To: kerry@ projectcamelot.org, ProjectCamelot@ hushmail.com
Subject: Re: Wikileaks - Upswing in High Caliber Disclosures
Dated: Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 4:51 PM
Dear Ms. Kerry, Project Camelot,
Hello. I often follow your video interviews with much interest, and usually also with much skepticism. But you are very refreshing, as is Mr. Ryan, both immensely articulate and empathetic interviewers. It is a pleasure to watch your investigations. Because I view your work as tentatively pointing to new mountains to climb, and always subject to my own climbing based on my interests – whichh I imagine is what you wish your audience to do anyway – I wanted to respond to the advertising blurbs on your websites for Wikileaks:
I enclose below a brief analytical deconstructon of Wikileaks. I would like to believe that it is rooted in hard political science, and not in immanent whimsicism nor wishful thinking. I hope you find it interesting and will let me know your opinion of its thesis which is in opposition to your own wrt Wikileaks. Minimally, I hope it invites greater circumspection on your part than is displayed in the above quoted blurbs of your effusiveness for Wikileaks' so called 'whistleblowing' which reveals nothing new and which very cleverly manages to re-echo and re-implant the unquestioned axioms of empire into public consciousness!
It is only these core-axioms, or myths if you will, which ab initio enable "imperial mobilization". To oppose the latter while echoing the former is to be in Machiavellian collusion with empire, as I am sure you will agree with even a little bit of forethought.
All the best, and I do hope you can respond to this letter publicly.
Kerry Cassidy replied with clarification, also generously inviting Zahir to be on her radio talk-show
From: Project Camelot [projectcamelot@ hushmail.com] Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:25 AM
To: Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Thanks for writing and sharing your considerable knowledge about the arts of deception....
I appreciate that you may have misinterpreted the intent of my message to Wikileaks. I am aware of the games that go on... but I don't let that detract from my desire to find worthwhile content and true whistleblowers regardless of the level of suppression we are under.
The message is not so much lauding the recent wikileaks releases but applauding any effort to leak documents (even if they contain nothing new)... I do understand how we are also being used in this way :-) Still it's worth the fight. I won't give up and decide they've won already. That would serve them even further.
My real intent is to put the word out there that we need more whistleblowers to come forward. That is the real issue. And this is an opportunity to draw attention to a seachange out there.
Which there is...
I applaud your considerable scholarship on this subject of secrecy and the many faces of the controllers. I am also a student of this. And I am particularly interested in the real manipulators behind the obvious controllers.
At any rate, your point is well taken. But I am not naive on this score regardless of how it may appear.
I would welcome a discussion with you on my radio show if you have any interest in coming on there to discuss this subject. Along those lines if you are interested, I have september 17 available. My show is from 11am PST to 1pm. Send me a skype or phone number for the show engineer to call if you want to join me.
I don't consider this email address much safer than my kerry@ projectcamelot.org given the level of technological sophistication they are using (but use either -- your choice).
Kerry Lynn Cassidy
.."he asked if it was classified and he was told no, because you can't classify something that doesn't exist."--Hawk Tales
Zahir courteously declined the invitation with elaboration
From: Project Humanbeingsfirst.org Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:29 AM
To: Project Camelot [projectcamelot@ hushmail.com], kerry@ projectcamelot.org
Thank you for your reply, and your kind invitation to appear on your radio show. I'll pass on the latter with regret as I don't have much to add beyond what I have already written as just an ordinary researcher relying entirely on information available in the public domain. I do not have any vision into the secretive and the occult, some of the things you are interested in investigating about the “controllers” behind the scenes.
To me, all is explained, and is entirely self-contained, in the rather mundane terrrestrial political science wielded by the 'brotherhood of death' through their errand boys – which has been ongoing since time immemorial, for “hegemony is as old as mankind” (as Zbigniew Brzezinski put it) and “oligarchs have always existed, and presumably always will” (as Aldous Huxley put it) - with no need to hypothesize, or to gratuitously believe, in anything extra-terrestrial or in the occult. The occam's razor here, for me, is explained here: Please See Modernity-Simplified.
So, I don't think I would make a very interesting person to talk to for a radio talk-show.
On the Wikileaks, if I may be permitted to be frank, if you did realize that the disclosures of “Afghanistan Papers” aren't all that “High Caliber”, then calling them “High Caliber” in order to invite more disclosures, by your own admission: “The message is not so much lauding the recent wikileaks releases but applauding any effort to leak documents (even if they contain nothing new)” is a tad disingenuous – no? The mantra-amplification mileage these 'Afghanistan Papers' are deriving from all the public endorsements of Wikileaks which fail to point out that these “leaks” retain all the core-lies and keep all the axioms of “imperial mobilization” intact, keep all the myths that led to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq intact; keep the fiction of the external boogiemen that led to the death of millions of innocent peoples by America and the West waging fabricated wars against them intact; and furthermore, in their open endorsements don't even point out the obvious fact that these purported “leaks” reveal absolutely nothing that even all the 'barbers in town' didn't already know, well, all this only adds to the justification of bombing my country, my peoples, my civilization, as I have pointed out in my essay.
What kind of search for truth is this which endorses a deception in the wild hope that it could lead to uncovering some future truth? Since that's just silly, I suspect that Project Camelot didn't really have the chance to keenly study these papers or to understand their import when you issued that invitation to Julian Assange.
But If you realize this import now, perhaps a retraction, or at least a clarification....
Overall, you are doing a great job in Project Camelot of pushing the boundaries of what is people's comfort zones, including my own, and I thank you for your efforts.
Kerry Cassidy again replied very courteously
From: Kerry at Project Camelot [ kerry@ projectcamelot.org] Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:00 AM
To: Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
Cc: Project Camelot [projectcamelot@ hushmail.com]
Thanks for the reply... Sorry to hear you don't go beyond this level when delving into the Controllers et al. And that you don't want to come on my show. But I do understand.
Re the “high caliber”.. that was a quote from the CNN article not my phrasing. I will see if there is a qualifier I can put in there to clarify this so others won't have a mistaken perception on this.
Do keep in touch. I am sure you come across some interesting info from time to time. Feel free to share that or any new investigations you are on...
Zahir's rather spur of the moment postscript to Kerry's statement: “Sorry to hear you don't go beyond this level”
From: Project Humanbeingsfirst.org Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:46 PM
To: Kerry at Project Camelot [kerry@ projectcamelot.org], Project Camelot [projectcamelot @hushmail.com]
Like the rest of the thoughtful peoples in the world Kerry, I'd also like to think that I am rational, logical, forensic, driven by empirical evidence, and not subject to the vast fanciful immanent spaces of the human mind other than while dreaming.
I study political science and history as my interests, not occult, not esoterics. But I know Manly P. Hall wrote a lot about it, that occult symbolisms drive many world events, and arguably form the motivation for some psychopathic rulers.
But that does not lend my mind to esoterics in the realms of non-causality, ETs, relams of consciousness, vibrational energies, chakras, etc. These are Hindu-Eastern teachings and I am quite familiar with some of them, and I also do understand the Westerners' fascination with the East. Even Openheimer quoted the Gita at the time of witnessing the Atomic Bomb, what was it: “I am death, the destroyer of the worlds”, or something like that. It is evidently also only in America that a crackpot like Sri Rajneesh could sucker many people into donating him Rolls Royces – back in India he was a nobody. The West's fascination with Ghandi, with Deepak Chopra, are all too familiar to the Eastern mind (with a tad amusement I might add).
But as I am sure you will agree Kerry, the quest for [religious] truth is like searching for the “River of the Arrow” (Rudyard Kipling's Kim). Once found, it cannot be communicated or shared with another. One has to experience it on their own, one can not be shown it, just like Morpheus told Neo in the Matrix.
And I hope that you might also agree that a rational study of political science, psychology, social engineering, and hegemony, is not that. It can be rather objective, fairly empirical, and easily communicated. This is what I try to do in my limited way.
But ultimately, in the limit, the quest for truth is a self-referential problem. The poor guy in Plato's 'Myth of the cave', cannot know that he is being limited in his conception of reality by the controllers.
I appreciate your taking the time to communicate.
The following is Zahir's more reasoned political-science based analysis of the public import of pursuits like Project Camelot (despite their often entertaining and personal interest significance to him almost akin to reading Isaac Asimov's classic sci-fi novels). It appears in the revised 2010 edition of: Weapons of Mass Deception – The Master Social Science. If Kerry chooses to offer a repartee, it will be appended below.
>> Witness how Wikileaks brouhaha infected even the most outlandish among dissent: Project Camelot. There is no genre of dissent more dissenting than these folks; they search for Aliens, Annunaki, UFOs, as the prime-mover forces behind the psychopathic drive for globalism of the hectoring hegemons! Speak of introducing “beneficial cognitive diversity” with “cognitive infiltration”, this menagerie takes the cake for the political science of immanent dialecticism – with no feigned apologies to Kerry Cassidy who appears to be most sincere in her endeavors.
Surely there are magical aliens flying around in UFOs under the command of the Annunaki fighting Zeus-like epic battles of the gods, or like those scripted in the Gita, using humankind as their patsy genetically engineered children-proxies. But this confabulation is also akin to the fabled Ali Baba flying on his magical carpet who miraculously pulled off 9/11 with box-cutters from its squirrelish perch in Afghanistan, and the people of America still eagerly “United We Stand” against that threat. It is not inconceivable, and is in fact entirely empirical, that the greater agenda going forth is to unite all the peoples of the world against a super Ali Baba++.
The astute Machiavelli, imaginatively toiling away in the National Security State to create the hell for the world's 'untermensch', surely know how to effectively harness even the Alien and cosmological threats from the heavens above for creating its one-world government in no less a measure than it knew how to harvest the Ali Baba of Afghanistan for its long planned “Imperial Mobilization”! The Alien Agenda and its official disclosures with perhaps vivid demonstrations in the skies above and in the seas below, will be the coup de grace for finally bringing a fractious nationalism-driven peoples long divided by religion and race, forcibly together in the secular humanism of planetary-level world government: “if suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species from another planet”. President Ronald Reagan had read that out loud from his script at the United Nations podium in 1987, continuing: “we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world”.
The hundreds of hours of mostly specious but often entertaining video testimonies captured by Project Camelot is unarguable evidence that its harbingers, perhaps unwittingly – and irrespective of their own zealous convictions – are contributing their bit to facilitate public's irrational beliefs in that new super-mantra, and in the process, arguably causing many rebels to misapply their energies of dissent chasing Annunakis and UFOs. This is straight out of the COINTELPRO recipe book for subverting focussed dissent, spun from the mind of the likes of Harvard's Cass Sunstein, President Obama's minister of advanced learning and legalism, and “Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs”. They evidently have copious help from a plethora of very earnest sounding supposed whistleblowers who bring nothing independently verifiable but their sole moral word as evidence to their Project Camelot video interviews; and from the likes of Zecharia Sitchin et. al., story-tellers par excellence who have got rich peddling enjoyable science fiction based on intriguing re-interpretations of ancient myths and archeology as the New Age Theology of Spiritual Secular Humanism.
I have not encountered a more learned gibberish-space than this as part and parcel of the science of hegemony called political science; it would even top money-as-debt and modern Wall Street economics were it to become a ubiquitously held belief-space. The hectoring hegemons' forte is to cultivate false beliefs in order to pursue their untenable agendas. This is self evident from the plethora of myths of 9/11 cleverly employed for “imperial mobilization”. In fact, 9/11 Commission Executive Director Philip Zelikow had this to say about myths in a Terrorism Study Group three years before 9/11: “'Public Assumptions' Shape Views of History: Such presumptions are beliefs (1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community. The sources for such presumptions are both personal (from direct experience) and vicarious (from books, movies, and myths).”
Successfully implanting such presumptions and myths among any group is to motivate the groups' overall actions (and inactions) in accordance with those implanted beliefs. Thus, many intelligent peoples for whom it is otherwise inexplicable to understand why they persist in 'United We Stand' with absurdities, are motivated to naturally react sympathetically to those absurdities. Hence the immense utility to the science of hegemony – which Zbigniew Brzezinski presages in the opening sentence of his book the Grand Chessboard with “Hegemony is as old as mankind” – that is to be derived from vicariously implanting enabling beliefs in society long before they are to be harvested, and letting them percolate naturally as part of social engineering.
This is how “militant Islam” was implanted into Western consciousness years ahead of its harvesting on 9/11; as was environmentalism which led to the Newspeak “global warming” Nobel peace prize being awarded to Al Gore as the precursor to “carbon credit”, the new key instrument of global control of the planet. Sophisticated cultivation of mantras and false beliefs precede the successive baby-steps of “imperial mobilization”. They sew so much confusion and cacophony in the public mind, that in the revealing 1974 words of CFR author Richard N. Gardner: “In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.” See the import of those Realityspeak words in Project Humanbeingsfirst's “Response to Financial Times Gideon Rachman's 'And now for a world government'”.
Those infected with such myths and false beliefs among the public are generally in the First and Second group in Hitler's nomenclature. Those in the Third group advocating such false beliefs are arguably the agents, assets, and sayanim of the Hectoring Hegemons. They can't themselves be genuinely believing in such absurdities – but then again, many genuinely thoughtful people believe in all sorts of religions and things based on faith alone. Here, it is the empirical political science and not immanent personal faith that is under rational scrutiny through the varifocal lens of social engineering, in order to comprehend the complex manufacturing of consent and dissent. See the tortuous Realityspeak of how mantras are seeded and harvested to achieve world government in Project Humanbeingsfirst's online tutorial: “The Brilliant Construction of World Order – Or a children's bedtime story!” at http://unhidden-agenda.blogspot.com .
Zahir's letter to Kerry Cassidy at Project Camelot on 'Wikileaks - Upswing in High Caliber Disclosures'