Is Zionism a sophisticated Hegelian Dialectic?

Oligarchic Primacy and Zionism Part-1
The Endgame Hegelian Dialectic
Just like Brzezinski's “The Grand Chessboard” [1] now appears to be a fantastic red herring to bankrupt the United States and create the right pretexts and ripe conditions to present a NAU to its public as the only panacea enroute to the international banksters' world government, is it possible that Zionism too was/is a phantasmic red herring to set the stage for Albert Pike's World War III in order to drive the final nail into the coffin of all nationalism and sovereign nation-states?
The fact that the harbingers of all wars and world government are also the prime supporters of Zionism means little, for just as they were once prime supporters-bankrollers of the USSR and Nazi Socialism before destroying them, the Hegelian Dialectics of conquest require credible enemies, or rather credible opposites to achieve the synthesis of the desired agenda - global communism to be centrally controlled by a hierarchy at whose apex sit the all-seeing eye!
Is it at all possible that the modern Jews themselves were calculatingly setup with the mal construct of Zionism and entirely brainwashed/enticed into nurturing/supporting it with the introduction of Reform Judaism? Empirically, just as the Grand Chessboard initially appeared to be the blueprint for all the wars of conquest since 911 as the Trilateralist Zbigniew Brzezinski deceptively pitched the believable “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization” mantra and showed how that could be subverted with a “new pearl harbor” in order to perpetuate “American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives”, Zionism too appears as the believable blueprint for Eretz Yisrael that Jews must pursue as their 'divine imperative'. But is that the real planned endgame? Is that what Theodor Herzl, a secular atheistic ideologue, really after as he spun his 'Der Judenstadt' for the hidden hand of the international banksters who almost entirely bankrolled Zionism through their many vassals throughout the 19th and 20th century?
Notice that in any critique of Zionism or Israel, [2] the names of International bankers is seldom uttered. And yet, the Balfour Declaration was issued to Lionel Rothschild, and Moses Hess, the reformer of Messianic Judaism who ushered in the notion that Jews don't have to wait for a Messiah in order to return to their Promised Land, was presumably bankrolled by the Rothschilds.
Today, these banksters and their offspring control all the world's private central banks as well as most of the world's debt, and through the infinite monies they rake in through usury, control all the foundations, think tanks, global governing-lending-financial institutions, including the United States Congress and its military-industrial complex, and through them all the political bases, and through them all the world events including its media coverage. Thus, not only is our condition of voluntary servitude, but also our perception of our own zeitgeist, entirely and completely in these oligarchs' Orwellian hands!
Is Zionism merely a tool in their hands too, just like the venerated Mujahideens once were for taking down the USSR, and the despised 'militant Islam' now is to perpetuate the manufactured 'war on terror'? The real unhidden agenda of free-market capitalism to be so egregiously maligned for its unbridled greed and unbridled conquest, and subsequently, as a solution to that problem, replaced by a centrally managed world communism with these banksters consolidating all the world's assets, properties, land, natural wealth, and legal-political-financial-economic-military power into their own private grubby little hands? And their Hegelian Dialectical brainchild of Zionism merely being essential to fighting another World War that will destroy it as well as all the remaining vestiges of the “old world order”? Is the famous neocon quip “Zion that will light up all the world” the banksters' ephemeral ploy of the Straussian vintage to malign Godly Judaism just as much as they malign the other Godly religions of antiquity?
For Secular Humanism is indeed the modern religion of conquest, and Nietzsche their god. [3] That god killed off absolutes and ushered in relativity of morality whereby ends justify the means. Humanity in this new religion is merely sheep to by guided by the illuminated ones, utilized for their benefit, and when necessary, population controlled as in any natural wildlife preserve. The human rights in this modernity are relative to an agenda, and as Justice Vinson of the U.S. Supreme Court had candidly opined in 1951:
Nothing is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only when associated with the considerations which give birth to nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we must reply that all concepts are relative.” [4]
If all this grotesque perversion is indeed true as empiricism suggests it to be, and not merely a tin-hatted conspiracy theory, [5] then, instead of focussing on Zionism which will be destroyed in time by the oligarchs anyway along with most of humanity, [6] is it perhaps high time the spotlights from all directions get focussed on the real roothead of oppression?
The ones who nurture not only this mal construct abhorrence among a beleaguered humanity in Palestine, [7] but are also the prime-movers behind all the abhorrent wars orchestrated by their glorified 'errand boys'? [8]
The ones who use their dialectical instruments for one-world government to piece-meal enslave us all using multifaceted fabricated pretexts [9] in the best mold of Hegelian Dialectics?
Who can deny with a straight face that their diabolical “end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece [has not already] accomplish[ed] much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault” [10] ever could have!
But wait – let's just keep talking of one-state vs. two-state solution as Jimmy Carter just did in his Washington Post article today. [11]
[6] See analysis of NSSM 200 in
[10] Richard N. Gardner, “The Hard Road To World Order”, April 1974, Foreign Affairs, Council on Foreign Relations.
--- end
Related Excerpts (Appended Saturday, Nov. 14, 2009)
[R1] From Delusion to Vindictiveness by Gilad Atzmon, October 8, 2009
Interpreting the Zionist Dream
The socio-economic structure of the Jewish people differs radically from that of other nations. Ours is an anomalous, abnormal structure.” (Ber Borochov – The Economic Development of the Jewish People 1917)
You [Jews] lack the right notion of honour, feeling for duty, morality, patriotism, idealism….” (Max Nordau – Address at the 1st Zionist Congress 1897)
But labour is the only force which binds man to the soil… it is the basic energy for the creation of national culture. This is what we do not have, but we are not aware of missing it. We are a people without a country, without a national living language, without a national culture. We seem to think that if we have no labour it does not matter - let Ivan, John or Mustafa do the work…” (A.D. Gordon, "Our Tasks Ahead" 1920)
Early Zionism was indeed a cheerful dream, it was all about the transformation of the ‘Jew’ into a ‘civilised, respectful and authentic human being’. The founders of Zionism were inspired by the notions of ‘people like any other people’ and ‘nation amongst nations’. Reading early Zionists such as Nordau, Borochov and Gordon provides us with some very contemptuous references to Jewish character and identity that would make Nazi ideology look mildly liberal.
However, one is advised to take a short break for a second and to contemplate critically over the above Zionist dream. One may wonder what kind of people dream of ‘becoming human beings’. Can anyone imagine a French, English or Chinese man or woman who dreams of becoming an ordinary ‘human’? We can easily think of oppressed human beings who demand to be treated as humans (Palestinians, Civil Rights movements, anti Apartheid and so on). Yet, the Zionist dream is rather different. It is not just about the desire for recognition or equality, it is not just about being treated appropriately, it is also a dream of ‘self-transformation’. In fact, it is all about a miraculous metamorphosis from a morbid ‘abnormal’ state of being into an acceptable decent human form.
Within the context of a fictional fable we can easily imagine a cow that fantasises to become a dairy farmer, a pig who ‘dies to’ become a Kosher schnitzel, a snake who aspires to take over the Labour party and then to launch a new Zionist illegal war. And yet, it is pretty unusual to think of people who have managed to develop an aspiration to become ‘ordinary humans’.
An intelligible way to explain or interpret that very unusual dream is probably to assume that those who succumb to the Zionist dream are those who happen to believe that, as far as their natural state of being is concerned, they are indeed remotely human. One would rightly assume that those who dream to become humans must be convinced that humanity is somehow not exactly a characteristic that they happen to possess.
Yesterday during a talk at Librairie R√©sistances, Paris (a fund raising event for Gaza) I was asked for my interpretation of Israeli ‘evolving barbarism’, how is it possible that 84% of the Israelis supported the IDF genocidal crime in Gaza last December. “In order to understand how these Israeli murderous practices emerged” I said, “all we have to do is to trace back and reread the early Zionist ideologists.” We can easily learn from Zionist thinkers about their ‘dream’ and their vision of their fellow brothers. They, the founders of modern Jewish nationalism happened to admit somehow that something was totally corrupted within the Jewish identity, culture and character. However, they genuinely believed that it was amendable.
Zionism was there to bring about a new Jew, a civilised productive human being. It was indeed a very wet and epic dream. As an Israeli youngster I myself succumbed to this dream. I tended to believe that Israel was ‘my’ historic land, I regarded the Biblical protagonists as my direct ancestors. I was sure that, at least in the case of the so called ‘first Israelis’, the ideological transplant operation was a great success. We, the young Israeli natives tended to believe that we were all nothing less than a success story of ‘modified-civilised-humanist-secular-beings’.
Needless to say that the history of Palestine, the Palestinians and the Nakba was totally hidden from us. We didn’t see the Palestinians around us either, we were hardly aware of their suffering not to say their cause. We were in fact totally blind. We tended also to believe that our army was the ‘most humanist army around’. We grew up with the ‘1967 Victorious Diary’, a legendary chunky photo album every Israeli held in a prominent location on his book shelve. There in that glossy propaganda book an Israeli soldier was giving his water to an Egyptian prisoner. We regarded him as a symbol of our people’s endorsement of universal humanism. We were obviously not aware of the horrendous fact that the Sinai Desert was actually a slaughter field for hundreds of Egyptian POWs. Why didn’t we know? This in itself is a very good question. Our fathers who fought in this war must have known something but they kept quiet. Our parents who witnessed the 1948 convoys of Palestinians refugees should have known something about the Nakba but they somehow kept quiet. Interestingly enough, it wasn’t just our parents, we followed the exact same pattern. Once we ourselves matured into IDF soldiers, we did exactly the same, we turned a blind eye (1982 in Lebanon). And this has never changed. The Israeli moral awakening has never happened. By now I allow myself to argue that it won’t happen. The Zionist dream is just too comfortable. After more than one hundred years of moral phantasmic delusion the Israelis are deeply stuck in an ethical coma.
[R2] Israel/Palestine: How to End the War of 1948 by Tanya Reinhart October 1, 2002
The state of Israel founded in 1948 following a war which the Israelis call the War of Independence, and the Palestinians call the Nakba - the catastrophe. A haunted, persecuted people sought to find a shelter and a state for itself, and did so at a horrible price to another people. During the war of 1948, more than half of the Palestinian population at the time - 1,380,000 people - were driven off their homeland by the Israeli army. Though Israel officially claimed that a majority of refugees fled and were not expelled, it still refused to allow them to return, as a UN resolution demanded shortly after 1948 war. Thus, the Israeli land was obtained through ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Palestinian inhabitants. This is not a process unfamiliar in history. Israel's actions remain incomparable to the massive ethnic cleansing of Native Americans by the settlers and government of the United states. Had Israel stopped there, in 1948, I could probably live with it. As an Israeli, I grew up believing that this primal sin our state was founded on may be forgiven one day, because the founder's generation was driven by the faith that this was the only way to save the Jewish people from the danger of another holocaust.” -- Pg. 1

Subtitled for Modernity Reader 2015, The Poor-Man's Guide To Modernity, Sunday, September 20, 2015 02:00 am
Links fixed September 01, 2016

Is Zionism a sophisticated Hegelian Dialectic?

The Plebeian antidote to Hectoring Hegemons

Home is

INDEX here.

Okay to copy, print, or post this document; verbatim reproduction only.
here. Full Copyright Notice

Reprint License

All material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety, unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, granted in perpetuity, provided the source URL sentence and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part of this restricted Reprint License, along with any embedded links within its main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at All figures, images, quotations and excerpts, are used without permission based on non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research use only in the greater public interest, documenting crimes against humanity, deconstructing current affairs, and scholarly commentary. The usage by Project Humanbeingsfirst of all external material is minimally consistent with the understanding of "fair use" laws at Project Humanbeingsfirst does not endorse any external website or organization it links to or references, nor those that may link to it or reprint its works. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”.