Open Letter to Francis Boyle, the Moral Law Professor, on the Ignored Iraqi & Afghani Victims of Imperial Mobilization

Open Letter to Francis Boyle, the Moral Law Professor, on the Ignored Iraqi & Afghani Victims of Imperial Mobilization

Date: January 31, 2010

Subject Re: International Criminal Court Complaint Filed Against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Tenet, Rice, Gonzales By Prof. Francis A. Boyle

Dear Dr. Francis Boyle:

In reference to your complaint filed with the ICC against the previous errand-boys who occupied the White House, would it be rude to notice that the higher order bits of using 911 to “goosestep the herrenvolk across international frontiers” ; the subsequent “shock and awe” visitations upon largely civilian population-centers and civilian infrastructures ; the decimation of millions of Iraqis/Afghanis ; subverting of the United States into a pre-planned police-state ; fabricating crises upon crises to propose pre-planned solutions in order to systematically usurp national sovereignty as per the diabolical modus operandi set by the Council on Foreign Relations in their own documents: “In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.” – have all been overlooked to pursue the relatively lower order crimes of “extraordinary rendition” upon a few individuals with the highly dubious statement: “I doubt very seriously that the Accused would have inflicted these criminal practices upon 100 White Judeo-Christian men.” ?

We only wish there was one decent 'Christian' man or woman alive in the hallways and beltways of Western academe and among the legal fraternity who might even attempt to capture the angst of the tens of millions of Iraqis/Afghanis still barely alive and who still await someone who will file legal charges against the monumental crimes that have been perpetrated upon them and their millions of murdered kin.

We fervently hope that you, Professor Francis Boyle, might be such a person. That you will file pertinent charges in the ICC, for both culpability and restitution, on behalf of the untold millions already dead in Iraq and Afghanistan, many more suffering with their entire national fabric, ancient heritage, and even their DNA despoiled in a crime so stupendous that “it is a mystery whose parallel may only be the one of Sinai when something was revealed to mankind.”

For surely, it is inconceivable that you make complete obeisance to Western standards of morality by focussing on this lower order crime in the presence of un-addressed higher order monumental crimes – a morality which brazenly asserts from the highest pulpit of law in this land of the free:

“Nothing is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only when associated with the considerations which give birth to nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we must reply that all concepts are relative.” -- Justice Vinson, U.S. Supreme Court, 1951 AD

And as you venture to focus on the higher order real monumental crimes against humanity, we hope you will not remain content by focussing merely on the errand boys. That you will see the connections between the quest for Global Governance, fabricated crises from pandemics to global warming, the seeding of “revolutionary times” across the “global zone of percolating violence” to make imperial mobilizationpossible which otherwise is “inconceivable in normal times”, and the history's actors who drive war-mongering policies and orchestrate wretched events from their Zion in the Middle East to their Zion in the Western capitals, not the least of which is Washington DC, in the expectation of creating the ultimate Zion that will light up all the world”.

And that, as you pursue the highest order crimes, you will not shy away from going directly for the jugular of the prime-movers behind the scenes of all the war-mongering 'errand boys' fronting for them in the Western capitals as the duly elected representatives of a duped Western peoples, including those presently occupying the White House. This was, lamentably enough, already pleaded to no avail in the following editorial when your lonely fraternal brother, Mr. Vincent Bugliosi, courageously asserted that “Murder Trumps Torture”, but inexplicably failed to also simultaneously assert the legal and moral commonsense that prime-movers trump trigger-pullers: Who is more guilty of monumental war crimes - the prime-movers or trigger pullers? April 09, 2009.

Attempted prosecution of state-criminals on 'petty charges' without also prosecuting their criminal aiders and abettors who 'legalize' and propagandistically justify their brazen acts of aggression, and therefore are entirely culpable in toto for “all the evil which follows” ; staying silent on punitive as well restitutive compensation for their victims, is a legal sham that is only waiting to be torn down by some courageous people. We hope, Dr. Francis Boyle, that you might be one such precedent setting spark which ignites the moral imagination of many to follow. The world has had enough from the dispensers of victor's justice!

Thank you.

Zahir Ebrahim


Addendum February 02, 2010

In. Ref To: Bush To The Hague! The Hague Acknowledges Francis Boyle On His Filing Against Bush et al For War-Crime: Extraordinary Rendition

Additionally, in principle, Project supports all effective measures which attempt to bring the entire hierarchy of monumental criminals to fair justice. As is often the case with victor's justice however, and with those in the victor civilizations pursuing their notion of justice against the criminals in their own midst, the big picture is being silently swept aside in the “Bush To The Hague!” Campaign. That moral campaign should rightly be “Bush-Obama-Congress-Foundations-Banksters To The Hague” Campaign. And a similarly appropriate one waged in the UK and the EU.

It is not sufficient, in the view of Project Humanbeingsfirst, to pursue lower order crimes and charge the lower-order errand boys for these crimes, while staying eloquently silent on the most significant crimes and neglecting to seek restitution/compensation/punitive-damages for the most significant of its victims! While the old errand boys out of power are being pursued with vigor, a new crop of errand boys are already in-charge committing new monumental crimes without inhibition. What rational commonsense does this make? Are we to presume that morality in modernity is inversely proportional to rationality and commonsense? That millions of 'untermensch' victims are to simply remain nameless and faceless statistics to build careers and glossy prize-winning narratives on? We certainly hope not!

To put efficacy into the matter of stopping crimes against humanity before they transpire rather than lament in futility afterwards with vacuous pledges of 'never again' with Public Relations show trials and new museums, the perpetual prime-movers of wars pushing their insidious multifaceted agendas behind the turbulence of wars have to be neutered. Their enormous power and influence stemming from their infinite wealth that is legally sanctioned to them by the law makers who represent them in governance, terminated. Where is the precedent for that being set?

It wasn't even set at the Nuremberg Military Tribunals when Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, the former governor of the Reich Bank – the bankster who orchestrated the financing for Hitler's war-machine with funding from Wall Street and the City of London financiers – went scot-free! Just that tiny point of incontrovertible fact proves the truth of this open letter and demonstrates the enormous power of the prime-movers which is being swept under the rug by focussing on their errand boys. These errand boys are untouchable so long as their godfathers protect them, except when made dispensable and administered the victor's justice as at the Nuremberg Trials.

We hope this minor oversight will be rectified.

Read the original open letter emailed to the distinguished jurist and his response here

Source URL:

Source PDF:

Open Letter to Francis Boyle, the Moral Law Professor, on the Ignored Iraqi & Afghani Victims of Imperial Mobilization By Zahir Ebrahim

Letter to Editor: An easy precedent setter – that's the only real compelling raison d'être for the take-over of Haiti!

Letter to Editor: An easy precedent setter – that's the only real compelling raison d'être for the take-over of Haiti!

January 28, 2010

I have been racking my brains out to understand why? Why take-over Haiti? As mused here:

It made no sense at all. Until I read the following statement in John Pilger's recent article 'Enslaved Haiti':

'On 22 January, the United States secured “formal approval” from the United Nations to take over all air and sea ports in Haiti, and to “secure” roads. No Haitian signed the agreement, which has no basis in law.'

Now with that new precedent established as international law for every country in crisis, and duly stamped by the United Nations as the last refuge of all former sovereign nation-states – the new governing body which exudes global governance authority, by fiat, and by legal treaties, across the full spectrum of crises from Global epidemics to Global Warming to Global Financial Collapse to Global War on Terror to Global Population Explosion – the next country to be taken over may well be Pakistan! To both protect itself and the world from all the 'loose nukes' about to fall into Bin Laden's cold dead hands!

Now, no traitor from Pakistan even has to sign on the dotted line - all they have to do is continue on with accelerating the crises within...

And a great earthquake just about now, like the one which hit Kashmir in 2005, wouldn't that be just wonderful for a full-spectrum humanitarian takeover of Pakistan? We have the precedent set in Haiti – unopposed by the world!

An easy precedent setter -- that's the only real compelling raison d'être for the take-over of Haiti!

Zahir Ebrahim


United States of America

Source URL:

Letter to Editor: An easy precedent setter – that's the only real compelling raison d'être for the take-over of Haiti! January 28, 2010

Open Letter to the Authors of 'U.S. policy must factor in changed landscape in Iran', Dr. Trita Parsi et. al. -- Brzezinski & Fukuyama protégé

Dear Drs. Trita Parsi and Muhammad Sahimi,

January 29, 2010
I take the liberty of forwarding you a snapshot of your article: 'U.S. policy must factor in changed landscape in Iran', taken today from with 5 comments by readers (cached) including myself. And I wonder if either or both of you would wish to elaborate, clarify, or offer any refutation. Beleaguered Iran is in the cross-hairs of hectoring hegemons as the entire world knows, and I feel that both of you are aiding in that mission against your own native nation. That confuses me and therefore I imagine that I merely mis-perceive. I hope you can kindly examine the 5 comments below and offer some clarification as to why they might be inaccurate.
I understand that you, Dr. Trita Parsi, are a Brzezinski & Fukuyama protégé (or student), like Dr. Zalmay Khalilzad was in his time. This is great because you might wish to also be aware that I have read almost everything Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski has publicly written, or has been declassified and easily accessible. I regularly read CFR documents, regularly peruse the national archives, and am also quite well acquainted, inter alia, with both Leo Strauss' and Plato's works and the self-proclaimed right of the ubermensch to shepherd humanity's flock. So we have much common-ground when I candidly state that I understand plainly that “hegemony is as old as mankind”, as are its exponents and coterie of mercenaries, patsies, useful idiots, native informants, and including those suffering from the plague of “occidentosis” in our native developing nations who are duly harvested as dupes, patsies, and traitorous mercenaries to serve the imperial interests as fifth columnists. Therefore, I humbly urge you to keep that in mind as you cogently respond in order to not waste our precious time with preliminaries, and that you may directly cut to the heart of the matter noted in the comments.
I would also appreciate your insider's assessment on what covert role the United States is playing in fomenting the “green revolution” in Iran – the “pro-democracy aspirations of the Iranian people” as you put it – and how is it doing it? Harvesting the natural disaffection, cultural, religious, and political cracks and lacunae of any people has been the forte of the white man since the East India Company perfected the technique of divide et impera. Today, it is the sine qua non for asymmetric warfare to succeed, and to which no erudite academic receiving awards from the Council on Foreign Relations can be a total stranger. Most in the world already know, lamentably only ex post facto, the distinguished role your mentor Dr. Brzezinski played to rally the Afghan Mujahideen with “god is on your side” mantra – but which even the most profound Western journalists when interviewing the grandmaster aren't able to grasp with much significance to current affairs! I am sure the war-weary world would factually like to learn that information for beleaguered Iran today, before fait accompli seals Iran's miserable fate. We already know the role Jundallah is playing in destabilizing Iran and carrying out terrorist operations from across the borders from Pakistan. And we of course know of the new crusading “soldiers of god” lined up today to invade/decimate Iran just as they did Iraq and Afghanistan. Clearly, you would not wish to see Iran pulverized as Iraq – I simply cannot come to accept such an insane conclusion for any rational peoples, let alone ones from as proud and fine a civilization as the Persians. At such existential thresholds, even the lowliest of the lowlies ally themselves against the external hectoring hegemons of their jungle, putting their own differences aside.
Please also permit me to draw your kind attention to my little Open Letter written to the ordinary, non-scholarly mainstream Iranian Expatriate who is today inexplicably imbued with the renewed white man's overzealousness for “la mission civilisatrice” upon their own nation – a civilization that is far older and richer in heritage than all Western civilizations added together – and which further references, Dr. Parsi, your work:
I'll simply close this letter with Adolph Hitler's famous last words to his Generals in Bavaria (which as you well know were utilized to invade Iraq, inter alia, by your own Ph.D. thesis supervisor Dr Francis Fukuyama as the signatory to PNAC and to the many letters calling for the invasion of Iraq on the WMD pretext):
“[I will] give a propagandist reason for starting the war [and don't] mind whether it was plausible or not. The victor will not be asked afterward whether he told the truth or not. In starting and waging a war it is not the right that matters, but victory.”
Thank you very much for your time.
With best regards,
Zahir Ebrahim
United States of America

-- ### --

Link fix November 6, 2016

Open Letter to the Authors of 'U.S. policy must factor in changed landscape in Iran', Dr. Trita Parsi et. al. -- Brzezinski & Fukuyama protégé

FAQ What is 'Hegelian Mind Fck'

What you never learnt despite years of schooling, a Ph.D. in political science, mathematics, physics, history, international relations, or even underwater basket weaving - The one master key that unlocks all mysteries of modernity
What is the Hegelian Dialectic? The singular master key that unlocks the mysteries of modernity as explained by Antony Sutton
'After 16 books and 25 years in basic research I thought I'd heard it all ... the world was a confused mess, probably beyond understanding and certainly beyond salvation - and there was little 'l could do about it.

Back in 1968 my Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development was published by the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. In three substantial volumes I detailed how the West had built the Soviet Union. However, the work generated a seemingly insoluble puzzle - why have we done this? Why did we build the Soviet Union, while we also transferred technology to Hitler's Germany? Why does Washington want to conceal these facts? Why have we boosted Soviet military power? And simultaneously boosted our own? In subsequent books, the Wall Street series, I added more questions - but no answers. I had more or less arrived at the conclusion that there was no rational answer that could be proven.

Then a year or so ago I received an eight-inch batch of documents - nothing less than the membership lists of an American secret society. Glancing through the sheets it was more than obvious - this was no ordinary group. The names spelled Power, with a capital P. As I probed each individual a pattern emerged ... and a formerly fuzzy world became crystal clear.

... These volumes will explain why the West built the Soviets and Hitler; why we go to war, to lose; why Wall Street loves Marxists and Nazis; why the kids can't read; why the Churches have become propaganda founts; why historical facts are suppressed, why politicians lie and a hundred other whys.' --- Preface Antony C. Sutton
Here is a sample, pgs. 37-38:
'How can there exist a common objective when members are apparently acting in opposition to one another?

Probably the most difficult task in this work will be to get across to the reader what is really an elementary observation: that the objective of The Order is neither “left” nor “right.” “Left” and “right” are artificial devices to bring about change, and the extremes of political left and political right are vital elements in a process of controlled change.

The answer to this seeming political puzzle lies in Hegelian logic. Remember that both Marx and Hitler, the extremes of “left” and “right” presented as textbook enemies, evolved out of the same philosophical system: Hegelianism. That brings screams of intellectual anguish from Marxists and Nazis, but is well known to any student of political systems.

The dialectical process did not originate with Marx as Marxists claim, but with Fichte and Hegel in late 18th and early 19th century Germany. In the dialectical process a clash of opposites brings about a synthesis. For example, a clash of political left and political right brings about another political system, a synthesis of the two, neither left nor right. This conflict of opposites is essential to bring about change. Today this process can be identified in the literature of the Trilateral Commission where “change” is promoted and “conflict management” is termed the means to bring about this change.

In the Hegelian system conflict is essential. Furthermore, for Hegel and systems based on Hegel, the State is absolute. The State requires complete obedience from the individual citizen. An individual does not exist for himself in these so-called organic systems but only to perform a role in the operation of the State. He finds freedom only in obedience to the State. There was no freedom in Hitler's Germany, there is no freedom for the individual under Marxism, neither will there be in the New World Order. And if it sounds like George Orwell's 1984 - it is.

In brief, the State is supreme and conflict is used to bring about the ideal society. Individuals find freedom in obedience to the rulers.'

The tortuously descriptive expression “Hegelian Mindfuck” (syntactically sugared to the spelling “Hegelian Mind Fck”) captures the raping of the public’s moral imagination and commonsense by brilliant hectoring hegemons. It is the perverse method of mass behavior control through perception management, in which the mind-fcked public, quite unwittingly, is guided, coerced, and left with no choice but to voluntarily give a measure of its consent to its own enslavement; acquiescing to its own loss of freedom in decision making; and voluntarily submitting to the diktats of those in positions of power as: 'they know best'. Thoughts and behavior are voluntarily self-policed in accordance with the tune of the shepherd's whistle.
The highest shepherd in Hegelianism is the 'state', the supreme authority, meaning, in essence, those who control the theology, beliefs, policies, and agendas of the state. The state is often akin to religion, its precepts a taboo, its narratives holy and divine. Belief in the axioms of 'state' is sacred --- regardless of the state. The modern nation state in that respect is little different from empires of the past or present. The state is “implemented” by front-men and front-woman who, in electoral democracies, are elected by the public in the mistaken belief that this elected ruling class is the public's representatives to the state, doing what's best for those who elected them, when, in reality, the ruling class is the representatives of the controllers of the state to the people, manipulating the public to believe and behave in accordance with what's projected to be in the interest of the state. Profound? Hardly. This was true even when kings ruled in the name of gods too. What changed in modernity is the make-belief script and its actors.
Just a simple example makes this clear: going to war --- getting people to lay down their lives for the state under the sound of trumpet, when, in reality, the behind the scenes shepherds of the state are the ones deciding when, and for what, to make war and peace in the blood of the sheep. Only a truly fucked up mind can be made to believe and act in this unholy manner to voluntarily give its measure of consent for a 'higher cause' as defined by the shepherd, which culminates in its blood offering and commensurate 'honor' in society. It's called 'patriotism'.
In a theological state, its clergy class is deemed to be the representatives of God to man, and thus, in even more egregious a manner in the name of divine favor, the state gets away extracting voluntary servitude from the flock in much the same way as in electorally elected government. Military-style dictatorships however, are slightly different in that they control public behavior at the point of their totalitarian bayonet. Such coarse dictatorships usually find little use for Hegelian mind fuck; the point of the bayonet is sharp enough for the public to obey regardless. Albeit, in the Orwellian depiction of a more sophisticated totalitarian dystopia, mind-control is seen as being instrumental in extracting the desired behavior, uniformity, and conformity, under full spectrum thought control. Even a slightly divergent or independent mind within the darkest privacy of the silence of thought, is deemed a threat to the state. Independence of thought, which naturally leads to resistance to behavior control in any form, as depicted by George Orwell in Nineteen Eighty-four, is deemed to be a 'thought crime' punishable by legal sanction.
Theological states are more inclined to police thought crimes than democratic states where the illusion of 'freedom' is normally maintained. However, as witnessed on the sacred cow axiom of the Jewish HolocaustTM, even democratic states willingly give up that illusion of freedom when necessary; it is a criminal offense in European states, Canada, to not accept the Jewish narrative of the Holocaust. In the United States, it is usually the end of a career. Similarly, in times of crisis, constitutionally guaranteed freedoms are suspended or abolished in the name of state security, as in the various Congress approved Patriot Acts, and Presidential Executive Orders. Without some form of mass behavior control, a state simply cannot function in its primacy objectives, and the most diabolical method for this exercise is to employ the Hegelian Dialectic. The public can never figure out what's really going on.
In the democratic modernity, any strain of totalitarianism in the state which often accompanies its primacy imperatives in which the public are not naturally participant and their compliance must be extracted by mind fuck whenever it's needed, is disguised with cunning illusions. Both sustained propaganda and indoctrination from birth rely on some technique of mind fuck for mass behavior control in the name of any number of pretexts, such as the flag, religion, the state's sacred cow axioms, self-defence, crisis management, terror and threat of terror, aliens, natural and unnatural catastrophes, fear of catastrophes, etc. The public mind is kept agitated and in a state of turmoil under one pretext or another, which is why war has been so useful as a means of social control since time immemorial.
The expression “Hegelian Mindfuck” originated (as far as one is aware) in the insightful analyses of comrade in common cause, A. Peasant, at Twelfth Bough. See its usage in The Ultimate Hegelian Mindfuck, and in the broad spectrum tutorial that covers a large canvas of modernity: Hegelian Mindfuck Records. All rights reserved (PDF). More “Hegelian Mindfuck” here, here.
To mildly sanitize the expression to pass automatic filters, and also to make it acceptable to the profoundly innocent of knowledge”, Project Humanbeingsfirst borrowed it with permission and re-spelled it “Hegelian Mind Fck”. Several Project Humanbeingsfirst reports carry that appropriate expression in the report title itself (see here, here, here). Other missives elaborate upon it (see here, here, here, here).
The Hegelian Dialectic upon which this diabolical raping of the public's mind is calculatingly waged to keep the peasants and the plebeians and the useless eaters perpetually chained as “Prisoners of the Cave”, is examined in the tutorial: The Hegelian Dialectics of Deception Today's Focus: Anatomy of Modern Lies, Senseless Warfare, Merchants of Death – Educate Yourself.

Conspiracy: “in law, agreement of two or more persons to commit a criminal or otherwise unlawful act. At common law, the crime of conspiracy was committed with the making of the agreement, but present-day statutes require an overt step by a conspirator to further the conspiracy. Other controversial aspects of conspiracy laws include the modification of the rules of evidence and the potential for a dragnet. A statement of a conspirator in furtherance of the conspiracy is admissible against all conspirators, even if the statement includes damaging references to another conspirator, and often even if it violates the rules against hearsay evidence. The conspiracy can be proved by circumstantial evidence. Any conspirator is guilty of any substantive crime committed by any other conspirator in furtherance of the enterprise. It is a federal crime to conspire to commit any activity prohibited by federal statute, whether or not Congress imposed criminal sanctions on the activity itself.” -- Columbia Encyclopedia
Ah – but what if the “criminals” were to write the laws and the statutes themselves? Then, the conniving and conspiring isn't legally defined as a crime, nor the “criminals” called criminals. In fact, most are called bankers (emperors previously), and their instruments today, foundations (fleets previously)! Isn't that just peachy?
Now let Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski and the US. Secretary of state Hillary Clinton confirm that very process of behind the scenes planning and orchestration by “legalized” instruments of the oligarchy without it legally being defined as “conspiracy” and “subversion” --- it's all in the OPEN stupid and therefore not deemed illegal!

The Hegelian Dialectic and Hegelian Mind-Fck 8/8 Zahir Ebrahim Project

Zahir Ebrahim's response to James Petras' The US and China: One Side is Losing, the Other is Winning

Zahir Ebrahim's response to James Petras' The US and China: One Side is Losing, the Other is Winning

China is only the template for central planning in One-world Government

Friday, January 08, 2010

In China, it all started with a revolution…” -- backed by the same financiers who took American jobs offshore and replaced its real industrial production base with fictitious financial base - doing the opposite for China. And why would they do that? Why would they want to make America bankrupt and shore up the communist state with their new penchant for state-capitalism? Have you studied their overarching agenda? Erosion of the sovereignty of nation-states, ushering in one-world government, world communism under the control of the handful of capitalist oligarchy?

Have you seen this interview with Norman Dodd: is he to be believed for his revelations to the Congressional Reece Committee and to G. Edward Griffin who recorded the interview:

Is this book by W. Cleon Skoussen to be believed: The Naked Capitalist, in which Skoussen quotes the head (or prominent worker) of the Communist part in the US receiving her instructions for the USSR from the Waldorf Astoria, and USSR subsequently confirming those instructions - all at the height of the Cold War?

Is this book by Carroll Quigley to be believed: "Tragedy and Hope"?

Is the data and analysis provided by Antony Sutton in his Wall Street related books of their role in financing Hitler and other boogieman to be believed?

Is the role of the international banksters in the running the major macro affairs of the world, creating world wars, providing passage to Communist leaders to reach Russia at the beginning of their communist revolution, to prop up both the warring Chinese leaders, one became Taiwan, one the “revolution” you speak off?

Is the role of Hegelian Dialectics to raise the phoenix from the ashes of global conflicts empirical?

The examination of these questions can lend some insight into why the Chinese experiment is being conducted. China is pegged to the US dollar. And bound to it by the backing of the militarist state whom you speak of. When currency collapse is orchestrated to create global currency, all are in the same boat.

Just as once upon a time Berlin was at the top of the world with perhaps the fastest trains, then NY (and Japan), now Chinese cities - and all laid to waste, and to be laid to waste, by the same common godfathers of International finance whose primal agenda appears to be population Reduction, which includes China, if NSSM 200 is to be believed.

But why would one believe any of this - it all sounds such fantastical nonsense. It is surely by accident and sagacious policies alone that China came about.

Howsoever one may view history, as being orchestrated or accidental, forensic empiricism indicates that China is only a grand experiment of state managed production, central planning, and big government, and that experiment is being conducted by the same financial oligarchy which is making America bankrupt.

China is being held up as the model of success in their own Mighty Wurlitzer rag - and that's why the Financial Times is presenting matters in this way. The International banksters are orchestrating the recipe for global governance, and selling it to the public. They made that fact abundantly clear one year ago in the same Financial Times of Dec 08, 2008:

Wouldn't you say that Mr. Karl Marx is sitting pretty in his grave just about now? His communist manifesto coming to life with a twist!

Thank you.

Zahir Ebrahim, Project

Comment for: James Petras

Source URL:

Zahir Ebrahim's response to James Petras' The US and China: One Side is Losing, the Other is Winning

And A Note to Myself Jan 2010 - Obama adds 675 million Muslims to the ultimate US Terrorism List

The Headline of the new decade reads:

Obama adds 675 million Muslims to the ultimate US Terrorism List

And A Note to Myself

Jan 06, 2010 | Revised Jan 07, 2010

I, however, still maintain that this is neither about Islam nor Muslims, but about creating pretexts for continued demonization of Muslims in order to sustain “imperial mobilization” ; pavlovianly train the Western peoples to accept all the draconian police-state measures and teach them to be servile from their previously free-wielding state ; and cement one-world government of the oligarchs – most of them atheist Khazar Jews (i.e., not from historic Palestine, not descendants of Moses/Abraham, but Asiatic who converted at the Steppes 1000 or so years ago). See The Thirteenth Tribe By Arthur Koestler:

Why is it so hard for the Muslim people to believe this? Many still claim it is war on Islam. Some claim it is the Islamofascists' war on civilization. Most educated and learned Muslims in fact echo Daniel Pipes: “Not a Clash of Civilizations, It's a Clash between the Civilized World and Barbarians.” See:



It is neither war on Islam, nor war by the Islamofascists on civilization, but only a full-spectrum WAR OF TERROR on all the 'untermenschen' – i.e., the 'lesser' peoples, by the 'chosen peoples' with Muslims only being the first batch. Population reduction does not distinguish among the goys.

But the 'ubermensch' are not “god's chosen peoples”, rather, pretenders to that heritage:

They, using the Talmud, have hijacked the Torah, the Golden Rule, the Ten Commandments, and of course: "Thou Shall Not Kill".

They, using their incredible brains, have also mastered Machiavelli and Orwell, Plato and Nietzsche. They have become their own gods:

They, using the legal system, have constructed new semantics for every word:

Nothing is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only when associated with the considerations which give birth to nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we must reply that all concepts are relative.”

They, using their diabolical deceit, have made useful fools out of almost everyone. From the Armageddon seeking Christian Zionists, to the groveling Native Informants and treasonous mercenaries of all stripes, now prostrate before them.

And they, using their bought and paid for Mighty Wurlitzers, spin the distorted matrix on the cave-walls for the goy 'Prisoners of the Cave' – both Christians and Muslims, as well as all the rest of the planet. See:

But of course, None Dare call it Conspiracy to Takeover the World:

See no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil is the best policy - leave any Good Samaritan work exclusively for the 'ubermensch' to infernalize the fcking 'Islamofascists':

So, how do we, the 'untermenschen', practicably defend ourselves from such a full-spectrum onslaught which even co-opts our commonsense ; which makes us unable to even reach sensible conclusions of the world around us ; and which forces us to use the vocabulary given us by the 'ubermensch' to even think our own thoughts, and thus force us to think in their semantics?

Well, I don't know the whole recipe, only part of it.

And that is, minimally, to know up from down, bullshit from political science, and stop getting damn confused by new katputli tamashas (puppet shows) enacted every day.

But how to do that? A wise man once said: Know Thy Self!

It seems to me that, as even a little reflection will reveal, that is really the only place to start – with 'jihad-un-nafs' – of learning to know one's own self first, and conquering it. I am not sure the world can wait that long however.

But even after that, I still don't know the next answer. Perhaps 'jihad-un-nafs' automatically shows the solution just like the promise of getting to the bottom of the Pandora's Box and always finding one?

But I do know that NOT embarking on that path, and as most Muslims already seem to be doing, merely “waiting for Allah” or “waiting for messiah”, is the most obvious and hopeful solution chosen by most pious people of the cloth today – inter alia, almost all 1.5 billion Muslims – as more than half of us are classified as terrorists and put on the watchlist. Bravo!

That's sure gonna protect our children from the yoke of slavery from uterus to grave!

But apparently man gets used to everything eventually. Even the Orwellian world. So enjoy the brilliant construction of the world order while one still can from the comforts of the internet-couch and witness the jackboot stamped on the human face, soon on our own children:

Is anyone else bothered by all this “waiting for Allah”? How much bothered? Drawing-room conversation level bothered? Writing level bothered (as I seem to be)? Okay my imagination ends here... must not have done too much 'knowing thy self' and 'jihad-un-nafs' ...

Oops, I forgot, I am only talking to myself.

I'll sign my name anyway – just in case someone even bothers to read and wonders who is this nut who talks to himself.

Zahir Ebrahim


Source URL:

Source URL:

And A Note to Myself Jan 2010 - Obama adds 675 million Muslims to the ultimate US Terrorism List

JFK's Camelot: Victim of Hegelian Dialectics

There is of course an implied question mark in the title.


Source URL