Foreword Pakistan Decapitation Papers 3rd Edition

  Frontcover Pakistan Decapitation Papers 4th Edition
Zahir Ebrahim | Project | PDF
This Fourth Edition of The Pakistan Decapitation Papers is issued with a companion standalone Ebook The Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity. It is recommended that the companion Ebook be perused simultaneously in order to comprehend the diabolical sub-text behind the systematic decapitation of Pakistan. The latter's Chapter 7, Islam and Knowledge vs. Socialization, is perhaps the most pertinent to Pakistanis today. It examines a recipe which can potentially still enable the Pakistani peoples to extricate their ill-begotten nation – now so visibly being destroyed after years of staging by fifth columnists attired in their virginal bride's dress across the board – from the jaws of ignominy.
That same recipe, if forcefully employed globally by the ordinary man and woman on planet earth against their own respective fifth columnists, irrespective of religion, caste, or creed, can in fact set the stage for a new world order that is suited to the pleasurable living of all ordinary human beings, instead of the present one being orchestrated by the elite which is only suited to the pleasurable living of the inhuman oligarchy.
This new Fourth Edition of the Pakistan Decapitation Papers that you now hold in your hands as a printed hardcopy, or, before your eyes as an Ebook, straightforwardly continues in its Volume 3 from where Volume 2 had left off. It is so painful for the author to continue to make these commonsensical and blatantly obvious observations on Pakistan and its peoples, that this is the last edition!
In this tenth year of 9/11, Volume 3 befittingly begins Chapter 1 by revisiting the New Pearl Harbor and the Who Dunnit question. The imperial misidentification of its culprits as the proverbial pirates in order to synthesize the Machiavellian “War on Terror” of the emperor, has been the final harbinger of the decapitation of Pakistan.
However, let the decapitation of Pakistan not all be blamed on the New Pearl Harbor. As this book is evidence, Pakistan was, first and foremost, destroyed by the active connivance of its own military, its own politicians, its own literati, its own press, its own fifth columnists, and by the silent apathy of its 180 million spectating public who are still to become the greatest victims of “imperial mobilization”. That fancy phraseology is Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski's, from his layered 1997 blueprint for what's happening along the “arc of crisis” in the “Global Zone of Percolating Violence” today, titled “The Grand Chessboard – American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives”. The preceding two phrases are also Zbigniew Brzezinski's, respectively from a January 15, 1979 Time magazine article titled 'IRAN: The Crescent of Crisis', and from Brzezinski's 1997 attempt at his own Mein Kampf.
This scribe's 2003 unpublished book titled “Prisoners of the Cave” (available as an Ebook), had already systematically deconstructed Brzezinski's statecraft. And the scribe's 2011 Ebook “Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity”, succinctly updates that analysis to match the empiricism of our times.
None of this is, or has been, rocket science. Nevertheless, to the “likkha-parrha jahils” (the super-learned peoples with college degrees) of modernity, in every nation, it evidently is rocket science. There is nothing this scribe can do about such “learned peoples” of any society. Even so, this volume addresses their “learnedness” once again. These are the very peoples who must experience a metanoia (a change of mind, a rebirth) in order to effectively lead the termination of the abhorrent conditions of our times. The rest of the public by themselves are merely putty in the hands of the demagogues otherwise, oft taken for a ride between bread and circuses on the one hand, and rioting for “revolution” and sloganeering for “democracy” on the other.
Chapter 1 of Volume 3 therefore, is intended to be a self-study tutorial for the “likkha-parrha jahils”, whether of Pakistan, or the Middle East, or the West. The learned reader is encouraged to visit the web links for the many voices cited therein in order to give due diligence to this subject which, from day one, has been wrapped in layers upon layers of deception. Only when the first principles of modern statecraft become apparent to the “likkha-parrha jahils”, only when the fundamental light bulb of insight into Machiavelli and the Hegelian Dialectic goes off in one's head, shall the rest ever follow. Before then, one will inevitably remain chained by one's neck as the proverbial prisoner of the cave (Plato) despite all of one's fancy qualifications, titles, degrees, and lauded accomplishments. This is true irrespective of nationality, religion, sex, caste, or creed. And it is as true of Pakistanis and Middle Easterners as Americans and Europeans. All peoples today, despite our modernity and our information age, share a common constant companion – the new age of Jahiliya! In addition to the companion Ebook “A Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity”, this ignoble fact is further demonstrated in Chapters 2, 3, and 4 of Volume 3. Chapters 5, 6, and 7 comprise this scribe's latest ripostes with various useful idiots and “likkha-parrha jahils” of Pakistan.
Chapter 8 is the anchoring chapter of this short and final volume of The Pakistan Decapitation Papers. Judge for yourself the sublime character of the ordinary Pakistani housewife turned activist that is narrated therein. Can one imagine just ten million activist home-makers like that in Pakistan, and in every nation on earth, coming out of their kitchens!
Chapter 9 is the Epilogue of Volume 3. It is apropos to refer it so as it once again unequivocally underscores the fact that even when the intention of rebellion might be genuine, even when the thirst for independence from empire's mayhem might set an indigenous military patriot's throat on fire in Pakistan, our modernity is a twisted devil. It comes wrapped in multifaceted Hegelian Dialectic. Without acutely comprehending this modernity, there simply cannot be any freedom for any nation and any people, no matter how fervently riled up they might get. That riling up is simply harvested on one or the other side of the Hegelian Dialectic. You are either a “militant” aiding and abetting “insurgency” if you don't like hegemony or have been “tickled” into it, or, are part of empire's Allies douching it with “counter-insurgency” if you don't like the insurgents or just love to play house negro to the white man. Once caught in such a Hegelian Dialectic where both sides are orchestrated by the same powers, there is no escape from that matrix. The Epilogue bears testimony to that sad fact. Until that is overturned, nothing else can.
A nation can surely suffer its fools and still survive, but not its house negroes and fifth columnists. Nor the silence of its peoples. No nation and no peoples can survive its traitors, or an apathetic public drawn mainly to bread and circuses. It was the traitors who enabled the East India Company to colonize the indo sub-continent with treachery in the yesteryear. And it is the traitors who are enabling the owners of the former East India Company to colonize the world with treachery into a one-world government.
Therefore, to continue to describe what has been obvious to this scribe from the very day of September 11, 2001, and what was also visible to the few sighted – that 9/11 was an 'Operation Canned Goods' to launch “imperial mobilization” for the global Fourth Reich of the oligarchs – has already been a matter of “I told you so” for these past ten years. That is not just of zero consolation to this author, but is also of immense pain to see one's own nation destroyed by the handful of slaves and house niggers carrying the White Man's Burden for the white man!
In another day and age, all such house niggers and fifth columnists across the nations of the world, including in the United States of America, along with the puppetmasters behind the scenes, would hang from the tallest gallows many times over. That timeless hope, if there can ever be any consolation for what's being inflicted upon the 'lesser humanity', is the last prayer on each and every lip as they struggle for their final breaths at the nightmarish altar of full spectrum tyranny.
Only the dead have seen the end of war. For those still living, the silent spectators, the unfortunate narrators unpeeling truths protective layers, the bullshit purveyors adding more obfuscating layers, and the henchmen niggers, the travails are only just beginning.
Perhaps God too sheds a tear for the living – the dead have already returned to it.
Zahir Ebrahim,
June 20, 2011

DOWNLOAD PDF Fourth Edition, The Pakistan Decapitation Papers - writings covering the period 2007 – 2011 (692 pages):

Foreword The Pakistan Decapitation Papers 4th Edition – A Report on the Banality of Evil

As bad as things are in Pakistan today, it will get far worse in the West. The Letter to Muslims, Chapter 2 of vol. 2, examines this tortuous aspect of our zeitgeist.
We can still salvage Pakistan for its 200 million peoples despite all that has transpired in this twisted War on Terror; despite all our traitors, mercenaries, useful idiots, native informants, and house negroes who have sold the public short; and despite the state of un-functioning of the nation, without electricity, water, decent livelihood and affordable living for the 98% of the majority, and a lawlessness that would have been beyond imagination in the 1960s and 1970s when I grew up in the carefree idyllic Pakistan.
One cannot look at Pakistan in isolation on the Grand Chessboard. The world conditions are rapidly percolating towards global governance to culminate in world government. Pakistan has thus far been played for a dumb-ass pawn with copious help from Pakistan's military – the only real power-base in Pakistan whose upper echelons since Pakistan's blood-drenched creation have been entirely beholden to its foreign masters. It is now self-evident that Pakistan's and Israel's creation were crafty ploys by the world superpowers who for the past hundred plus years have only dreamed of global empire and world government. Islamic Pakistan was to be the foil for Zionist Israel – both created in the name of religion. One to be played up to culminate in the “Zion that will light up all the world”, the other to be eventually destroyed after it had been calculatingly harnessed to fertilize and birth-pang terror like a condom deliberately pricked by the illicit concubine. What happens to used condoms? That's right! And to unwanted babies? Right again.
Given Pakistan's 'used condom' status, I mean en passant status on the Grand Chessboard, what can Pakistanis realistically do about it? First of all, Pakistanis can do absolutely nothing so long as they are ruled by mercenaries, fools, and uncle toms. Unless that obstacle is removed, there is no sense in day dreaming. I have no idea how to do that – for, even the noble Prophet of Islam had to bow before the tyrannical power of the mercenaries of his time who eventually succeeded in killing his family and hijacking Islam to such a vile degree that today, our mosques are full with apathetic worshippers seeking heaven's glory while God's creation is made to live hell right here on earth.
All I can humbly do, appropriate to my limited vision, experience, and commonsense, is provide the forensic global analysis to explain what the game is on the Grand Chessboard, identify where it's headed, and to coldly opine to my brethren among the remaining 2% population of Pakistan who have turned Pakistan into the 'used condom' of the hectoring hegemons: stop being spineless bastards, for Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned; nor Hell a fury like the plebes scorned.
The time to affect change is now if not already way past. Fait accompli mercilessly awaits right at the edge of the Rubicon after which humpty dumpty cannot be stitched back together again.
Surely, at least some among Pakistan's military is a MA KA LAL who must realize this? Surely, some among Pakistan's literati is a Field Negro who can say NO to the “massa”? Surely, some among Pakistan's ruling class suckled on the liberating bosoms of un-servitude? Illegitimate birth was the fault of our ancestors that, in their unconstrained zeal for a separate nation-state for Muslims which had no parallel in the annals of history, they proved to be no match for the Machiavellian raping-game of divide et impera of the hectoring hegemons. The colonizers knew how to dangle just the right incentives and ripe-conditions before the colonized natives so that the sheep would themselves demand their own slaughter. But illegitimate fucking-around ever since, in every generation, is entirely our own fault. We inherited Pakistan – and our rulers have made the world a far worse place for it, including for the peoples of the sub-continent. The largest forced displacement which saw millions dead on either side of partition, followed by the largest forced dismemberment, followed by playing mercenary army for three decades for America's wars destroying neighboring Afghanistan in the process in a cataclysm whose reverberations are being felt in the 'War on Terror' all across the globe today, and now attempting to do the same to neighboring Iran. In the process of all this anal service to empire, converting Pakistan into a Terror Central from which it has now become impossible to extricate – the legacy of Pakistan. See my 2007 Open Letter to Pakistani General, Chapter 40 of vol. 1.
I am entitled to make these truthful and empirical observations as painful as they are to hear, because I am still a concerned citizen of Pakistan, the only country whose passport I bear, the only place where my heart longs to be despite having lived in the West for the best part of my life, and while others desert the sinking ship seeking foreign passports wherever they can find them, and willingly play House Negro to get visas from the white man, I carry my green one without fear.
I know I have a rendezvous with deathand I shall not fail that rendezvous. That pledge compels me to continually break my silence. To stay deaf, mute and blind, is to be an accomplice. To be a house negroe is to be without dignity. To be of illegitimate birth is to be a bastard. To seed illegitimate births is to be a zani. To pursue virtuous piety in apathy to all this is to be complicit in crimes against humanity as its greatest enablers – as amply demonstrated in the Letter to Muslims in Chapter 2 vol. 2. To feel offended by the plebeian language I employ and not by what the elite have done to Pakistan is to be a hypocrite. I hope this frank Realityspeak is not lost on the profoundly innocent of knowledge weaned on Newspeak 24 hours a day, just as it is evidently entirely lost on the criminal uncle tom rulers of Pakistan. As serendipity would dictate however, it is a profound irony of fate that the same elite who have been instrumental in writing the Requiem Mass for Pakistan, also hold the key to Pakistan's salvation within their grasp – with just a little bit of genuine courage to throw the tea overboard! Ultimately, all have a rendezvous with death – and none shall fail that rendezvous! Neither shall one, the God of the virginal Muslims assures one, cross the razor's edge to heaven's doorway when the virtuous silence of the pious created the hell on earth for everyone.
This Third Edition of The Pakistan Decapitation Papers adds my current writings to the Second Edition, divided into two epochs. The material of the second edition is carried over into the latter half of the book as vol. 1 for the period 2007 – 2009. The first half adds new content from where the second edition had left off to the present, as vol. 2 for the period 2009 – 2010.
Zahir Ebrahim
October 31, 2010
October 31, 2009

Foreword The Pakistan Decapitation Papers 3rd Edition – A Report on the Banality of Evil

Who in Pakistan has not heard of the famous fable of King Solomon the wise. When presented with two women feuding over a baby, each claiming to be the real mother, the king drew his mighty sword to cut the baby in half to give to each quarrelsome woman. One of them, the real mother, cried out: “It's hers, it's hers, please give the entire beautiful baby to her, she is the real mother; I don't want half of the dead!”
Alas, on the face of it, not one among the rulers of Pakistan is the real mother of the Pakistani peoples.
Pakistan has been under the hectoring hegemons' sword the moment the Berlin Wall came down. Almost overnight, with the calculated destruction of the Soviet Union, a new perpetual enemy of mankind was brought to the fore in the continuing game of Hegelian Dialectics to raise a new phoenix of world government from the ashes of the old world order. Variously titled as militant Islam, radical Islam, islamofascism, but most often called Islamism to bring it kinship with the earlier enemies of mankind, namely, Fascism, Nazism, and Communism, though not Zionism, Pakistan has been the unrecognized eye of the storm from day one.
The only Muslim country with nuclear weapons, also harboring a ready-made psychological-tribal ethos which makes some of its inhabitants easy recruits for enabling the perpetual World War IV with just the right “tickling”, Pakistan had to be both harvested for fodder, and setup for destabilization and balkanization. The latter not primarily for the purpose which is most apparent, the riches under its soil, but to continue the path of creating World Order.
The previous four decades since the end of World War II until the dismantling of the Soviet Union, saw most of the world held hostage into two partisan camps of two combating nuclear titans. These bastions of civilization and high-morality of course only exchanged blows in proxy warfare upon poorer nations, but primarily used that Cold War as the pretext to run up a phenomenal expense on arms buildup. That was deemed World War III. The moment that ended, World War IV began right away, albeit it remained poorly recognized as such until 911. The first barbaric invasion of Iraq, followed by the 13 years of strangulation regimes of economic sanctions and silent warfare – which notably elicited the famous affirmation from the US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright to the reporting of deaths of half a million Muslim children for a want of medicines “We think the price is worth it” – set the stage for it.
911 created that shock effect of “New Pearl Harbor” upon the American public to provide the full pretext to the remaining superpower left standing after World War III, to launch its final gambit to entirely overthrow the remaining Old World Order. Thus, the past one hundred and twenty years have seen four World Wars, or their preparations, and in each war, three unusual things transpired: 1) existing world order and existing empire were partially destroyed, to be replaced by a transient world order that was to be an incremental baby-step towards the ultimate agenda of world government, and repeat; 2) no territorial expansion occurred for any warring nation; 3) a private financial oligarchy continually emerged the most victorious, consolidating its gains from each war, and each economic boom-bust cycle, to grow more and more powerful. All warring nations ran up astronomical debts to these financial barons who armed all sides of the manufactured conflicts, and also controlled the monetary policy and currency-issue in each of those nations. The victors, as well as the vanquished. The war debt was administered by the Bank of International Settlement, or BIS for short. Who owns BIS and what do its owners want with world government? Was it foreseeable that Pakistan would be put on the chopping block of the war planners?
The collection of Project Humanbeingsfirst's letters and essays comprising this book examines the latter question, of the predictability of Pakistan's sorry fate. Had it not been for her own cowardly and treasonous rulers alternately cowering and thumping their chests while killing their own civilians in the most barbaric way imaginable; and for a public watching in apathy while waiting for Allah to come save them, it was a fate that was completely avoidable! Who gave the mandate to military dictator General Pervez Musharaf to ally Pakistan with the hectoring hegemons in the aftermath of 911? At Nuremberg, the rulers of Pakistan would all hang for creating and maintaining an alliance with the aggressor who committed not just war crimes, but “the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole” as was concluded by Justice Robert Jackson, US chief prosecuting counsel at the Nuremberg Military Tribunals. General Pervez Musharaf treated Pakistan as his private inheritance, and the same is being done by his successors, both military and civilian.
It is my hope that in presenting this volume to them, that they might suddenly recall that six feet under, the maggots can't tell the difference. While surely, the soul extractor can!
For gaining a deeper comprehension of the larger context of one-world government in which Pakistan's dismantling is situated, please acquire the “Monetary Reform Bibliography” from Project Humanbeingsfirst's website, or take the online tutorial titled: “The Hegelian Dialectics of Deception Today's Focus: Anatomy of Modern Lies, Senseless Warfare, Merchants of Death”.
These essays and letters are arranged in reverse chronological order (for the lack of a better way to present them). All pertain to Pakistan directly, except three overarching ones which are more general: 1) the letter to the Financial Times of December 11, 2008 (Chapter 46), which is included to demonstrate that when the rest of the documents refer to one-world government, it isn't a conspiracy theory of idle schizoids on some LSD trip ; 2) the report of April 26, 2008, From Balance of Terror to Unilateral Terror on the Grand Chessboard (Chapter 28), which is included to succinctly identify the fundamental political science reality behind the “war on terror” ; and 3) the editorial of October 19, 2009 (Chapter 3), on the Pentagon's Fourth Generation Warfare which gives a bird's-eye view of the conspiratorial orchestration of modern history as the forensic backdrop for situating the ongoing World War IV and how to end it. It would be preferable to read these general essays in that order before proceeding to the predictable sorrows of Pakistan and the impediments to its obvious remedies.
This Second Ebook Edition of Pakistan Decapitation Papers collects several additional reports and letters, and is suitable for hardcopy pretty-printing.

Foreword The Pakistan Decapitation Papers 2nd Edition – A Report on the Banality of Evil

There is many a slip between the cup and lip. Pakistan is still on the map. It is not too late to wage a genuine struggle for independence against the barbarians at the gate who call themselves the hectoring hegemons.
There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free--if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending--if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained--we must fight!
I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!
They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger?
Will it be the next week, or the next year?
Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a Xe guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength but irresolution and inaction?
Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot?
Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us.
Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest.
There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Baluchistan to the mountains of the Tribal Belt!
The war is inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.
It is in vain, sir, to extentuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace--but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms!
Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have?
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
Once upon a time, so entreated a courageous man whom all honor in the United States of America as their founding father! But when he had spoketh, he wasn't addressing a nation of traitors, mercenaries, native-informants, 'Negroes', and a confused mass of people. The enemy was clearly identified. All he had to do was to rile them up to stand up for their dignity, and their independence.
Today, the enemy is shrouded in obfuscation for the vast majority of Pakistani people. They don't know the enemy. With each suicide bomb blast they bury their dead anew. Whom should they charge for the crime? Osama Bin Laden? With each drone strike, they bury their children anew. Whom should they charge for that crime? Or should they remain in awe of the benevolence of the imperial storm troopers after Iraq and Afghanistan that they used only precision high-tech strikes to kill far fewer innocent men women and children in Pakistan than they otherwise might have with “shock and awe” if General Collin Powel was still around? And feel gratified when it's only their own military (or jihadis) doing it to them – for surely, being dispatched to heaven by fellow Muslims is superior in some way than by infidels alone? What ought the Pakistanis to feel, think, and do? Or simply do nothing and let god sort it all out with the Hectoring Hegemons?
Who is the real enemy responsible for waging World War IV? Is it the mosque, the mullah, the military, the militants, the politicians who turn on a dime, Israel, India, ISI, NATO, America, Islam, Judaism, Christianity, or god who has fated this dastardly destiny so that it can nicely bring about its promised messiah and show the good and wronged people how really mighty powerful and merciful it is so that they may all bow even lower in praise showing up their rear end even higher; who?
Whosoever is the enemy, staying silent 'looking from the side' only invokes the curse of all victims throughout posterity :
I still curse the killers, their accomplices, the indifferent spectators who knew and kept silent, and Creation itself, Creation and those who perverted and distorted it. I feel like screaming, howling like a madman so that that world, the world of the murderers, might know it will never be forgiven.”
I absolve myself, and my progeny from that curse. We have tried our best to be heard.
Zahir Ebrahim
October 31, 2009

Epilogue The Pakistan Decapitation Papers – A Report on the Banality of Evil

Foreword The Pakistan Decapitation Papers – A Report on the Banality of Evil BY Zahir Ebrahim | Project

Insurgency vs. Counter-Insurgency

Case Study: Manufacturing Pretext for Perpetual Controlled Conflict and Controlled Chaos
By Zahir Ebrahim | Project | PDF
[Dateline California, October 26, 2010] The BBC News reported on October 06, 2010 that 'Nato contractors 'attacking own vehicles' in Pakistan'. It stated in its carefully worded “limited hangout”:
'Nato supply convoys travelling through Pakistan to Afghanistan have regularly come under attack in the past, but following Pakistan's decision to block their route through the Khyber Pass, they now face an even bigger security threat. Hundreds of tankers and trucks have been left stranded on highways and depots across Pakistan, with little or no security. Taliban militants have regularly been targeting the convoys, even when they are heavily protected. But many believe it is not just the militants who pose a security threat to the convoys. The owners of oil tankers being used to supply fuel to Nato in Afghanistan say some of the attacks on their convoys are suspicious. They say there is evidence to suggest that bombs have been planted in many of vehicles by the “Nato contractors” – individuals or companies who have been contracted by Nato to supply fuel and goods to forces in Afghanistan.'
With allegation-phrases like “many believe”, “they say”, without lending any forensic or critical factual analysis as to why 'Nato contractors' who work directly for the Pentagon and NATO, might be doing such a thing, the belated disclosure feeds rumors that are already ripe among the 'untermensch' victims that there is something terribly wrong with this 'War on Terror' whose principal victims since its inception continue to be innocent civilians. Why would the occupation forces want to increase the discontent of the already beleaguered people by such rumor-mongering reportage, and by the systematic controlled leaks that we see cropping up now and then which convey, from its own official records, American barbarianism upon Muslim civilians? Or more aptly framed in Michael Hayden's vernacular, what is the purpose of this “tickling” reportage?
Our newsmedia, both mainstream print and television, and almost all of alternate media largely playing controlled dissent worldwide, are unwilling to inform the public of the military significance of “insurgency” and “counter-insurgency”. The simpleton mind of the public, these lords of public relations must feel in sympathy with the Report from Iron Mountain, remains “unexposed to the exigencies of higher political or military responsibility” and cannot therefore appreciate the value of the “considerable political sophistication” that goes into the deep calculus of hegemony as “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.”
Poorly read of history as the commoners of course are, including the most educated ones among them with 'scholar' stamped upon their forehead, and weaned on the immediate gratification of the here and the now by having pursued their 'American Dreams' in deep slumber all of their lives, the plebes obviously naturally fail to recognize the distemper of hegemony when it is inchoate and kept brewing under covers.
They cannot believe that “Peace and its duration, like war, is determined by natural laws that in their fundamental principles do not vary nor are found wanting”. And when this law of hegemony is steamrolled into practice in the form of the lifetime of 'War on Terror', the only thing visible to the public is the death and mayhem with the respected narrators keeping score. But not the military precision with which red-teaming/blue-teaming insurgency and counter-insurgency are employed to perpetually engage the world in the controlled chaos of World War IV.
The factual political science reason for engaging in such permanent warfare was serendipitously discovered in the 1908-09 minute books of the Carnegie Endowment for Peace in 1953-54 by the indefatigable Congressional Investigator Norman Dodd, for the Reece Committee investigating the suspected subversion by tax-exempt foundations. Norman Dodd rehearsed from memory the occurrence of the following question from the minute books:
'We are now at the year 1908, which was the year that the Carnegie Foundation began operations. In that year, the trustees, meeting for the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed throughout the balance of the year in a very learned fashion. The question is: “Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?” And they conclude that no more effective means than war to that end is known to humanity. So then, in 1909, they raised the second question and discussed it, namely: “How do we involve the United States in a war?”'
That same principal reason guides the presence of American soldiers all across the “Global zone of percolating violence”, as Zbigniew Brzezinski characterized these locations in 1996, where we now find Western troops engaging in the 'War on Terror'.
So why should NATO set fire to their own convoys and blame it on the insurgents? Insurgency vs. Counter-Insurgency was forensically examined in my article last year “The Decapitation of Pakistan by its own Military!” and is reproduced below in its entirety. The reader is invited to spend some time reviewing Operation Gladio also cited in its footnote.

VALIDATION UPDATE July 21, 2011: 'US aid may be flowing to Afghan insurgents'
Zahir's note: The United States government is itself admitting that American funds are being funneled to the insurgents, once the disingenuousness of doublespeak statements like these are peeled away. Also see John Perkins on how corruption is manufactured among the beggar nations by the donor agencies, slyly aided and abetted, and encouraged by deliberately turning a blind eye knowing full well where the funds are going. The process of covertly as well as overtly inducing corruption to co-opt, and then claiming there is corruption during mechanical “audits”, is an art well known to those who understand imperial statecraft and its multifaceted notions of cover stories and “plausible deniability” (see Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory for the presidential directive NSC 10/2 if unfamiliar with the concept of “plausible deniability”):
'... "US agencies have taken steps to strengthen their oversight of US funds, but the United States still has limited visibility over how these funds flow through the Afghan economy, leaving these funds vulnerable to fraud or diversion to insurgents," said the audit.
The findings come amid growing frustration in Washington over the corruption-plagued Afghan government and steadily declining public support for the nearly 10-year-old war.
The audit reviewed oversight of US aid converted to cash, including electronic payments to contractors, and assessed American efforts to bolster the Kabul government's regulation of commercial banks and informal hawala financial networks.
The report said that "given the amount of US cash that flows through the Afghan economy, it is imperative that the US government have robust measures in place to ensure that these funds are not used for fraud or diverted to insurgent networks.
"However, we found that agencies have not instituted sufficient controls over US funds," it said. ... Since 2002, the United States has spent more than $70 billion on security and development assistance in Afghanistan.'

Zahir's note: The government of Pakistan is even admitting that insurgency is fabricated (see Letter: Understanding the 'arc of crisis' with minimal work By Zahir Ebrahim which records my own defeat: “Just don't ask me how to get rid of our fifth columnists – that's where I stand defeated.”)
'Islamabad: A total of 331 US officials in Pakistan, most of them suspected of engaging in espionage under diplomatic cover, have been "identified to leave the country" under a secret deal between the two sides for release of American national Raymond Davis, a media report said on Thursday. ... An official said that most of the suspected US officials were "involved in suspicious activities, including photographing and filming of sensitive installations like airbases (Warsak, near Peshawar and Multan), defence bunkers along the Pakistan-India border near Lahore, recruiting persons supporting their activities and launching local people for suspicious activities by offering lucrative benefits".'

Zahir Ebrahim
September 28, 2009 | Revised November 02, 2009
Author's Note, Nov. 02, 2009: Pakistanis, apparently, simply cannot perceive that “insurgency” is manufactured – judging by the asinine questions they asked the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during her visit to Pakistan last week. Every one of them was simplistic and devoid of any appreciation for the political science behind “imperial mobilization”. Ignoring the mercenaries, traitors, and vulgar propagandists at work in Pakistan, many well-meaning Pakistanis are entirely confused. Therefore, this revision draws upon some stark lessons learnt from Iraq to further substantiate the original report. See additional evidence and extensive deconstruction of mythologies in The Pakistan Decapitation Papers.
© Project HumanbeingsfirstTM. Permission granted to use freely as per copyright notice

[PHBF Report] Dateline Sept. 28 to Nov. 02, 2009, California, United States
Let me begin this very difficult exposition as a Pakistani citizen (my only citizenship, by choice, despite being a legal permanent resident in the United States for almost three decades) with the question Who really killed Benazir Bhutto? [1] I mean who are the prime-movers?
The trigger-pullers are obviously irrelevant and remain faceless. They will surely never be known.
Well, let's read it in Benazir Bhutto's own lucid words which have now been augmented, almost two years later, with the Pakistan's Army Chief of Staff's belated disclosures of September 21, 2009. [2] Why belated? Well, please see these unpublished letters to many Pakistani newspaper editors on their repeatedly perpetuating the fiction of Who Killed Benazir Bhutto in cahoots with the 'hectoring hegemons' and their agents! All traitors and co-opted errand boys. [3]
The American agenda for Pakistan is not a state-secret. Rather, it is only thinly disguised as perpetually fighting the “insurgents” in a lifetime of war, the World War IV. [4] Whereas, in reality, both the “insurgency”, and the “counter-insurgency”, are entirely designed and fabricated in the USA as part of the evolving tactics of Hegelian Dialectics. They are enacted on the ground by various two-bit errand boys and expert trigger pullers. The already well-known existence of black-ops assassination squads in Pakistan/Afghanistan, known to the local peoples for years as the real prime-movers behind the heinous local terrorist acts, belatedly confirmed by NYT, WP, and NYT, in August 2009. [5] See these two December 2008 reports on the Mumbai terrorist Act as reportedly orchestrated by ALI BABA from his perch in the Hindu Kush. [6] The arrival of the black-ops in the region is not recent, albeit the public disclosures might be.
Starting in the immediate aftermath of 911, and perhaps even earlier, Pakistan may well have become the largest deployment region for the CIA in modern times, both covert (unknown to Pakistani government and secretly working to destabilize Pakistan with false-flag operations), and overt (with Pakistani military's aiding and abetting, in full view of the world, ostensibly fighting the “insurgents”, “Bin Laden”, “Al-Qaaeda”, but in the process mainly “tickling” its own innocent civilians in many a barbaric way). [7]
And since Jundallah got launched to destabilize Iran from Pakistani soil (their “insurgencies”), Baluchistan along with the Pak-Afghan regions have been awash with black-ops, and obviously of course, also with officially recognized US soldiers manning American military bases on Pakistani soil. [8] But these soldiers of freedom were rarely spotted in the streets of major cities before. The following video report of September 08, 2009, therefore portends of ominous whirlwinds imminently engulfing Pakistan: [9]
RussiaToday September 08, 2009, Contractors in Pakistan: are troops next?
To put this ominous presence of soldiers of freedom and fortune on Pakistani soil in full black-ops context of NATO and the Western Alliance, of diabolically manufacturing and sustaining the very pretexts out of uniform to enable the in-uniform forces to continue on with their perpetual mission of fighting World War IV, it is sufficient to look at what is transpiring in IRAQ for lessons to wisely apply to one's own predicament in order to avoid a far worse one.
Fast forwarding past all the initial pretenses of Sadaam Husain being responsible for 911, his WMDs about to destroy America, the Mission Accomplished statement of President Bush, and the “oops! intelligence failure” statements by the neo-con's own Iraq Study Group after the raping of Mesopotamia and the DNA of its ancient and proud peoples were fait accompli, etceteras, the biggest reason for not withdrawing the US troops from Iraq is continually stated to be the infernal ongoing INSURGENCY. Iran, Shias, Sunnis, and Al-Qaeeda are variously blamed for the main cause of America's continued military occupation of Iraq; new “troop-surges” are periodically announced amidst some dissenting consternation willy-nilly expressed in its news media and by its politicians to let the American public know that it is not an easy choice to be making. The Iranian strawman has already been amply unraveled elsewhere. [10] However, witness the following familiar statement of former President George W. Bush on the legend of the new Ali Baba [11] of Mesopotamia, Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi: [12]
“You know, I hate to predict violence, but I just understand the nature of the killers. This guy, Zarqawi, an al Qaeda associate -- who was in Baghdad, by the way, prior to the removal of Saddam Hussein -- is still at large in Iraq. And as you might remember, part of his operational plan was to sow violence and discord amongst the various groups in Iraq by cold- blooded killing. And we need to help find Zarqawi so that the people of Iraq can have a more bright -- bright future.” -- George W. Bush, Press Conference, 1 June 2004
The indefatigable Michel Chossudovsky, citing Bush's afore-quoted statements wrote: “Zarqawi constitutes Washington's justification for the continued military occupation of Iraq, not to mention the brutal siege of densely populated urban areas directed against 'Al Qaeda in Iraq' which is said to be led by Zarqawi.” [13]
It is now November 02, 2009 – and the United States is still very much in Iraq. Its own economy is in deep recession, and the free-money printing by the Feds is taking it towards hyperinflation. The world is not only mired in its worst global financial crisis that is seeing the end of Western hegemony in its industrial production capabilities, but is also plagued by a global pandemic, global warming, and an un-ending global war on terror, sinking valuable trillions of dollars which could otherwise have been spent on converting overnight the entire world's six billion population into America's middle class status of the 1960s, while also wiping out much of the developing nations' unbearable debt. That alone would most assuredly have earned the United States the genuine love of the entire world instead of the present shoes thrown at its all powerful president. How remarkably has the world's sole superpower been brought down so pathetically to its knees by the Ali Baba of Iraq that today it cannot even extricate itself from giving a diabolical police-state to its own peoples in the pretext of saving them from the global terrorist! What sort of idiotic “American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives” agenda, and what kind of asinine quest for “Full Spectrum Dominance” is this? [14] Wow Ali Baba, what magical powers you have of not only so successfully entangling the United States in the Iraqi “quagmire” indefinitely, but of being the prime-mover behind the demise of nation-states to usher in the only permissible solution out of these multifaceted global threats – world government! [15]
Focussing on the pertinence at hand however, what does the Ali Baba of Iraq have to do with the following shocking news reports purveyed in titles which are illustrative enough of the key point: “Were British Special Forces Soldiers Planting Bombs in Basra?” September 25, 2005 ; British “Undercover Soldiers” Caught driving Booby Trapped Car “They refused to say what their mission was.” September 20, 2005. [16]
Michel Chossudovsky, writing the latter article and displaying his un co-opted integrity, asked the 64-million dollar obvious questions – the same modus operandi being replayed in Pakistan with even more drastic effect, as now the black-ops have been hardened in Iraq on how not to get caught when plenty of patsies can be trivially harvested for the job of “legitimizing Insurgency” [17] – which none appear to be publicly asking in Pakistan:
'The following Reuters report raises some disturbing questions.
Why were undercover British “soldiers” wearing traditional Arab headscarves firing at Iraqi police?
The incident took place just prior to a major religious event in Basra.
The report suggests that the police thought the British soldiers looked “suspicious”. What was the nature of their mission?
Occupation forces are supposed to be collaborating with Iraqi authorities. Why did British Forces have to storm the prison using tanks and armoured vehicles to liberate the British undercover agents?
“British forces used up to 10 tanks” supported by helicopters “to smash through the walls of the jail and free the two British servicemen.”
Was there concern that the British “soldiers” who were being held by the Iraqi National Guard would be obliged to reveal the nature and objective of their undercover mission?
A report of Al Jazeera TV, which preceded the raid on the prison, suggests that the British undercover soldiers were driving a booby trapped car loaded with ammunition. The Al Jazeera report (see below) also suggests that the riots directed against British military presence were motivated because the British undercover soldiers were planning to explode the booby trapped car in the centre of Basra: ...'
See: Who is behind “Al Qaeda in Iraq”? Pentagon acknowledges fabricating a “Zarqawi Legend”, in which the Washington Post of April 10, 2006, in its rare moment of candor – just like the New York Times' ex post facto exposé of April 20, 2008 on the Pentagon using retired Generals as mercenaries for hire to blatantly lie on American television in order to drum public support for the Iraq war [18] – is quoted in full context as follows: [19]
'“The Zarqawi campaign is discussed in several of the internal military documents. "Villainize Zarqawi/leverage xenophobia response," one U.S. military briefing from 2004 stated. It listed three methods: "Media operations," "Special Ops (626)" (a reference to Task Force 626, an elite U.S. military unit assigned primarily to hunt in Iraq for senior officials in Hussein's government) and "PSYOP," the U.S. military term for propaganda work..." (WP. 10 April 2006)
The military's propaganda program, according to the Washington Post, has "largely been aimed at Iraqis, but seems to have spilled over into the U.S. media. One briefing slide about U.S. "strategic communications" in Iraq, prepared for Army Gen. George W. Casey Jr., the top U.S. commander in Iraq, describes the "home audience" as one of six major targets of the American side of the war." (WP, op cit.)
An internal document produced by U.S. military headquarters in Iraq, states that "the Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful information campaign to date.”'
With that precious lesson in “imperial mobilization” through sustained PSYOP and manufactured “insurgency” learnt from our brethren Muslim nation of Iraq – where, in retrospect, and in moments of reflection through their daily strife and humiliation, its beleaguered people must surely ponder upon what could they have possibly done earlier, before 1990, during the iron-reign of Sadaam Hussein, and throughout those horrible intervening 13 years of Western hegemonic sanctions, to have avoided this new dismal fate altogether – let's return to Pakistan.
The multimodal approaches to destabilizing, and consequently balkanizing Pakistan under the fabled pretext of its own illusive Ali Baba, “Osama Bin Laden”, have been so transparent, that today, finally, many a retired con-fession artist are getting in on the act to claim the flag of patriotism. [20] Going for hajj after having eaten 900 mice is the favorite pastime of Pakistani praetorian guards. I am only waiting for any sitting Pakistani General to rise to that occasion, if it's not already too late! [21] But I am afraid it probably is – see here, here, here, here, and here. [22]
The decapitation of Pakistan by Pakistan's finest, wantonly justifying the inglorious 'white man's burden' – the same old 'la mission civilisatrice' under a new name – upon impoverished indigenous shoulders! [23] Even Martin Luther Kings' penetrating description fails to do justice to the scale of calamity in Pakistan: [24]
“The white establishment is skilled in flattering and cultivating emerging leaders. It presses its own image on them and finally, from imitation of manners, dress, and style of living, a deeper strain of corruption develops. This kind of Negro leader acquires the white man's contempt for the ordinary Negro. He is often more at home with the middle-class white than he is among his own people. His language changes, his location changes, his income changes, and ultimately he changes from the representative of the Negro to the white man into the white man's representative to the Negro.”
The shameful and criminal dislocation of up to 2.4 million civilians in May of this year was rightly described as “an exodus that is beyond biblical”. [25]
Swat exodus biblical. UK Independent, May 31, 2009, caption: In Pakistan, an exodus that is beyond biblical; Photo Rashid Iqbal/EPA, source UK Guardian, May 11, 2009, caption: People flee Pakistan's restive Swat valley after a curfew was temporarily lifted to allow people to leave the intensifying conflict
Just as from the USSR's point of view in yesteryear, the “insurgency” against them in Afghanistan was foreign inculcated, entirely fabricated in the USA (as we know today but held as a closely guarded secret then), which thus forced the Soviets to apply counter-insurgency measures, and subsequently, an outright invasion of Afghanistan (read Brzezinski's own statements in Saving Pakistan, and watch Brzezinski speak in this video clip devilishly crafting the “insurgency” for the Russians on the Pak-Afghan border); the so called “insurgency” in Pakistan is also calculatingly fabricated, ab initio, in the USA through covert intervention and black-ops. [26] Subsequently, with sufficient “tickling” during the overt counter-insurgency operations, and by astutely harvesting all the cultural cracks and lacunae of the people, the “insurgency” acquires a reactionary life of its own. [27]
That latter stage, as well as on-going black-ops induced wanton acts of terrorism using the pre-“tickled” dupes and patsies as now rapidly transpiring, October 9-12, 2009, NYT, NYT – like the secret and 'officially denied' component of NATO's Operation Gladio in Western Europe of yesteryear which blamed it on the communists to keep an increasingly skeptical public's fear of the then boogieman du jour continually alive – are Machiavellianly projected in the news media, by the native informants, by the fabricated dissent-chiefs, and the Mighty Wurlitzer, as INSURGENCY. [28] And therefore, it is officially argued, an unarguable raison d'être for continuing the barbaric counter-insurgency to implement the writ of the state. This predictably creates a self-sustaining destabilization as both commonsense and political science 101 would inform even an imbecile. The blood-drenched puppetshow so enacted, inevitably affords a compelling pretext to the puppetmasters to justify their own military intervention to “save” the people who are incapable of doing it themselves.
The innocent Pakistan military, not too well-versed in political science or Hegelian Dialectics based Machiavellian state-craft (I presume), in this prelude to NATO forces marching in, is similarly being compelled to take real counter-insurgency measures like the Soviets. Aided and abetted of course by high ranking traitors from within their own ranks, and by their foreign paymasters' militaries (NATO, Blackwater now renamed Xe, and other un-named foreign divisions operating within Pakistan which I call “Jundallah-plusplus” to distinguish them from “Jundallah” which is apparently targeting Iran from Pakistani soil). The simple fact that Pakistan is supplying all the drinking water (bottled by Nestle), and full logistics channel for war-making supplies to NATO in Afghanistan is telling in and of itself. Pakistan is equally responsible for destroying the Afghan society, the Afghan people, and there is no less spilled-blood of innocent Afghani Muslims upon Pakistan's hands over the past 30 years, than upon the United States'.
Pakistani military helped destroy Afghanistan, and they are now helping to destroy Pakistan. No Pakistani civilian I know, including myself, ever authorized the Pakistani military to destroy Afghanistan, or aid the United States in its own hegemonic plans on the Grand Chessboard. Do you know anyone? So from where did they get their mandate? I would rather have clean drinking water in my tap, damn it! What good are the bloody nukes when they become the raison d'être for our very destruction in this manner without ever firing a single missile at the drones that are killing our own peoples?
It gives me no pleasure to repeatedly rehearse this footnote to history. What is not already obvious to the Pakistanis? It must surely still occur to many a reasonable military man serving with genuine zeal and honor in the real pivot of power in Pakistan that the end is drawing near. What are they doing idly watching the battle of their lives from the sidelines – when they are not shooting or displacing their own peoples that is? As quoted from a Dawn newspaper column:
“THIS article poses two questions: on the day after US/Nato forces invade and occupy some of Balochistan and Waziristan, what will we say we should have done, and why aren’t we doing it now? Is this far-fetched? ... One hopes that a small group of patriotic officers in Pakistan are also asking themselves what can be done, and why aren’t we doing it now.” [29]
Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace--but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! And that's the tortuous déjà vu reality today. [30]
If one is genuinely confused about who is the enemy, whether it's the Taliban, Al-Qaeeda, Islamism, Militant Islam, unknown foreign fighters, foreign intelligence agencies, India, Israel, American interests, or the United States' globalist oligarchs hell bent on criminally realizing their one-world government agenda by fabricating and harvesting “revolutionary times” across the planet, [31] please spend some time reviewing the book The Pakistan Decapitation Papers available from Project [32] Write to me if you are still uncertain about who is behind “tickling” the so called “insurgents” into existence, and why that is necessary in order to fight the lifetime of World War IV with our blood. After all, God is on your side! [33]
Caption Zbigniew Brzezinski on the Pak-Afghan Border: 'God is on your side'!

Footnotes April 03, 2003, Ex-CIA director: U.S. faces 'World War IV' by Charles Feldman and Stan Wilson,
[5] NYT August 19, 2009 C.I.A. Sought Blackwater’s Help to Kill Jihadists
The Washington Post August 20, 2009 , CIA Hired Firm for Assassin Program
NYT August 20, 2009, C.I.A. Said to Use Outsiders to Put Bombs on Drones
The Miami Herald, Oct. 02, 2009, Scores of bodies found in Pakistan's Swat valley By Saeed Shah, McClatchy Newspapers
Los Angeles Times April 13, 2008, Bomb blast in Iran mosque kills 9
'Bombings are rare in Iran, but insurgencies have been blamed for some deadly bomb attacks in recent years. In February 2007, a car loaded with explosives blew up near a bus carrying members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, killing 11 of them. In 2006, blasts killed nine people in Ahvaz near the Iraq border. Iran alleges that the United States, Israel, and Britain are behind the upsurge in militant activity and says it has intelligence to support the allegation.' -- LA Times, April 13, 2008.
[9] Russia Today September 08, 2009, 'Contractors in Pakistan: are troops next?' Interview with Wayne Madsen
[12] Global Research, June 11, 2004, Historical Origins of the Islamic State (ISIS): Who is Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi? By Michel Chossudovsky
[13] Global Research, April 18, 2006, Origins of the Islamic State (ISIS): Who is behind “Al Qaeda in Iraq”? Pentagon acknowledges fabricating a “Zarqawi Legend” By Michel Chossudovsky
[14] Zahir Ebrahim, Prisoners of the Cave, 2003, Chapter 1
Project Humanbeingsfirst's Tutorial: The Hegelian Dialectics of Deception – Today's Focus: Anatomy of Modern Lies, Senseless Warfare, Merchants of Death
[16] Global Research, September 25, 2005 Were British Special Forces Soldiers Planting Bombs in Basra? Suspicions Strengthened by Earlier Reports, by Michael Keefer
Global Research, September 20, 2005 British “Undercover Soldiers” Caught driving Booby Trapped Car “They refused to say what their mission was.” by Michel Chossudovsky
[18] NYT, Sunday, April 20, 2008, Message Machine: Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand - A PENTAGON CAMPAIGN Retired officers have been used to shape terrorism coverage from inside the TV and radio networks. By DAVID BARSTOW
See its pertinent deconstruction in Zahir Ebrahim, 'Bin Laden': Key enabler of “imperial mobilization” and nuclear attack on Iran-Pakistan
See Project Humanbeingsfirst's A Note on the Mighty Wurlitzer
[19] Global Research, April 18, 2006 Who is behind “Al Qaeda in Iraq”? Pentagon acknowledges fabricating a “Zarqawi Legend” by Michel Chossudovsky
Press TV September 14, 2009 Ex-Intel officer discloses US plans for Pakistan, exclusive interview of Pakistan's former ISI Chief General Hamid Gul to Press TV
'US officials "want to go for Pakistan's nuclear assets. They are inching close to those nuclear assets day by day," he added. When asked about Washington's long-term goal in Pakistan, the former Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) said that the United States wants to keep the country destabilized.' -- Press TV Sept. 14, 2009.
This is the same General Gul turning on his own patrons after he had fully assisted them in “giving to the USSR its Vietnam war” from Pakistani soil. An African proverb says: you need a very long spoon to sip with the devil.
Tehran Times September 14, 2009, Blackwater involved in Bhutto and Hariri hits: former Pakistani army chief
'TEHRAN - Pakistan’s former chief of army staff, General Mirza Aslam Beg (ret.), has said the U.S. private security company Blackwater was directly involved in the assassinations of former Pakistani prime minister Benazir Bhutto and former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri.' -- Tehran Times Sept. 14, 2009
Why was this General muted when all the specious reports were being so boisterously promulgated by the Mighty Wurlitzer's propaganda machinery both in the West and in Pakistan's own newspapers? See the many Letters to Editors on Perpetuating the Fiction of who killed Benazir Bhutto by Zahir Ebrahim,
[22] UK Telegraph September 27, 2009 US threatens to escalate operations inside Pakistan
The News, Friday, September 25, 2009 More drone strikes possible in Pakistan (dead link) September 24, 2009 US Mulls Increasing Drone Strikes in Pakistan - Will Pakistan Escalation Come With Afghan Escalation? by Jason Ditz, September 27, 2009 US Threatening to Attack Major Pakistani City of Quetta - Will US Drone Strikes Move From Rural Pakistan to Baloch Capital? by Jason Ditz September 24, 2009 U.S., NATO Poised For Most Massive War In Afghanistan's History, By Rick Rozoff writing for Stop NATO
Thaindian News October 5, 2009 US pullout from Afghanistan would be ‘disastrous’: Musharraf,
[Added] Zahir Ebrahim, White Man's Burden,
The Grand Chessboard by Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1996,
[24] A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings and Speeches of Martin Luther King (Jr.), pg. 307,
UK Independent, Sunday, 31 May 2009, In Pakistan, an exodus that is beyond biblical - Locals sell all they have to help millions displaced by battles with the Taliban By Andrew Buncombe ;
[Attribution Corrected] Photo Rashid Iqbal/EPA, source UK Guardian, Monday, 11 May 2009, caption: People flee Pakistan's restive Swat valley after a curfew was temporarily lifted to allow people to leave the intensifying conflict
[27] BBC News, Islamabad, October 02, 2009 Pakistan in video beating probe By Syed Shoaib Hasan,
[28] NYT October 9, 2009 Latest Pakistan Bombing Seen as Warning to Government
NYT October 12, 2009 Car Bomb Kills at Least 41 in Restive Region of Pakistan
Article: NATO’s secret armies linked to terrorism? 2004, by Daniele Ganser ;
Book: NATO’s Secret Armies. Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe, 2004 by Daniele Ganser , free PDF available online ;
Video: BBC Documentary Timewatch, 3 episodes, aired on BBC Ch 2, June 1992,
[Added] Analysis: Operation Gladio Yesterday and Worldwide Terrorism Today – Identifying the Enemy By Zahir Ebrahim, ; Imperial Surrogates and 'Terror Central' in Operation Gladio Redux By Zahir Ebrahim,
[Added] Zahir Ebrahim, Masters of Dissent and The Dying Songbird,
[Added] Zahir Ebrahiim, Gatekeepers From Left to Right - Response to Chris Hedges' amalgam of half-truths 'A Decade After 9/11: We Are What We Loathe',
[30] Epilogue in The Pakistan Decapitation Papers, echoing the immortal words of Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775,

The author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley ( ), and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden 2003 book was rejected by numerous publishers and can be read on the web at He may be reached at Verbatim reproduction license at

Decapitation of Pakistan First September 28, 2009 | Revised November 02, 2009 4835
Links fixed, references [Added] to Footnotes to sync with Case Study: Insurgency vs Counter-Insurgency, April 17, 2016
Links fixed, Swat photo attribution corrected, March 03, 2018 1:00 pm

Insurgency vs. Counter-Insurgency First Published October 26, 2010 | Last updated VALIDATION UPDATE July 21, 2011 6091
Links fixed March 13, 2014 | Links fixed, references [Added] to Footnotes, Subtitled Case Study: Manufacturing Pretext for Perpetual Controlled Conflict and Controlled Chaos, April 17, 2016 6366

Insurgency vs. Counter-Insurgency By Zahir Ebrahim 21/21