Christian criminals, and even alien criminals when they will shortly materialize (as noted by the FBI in their recent Hottel memo release to the public; look for it on my website if curious). And I rise to defend the ordinary Jews from gratuitous Jew-bashing of the Christians just as much as I rise to defend the ordinary Christian when they are collectively blamed for what's happening to the Muslims today. Such an attitude is not very conducive for promulgating “anti-Semitism”, the “Clash of Civilizations”, and general “revolutionary times” of brother turning upon brother, now is it? It, in fact, yanks the very rug from underneath those who want to expand it for their own benefit of cementing more Zionistan, more “revolutionary times”, more abhorrent laws, more world government, now doesn't it?
Fairness, and truth, are the biggest enemies of injustice and falsehood. Not a cliché – it is proven to be empirical from time immemorial. If it was false, then, since Cain killed Abel, there would have been no good surviving on earth. Yet good lives on in the hearts of the same race and clan of people out to conquer others even today. This good today is directionless, floundering, lost in the deception which mires them. To keep them lost and floundering is the key agenda of the purveyors and conveyors of oppression from time immemorial. Those who are able to extricate themselves from this fog, pose the biggest threat to the primacy parasites among mankind.
So, dear reader, do you think I am correct in thinking that I have actually unearthed a confirmed crypto Mossad asset in rebelnews.org?
They ran that “Mossad Agent” charge on me in order to preempt my, in due time I am sure, uncovering them as has been my record with many former friends of the 'untermenschen'? I am really not up on crypto Jewish names so nothing can be judged by the name of the presumed frontman of that website, the rabid Jew bashing liberal “rebel”, Andrew Winkler. (Although I am told by others who know better that Winkler[3] is a Jewish name – but what's in a name, judge the acts). I would like to be wrong about this – perhaps it is just a lonely high-school midget with a keyboard? But, calling me a “Mossad Agent” can't just be some simple gratuitous nonsense as I had deemed it to be all this time – since no arguments, facts, or analysis is provided in the silly editorial to which one could respond if it was an honest appraisal by a genuine petitioner. It was a tit for tat for my unmasking their rabidly anti-Jew favorite author John Kaminski. Never mind that it was a gratuitous editorial attack on me when I submitted a fair rebuttal to John Kaminski to their website, but it has lasted a tad too long for even the most fiendish high-school trolls on a payroll to enjoy.
A Muslim, bold, unabashed, un co-opted, bearing no false piety, able to trade “intellectual bullets” with equal alacrity, and at times with much greater tenacity, and fully attuned to the White Man's thinking, tactics, strategies, doctrines, literature, scholarship, is the White Man's biggest existential threat. Malcolm X proved that. An attitude such as the one he publicly proclaimed in the last few months of his life as he profoundly metanoia'd (transformed) from his earlier rabidly blanket white man's hatred:
“the most cruel beast that has ever taken a people into captivity. That is this American white man” (from a speech),
into the following:
'My thinking had been opened up wide in Mecca. In the long letters I wrote to friends, I tried to convey to them my new insights into the American black man's struggle and his problems, as well as the depths of my search for truth and justice. "I've had enough of someone else's propaganda," I had written to these friends. "I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it is for or against. I'm a human being first and foremost, and as such I'm for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole." Largely, the American white man's press refused to convey that I was now attempting to teach Negroes a new direction.' (Autobiography of Malcolm X, Second Ballantine Books Hardcover Edition: March 1999, chapter 1965, pg. 400),
is a mortal threat to all purveyors of injustices and falsehoods.
Malcolm X's newly acquired insights as destiny continued to hit him full blast in the last 10 months of his rapidly developing metanoia, quickly sealed his fate to the early graveyard just as he had been prognosticating for months – although it was carried out by surrogate stooges who looked like him (in skin color):
'An American white Ambassador in one African country was Africa's most respected American Ambassador...We talked for an entire afternoon. Based on what I had heard of him, I had to believe him when he told me that as long as he was on the African continent, he never thought in terms of race, that he dealt with human beings, never noticing their color. He said he was more aware of language differences than of color differences. He said that only when he returned to America would he become aware of color differences. I told him, "What you are telling me is that it isn't the American white man who is a racist, but it's the American political, economic, and social atmosphere that automatically nourishes a racist psychology in the white man." He agreed. We both agreed that American society makes it next to impossible for humans to meet in America and not be conscious of their color differences. And we both agreed that if racism could be removed, America could offer a society where rich and poor could truly live like human beings. That discussion with the Ambassador gave me a new insight-one which I like: that the white man is not inherently evil, but America's racist society influences him to act evilly. The society has produced and nourishes a psychology which brings out the lowest, most base part of human beings.' (Ibid. pgs. 405-406)
For twelve long years, Malcolm X reviled the white man as “the most cruel beast”, pushing black peoples' liberation via his well-articulated separation philosophy as part of the Nation of Islam movement, and nothing happened to him.
The moment, as a Muslim returning from Mecca with a clearer thinking cap on, he uttered his fair and just political philosophy to unite all black man in America regardless of religion, first as unified Afro-American political block, and then in his Pan-Africanist vision across continents with the rest of Africa, South America, and with Islam as one people, followed by developing the radically transforming insight that “the white man is not inherently evil, but America's racist society influences him to act evilly” which would have naturally led him to develop a radical unification with the common man of America regardless of color as “human beings first”, he was dead within a few short months!
No black man from the Nation of Islam, or any black man on earth, ever had the power to have Malcolm X declared persona non grata in France and have him deported from the airport. The forces who orchestrated pulling the death trigger were far greater than the 13 shotgun wounds in his heart and chest, and .38 and .45 holes in his legs and thighs.
Malcolm X is discussed in considerable detail for his impact upon our own times, in the rewritten article Palestine: Seeking the Enemy Within. Suffice it to state here that the following philosophy is empirically known to be the shortest path to an early graveyard from time immemorial, from Socrates to Malcolm X: "I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it is for or against. I'm a human being first and foremost, and as such I'm for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole."
The intelligence apparatuses worldwide, spend billions of dollars in creating disinfo, misinfo, fabricated dissent, and general confusion as “collection agencies” for people to congregate around; so that amidst all the cacophony, none in the public may reach the complete truth of the matter. The public is kept floundering from one seemingly appealing "truth" to another. Much sophisticated psychology and shrewd understanding of human nature goes into these endeavors. I have now spent several years of my life studying it – and it is frightening to realize just how much captive “prisoners of the cave” we really are. But I kinda also feel gratified by their silly focus on an unknown me – because, for their own audience, I imagine being labeled a “Mossad agent” is probably the biggest "gaali" (curse, explicative which can pass PC). And they have, I presume, cursed me with their most atrocious curse to ensure that no one among their “rebel” audience can latch on to their crypto role nor take my work seriously! Hooray – as an 'untermensch', must be doing something right. The early graveyard is really the only destination for us as we start getting effective in our message – as it was for Malcolm X. We are never celebrated by any assets of empire because they know that the only thing they must really fear is one who is not afraid, has commonsense, harbors no superiority complex, spares no punches, suffers no fools, and most importantly, feels the human dignity in belonging to the field Negroes (see FAQ: What is a Negro).
Such people do not accept bullshit from anyone – friend or foe – whether or not someone is paying attention to them (most often not). Eustace Mullins was one such person. An intellectual friend. And he was a threat to his nation's elite. Yet, he too, carried the “pious virtue” (see FAQ: What is a White Man) upon his shoulders and I boldly called him on his “Orientalism” (see his glorification of Shem, the white man's race, in Mullins' book The Curse of Canaan referenced in part-6 below). Unfortunately, I only discovered and read this interesting book after the scholar had passed away due to frail health of many years. Had I uncovered it years ago when Eustace Mullins was healthy and able to correspond, either he would have retracted or rephrased it more circumspectly as a fair intellectual when I challenged him, or, I would have publicly condemned him for the “Orientalism” which even he, as the fair scholar of the white man that he evidently was, could not escape its prejudice against the non-white races of the East! Now I only mention it as a statement of fact which appears in Eustace Mullins' book, to illustrate the point that one must be shrewdly able to discern friend from foe; that, it not be a blanket characterization; and that, just because someone is the enemy of my enemy, it does not necessarily make him my best friend under all circumstances.
This theme is reinvigorated in my confusion series part-4, part-5, and part-6, where we see Christian leaders rushing to condemn Israel and Jews with great “pious virtue” while pretending to be the friends of Muslims and Palestinians. Part-7 is the final part, the White Man's Burden which is excerpted below.
I might just put that honor of “Mossad Agent” as yet another mildly gratifying accolade up on my website, right next to the one bestowed upon me by the darling of Christian dissent and white supremacists alike, Paul Craig Roberts, United States Former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, who wrote me: “you are a completely stupid fool, a disgrace to humanity”. Then again, since nothing I have received thus far can surpass that mighty award from the empire's own asset, perhaps I won't dilute it with some lesser honor from a pathetic lonely midget in front of a keyboard. This question mark to the world asking them to look at this “Rebel Media Group” as possible agent provocateurs for the Jews themselves, spanning the full gamut of Jewish agendas from fostering anti-Semitism to making the soil fertile for Secular Humanism, is the only rebuke they are worth. It started off as a letter written to my friends inquiring if I had figured them out correctly. Now, I am just making it available to a wider audience asking the same question.
“Heeheeheehee” – as I wrote in my letter to my friends, “I am sure all my silent friends who see me bashing my head unproductively on stone walls of 'pious virtues' daily, are now just pink with envy :-)”
No, my silent 'untermensch' friends, we have to fight our own battle. The “white man” (the term is defined in the FAQ cited above) is neither our friend, nor, is their enmity towards our enemies a sign of friendship for us. We have to learn to discern friend from foe using the surgeon's fine scalpel and Socrates' laser-sharp intellect, irrespective of who is in front of us. In the vast majority of cases, apart from our obvious victimizers, our first enemy who inflicts the coup de grâce upon us on behalf of the syndicate, like Brutus, almost always looks very much like us.
The thoughtful person today has to learn to mistrust everyone regardless of what garb they wear. In an age where “deception is a state of mind and the mind of State”, it is only rational commonsense to learn to trust only those people in our groups and among our midst who have time and again proven themselves to be trustworthy. Such trust does not, and cannot extend to the internet. Here, everyone is a potential Mossad, Pentagon, ISI, or other alphabet soup agent, asset, sayanim, or just a quack.
This means, neither should you trust me just because of my self-serving claims to forthrightness. The rational test of forthrightness is daily, constant, and not a once-only occurrence. For this lowly plebeian's self-serving claims to forthrightness, see FAQ: Why should I believe anything here?.
And for the vaunted scholar's, saint's, philosopher's, leader's, rebel's, media mogul's, even the messiah's, and no less the alien's (which I am sure would be materializing shortly) self-serving claims to forthrightness in the service of the lowly plebeians, see Responsibility of Intellectuals – Redux!
Finally, if Andrew Winkler is indeed a Jew, or a crypto Jew (crypto because he failed to identify himself as a Jew on his own Jew self-bashing website rebelnews.org), then his act of calling a Muslim a “Mossad Agent” while he is publishing material reviling all Jews, Christians, and Muslims, including our religion Islam, commonsensically speaks to only one agenda. There is nothing facile about deception. No, they, Mossad assets, agents, and sayanim, have a Ph.D. in waging wars by way of deception. They are up to their schemes. Anyone, Jew or Gentile, even native informants, publishing or writing vile articles demonizing the Muslims or our religion, is a Zionist asset serving only their interests. It is wise to be especially wary of Jews (and crypto Jews) who protest too much against their own kind in blanket, vulgarly demonizing manner. Anti-Semitism has been the Zionist Jews' best friend and the foolish goy are always inclined to take that bait. See my deconstruction of Gilad Atzmon's “pious virtues” – another Jew self-bashing favorite of the goy. When Jews play lead dissent with Israel and Zionism, often collecting all the well-intentioned goyish activists around them, it isn't always as kosher as it might first appear. One has to be able to discern very shrewdly using a laser's edge. I have already unmasked several well-known pious Jews as major assets of Zion, most strikingly Noam Chomsky, in The endless trail of red herrings.
Zahir Ebrahim
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
Footnotes
[1] Israel Shamir is unmasked as a confirmed disinfo agent of empire: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/01/wow-israel-shamir-works-for-wikileaks.html
[2] Dr. Steven Greer is unmasked as a likely Mossad agent: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/01/letter-is-steven-greer-mossad-agent.html
[3] SNIPPITS AND SNAPPITS on Andrew Winkler: 'It must be done in a peaceful and civilized way. But as Douglas Reed explains in The Controversy of Zion ~ the chapter titled “The Destructive Mission”, a “good Jew” is bound to be a destructive member of the Western World. This seems to also be the understanding of the explosively growing internet-site “ZioPedia”, run by Andrew Winkler and his idea of starting a “Jew Anonymous” movement, like “Alcohol Anonymous” ~ to wean Jews away from Jewishness. We must help them in this while protecting ourselves from their schemes all along.' http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.com/2011/03/three-models-of-jewish-problem.html
Begin Excerpt
The White Man's Burden appears Uniformly Distributed among Jews Christians and Atheists – how can one tell the difference?
Part-7 of my confusion series
[...]
The foolish 'untermenschen' better understand the insidious breadth and depth of the common la mission civilisatrice bond among the white man (and including their house niggers who are often more white than the white man) when they come, individually, and in groups, wearing different colored labels of Left, Right, Liberal, Conservative, Progressive, Atheist, Christian, Jew, whatever, bearing gifts of pious virtue in various Hegelian Dialects. Zbigniew Brzezinski justified the primacy of the powerful with “Hegemony is as old as mankind” in The Grand Chessboard only as the latter day secular version of that same white man's burden.
When I recently, only this past week in fact, once again challenged the pious white man's characteristic narratives in their blanket Jew bashing screeds in my letter: Zahir Ebrahim's Letter to John Kaminski – Are you Jewish?, and deconstructed the new white man's burden of Secular Humanism they now wish to inflict upon humanity in the guise of discrediting all established religions in order to secure their one-world government, I was not surprised by what happened. You can read the response of the fanatic all-knowing Jew-basher, who has extended his unfettered Jew bashing to both Christian and Muslim bashing: “Christians and Muslims are trapped in the same delusional mindlock as the Jews,” reviling without any compunction more than 5 billion peoples on the planet in just one sentence, even calling my religion, Islam, “fetid and toxic dogma”.
The supposedly rebel website which goes by that very name and presents itself on the side of the 'untermensch' by publishing dissenting articles with empire, gratuitously wrote an amusing editorial response to my letter instead of condemning their own favorite white man whose trite screed they boldly feature on their front page every week as the avantgarde in progressive thought: Rebel News' Letter to Zahir Ebrahim – Are you Mossad?. When I submitted my response to the white man denigrating my religion and 5 billion peoples' on the planet in the name of dissent and requested the website publish my response, the same editor wrote back: “I won't. Your writings clearly don't fit in. Thank you for your time. -- Andrew Winkler Rebel Media Group”!
Indeed!
This plebeian's antidote to hectoring hegemons clearly won't fit in where the white man's burden is the real agenda – heeheehee!
I have been labeled worse than “Mossad” for calling the bullshit of the white man. The 'denier' label from Israel Shamir, the holy Jew miraculously metanoia'd into pious Christian like the historical Saul into Paul, was a tad more cognitive.
But as of this writing, nothing has surpassed what the genuinely Christian rebel leader extraordinaire, Paul Craig Roberts, United States Former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury who sat at the same oligarchic tables before taking on his new role, and who writes for the camouflaged white supremacist website VDARE.com, honored me with in Dec 06, 2008: “you are a completely stupid fool, a disgrace to humanity”. My unpardonable sin? Boldly calling his bullshit of maligning the Muslims as terrorists, while all the rest of fools, mostly the white man, applaud him for his gallant dissent!
Dissent with what? Dissent does not automatically imply being on the side of the 'untermenschen'. It is only presumed to be so in the vernacular which has calculatingly been developed in the West as a neuro linguistic programming Trojan Horse for the mind, to alias subversion under association with something familiar. And this works great for pushing covert agendas of the political elites in a far more sophisticated format than merely through “controlled dissent”. The latter is principally employed for craftily channeling any public opposition, or the premature discovery of monumental crimes in progress, towards inefficacy and at best, a Limited Hangout sacrificial mea culpa, as already examined in Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory. The endless trail of red herrings established by the social engineering symphonies of the Mighty Wurlitzer, of which “controlled dissent” is an essential melody, is primarily intended to waste sufficient time while manufacturing consent in order to successfully engineer a fait accompli that is subsequently irreversible due to its very nature, even if the truth is ex post facto revealed with much fanfare. This is straightforwardly true for a single set of masters pursuing a single set of overarching goals. Empiricism however, undeniably suggests that there are in fact, multiple sets of masters carrying their respective white man's burden, and competing amongst themselves for the unfettered rights to primacy.
For these elites, the common plebeian masses are merely the puck to be pushed around towards their own respective goal posts. In the full engagement of such broad-spectrum mind-fcks, the dissent of the lauded chiefs, and many a public figure, evidently spans the gamut – and perhaps my cynicism may be forgiven as one of only a confused person endeavoring to think for oneself without the benefit of prominent “experts” to guide one – from disagreeing amongst each other while sharing the white man's burden, to vilely herding the sheep of dissent to the same pastures as the sheep of mainstream but in erudite round-about ways. Dissent under social engineering burdens, is not always the lofty mantle of Socrates. More frequently, it is the mantle of the controllers outside of Plato's Cave pursuing their own narrow primacy interests. See: Responsibility of Intellectuals – Redux.
The pious white man is slipping today. Those majoring in Western hypocrisy might wish to work at layering their common mission civilisatrice with a bit more finesse and diabolicalism than they are doing now. Perhaps as they used to do in the past, when the East India Company created its version of globalism with free trade inflicted upon its colonies. And perhaps when small pox laden blankets decimated entire tribes and nations and genocided them off the face of the earth as a peoples. Today, even an ordinary plebeian is trivially able to call attention to their common bond of pious virtues, and trivially unravel their bullshit. Their Hegelian Dialectic is slipping....
Below are some empirical essays which unarguably demonstrate how the modern white man is still united in the same un-severable common bond, its la mission civilisatrice, even upon each other, irrespective of their separate creeds and occasional bouts of antagonistic power-plays among each other. They only compete amongst themselves, and the outclassed by the better trained simply run home to mommy, variously crying foul and grapes are sour.
The losing white man in this primacy contest often makes a great show of friendship to the 'untermensch' victims of the winning white man, employing the timeserving “enemy of my enemy is my friend” principle to open new backdoors back into the same contest. I suspect that the white man's burden intrinsically makes sharing the prize problematic among the various white man from differing creeds and races for very long, despite their common mission of unfettered primacy whenever they can get away with it.
This common mission statement used to be mistakenly called the law of the jungle – but it really isn't. In the jungle, when the primacy hierarchy, all the way to the top, has eaten its fill, each rests until the next mealtime. The strong weed out the weak yes, but only from wanting to have their daily meals, and the weakest not being able to do so for one reason or another. Never just for the sake of control, for full spectrum dominance, in the urge to enslave others. But for the arbiters of the white man's burden, there can be no point of satiation in their social Darwinianism. Such primacy can only culminate in full master-slave bondage, couched in modern day Newspeak for camouflage, as world government (see Of Ostriches and Rebels on The Hard Road to World Order). But then, the masters must turn upon each other because there really can be, only one master!
This is the Nihilist Order that is being pushed upon mankind today by the legatees of the same old white man's burden. I really can't tell these different strands of the white man apart – be they holy Zionist Jews in Palestine bringing us Western civilization on that front, or pious Christians bringing “Jesus” to Afghanistan just as they did to the Americas, and to the Indo subcontinent, or noble leftists and atheists posing as their common peacenik antagonists. They all look the same to me, especially from Mt. Fuji:
“Aspire to be like Mt. Fuji, with such a broad and solid
foundation that the strongest earthquake cannot move you, and so
tall that the greatest enterprises of common men seem insignificant
from your lofty perspective. With your mind as high as
Mt Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the
forces that shape events; not just the things happening near to
you.” -- Miyamoto Musashi -- Quoted in Political Ponerology
Here are some of my pertinent writings on the theme of white man's burden, in reverse chronological order:
Judge for yourself – and if you learn to tell the difference, please inform this confused plebeian who is fast reaching the pitiable conclusion that almost all of the dissent in the West, especially that led by the white man, is bogus! The rare exceptions are not sufficient in influence to call it effective dissent, and they are generally the unknown ordinary men and women of conscience who nobody knows, and who aren't the typical opinion-makers.
What this further underscores is the empirical pragmatism which has always been true, that the Global East, and the Global South, the lowest in the pecking order of the 'untermensch', stand pretty much alone against the incessant, all encompassing onslaught of the hectoring hegemons of the Global North-West. This has been the unvarnished history of the past several hundred years, and just because there is internet today, and the information age, it is foolish to think that it is all about to miraculously change! These new age tools have been deftly adapted for the same agenda which were previously thrashed out on lonely typewriters.
Unless the 'untermensch' nations of the East indigenously come to our own common self-defense against these almost superhuman global forces arrayed against us, no one else will.
The only known defense for the weak, is to innately become strong. No people living on the begging bowl pleading for justice in charity, have ever got a fair hearing in the imperial courts of any ubermensch, white, black, brown or yellow, any place on earth.
Becoming strong does not however imply following a new pied piper, such as falling prey to “revolutions” orchestrated through mob-power, wherein, the same puppetmasters diabolically harness the public's genuine disaffections to merely replace one tyrant by another in a game of hegelian musical chairs. See: Zahir Ebrahim's Letter to BRussells Tribunal: Egypt Revolution, the White Man's Burden, and Iraq, which penetrates behind the “revolutions” now transpiring among the 'untermensch' nations in the Middle East in the vaunted name of “change”.
This is a stark lesson to remember for the American and Western public as well. They are continually taught to look towards “leaders” and “experts” to show them the way at the expense of their own commonsense. Kept thoughtlessly occupied chasing the mirage of the 'American Dream', the 'white trash' of the Global North-West shall not escape the butcher's knife either. Their biggest Achilles heel today, is their loss of faith, and their greatest nemeses are those pitching Secular Humanism to them by reviling all religions.
And it is done with such finesse – if one were to judge Islam by the ubiquitous song of “Islamofascism” in the Western newsmedia and the Hollywood movies, Christianity by the child molesting priests proudly decked in their starched collars of piety, Judaism by the Judeofascist Talmudic cabal who today principally stand out as the most barbaric of peoples on planet earth, one would become naturally primed for a great new secular substitute for the New Age.
Without faith, without a deep sense of justice and morality, all of which are being systematically stripped from the gullible Americans' national psyche which was already too rich in the fertile soil of hedonism pre-ploughed with the ripe seeds of moral relativism, what is to prevent the American masses from turning into “cannibals”? They have already been sufficiently psychologically conditioned into barbarianism, almost gleefully watching the slaughter of the 'untermenschen' without much anxiety, in just this past decade (see America's Shame). Now they are also being physically conditioned through their own systematic dehumanization at airport security checkpoints where 99% of the travelling public meekly acquiesces to the false choice between accumulating deadly radiation dosage and grotesque molestation to keep them “safe” (see What Went Wrong In The Land of The Free – Standing For Airport Indignities).
And if this science report is to be believed, pharmaco'logically induced moral reconditioning may well be the next mandatory prescription, prescribed in Newspeak of course, like every other Orwellian remedy: “Racist? Angry? The answer may be in a pill. A pill to enhance moral behaviour; a treatment for racist thoughts; a therapy to increase your empathy for people in other countries – these may sound like the stuff of science fiction but, with medicine moving closer to altering our moral state, society should be preparing for the consequences, according to a book reviewing scientific developments in the field.”
The “ultimate revolution”, as Aldous Huxley had put it almost a half century ago, would be “to get people actually to love their servitude!”
That “ultimate revolution” of full spectrum servitude is being brought to the Western shores in systematic crisis stages. Each crisis stage masking the preceding one, to appear independent and unrelated. The public naturally focuses on the most recent crisis which is tearing their lives apart, and remain unable to distinguish between cause and effects that are cumulatively and systemically disintegrating their free society into a draconian police-state, one crisis stage at a time. This calculated lapse of public understanding works beautifully in the interest of those who are the first-cause of the Social Darwinian disease of primacy, the untouchable oligarchy. These murdersome Hectoring Hegemons, the Brotherhood of Death, perceptively understand that which the public mind simply cannot comprehend. Namely, that the political and social engineering of how to usher in unpopular transformations, the piecemeal erosion of national sovereignty to create world government, requires the creation of overwhelming “revolutionary times” which can make the public's reality “look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality,”. Each new ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ provides the new enabling pretext for inching the world one baby-step closer towards the Global Governance of the Planet by the oligarchy. Because they control the global mass media and the Mighty Wurlitzer's infinite capacity to mold national destinies, they are always successful in getting public perception to focus on whatever they wish to fabricate, instead of the public accurately perceiving its zeitgeist as an interconnected whole (see Some Dare Call it Conspiracy! Are you among them?).
All this mind-fck primes the desperate public mind to easily accept the equally shocking remedies that are proffered up to alleviate the crisis in the cacophony of experts and useful idiots. Much effort gets expended by the many doctors of society, some mercenaries, some dupes and patsies, and with much fanfare, in chasing the remedies for the most shocking symptom with little impact on the actual disease which remains largely undiagnosed. Even the most brilliant and honest social and political physicians get caught in this mind-fck. The master sociologist of all times had insightfully observed of this principle of social engineering in his own epiphany to the white man's burden. I hope I may be forgiven if I see the many convoluting parallels at many levels too acute to deny:
“The cure of a sickness can only be achieved if its cause is known, and the same is true of curing political evils. To be sure, the outward form of a sickness, its symptom which strikes the eye, is easier to see and discover than the inner cause. And this is the reason why so many people never go beyond the recognition of external effects and even confuse them with the cause, attempting, indeed, to deny the existence of the latter.” -- Mein Kampf, 1:10, Causes of the Collapse
Indeed, even commonsense suggests that the cure of a sickness can only be achieved if its primary cause is known, and the same is true of curing political evils which create and sustain all others. In my Response to Nihilists and Letter to Muslims, I examined the new color that Western society is being so methodically painted in with the delicate and sophisticated brush strokes of Secular Humanism, as a necessary adjunct to getting them to love their own cannibalistic servitude. This ain't a matter to be digested within the 15-second attention span that Westerners are taught to parse headline news with. If there is any truth to the sociologists' statistic that less than 2% people actually think, 8% think they think, and 90% would not be caught dead thinking, all plebeians are gonna have to work really hard to comprehend the Hegelian mind-fcks we are being routinely dished to prime us for “voluntarily” accepting the New World Order. As far as the hectoring hegemons are concerned, the North Western 'white trash' only occupy a different pecking order from the 'untermensch' of the East and the South. The misery at least ends for the dead. The wretched of the earth must continue to live in full service to the masters, wherever they might be, until it is their turn to be served at the dinner table. As meal. And if the wretched can be kept in a happy-happy state while waiting for their turn, voluntarily acceding to what is happening to them, so much the better. See What can be done?.
End Excerpt
Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/07/is-rebelnews-crypto-mossad-asset.html
Mirror URL: http://bloghumanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2011/07/25/is-rebelnews-crypto-mossad-asset-by-zahir-ebrahim/
Source PDF: http://humanbeingsfirst.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/is-rebelnews-crypto-mossad-asset-by-zahir-ebrahim-2a.pdf
The author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley ( http://tinyurl.com/zahir-patents ), and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden 2003 book was rejected by six publishers and can be read on the web at http://PrisonersoftheCave.org. He may be reached at http://Humanbeingsfirst.org. Verbatim reproduction license at http://humanbeingsfirst.org#Copyright.
07/25/2011 20:00:05 7765
RebelNews – A genuine Crypto Mossad Asset Unearthed? By Zahir Ebrahim 19/19
