Zahir
Ebrahim | Project
Humanbeingsfirst.org
Saturday,
March 20, 2010 | Last
Updated July 16, 2010
| Addendum:
Letter March 24, 2010 | Photo of Shameless Stooges
Added March
02, 2011
The
political philosophies and social engineering underlying imperial
mobilization are far more
diabolical today than they have been in the past. Comprehending the
role of fabricated enemies and false oppositions to lend credence to
the fabricated enemies, begins at the
doorstep of political science, not Islam. The fatwa is part of the
finely tuned social engineering to continually engineer
consent for the fabricated
perpetual war on terror.
Caption
Shameless Stooges at the massa's table in payoff for
“Bukakke”
services rendered. Tahir ul-Qadri is not a patsy – he knows
exactly what he is doing by echoing empire's axioms on Terrorism.
The Western establishment's cultivated Trojan Horse among
Muslims to institute beneficial religious diversity (sic!),
namely “moderate
Islam”,
Qadri makes even Mir
Jafar/Mir Sadiq duo look virtuous. If there was any
doubt earlier, the gratuitous presence at the 2011 WEF is conclusive
proof of the Qadri–Khan
duo being the pathetic house
negroes eagerly carrying the white
man's burden. Just being invited to sit at the
white man's table and utter gibberish in gratitude is
evidently sufficient incentive for Pakistani brown-sahibs to
commit treason. The final payment awaiting stooges when their
services are terminated can be witnessed in the fate of the one far
more illustrious, Benazir
Bhutto. The ill-fated daughter of the East had
echoed the same axioms on Terrorism at the CFR.
Evidently, anyone and everyone can be recruited after they have
shown their willingness to echo the massa's mantras –
here is CFR's
latest promotion. Now is your chance to serve the
massa – house negroes are evidently still in great
demand! And you have the vast array of “Betweens”
to choose from for your daily chores. Trips to Disneyland,
sabbaticals, and book deals are included in the compensation
package. (Image sent by a Pakistani field negro, copyright
unknown. Added March 02, 2011)
This
is a response to the following pertinent passage from the Pakistani
news reports on the Islamic scholar Dr. Tahir
ul-Qadri of
Minhaj-ul-Qur’aan,
a Sufi organization in East London, issuing terrorism fatwa
(also BBC March
2, 2010).
The
Pakistani English language daily The News reported:
‘LONDON:
The 600-page document, drawn up by Dr
Tahir-ul-Qadri, declares that attacks on innocent citizens are
“absolutely against the teachings of Islam”.
The
Minhaj-ul-Qur’aan, a Sufi organisation
based in East London, which advises the British government on how to
combat radicalisation of the Muslim youth,
will launch the 600-page Fatwa against
suicide bombings and terrorism, declaring them un-Islamic, tomorrow.
It
condemns the perpetrators of terrorist explosions and suicide
bombings. The document, written by Dr Tahir-ul-Qadri, declares the
suicide bombings and terrorism as “totally un-Islamic”.
It is one of the most detailed and comprehensive documents of its
kind to be published in Britain.’
Right!
The
BBC in its own truthful coverage of the fatwa (and parroted by the
world press) noted that: 'The scholar describes al-Qaeda
as an “old evil with a new name” that has not been
sufficiently challenged.'
Al Qaeda is indeed the same age “old evil with a new name”:
the fabricated Hegelian Dialectic necessary for launching and
sustaining “imperial mobilization” on the Grand
Chessboard!
But
sadly, and quite expectedly, none heralding the fatwa in the
worldwide media coverage, nor any branded scholar manufacturing
consent or dissent, dared to complete that virtuous
proclamation on terrorism in that 600-page fatwa with the following
obviousness:
'Furthermore,
gratuitously laying a carpet of bombs on
civilian populations, invading one’s military forces into other
nations’ territories, and decimating entire civilizations to
the point of cultural and physical genocide, is a far greater
terrorism; a crime of aggression so heinous
that it is not simply referred to as “war crime”, but
“the supreme international crime differing only from other
war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of
the whole.”'
Unless
that additional truism – which is also the Islamic principle
for culpability expressed in the Qur’an as the blame is with
those who initiate the war-mongering aggression – well
established by the Military Tribunal at Nuremberg by the United
States herself as the yardstick for identifying primary war-mongers,
is appended, or pre-pended, to any
overarching statement on terrorism, one must know that all such pious
proclamations, including that in the 600-page document, are only the
Hegelian vomit of vulgar propagandists justifying the “supreme
international crime” of their real masters.
Their
fate will be no different than Goebbells'.
Whether or not that destiny actually transpires within our own
lifetime, let it be repeatedly told at every opportunity, in every
generation, and in no uncertain terms, that in the hammaams
(bath houses) of the hectoring hegemons, these prostitutes are merely
their “Bukakke” (borrowing that
hideous new
word which appears to be the passionate pastime
of many a Pakistani as I learnt here).
Unlike
some others, I foolishly write under my own name with full
self-identification. And I invite these brilliant scholars who span
the gamut of doctrinal warfare from peddling “Islam” with
half-truths to peddling Secular Humanism with outright deception, to
haul me into the International Criminal Court of Justice for
referring to them by their only real profession. It should be
interesting, but only if the foolish plebeian is permitted to speak
unfettered.
Any
takers of “justice”, “Islam”, Secular
Humanism? How about you, Dr Tahir-ul-Qadri?
The
voice of reason of ordinary plebeians often seems to be accompanied
by only the thunderous sounds of silence. Free-speech
in free-space can kill mercilessly by
asphyxiation!
And
humanity is concomitantly being butchered under the twain
carpet of bombs because there is no one to challenge the “supreme
international crime” in a forum that has any meaningful
power to redress it. When the rare opportunity does materialize to
wage a genuine battle for justice for a change, it is largely
squandered on the lower order bits of the matter:
But
what kills me even more than these well-intentioned justice-minded
professionals whom I don’t personally know – at least
these courageous folks know the truth and operate on their own
peculiar calculus of justice which merely differs from mine –
is the obsequence of intellectual
and house negroes in America and Pakistan, many of
whom happen to be my good friends and colleagues. Some even know of
my humble pen. And yet, they too only see the friggin
Islamofascist
pirates, just like this Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri chap with
his fake Hegelian opposition to Islamofascism. But not the emperor’s
vast armies poised to annihilate entire
defenseless nations with their unmatched nuclear weapons, and already
having done so with extreme “shock and awe”
invasions of Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Palestine, and now even
doing their own nation.
Nor
do they try to comprehend political science, that the pirates are
almost entirely a diabolical synthesis of the emperor’s
Machiavellian brains because without Islamofascism and its duped
recruits, the rulers of the world have no pretext to rapidly
transform their empire into world government. All the hectoring
hegemons’ raped-pregnancies and birth-pangs of world order
ultimately remain still-born without the synthetic curse of
Islamofascism:
‘[Because]
the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion,
except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public’s
sense of domestic well-being. The economic self-denial (that is
defense spending), and the human sacrifice (casualties even among
professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to
democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.
… [Thus it is] more difficult to fashion a consensus on
foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive
and widely perceived direct external threat. ... That exercise
requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual
commitment, and patriotic gratification.’
(Zbigniew Brzezinski)
I
expect Dr. Tahir ul-Qadri of Minhaj-ul-Qur’aan to publicly
explain his vulgar omissions in his partial definition
of terrorism. Perhaps he remains un-aware that: “Great is
truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence
about truth. By simply not mentioning certain subjects...
totalitarian propagandists have influenced opinion much more
effectively than they could have by the most eloquent denunciations.”
(Aldous
Huxley) I would in fact
support his thesis on terrorism if it was accordingly amended
to reflect all the omissions noted here, and not couched as fatwa in
the service of empire.
However,
the learned scholar labors under a grave misconception that
his personal opinion has any religious significance as fatwa, even if
he were to make the aforementioned corrections and forthrightly
condemn empire's own state terrorism and
war-mongering aggression in his document.
No
human being needs permission from another to wage his or her
legitimate self-defense. It is a primary existential instinct, more
fundamental than any dogma, religion, or belief – even the
lowliest of animals have their instinct for self-preservation. If
modernity has desensitized that basic
instinct among humankind, watch its demonstration in animalkind
in the Battle
at Kruger. Loftier principles of morals and dogmas
layered upon these basic natural instincts which purport to transform
us human beings from the amoeba into
Ashraf-ul-Maklooqat –
such as America's famous Bill of Rights and its Declaration of
Independence, and of course Islam which
proclaims itself the natural religion liberating man from the
shackles of all servitude to fellow man – regulate what is
lawful and what isn't so people may equitably co-exist with each
other and with state-power without usurping each others rights. That
regulation for Muslims choosing to follow the religion Islam, is
explicit in the Qur'anic teachings in the
context of terrorism vs. Jihad. These require no mullah's fatwa, no
matter how learned. Personal fatwas in the
religion of Islam may not be issued on what is already made explicit
in the religion of Islam itself – by the very definition of the
concept of fatwa in Islamic jurisprudence. What is permissible, and
what isn't, in waging the battle of self-defense is already made
abundantly explicit in the principled teachings of the Holy Qur'an.
One may surely explain these principles to others in full context,
but not issue fatwas amending, particularizing, or hiding its general
import in the totality of the message of Islam through calculated
omissions in the service of vested interests.
Any
personal opinion couched as fatwa which fails to recognize the
greatest enemy systematically devouring Muslims today, can only
emanate from the enemy of the Muslims. The
hectoring hegemons are experts at disguises and can wear any garb.
The Mussalmans' short and blood-soaked
history is replete with such two-bit shills putting religion in the
service of empire. The price has spanned the gamut of co-option from
a few silver coins for issuing imperial proclamations in the name of
Islam, to anointed leadership of manufactured sects for sowing
discords and “beneficial cognitive diversity”
in the best mold of divide et impera.
In
this instance, it is the realization of Daniel
Pipes
wet-dreams in the service of empire that 'The idea that
“militant Islam is the problem, moderate Islam is the solution”
is finding greater acceptance over time.' Well, here is
empire's own “moderate Islam” for us
plebes, as the WWF wrestling match against its own virulent creation
of “militant Islam”.
Caption
Video Face of “moderate Islam” featuring
Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri, the “Ambassador
of Peace”.
An even more entertaining version of Daniel Pipe's choice for
“moderate Islam” with its leader* basking
in the adulation of his prostrating
fans,
is here
(search)
The
political philosophies and social engineering underlying imperial
mobilization are far more diabolical today than they have
been in the past. Comprehending the role of fabricated enemies and
false oppositions to lend credence to the fabricated
enemies, begins at the doorstep of political science, not Islam. The
fatwa is part of the finely tuned social engineering to continually
engineer consent for the fabricated perpetual war on
terror. The primary modus operandi
of that social engineering is seeded in the Hegelian Dialectics of
Deception and the Technique of Infamy as already explained in this
tutorial.
Witness the dialectical twin of this pious Fatwa in the promulgation
of the impious girl flogging video which was presciently unraveled in
this Letter
to Editor of April 06, 2009,
and which is now coming unraveled even officially.
This
factual observation of diabolically engineering consent
with tortuous
political theories and absurdities being primarily at
work here, is further underscored in the stark contrast between the
pious 'Islamic scholarship' of the Fatwa in the service of empire and
this Syrian Arab Catholic priest's lament in his open letter 'To
His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI'. The latter
demonstrates a moral fibre largely unknown
to Pakistan's virtuous house
negro peddling 'Islam's holiness' for
gratis (£6.99
for hardcopy),
and which was even intoned by the BBC
News Magazine as 'A fatwa they can work with?': “An
Islamic scholar turned up in London last week to deliver a religious
ruling denouncing terrorism in all its forms – but what was it
about him that made everyone sit up and listen? He’s
a man on a mission – a mission to state the obvious.”
Unfortunately
for the 'untermenschen' everywhere, this virtuous “man
on a mission” journeying
to the heartland of empire in voluntary servitude to peddle his
“Islam” felt no “moral mission to state the
[even more] obvious”!
Facts which, quite unsurprisingly, even the empire's
own top field commander, Gen.
Stanley A. McChrystal,
being a free man unfettered in his own la mission civilisatrice,
had the cold chutzpah to boldly proclaim without fear of any future
Nuremberg accountability: “We have shot an amazing number
of people, but to my knowledge, none has ever proven to be a threat,”
(New York Times, March 26, 2010)
Finally,
I conclude this lamentable but principled response to Dr.
Tahir-ul-Qadri’s terrorism fatwa in
the service of his empire with the only universally humanitarian
prayer to perhaps ever escape from the particularistic lips of 'god’s
chosen people' now waging full spectrum war of domination upon all
Amelekites, that of its favorite Nobel laureate HolocaustTM
spokesman, Elie Wiesel:
‘I
still curse the killers, their accomplices, the indifferent
spectators who knew and kept silent, and Creation itself, Creation
and those who perverted and distorted it. I feel like screaming,
howling like a madman so that that world, the world of the murderers,
might know it will never be forgiven.’
Thank
you.
*
Footnote: I have no opinion on
Tahir ul-Qadri's version of “Sufi Islam” per se, only on
his brazen omissions in defining terrorism in the calculated
service of empire. Qadri is not a patsy.
Zahir
Ebrahim
Project
Humanbeingsfirst.org
Date:
Wednesday March 24, 2010
From:
Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
To:
The originators and authors of
the Fatwa on Terrorism
tehreek@minhaj.org,
spokesman@minhajuk.org, shahid.mursaleen@minhajuk.org,
zahid.iqbal@minhajuk.org, ishtiaq.ahmed@minhajuk.org
CC:
Press
Dear
Scholars and Leaders of Islam issuing the One-sided Fatwa on
Terrorism:
You
might be aware that I do not recognize any pious leaders, of Islam or
otherwise, when they intersect conversely with truth, or with
political science. The only genuine leadership I know of today, is
that of the devil – the hectoring hegemons – and
therefore, I oppose it.
Therefore,
I do not find it impertinent to boldly ask whether you take peoples
to be fools? Or are you just being useful idiots in the hands of
hectoring hegemons? I am not sure which one. Therefore, I draw your
kind attention to Project Humanbeingsfirst's Response to your
Terrorism Fatwa which is entirely in the service of empire:
Please
be advised that people are aware that all sorts of fatwas have been
issued throughout history by the most pious pontiffs to justify the
crimes of empire. If it is news to you how religion, and especially
Islam, is put in the service of empire through half-truths and
outright omissions, then, instead of presuming to teach others, you
might perhaps spend some time studying yourself.
And
lest you believe that you have acquired some newly
inspired knowledge through virtuous piety which I do not possess due
to my ordinary dint of hard study and forensic observations, and due
to which you believe your palpable omissions as noted in the response
are justified, I would be happy to hear of your inspired knowledge.
And
if I am shown the error of my analysis and conclusions due to my
general lack of humility before either the pirates or the emperor, I
would be happy to eat crow.
Otherwise,
I invite you to be forthright and include what is omitted in your
terrorism report to complete your partial thesis in the full service
of the people, of all peoples. For doing that, you will most
assuredly earn my genuine and humble thanks with full endorsement of
your report - provided the word fatwa is dropped from it. Your
personal opinion has no religious significance in matters in which
the religion of Islam has unequivocally already spoken. Only a
political one, and that would be sufficient, nay [of] immense
significance for the ordinary peoples of the world, almost 7 billion
of us, of all faiths and persuasions, that even one Muslim scholar
has the balls to call a spade a spade.
Even
further, I would be most happy to enter into fair interlocution
with your learned scholar who presumably authored this one-sided
Fatwa, or obligingly put his name to it, in any public televised
forum. Should be interesting for the world to witness a rational
dialog between a virtuous Islamic scholar berating the pirates while
ignoring the grotesque imperial mobilization of the emperor that is
not only responsible for genocide of multiple Muslim civilizations,
but is also rapidly lowering an iron-curtain of tortuous
police-states throughout Europe and America, and an ordinary plebe.
I
humbly invite the press to publish this letter in their columns and
newspapers.
Thank
you.
Zahir
Ebrahim
Project
Humanbeingsfirst.org
http://humanbeingsfirst.org
California,
United States of America.
Updated
Source URL:
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/03/resp-terror-fatwa-in-service-of-empire.html
Source
URL:
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2010/03/resp-terror-fatwa-in-service-of-empire.html
Source
PDF Letter March 24, 2010:
http://humanbeingsfirst.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/letter-to-fatwa-authors-response-to-the-fatwa-on-terrorism-in-the-service-of-empire-by-zahir-ebrahim-march-24-2010.pdf
The
author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary
geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied
EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley
(patents here),
and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden
2003 book was rejected by six publishers and can be read on the web
at http://PrisonersoftheCave.org.
He may be reached at http://Humanbeingsfirst.org.
Verbatim reproduction license at
http://www.humanbeingsfirst.org#Copyright.
030220112300053266
Response
to the Fatwa on Terrorism in the Service of Empire By Zahir Ebrahim
11 / 11
