What is War on Terror?

What is War on Terror?

But first, some latest empiricism from the BBC: Nato contractors 'attacking own vehicles' in Pakistan

(as in Operation Gladio in Western Europe during the Cold War to keep the fear of Communism alive)

First Watch Operation Gladio part1 part2 part3

Top Secret: There may be times when host country governments show passivity or indecision in the face of Communist subversion ... US Army Intelligence must have the means of launching special operations which will convince host country governments and public opinion of the reality of the insurgent danger ... US Army Intelligence should seek to penetrate the insurgency by means of agents of special assignments, with the task of forming special action groups among the most radical elements of the insurgency. --- “I never heard such a thing” William Colby, Director of CIA 1973-1976

Here are some straightforward definitions

War on Terror: 'Might defines right' leads to “Hegemony is as old as mankind”, which in turn leads to If we don't have real enemies then we have to create or imagine some, and in either case yell 'we are being attacked' in order to a) justify “imperial mobilization” and all its barbarianism upon the “terrorists”; and b) motivate an unwilling peoples into sacrificing for the agendas of achieving world government in the pretext of fighting terrorists in a perpetual Global War on Terror. To understand this visually, watch how Oceania is in perpetual war with the murdering barbarian armies of Eurasia, and compare with George W. Bush ushering in the perpetual war with “either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists”.

So, how to do this in perpetuity in order to maintain police-state in perpetuity? Because, “World government could only be kept in being by force.”!

Insurgency and counter Insurgency: The American agenda for Pakistan is not a state-secret. Rather, it is only thinly disguised as perpetually fighting the “insurgents” in a lifetime of war, the World War IV. [4] Whereas, in reality, both the “insurgency”, and the “counter-insurgency”, are entirely designed and fabricated in the USA as part of the evolving tactics of Hegelian Dialectics. They are enacted on the ground by various two-bit errand boys and expert trigger pullers. The already well-known existence of black-ops assassination squads in Pakistan/Afghanistan, known to the local peoples for years as the real prime-movers behind the heinous local terrorist acts, belatedly confirmed by NYT, WP, and NYT, in August 2009. [5] See these two December 2008 reports on the Mumbai terrorist Act as reportedly orchestrated by ALI BABA from his perch in the Hindu Kush. [6] The arrival of the black-ops in the region is not recent, albeit the public disclosures might be.

Out of uniform and In-uniform forces: To put this ominous presence of soldiers of freedom and fortune on Pakistani soil in full black-ops context of NATO and the Western Alliance, of diabolically manufacturing and sustaining the very pretexts out of uniform tickling insurgency to enable the in-uniform forces to pursue counter-insurgency in the perpetual mission of fighting World War IV, it is sufficient to look at what is transpiring in IRAQ for lessons to wisely apply to one's own predicament in order to avoid a far worse one. Excerpted from The Decapitation of Pakistan by its own Military.

But when you ask about this today of any among the “Massa” and their plentiful “House Negroes” around the world, like William Colby quoted above in the context of Operation Gladio of yesteryear, all only incestuously reinforce the white man's theme song of 9/11, that “Islamofascism” of Osama Bin Laden and the Talibans/Al-Qaeeda is the enemy.

The House Negroes further rush to clarify the distinction between “good Muslim” and “bad Muslim” ostensibly to distance themselves from the “enemy', but in actuality only lending further credence to the existence of the enemy and its threat in full service to the “Massa”. The Hegelian Dialectic Militant Islam vs. Moderate Islam will surely go down in history as among the greatest enablers of war and manufactured consent, rivaling and perhaps surpassing both Communism vs. Fascism and Communism vs. Capitalism of the twentieth century. It is their legatee for the twenty-first century. It is already called “World War IV” (see Ex-CIA director: U.S. faces 'World War IV').

This is all what you hear on all media sources as consent is continually engineered for sustaining “imperial mobilization”. That's principally all there is to it.

The rest is merely the narrations of the 1001 puppet-shows built on this core-lie. Its narrators are all murderers – their hands are as soaked in blood as those who press the triggers – but only the victor's justice can ever prove that in court.

As Hitler had observed at the peak of his own hubris: “The victor will not be asked afterward whether he told the truth or not. In starting and waging a war it is not the right that matters, but victory.”

For ordinary people to see all this truism only requires that they overthrow their own self-interests as the House Negroes of Empire. The ubiquitous indoctrinating mantras are only as potent as people's own self-interests in believing what they are told. If not for self-interest, Realityspeak trivially nullifies Newspeak. All human beings are capable of thought. Try it.

But not all are capable of giving up their self-interests.

When self-interest trumps morality, in Dante's colorful rendition: “the hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.”

All you pious peoples better believe it!

Zahir Ebrahim



Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2010/10/what-is-war-on-terror-by-zahir-ebrahim.html

Alternate URL: http://bloghumanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2010/10/07/what-is-war-on-terror/


What is War on Terror? By Zahir Ebrahim


The Plebeian antidote to Hectoring Hegemons

Home is Humanbeingsfirst.org

INDEX here.

Okay to copy, print, or post this document; verbatim reproduction only.
Comment
here. Full Copyright Notice
here.