The Swine Flu Chronicles 2009: Why to say ‘No’ to the Swine Flu Vaccine

SWINE FLU PANDEMIC IS A REAL SWINE

The Swine Flu Chronicles 2009

Project Humanbeingsfirst's Zahir Ebrahim's Analysis in Full Context

Continually updated to track WHO Advisory (no longer)

Skip to Preamble

Skip to latest breaking news

Skip to running deconstruction of WHO Reports April-May 2009

This Summary Report First Issued May 02, 2009 | Conclusion added Sept. 10, 2009 | Last Updated: That Great Debate of 2009 Nov 8, 2009

Postscript March 13, 2010: 'Reconstruction of a Mass Hysteria – The Swine Flu Panic of 2009'

PDF This Summary Report Here

H1N1 Conclusion: Whether or not there is a real Swine Flu pandemic raging, whether or not it may be real biowarfare, or mainly psyops being waged upon the unsuspecting world's public in combination with other fabricated global threats, I am saying 'NO' to Swine Flu Vaccination. All this heavy-handed hullaballoo appears to me to be yet another “war on terrorism” to fabricate a global pretext for quite a different agenda from the publicized one. The real agenda this time around being to inoculate the world public with something inimical in the guise of fighting the pandemic. This is more than simply an attempt to sell vaccines of dubious efficacy for hefty corporate profiteering. It suspiciously appears to be the new “imperial mobilization” of the long wished for population reduction agenda, 'to “prime” populations worldwide'. The threat of the A/H1N1 virus killing some (or many) people may well be real even if manufactured, just like 911 – the “new pearl harbor” – was a real demonstration of fabricated threat by controlled demolition which killed many thousand people. But under these dubious 'sky is falling' conditions made to “look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality,” the most rational and commonsensical course of action under conflicting claims of vaccine safety and efficacy backed by draconian 'police-state' policies to forcibly administer it: 1) take one's statistical chances with the “pandemic” rather than with its forced “cure”; 2) permit the human body's own natural defenses to fight the disease if infected, rather than be aided into oblivion by its purported helper, the vaccine! See note on vaccination here. See note on microchip implants here. See final note: on fait accompli. See The Ultimate Revolution in the Making here.

Other Breaking News Reports

(please skip to Preamble if you haven't read it before)

The Digital Cacophony of Conflicting Opinions, Medical Experts, Public Relations

THAT GREAT DEBATE OF 2009

Swine Flu: Fait Accompli

He had already said “It's fait accompli” --- vs. --- She consistently lied “It's voluntary

The merit of the CASE IS IRRELEVANT because the mercenaries and vulgar propagandists' half truths always triumph over full lies!

The 'empire' plays to win strategically and can't be derailed by a handful of reactionary truth tellers after the manufactured crises have been affected – for had truth-telling any efficacy, Socrates might have been handed a trophy instead of the Hemlock, and Jesus the kingdom instead of the cross. The key to the success of Hegelian Dialectics over time, is the diabolical Fait Accompli sewn in baby-steps. The impact of the invasion of Iraq upon its peoples cannot be reversed by withdrawing the American troops anymore than the impact of the Pandemic can be reversed by arguing whether the vaccine is good or bad. The Pandemic has already created its intended fait accompli – for, 90% of the masses are not only ready today to take the vaccine but also demanding it. The secretive agenda probably is to inoculate at least 50% of the targeted populations in this generation, priming them for at least two things: microchipping, and staging for long term population reduction/culling through some complex biowarfare protocol. They will surely achieve 70 to 80 percent success towards that goal in this round of the pandemic pandemonium. And this is a conservative estimate. That's pretty damn remarkable social engineering for one baby-step fait accompli. More baby-steps to come. The overarching agenda for world-government and its multi-dimensional goals is long-term, across multiple generations, and hinges on irreversibility of small baby-steps to eventually raise the complete Phoenix of the New Atlantis from the systematically burnt ashes in stages of the old order. Under the guise of this Pandemic look how much has already been achieved: the immense loss of national sovereignty to WHO. Under its level-6 Pandemic alert, WHO now controls the emergency response stratagems in all nations that are signatory to its convention. That's most of the world!

As validation of what is stated above, just look at the long lines demanding the vaccine after the declaration of emergency by the President of United States

And the mass psychology driving the long lines is an Edward Bernays special. In CFR shill's own very perceptive words of October 16, 2009:

... Having said that, does it work to mandate [vaccination]? I think what would work better would be to say that there was a shortage and people tend to buy more of something that's in demand. (Laughter.) We saw that -- there was one season where, really, people lined up all night to get a flu shot.

... we thought we were going to need two doses for every adult and since we are – only one dose, so, actually, we have twice as many doses and enough for the whole population at this point, I understand.”

Watch the entire incestuously-reinforcing CFR disinfo session on Pandemic Influenza this past October 16, 2009:

CFR Pandemic Influenza:  Science, Economics, and Foreign Policy: Session One: The Science Oct. 16  2009

No one from the learned audience in the above video asked the distinguished panel of experts carefully assembled by the CFR (whose bios, it was explicitly stated, is on the web and “in your packets if you are here”), that how did they suddenly learn that now the public needed only a single doze of inoculation, when just a few months ago it was being heavily promoted as requiring multiple dozes?

No one asked them that where did they get the new scientifically valid data (as opposed to anecdotal one) to change their expert recommendations so rapidly within the span of just a couple of months, when the vaccines for this new pathogen are themselves very new and haven't been around long enough to carry out controlled double-blind studies of their efficacy over the long term to know how many dozes are needed – since the damn virus itself is new and never seen before on planet earth?

And if the older vaccines are imagined by their manufacturers to be very broad-spectrum, as the President of the United States presumed when he ordered several billion dollars worth without testing on the actual new virus, then why did the officials not know how many dozes will be needed just a few months ago? What new data was received in the span of just a few short months between the summer and fall?

And the most crucial aspect to this question, no one asked the distinguished panelists who spoke in all sorts of foreign accents, that if, by their own admission, this 2009 virus is “novel” and “lacks certain signatures which other pandemic influenza viruses have ... which suggest that this virus is not a 1918 like virus ... or 1957 or 1968 virus”, then they could not have possibly known of the older vaccines' efficacy on this new virus a priori any more than the newly patented vaccines, and therefore, when did they actually test the vaccines on the new virus and upon whom?

Because, practically speaking, how could they have tested the vaccines on the new virus (for any length of time) when they didn't even know, and surely now don't know, who actually has the virus and who doesn't since “the CDC abruptly advised states to stop testing for H1N1 flu, and stopped counting individual cases” way back in late July 2009?

So, where did the clinical testing data magically come from between the summer and fall, for the expert's statement: “we thought we were going to need two doses for every adult and since we are – only one dose,” – except out of thin air no differently than the missing WMDs in Iraq after the domain experts from that officialdom had similarly asserted that their “data” incontrovertibly indicated that these were there and about to be launched upon the United States unless the superpower invaded Iraq with the most absolute “shock and awe” immediately?

But the ubiquitous Dr. Nancy Snyderman of NBC says that “this is one time there is no conspiracy, listen to our government agencies, these guys are telling the truth. You know there is no conspiracy here folks. Get your damn vaccine.” Should we believe her and dreadingly also await the inevitable ex post facto “oops! for this new nemesis of mankind?

Obviously not one science person in the audience, and those supposedly calling in their questions on Twitter, knew how to add 2 + 2 to become skeptical of the panelists' techno-babble gibberish anymore than any mainstream scientists have been of the official NIST report on the how the WTC towers catastrophically collapsed into their own footprints due to a short fire. No one among the questioners straightforwardly suggested to the expert CFR panelists that as per their own admission (quoted above), the simplest convincing explanation appeared to be their own one made in jest, that they were indeed artificially manufacturing demand for the swine flu vaccines for their own agendas!

But that's not the end of straightforwardness if one was actually permitted and inclined to ask questions freely as a science person is imagined to be wont. It could have gone straight down hill from there if even one person present had any courage to boldly ask the obvious followup questions and pushed the envelope of the CFR assembled experts' credibility right to the edge. One could, for instance, have put the following biowarfare related burning questions residing on many a skeptic's mind to the CFR panelists and given them an opportunity to counter all the nay-sayers rationally with reproducible scientific evidence rather than disparagingly as was actually done (see below):

a) what role did the secret bioweapons laboratories and their mad scientists play in fabricating this never before seen in nature hybrid virus, as by their own admission its signature is different from all other past pandemic viruses;

b) could they prove that the new virus occurred entirely naturally and that bioweapons labs played no black-ops role in its synthesis and dissemination when it is only they who possessed all the samples from the previous pandemic viruses and could indeed have more easily fabricated the new pathogen to their desired level of deadly pathogenicity than the poor pigs relying only on their natural pig-pens – just like 911 is more straightforwardly explained as an inside job, a coup d'etat, than as the surprise attack of a disgruntled Ali Baba upon the most armed to the teeth superpower from his underground caves in the Hindu Kush;

c) that, there definitely appeared to be so much incredulity in common in the officially designated nemesis in both cases, Osama Bin Laden and the pigs, that the public insists on seeing some verifiable proof this time around before submitting to the officialdom's remedies and could they kindly provide that proof since their own glowing bios, though undoubtedly stellar, were not sufficient evidence;

d) how could the big-Pharma have filed so many patents for the vaccines before the existence of the new virus itself was known, and remarkably, also just in time to profit from the sudden appearance of the virus as a pandemic, with WHO, CDC, and all governmental agencies coercively pushing these vaccines as the only solution upon the global public while giving blanket immunity from liability to the big-Pharma whose stock has gone soaring, and that why might not one conclude from all this that the pharmaceutical companies knew about the virus and its pandemic breakout schedule ahead of time and they are being given immunity from lawsuit because the vaccines are indeed dangerous and untested;

e) how could they make such accurate predictions of when the viral pandemic would burst on the world scene, even as a hypothetical case study, as for instance in the Air Force's April 1996 planning document “Alternate Futures for 2025” pg. 54 which stated: “in 2009, when an influenza pandemic struck”, and in IBM's 2006 interdepartmental memo whose very first bullet item stated: “There is a 100% chance that a Pandemic will occur within the next 5 years”;

f) that could they explain scientifically, how such predictions could be accurately made to come to pass by just the laws of chance on something as unpredictable as a mutating virus, without someone deliberately bringing it to fruition?

One could have further challenged the distinguished CFR panelists at this point by asking whether they were aware that the pandemic served CFR's own diabolical agenda of creating “an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece [to] accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault” as was blatantly stated by CFR's Richard Gardner in the April 1974 Foreign Affairs article Hard Road to World Order, and that they, as stellar scientists, but perhaps un-learned in the ways of Machiavellian social engineering, were being played as mere pawns for creating justifications towards that globalists' agenda?

Obviously, not one person in that carefully screened audience had ever read anything other their own science and medical text books. But strangely, no one from the internet Tweeted in those kinds of questions either (sic!). Indeed, one erudite questioner in physical attendance, someone who identified himself as being affiliated with Cornell Medical School (the man pictured in the CFR video image above), even preemptively described any skeptical questioning by the ever growing coalition of bipartisan nay-sayers in the world, as a sort of “Hitler-Stalin Pact” in this disparaging way:

I think we are all aware that the anti-vaccine movement is having a field day on the internet and on media outlets like Fox News and so on, and causing reductions in vaccine uptake. And it appears a pretty unholy alliance of the ultra-right and the ultra-left working together as the sort of Hitler-Stalin pact (laughter), and I am not sure that we are countering these people very well ... and you have to take these people on in a different style than the scientists are used to. ... Crazy people who think the vaccine will kill you! ... How best we can to stop the anti-vaccine movement?”

It is surely not beyond the wit of those “crazy people” left standing after all that propaganda and giving the CFR's dog and pony show only some minor indigestion from their over-exuded hubris, to imagine that the following riot preparations, ostensibly for the masses demanding vaccine and not getting it – again an Edward Bernays Special Edition – is in reality for the “Hitler-Stalin pact” malcontents unwilling to play ball and actually refusing it:

But Judge for Yourself if unconvinced that there is more to this pandemic story, and consequently, more to the bizarre impetus behind the hook or by crook vaccinating the world's populations under its ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ than meets the eye. Or, if you'd rather reread the Conclusion, or jump to the Preamble to better grasp the overarching dynamics behind the swine flu first, do it now.

Okay: So join Miss Piggy, Arnold Ziffle, Porky Pig, Pooh's Piglet and the Putnam Gang

THE AFFIRMATIVES

This is one time there is no conspiracy, listen to our government agencies, these guys are telling the truth. You know there is no conspiracy here folks. Get your damn vaccine.” — Dr. Nancy Snyderman, NBC’s Chief Medical Editor, August 2009

http://www.flu.gov/professional/federal/pandemic-influenza.pdf

THE NEGATIVES

Sky rocketing stock values of Novavax Inc., precipitated by dozens of flu deaths in Mexico, implicates a leading Anglo-American network of genetic engineers in a conspiracy to commit genocide.” — Dr. Leonard Horowitz, April 2009

Power Point Presentation: Swine Flu -  The Virus and the Mass Vaccination Campaign, originally presented at  the Curtis Memorial Library in Brunswick, Maine on 9-20-09 by Suze  Fisher, concerned citizen, www.swineflushots.us

( PDF of the above powerpoint presentation is here ~5 MB )

MORE ROUNDS

He said “It's a recipe for disaster” --- vs. --- She said “legal immunity”, no sweat!

He said “It's fait accompli” --- vs. --- She said “It's voluntary

He files lawsuit in New York to halt the vaccination campaign “None of the vaccines against H1N1 have been properly tested” --- vs. --- She insists on vaccine safety with great authority as “the most important tool against the pandemic”!

He reviews “Early and Current Fears about Vaccine Dangers” --- vs. --- She delivers the current data “As of 11 October 2009, worldwide there have been more than 399232 laboratory confirmed cases of pandemic influenza H1N1 2009 and over 4735 deaths reported to WHO.

He finally argues “remember the swine flu scare of 1976?

--- vs. --- And she strongly recommends “trust your government, trust the scientists, and take 3 shots”!

Are you pulling your remaining hair out by now? If so, skip to the Preamble to better understand why such cacophony, the “booming buzzing confusion”, is part of the game to continually keep you off balance. If you want some basic horsesense of a plebeian, go back and re-read the Conclusion. And if you enjoy this experts' chatter, continue on.

MORE CACOPHONY

October 16, 2009 WHO Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 - update 70 Weekly update (Laboratory-confirmed cases of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 as officially reported to WHO by States Parties to the IHR (2005) as of 11 October 2009, ... worldwide there have been more than 399232 laboratory confirmed cases of pandemic influenza H1N1 2009 and over 4735 deaths ... Influenza rates in the temperate zones of the Southern Hemisphere have all returned to below baseline levels and very few detections of pandemic H1N1 2009 virus are being reported. ... Systematic surveillance conducted by the Global Influenza Surveillance Network (GISN), continues to detect sporadic incidents of H1N1 pandemic viruses that show resistance to the antiviral oseltamivir.)

October 15, 2009 AFP: Lawsuit seeks to halt US swine flu vaccination campaign (cached) (WASHINGTON (AFP) – New York medical staff took legal action Thursday to halt a massive swine flu inoculation program being rolled out across the United States, claiming the vaccines have not been properly tested. ... “None of the vaccines against H1N1 have been properly tested,” ... The suit was brought on behalf of a group of doctors, nurses and other medical personnel in New York, where health care professionals who see patients are required to be vaccinated against H1N1, ... “Officials have said the virus is so much like the ordinary flu virus that they don't need to do special new drug testing on it because it's just the same old virus with a minor change to it,”)

October 06, 2009 Reuters 3:11pm EDT: WHO says H1N1 vaccine safe, urges mass take-up (cached here) ('GENEVA - The World Health Organization (WHO) restated its confidence in the H1N1 flu vaccine on Tuesday, calling it the most important tool against the pandemic. Mild adverse side effects such as muscle cramps or headache are to be expected in some cases, but everyone who has access to the vaccine should be inoculated, it said. Mass vaccination campaigns against the swine flu virus are underway in China and Australia and will be starting soon in the United States and parts of Europe, WHO spokesman Gregory Hartl said. “It is important to remember that the vaccines, which have already been approved, have been used for years and years and years in their seasonal vaccine formulation and have been shown to be among the safest vaccines that exist,” he told a news briefing. ... GlaxoSmithKline won a further 22 government orders for its H1N1 swine flu vaccine in the last two months, taking the total number of doses ordered to 440 million worth some $3.5 billion. Rivals in flu vaccines include Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, Baxter, AstraZeneca and CSL.')

Sept. 29, 2009: Canada's Largest Province Distributing H1N1 Flu Propaganda Kits ('Canada is furthering its flu hype agenda with the help of its largest populated province. Ontario's 10,000 pharmacists are now distributing H1N1 propaganda kits which will help promote untested vaccines and dangerous antiviral drugs. The Ontario government has asked Ontario's Community Pharmacies to act as a distribution point for public information on the H1N1 flu. “The initiative is clearly an attempt to sway and control public opinion on the controversies that surround the H1N1 flu, vaccine and antiviral drugs,” said public health specialist Marco Torres.') And Sept. 23, 2009: Impending Mandatory Vaccinations Will Affect The Health, Jobs of Canadians ('After recent reports that Canada's public health officials are engaged in cover-up operations to conceal flu origin, there is now evidence and growing concerns and that all the warnings, dire predictions and preparations for the H1N1 swine flu are leading to mandatory vaccinations under the guise of "voluntary cooperation" initiatives from Canadian health agencies. The Canadian pandemic plan calls for the vaccination of the entire population over a period of two months. Vaccination campaigns are targeting the workplace, schools, recreational centres and even bars and nightclubs. Community mass vaccination clinics are scheduled to inoculate millions of people in every province in Canada. The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) state on their own website that International Health Regulations provide a legal framework under the World Health Organization (WHO) to protect against and control the international spread of disease such as a flu pandemic. They also state that they will establish a process that is to be followed by the WHO for determining and responding to a public health emergency of international concern. Under the WHO charter determined in 2005, it has the authority to dissolve Canada's government policies on emergency planning, mandatory vaccinations and to take control should there be a “pandemic”. This applies to any country signed onto the WHO. From the WHO 2005 declaration: (excerpted) “Under special pandemic plans enacted around the world..., national governments are to be dissolved in the event of a pandemic emergency and replaced by special crisis committees, which take charge of the health and security infrastructure of a country, and which are answerable to the WHO and EU in Europe and to the WHO and UN in North America.” When it comes to the legal framework under the WHO, PHAC has absolutely no details or restrictions in terms of who will administer the inoculations and how. This means that once WHO pandemic policies are enacted, it could allow non-healthcare personnel, such as police and military to vaccinate people against their will to enforce mandatory vaccinations. These are obviously worse case scenarios, but the laws regarding pandemic preparedness and procedures are clear and these policies are not debatable once the government declares a nationwide emergency. Many countries are in the process of acquiring from Baxter, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline and other pharmaceutical companies enough doses of vaccine to vaccinate their entire population twice. Many countries are remaining quiet about mandatory vaccination, simply saying they will make vaccination ‘available’ to all on a priority basis. But Greece and Switzerland have already announced that their programs will be mandatory and enforced by the military. There are unconfirmed reports that Norway and Israel have done the same. Confirmed reports of regional H1N1 pandemic planning documents from the UK indicate that local authorities intend to set up mass vaccination sites to be overseen by crowd control police. The United States is preparing for military ‘assisted’ mandatory vaccination but has not explicitly declared its intentions to the public. Individual Canadian provinces are supposedly given the authority to decide how to achieve the highest level of vaccination. The Canadian government claims this does not mean they will make it mandatory or use physical force. However, there are tactics in place, including heavy doses of propaganda, along with various forms of social and economic coercion which suggest otherwise. Just how it will all play out depends very much on the individual province, but reports from the public suggest that the current theme of intimidation is requiring many Canadian workers to demonstrate that they have received the flu vaccination to remain employed.') ( Zahir's Last Comment Update: These coercively compelling “voluntary” methods always portend a fait accompli on a very broad scale when existential choices have to be made by individuals. We are, after all, headed towards one-world government, and all will have to face the same choices, eventually. I am sorry to suggest that vaccination is a done deal under these circumstances. The only solution known to mankind to defeat such tyranny, is what was lamented by Etienne de La Boétie in great futility 500 years ago: “I should like merely to understand how it happens that so many men, so many villages, so many cities, so many nations, sometimes suffer under a single tyrant who has no other power than the power they give him; who is able to harm them only to the extent to which they have the willingness to bear with him; who could do them absolutely no injury unless they preferred to put up with him rather than contradict him. Surely a striking situation! Yet it is so common that one must grieve the more and wonder the less at the spectacle of a million men serving in wretchedness, their necks under the yoke, not constrained by a greater multitude than they...”. This is the last and final update to the swine flu report. Thank you for reading. )

September. 28, 2009 – the following headlines this morning are self-explanatory as the Mighty Wurlitzer gets into its full articulated stride: NYT Sept. 28, 2009: Don’t Blame Flu Shots for All Ills, Officials Say (“As soon as swine flu vaccinations start next month, some people getting them will drop dead of heart attacks or strokes, some children will have seizures and some pregnant women will miscarry. But those events will not necessarily have anything to do with the vaccine. That poses a public relations challenge for federal officials, who remember how sensational reports of deaths and illnesses derailed the large-scale flu vaccine drive of 1976.”) ; Boston Globe Sept. 28, 2009: Second wave of swine flu pandemic begins to hit US – Surge in cases closes schools, strains hospitals (“After months of warnings and frantic preparations, the second wave of the swine flu pandemic is starting to be felt around the country. Doctors, health clinics, hospitals, and schools are reporting rapidly increasing numbers of patients experiencing flu symptoms.”) ; AOL Money Sept. 28, 2009: Intense tracking for swine flu shot's side effects (“More than 3,000 people a day have a heart attack. If you're one of them the day after your swine flu shot, will you worry the vaccine was to blame and not the more likely culprit, all those burgers and fries?”); The Scientist, Sept. 23, 2009: Swine flu windfall (“Though a worrisome flu season is knocking at the Northern Hemisphere's door, the five biopharmaceutical companies awarded massive contracts by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for development and production of more than 195 million doses of swine flu vaccine can't really complain.”) ( Zahir's comment: As you peruse the above articles, you probably also ought to read this Note on the Mighty Wurlitzer and watch the first two parts of the BBC documentary on Edward Bernays, Century of Self, to catch a glimpse of what Public Relations really means. It is not a benign advertising/marketing gimmick that most people are led to believe. It is an insidious, and at times diabolical, attempt at mass behavior control by manipulatively tapping into man's irrational self. It plays upon hidden and overt emotions, unstated fears, shameful desires, and ingrained and cultural myths to inculcate the necessary perceptions of interest, whether for selling a product, or for selling a political dogma. A new public myth is orchestrated in society – much like the “war on terror” mythology – based upon which a majority of the public reacts all too predictively to the continually fabricated Public Relations stimuli, or PSYOP. Overarchingly, this not only sets the stage for reinforcing the on-going current affairs narratives, but also creates the precedent for writing the preferred historical narrative. The 'ubermensch' political scientists and psychologists have figured out that on the whole, 'Public Assumptions' Shape Views of History: “Such presumptions are beliefs (1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community. The sources for such presumptions are both personal (from direct experience) and vicarious (from books, movies, and myths).” That was stated in October 1998 at the conference on contemporary political history organized by the Miller Center of Public Affairs at the University of Virginia, by the future 9/11 Commission Executive Director Philip Zelikow who emphasized that the public understanding of history is shaped by what are sometimes referred to as “public myths.” Zelikow was a participant in the so called 'Catastrophic Terrorism' Study Group in 1997-98, and subsequently presided in the “Warren Commission” for his own study group's predicted 'Catastrophic Terrorism', which just happened to be 911! This prediction-fulfillment cycle of political science is one of the most diabolical constructs of modernity, far outstripping Nostradamus in its accurate prescience for the near term, whereby, the failure to interdict the prediction is attributed to “chaos theory” of unavoidable happenstance, incompetence, and if all that stretches the incredulity of the public, to “blowback” of ill-conceived or greedy policies. When the unfortunate history of this Swine Flu Pandemic is similarly written, inter alia, the afore-cited headline news stories will help explain why so many people got exterminated from earth as an 'act of god', a lousy diet of “all those burgers and fries”, and in the developing nations due to “'complicating factors,' such as malnutrition, poor housing or crowded conditions, [as] 'flu was classically called a crowding disease in the 19th century.'” as per CNN April 28, 2009. According to the United States Air Force planning document “Alternate Futures for 2025: Security Planning to Avoid Surprise” dated April 1996, only 30 million people died in the pandemic of 2009! It noted in its chapter titled “Digital Cacophony” on page 54: “Technology could not solve some old problems, as in 2009, when an influenza pandemic struck in southern China, then rapidly spread worldwide. Three hundred-thirty million people were affected and over thirty million died. No one ever determined if the virus was a natural mutation or bioengineered. Many feared the latter.” That new prediction-fulfillment episode is now upon us even as I write this. Also note that amazing prescience re-surface in this 2006 IBM inter-departmental memo titled “Services & Global Procurement pan IOT Europe, Pandemic Plan Overview” whose very first bullet item stated: “There is a 100% chance that a Pandemic will occur within the next 5 years”. Thanks to whosoever leaked this revealing IBM memo – also cached here – which begs the obvious question how can a corporation which makes computers predict that a pig or another creature somewhere on the planet is going to acquire a pandemic inducing virus within the next 5 years with 100% certainty? And, have that event actually transpire right at the mid-point of the prediction? “Chaos theory” of course, the non-sequitur notwithstanding, explains all these predictions very well (sic)! And “simulations” of course (sic)! One only wishes that political science was merely science fiction to be enjoyed in large-canvas movies like the Star Wars “Revenge of the Sith” and the latest 2009 Star Trek which killed off billions of inhabitants of an entire planet. All this vicarious dulling of public sensibilities to massive deaths I wish was merely for the mass entertainment of a blood-thirsty people! )

Sept. 21, 2009 Reuters 3:21 pm EDT: VeriChip shares jump after H1N1 patent license win (cached here) (“Shares of VeriChip Corp tripled after the company said it had been granted an exclusive license to two patents, which will help it to develop implantable virus detection systems in humans. The patents, held by VeriChip partner Receptors LLC, relate to biosensors that can detect the H1N1 and other viruses, and biological threats such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, VeriChip said in a statement. The technology will combine with VeriChip's implantable radio frequency identification devices to develop virus triage detection systems.”) ( Zahir's Comment: And there is the real smoking gun for all this forced vaccination hullaballoo and this pandemic – inter alia, the pretext for micro-chipping human populations with RFID implants! The survivors can't get on a plane, train, or get money from the ATM account without it – very soon.)

( Zahir's Comment-2, RFID, September 22, 2009: Also see article dated November 21, 2008, “Boston launches flu shot tracking – City to pinpoint areas of low rates of vaccination”. More relevant details are here and here. Rational people might do well to ask themselves that if the H1N1 virus is (or may be) mutating rapidly into a vaccine resistant strain, then what's the purpose of a) the vaccine, b) vaccination tracking? Once one has acquired some reasoned perspective on that, one might further reflect that if the UN agencies are repeatedly stating that millions could die without vaccination scaring many a have-not into demanding it – beg, borrow or steal, the sheep pleads for its own sharpened knife from the butcher – and the vaccine is ineffective against a mutating vaccine-resistant viral strain, then what's the point of vaccination? Why is the WHO pitching vaccination so much, apart from Big-Pharma making mega-bucks that is? People will die anyway from the virus with or without vaccination! So it would appear to a sensible logician to further ask that 1) if the virus is designed to eventually kill with or without the help of vaccines, and 2) if behind the boogieman of the pandemic the real agenda is to implant RFID tracking devices into world's populations, then how will the elites and the hectoring hegemons protect their ownselves and their serfs in this pandemic? How exactly will selective culling be done for the “right” races, ethnic and socio-economic groups, important personal like doctors, privileged military, production and industrial slaves, et. al., slated for survival? This is why I have felt from day-one of this pandemic, that if its direct kill-scope is intended to be vast as opposed to merely being a trigger for something else, then there might actually be two “qualities” of vaccines, one harmful in some convolutedly complex way under presumption of mala fide intent, and one life-saving under the Hippocratic oath. And if people can't get the vaccine from the batch to be taken by the Rockefellers and Henry Kissinger [sic!], then to avoid it altogether. It's best to take one's chances by enabling one's own immune system to fight it – see note on vaccination. Man is a resilient being – not so easy to wipe us out! Look at the indomitable Palestinians. Against all odds, against the mightiest superpower on earth, against all the wealth owners of the world, and with the rest of mankind silently spectating, they are still hanging on tenaciously to what's precious to them! But it does require a conscious act of individual (and collective) resistance. Can RFID itself be ultimately avoided, irrespective of the question of this pandemic? Not if one is unwilling to live in the netherworld. Even if world-government in its final form is delayed indefinitely – there is surely many a slip between the cup and lip – the world systems are already in place in most developed nations which would make the normal daily routine of modern living almost impossible without it. Travel is already becoming its biggest sentinel. Even though many nations are grandfathering their existing passports, new passport issues are invariably micro-chipped worldwide by necessity of visa requirements! Many credit cards are already micro-chipped. While the present micro-chipping is primarily of the instruments of life and living, implanting them into human beings directly – by pretext, by necessity, or by force of law such as at birth much like birth-registering – points to the ultimate revolution. Seems to me that only the kinds of draconian policing systems made possible with this level of control would make world-government sustainable – for generations – barring a global catastrophe that would make it infeasible to control very human being. I have never understood the fascination of some with hegemony, but since it is a vestigial “as old as mankind”, its ultimate target must also be all mankind. The logic of it is inescapable. Thus, unless that cancerous vestigial is itself altered, cut-out and discarded somehow, or minimally, prevented from growing unfettered through a real non-fictitious balance of power perpetually holding it in check, its natural zenith is in the full spectrum dominance of mankind.)

Sept. 15, 2009: AFFIDAVIT OF LEONARD GEORGE HOROWITZ ALLEGING FRAUD, ORGANIZED CRIME, AND IATROGENOCIDE AFFECTING THE PUBLIC HEALTH SECTOR OF THE US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PERTAINING TO THE 2009 H1N1 SWINE FLU OUTBREAK, PANDEMIC, AND VACCINATION CAMPAIGN ( Watch Dr. Horowitz' SPECIAL REPORT on Mexican Flu Outbreak on his website ) (Zahir's comment: See Eustace Mullins' 1988 book “MURDER BY INJECTION The Story of the Medical Conspiracy Against America” , Ghislaine Lanctôt MD's book “The Medical Mafia” , but this note on vaccination first and read the two footnotes.)

Sept. 10, 2009 Times Online: Scientists warn over swine flu virus potency

Sept. 09, 2009: Swine Flu is Mutating

Sept. 09, 2009 Washington Post: CDC Says Most Won't Need Drugs for Flu (“the majority of adolescents and adults and most children won't need antiviral treatment and can be cared for with Mom's chicken soup at home.” Anne Schuchat, director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)

Sept. 08, 2009: China issues world's first warrant for A/H1N1 flu vaccination ( develops its own vaccine )

September 07 2009: Martial Law Alert Over Swine Flu by Stephen Lendman

Sept. 01, 2009 The Oregonian: Neurologists urged to watch for rare swine flu vaccine side-effect ( video Wayne Madsen on Guillain-Barre syndrome )

August 28, 2009 Natural News: Wake Up, America: Forced vaccinations, quarantine camps, health care interrogations and mandatory decontaminations

August 28, 2009: Early and Current Fears about Vaccine Dangers by Stephen Lendman

August 25, 2009 ABC News: Half of Health Workers Reject Swine Flu Shot

August 25, 2009 UK Daily Mail: Half of GPs refuse swine flu vaccine over testing fears

Aug. 2, 2009: Novartis Patent Application in Nov 2005 Evidence That The ‘Swine Flu’ Pandemic Is Man-Made ( Read patent Application at USPTO dated Nov 4, 2005 Here ) ( Alt Read at patentstorm ) ( JPG Here ) (Zahir's Comment: Only when Novartis files for patent protection on their Swine Flu vaccines citing this patent, will one really know if this patent application filed years before the pandemic is even applicable to the present strain of H1N1. This patent is generic, applicable to producing antidotes to many family of viruses, including perhaps this current strand of H1N1. Even if Novartis' antiviral vaccine employs this patent, I am not sure how that fact alone will prove that Novartis had early access to the specific H1N1 strain fueling this pandemic. To know that conclusively requires additional facts not visible in the above patent application, in my view. Furthermore, there is a fast-track antiviral vaccine development, testing, and approval process based on a manufacturer's prior experience with vaccines! Given that official institutional umbrella for fast deployment of vaccines, a vaccine manufacturer has no need to publicly disclose that it had access to a deadly mutable pathogen in order to make its antidote before that pathogen existed in a break-out epidemic. Some surely do have access to the highly secretive stock of the most deadly pathogens from the many biowarfare research labs around the world. The patent protection for antiviral vaccines however appears to be rather circuitous and generic as this patent application is. They are protecting the various methods and techniques by which they synthesize a vaccine for many viruses, the intimate science of which is of course understandable only to the practitioners in that field. A mention of “H1N1” in a patent application by itself is not a smoking gun! But I am not a practitioner in that field to claim that I understand this interesting patent.)

July 31, 2009 Natural News: Beware of the Fast Approaching Perfect Disease Storm

July 23, 2009: Baxter Vaccine Patent for H1N1, Filed Two Years Before Pandemic ( Read patent Application at USPTO dated August 28, 2007 Here ) ( Alt Read at patentstorm ) ( PDF Here ) ( JPG Here ) ( Smoking gun? ) (Note: The comment for Novartis above also applies to this Baxter patent application. I don't believe this is a smoking gun either.)

July 16, 2009 NYT: W.H.O. Says It Plans to Stop Tracking Swine Flu Cases

June 10, 2009: Readying Americans for Dangerous, Mandatory Vaccinations by Stephen Lendman


Preamble: Making sense of it all in full context

It's a virus that we've never seen before. There's no background immunity in the population and it is spreading from human to human, all of which has the potential for a pandemic.” -- Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director, U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (CNN, April 29, 2009)

I have decided to raise the current level of influenza pandemic alert from phase 4 to phase 5. ... All countries should immediately activate their pandemic preparedness plans. Countries should remain on high alert for unusual outbreaks of influenza-like illness and severe pneumonia. ... It is possible that the full clinical spectrum of this disease goes from mild illness to severe disease. ... From past experience, we also know that influenza may cause mild disease in affluent countries, but more severe disease, with higher mortality, in developing countries.” -- Statement by WHO Director-General, Dr. Margaret Chan 29 April 2009

WHO is not recommending travel restrictions related to the outbreak of the influenza A(H1N1) virus. Today, international travel moves rapidly, with large numbers of individuals visiting various parts of the world. Limiting travel and imposing travel restrictions would have very little effect on stopping the virus from spreading, but would be highly disruptive to the global community. ... Influenza A(H1N1) has already been confirmed in many parts of the world. The focus now is on minimizing the impact of the virus through the rapid identification of cases and providing patients with appropriate medical care, rather than on stopping its spread internationally. Furthermore, although identifying the signs and symptoms of influenza in travellers can be an effective monitoring technique, it is not effective in reducing the spread of influenza as the virus can be transmitted from person to person before the onset of symptoms. Scientific research based on mathematical modelling indicates that restricting travel will be of limited or no benefit in stopping the spread of disease. Historical records of previous influenza pandemics, as well as experience with SARS, have validated this point.” -- WHO Advisory, May 01, 2009

... [Population growth is] the gravest issue that the world faces over the years ahead. ... It is not a world that any of us would want to live in. Is such a world inevitable? It is not sure but there are two possible ways by which a world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way.” -- Robert McNamara, Speech to International bankers as Head of the World Bank, October 2, 1970. Also quoted by Antony Sutton in 'Trilaterals over America', pg. 79

Richard N. Gardner of the Council on Foreign Relations outlined the subversion processes for ending national sovereignty in CFR's Foreign Affairs in April 1974 in his article “The Hard Road To World Order” thusly:

In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.

Of course, for political as well as administrative reasons, some of these specialized arrangements should be brought into an appropriate relationship with the central institutions of the U.N. system, but the main thing is that the essential functions be performed.

The question is whether this more modest approach can do the job. Can it really bring mankind into the twenty-first century with reasonable prospects for peace, welfare and human dignity? The argument thus far suggests it better had, for there seems to be no alternative. But the evidence also suggests some grounds for cautious optimism.” (pages 558-559)

And we observe today that a very real “booming buzzing confusion” uncannily abounds, usually coordinated by the “central institutions of the U.N. system”, amidst the usual platitudes of “prospects for peace, welfare and human dignity”.

Who can make any rational sense of all these global events in real time, and all compressed in a short decade initiated by the crisis of 911 – from global war on terror, to global financial collapse, to global warming and global 'carbon credits', to now global pandemic? Does it require a brilliant man or woman to do so? An Einstein? A Rosalind Franklin? I have reached the conclusion as an ordinary human being of no particular notable brilliance, that it perhaps does only take an un co-opted plebeian to do so. Below is my analysis of the global pandemic now intruding in our lives just like the 'war on terror'. An alert just came home from my kid's school outlining the procedures they will follow in case the school has to shut down. Several schools in the vicinity have already shut down. So what is it all about? If you go to the 'experts', you will surely learn it.

Therefore, while I am not a biologist, in the past few days, I have had to become one by necessity of being a parent, to protect my family; so I know only as much as the title prominently displayed on my forehead, which spells 'expert'. Watch out for us 'experts' – we can suspend the laws of physics just because we say so. Our degrees, Nobel prizes, and elitists' applause are our credentials! So when an 'expert' from our learned ranks, one with known agendas written in our own hand writings but in other peoples' blood, brings you the news, look into it with great care and due diligence – lest you shortly regret having taken actions (or inactions) based upon it.

I find the afore-paraphrase of verse 49:6 from the Qur'an (the holy bible of the priests of 'Islamism', but for most Muslims to be left on the highest bookshelf for occasional dusting and annual pious rehearsing on death anniversaries and fasting) phenomenally insightful in unraveling current affairs (“O ye who believe! if a wicked person comes to you with any news, ascertain the truth, lest ye harm people unwittingly, and afterwards become full of repentance for what ye have done.”).

However, since I don't know in general, who is wicked and who isn't, as wickedness today comes wrapped in holy white, science, experts, presidents, shills, and "errand boys", and since our times have shown that it is almost trivial to make patsies of even the most sincere peoples to serve the devil's agenda, I apply this wisdom to all news and all bearers of news, all science and all bearers of science, and I don't much care for what's stamped on their lauded forehead.

Atheists and Agnostics of course may prefer to rely on Bertrand Russell's discourse on commonsense to adjudicate wisely.

If only we, the 'untermenschen' of humanity, the 'cattle' being led to the slaughterhouse, had collectively substituted some iota of commonsense from the very day of 911 for all the mantras by experts who shilled and continue to shill, who killed and continue to kill, for empire, we surely wouldn't be here today, “... on the verge of a global transformation [awaiting] the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” Please read on to understand how the multitude of crises perch humanity on that very cusp of global transformation with its oft-stated agenda for population reduction (also see analysis of NSSM 200). The latter is evidentially accomplishable as germ-warfare not only on 'target ethnic groups', but also on global crop, and thus global food production. And all attributed to natural causes, happenstance, incompetence, or unforeseeable blunder.

In this pandemic which is so deliberately being allowed to spread to other regions of the world, we might well be looking at the formation of a pretext for a new global central authority to supersede the largely advisory WHO, as direct global controllers of global public health, just as is now proposed for global central-banking to control global economics, global carbon credits to control global production (emissions), and the global war on terror which has already become the global truth du jour to control and deny essential liberties, all together constituting a global police state. 'One-world' government if you will (see Gideon Rachman's Financial Times Oped And now for a world government, December 08, 2008). In another 100 years, perhaps only 20, even to fart would require some 'fart-credit' from a global authority as it monitors the affluent on its ubiquitous sensors triggered off RFID implants in all that is living, and all which is commodified!

Some of our generation, caught Between the Two Ages (see Zbigniew Brzezinski's Between Two Ages, 1970), experience that angst in anticipation of global servitude to the Pharoahnic oligarchs. But our grandchildren will be taking it as their normal way of life without a second thought, despite their yoke of chains from uterus to grave. And 'that's just the way it is' being planned.

To derail it today, as well-nigh a fait accompli as it appears, is still far easier than it will ever be in the future – until such time when another Age will finally beckon. When, once again, “two cultures and religions [will] overlap ... when a whole generation [will be] caught in this way between two ages, two modes of life,” to resist change, but the new will finally overthrow the old at great human cost and bloodshed. No empire lasts forever.

Note on abetting the Pandemic

The American Heritage Dictionary defines Pandemic as: 'Medicine: Epidemic over a wide geographic area and affecting a large proportion of the population: pandemic influenza.'

The rapid spread of the swine flu 'H1N1' epidemic to other parts of the world is largely through Air Travel. With all the Homeland Security Apparatus so ubiquitously deployed at all the International Airports of the world to fight the global 'war on terror' against the 'Islamists', it ought to be rather trivial during check-in at departure points at all the international airports in the world to ascertain if a traveler has been to Mexico and deny boarding (for the immediate near term). The same type of form that is used during entry into the United States, and into most other countries, which asks the traveler questions on their whereabouts can be used at departure points, augmented by the same type of questions that are asked to fight the 'war on terror': did you pack your own bags, do you know anyone who has been to Mexico recently? And repeated a few times through the many steps of screening where they force you to take off your shoes, blow air up your skirt, and get their jollies looking at your imperfections through body imaging to identify 'suspicious' peoples who need to be interviewed further, before being let on board.

They do this routinely – I am subjected to it frequently whenever I travel – why not here? They can trivially shutdown schools as preventive measure and inconvenience thousands of students domestically, as noted in this AP report of May 02, 2009 (cached here): “The Education Department said that more than 430 schools had closed affecting about 245,000 children in 18 states. ... The government issued new guidance for schools with confirmed cases, saying they should close for at least 14 days because children can be contagious for seven to 10 days from when they get sick.” But they cannot detect and prevent a handful of travelers from getting on the plane through judicious assessment? Given the seriousness of the matter by their own admission: “It's a virus that we've never seen before. There's no background immunity in the population and it is spreading from human to human, all of which has the potential for a pandemic.” If the authorities were really concerned about the pandemic, a sensible human being among them would surely have reflected that some obvious policing and restrictions at points of embarkment would detect most of the obvious first order virus-carriers who are now reported, after the fact, to have been to Mexico. This is the low-hanging fruits of the tree which are not being plucked! It is interesting that almost all confirmed cases occurring in other countries of the world outside of Mexico and the United States, are directly traceable to visitors who have been to Mexico, or came in contact with someone who arrived from Mexico (see FluTracker and click on the balloons).

It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that the pandemic can be immediately mitigated by deploying a rational commonsensical first-order check on Departure Airports where the infrastructure to do so is already in place! This is the same sort of commonsense that is seen missing in all the crises since 911 which are subsequently blamed on incompetence, happenstance, blowback, complexity, unforeseeability, etc., and for which some global solution is hurriedly proposed. In fact, its immediate analogy is to both 911 and the financial crisis: the many deliberate stages (see Monetary Reform Bibliography) which were setup to calculatingly lead to the banking collapse, the solution to which, now the same financial ruling elites claim is a global monetary system in the hands of the same banksters. Similarly, according to the 'official dissent' to the official story of planes highjacking, the authorities deliberately monitored the highjackers for months rather than interdict them before 911 for various justifications. Their not heeding many a warning coming from intelligence sources is deemed “incompetence”, and the rationale for the attacks, “blowback”. The one common sacred-cow axiom among all these manufactured explanations: 911 was an invasion from abroad, the work of 'Islamist terrorists', rather than an inside job for “imperial mobilization”. The same thing is happening here: Pigs are being blamed as the first-cause prime-movers of this epidemic, and various justifications employed to monitor its spread, rather than interdict its carriers to prevent it from becoming a pandemic.

Whether it is the pigs in the pen or in the lab who unleashed it, the first-cause of swine flu in becoming a pandemic is evidentially the traveling-humans (not pigs, unlike the case of bird flu where birds are the prime cause of its spread), flying their payload from country to country in airplanes after passing through international airports which are controlled tighter than Fort Knox.

Therefore, the following advisory by WHO on “No rationale for travel restrictions” is not only irrational, and their justification specious, but outright criminal, for it is directly abetting in the spread of the pandemic in the name of science and mathematics. The same sort of “Scientific research based on mathematical modelling” gibberish was used to sell mega-loans to the poor developing nations to put them under massive debt to the World Bank, and then let the IMF let loose upon them to plunder at will (also see John Perkins' EHM, page 101, 2004). The same sort of “Scientific research based on mathematical modelling gibberish that is used to teach modern economics to generations of IVY and LSE students to justify making the gluttonous banksters richer and richer through their calculatingly induced credit-expansion-contraction-cycles (just as famously predicted by Thomas Jefferson) under their direct monopolistic control of the global central banking syndicate. And the same sort of “Scientific research based on mathematical modelling” gibberish that was employed by NIST and Popular Mechanics which 'proved' the absurd 'pancake collapse' of the WTC towers (see latest reality-check here). All the murderous pretexts are compressed in one short decade. What's the rush? Isn't the new 'one-world' empire supposed to last a thousand years?

Today, as yesterday, one can find legions of scholars, scientists, Nobel Laureates, and many an erudite “errand boy” swearing by these “Scientific research based on mathematical modelling”, while humanity is starved, robbed, decimated, victimized, and now gratuitously subjected to pandemics that are manufactured in Western laboratories for the oligarchs' global population reduction agenda.

A mathematics that is deployed in social sciences and which fails the test of commonsense, is a knife calculatingly constructed and sharpened to slaughter the sheep, not to pair fruit.

I respectfully challenge WHO to rise to the occasion despite being an agency of the United Nations, constructed by the financial oligarchs, to calculatingly orchestrate world governing bodies and global structures. I ask its respected Director General, Dr. Margaret Chan, who is entirely and monopolistically determining global policies which affect all nations – her 'advisory' is gospel for almost every country – to give humanity some respite, for she may not be aware of the overarching agendas any more than any other highly compartmentalized black-ops' unwitting executioners.

Note on CDC Reported Numbers

There is much discrepancy in reportage. The FluTracker using its own heuristics shows the spread of disease faster than officially reported. This report (cached here) by Reuters noted “176 deaths” in Mexico on April 30, 2009, whereas the officially reported “laboratory confirmed” deaths in Mexico as of May 05, 2009, according to WHO Advisory Update 16, is still only 29. The FluTracker shows “fatal cases” in Mexico to be 105 on the same date (20:41 EDT). Why this count anomaly?

See this report dated April 30, 2009, to understand one possible reason for the discrepancy in number of reported deaths, and this remarkable disclosure dated May 01, 2009, for why not to put too much faith in such 'official' reportage, as '“The specimens are coming in faster than they can possibly be tested,” ... CDC lab can only test about 100 samples a day.' The latter report sums it up: 'Why does any of this matter? Because people are under the great misimpression that H1N1 has killed "only" 7 people (or 10 as of today, as the CDC has added 3 deaths to its "confirmed" list). Therefore, people say, it's no big deal.'

This reporter's experience in New York City suggests the same: “I called New York City authorities, who told me they don't need to test everyone with the A/H1N1 virus and can't. They said they test only to identify and contain areas of outbreak.” The reporter, JOE LAURIA, Wall Street Journal's United Nations correspondent, who apparently caught the flu himself and spent 4 days in isolation in a New York hospital, describing his travails in “Reporter Tries to Get Tested for Swine Flu”, dated May 04, 2009, quotes Don Weiss, director of surveillance in New York City's bureau of communicable disease: “There are probably 10,000 people with the flu in New York, [w]e just don't have the capacity to test that. People with the flu should stay home and call their doctor.” Lauria further paraphrased Weiss: 'The only place in the world where testing is being done is at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, where a test had to be designed and produced for the new flu strain.'

The following is illustrative. The FluTracker map shows “1069 confirmed cases” in the United States as of May 6, 2009 08:08 EDT. The WHO advisory update 17 of May 06, 2009 reported “403 laboratory confirmed human cases” by the CDC in the United States. According to the FluTracker website: “The map was compiled using data from official sources, news reports and user-contributions.” Zooming into the map shows individual case stories. For instance, Missouri shows “2 confirmed cases”, both in its Howard County as of May 2, 2009. The link provided to the news report states: “The two cases were found during testing of specimens sent to the State Public Health Laboratory by doctors whose patients reported flu-like symptoms. Tests showed that the flu virus afflicting the two patients is a previously unseen type. Specimens from each patient will be sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for confirmation that it is the swine flu that has now spread to at least 20 states, including Missouri.”

Therefore, when the FluTracker map annotated Missouri with “2 confirmed cases”, it actually meant two “patients reported flu-like symptoms” which was confirmed by “State Public Health Laboratory” to be of “previously unseen type” virus. But the viral type has not yet been positively identified as 'H1N1' which only CDC is capable of doing (as per “Reporter Tries to Get Tested for Swine Flu” and this), and the specimens will be sent off to CDC for confirmation. As one can easily see, this kind of information can be quite useful provided one is able to discern hearsay from facts, as was possible to do in this instance. Thanks to Dr. Henry Niman for voluntarily compiling this data in the FluTracker.

Note on vaccination

In general, vaccination, when the intent of the health authorities is to preserve and protect, rather than to infertilate and eliminate, is only dangerous with respect to its side-effects. That is a matter of normal practice of modern medicine and pharmacology (the study of how drugs act on biological systems) – the intent being rooted in the 'Hippocratic Oath' to genuinely help people live longer and disease-free lives, and to minimally do 'No Harm' through medical intervention. Many a routine childhood vaccine (used to) come under this category. The evidence of the efficacy of vaccination is empirical – longer lifespans, elimination of many childhood diseases. [1]

However, when the health authorities are themselves beholden to powers from above, and their intent is suspect under certain circumstances, such as the case of the long standing United Nation's agenda for population control, fertility control, and ultimately, population reduction (as for instance outlined by Henry Kissinger in the now declassified National Security Study Memorandum NSSM-200 of April 24, 1974), the advice of the health authorities may not be trusted, especially when it is international. Even if, such advice is given with the best of intention by the peons (Doctors) working in those institutions. These specialists are merely the 'errand boys' doing their compartmentalized jobs for which they have trained as narrow experts. They are part of the establishment, and their rewards and careers are rooted in unquestioningly following the mainstream practice of medicine which is entirely run under the aegis of central organizations like the FDA and the AMA. So who can one go to for advice to ask what actual chemical cocktail is in a vaccine?

I tried that for the Hepatitis B vaccine which was needed for my kid in order to volunteer at a local hospital. I consulted all who were in reach of my phone, and I am rather well connected by plebeian standards. All I was informed was what they were themselves told by the FDA, or had read in the brochures that were dropped off at the doctors' front office by the pharma-reps.

So what's wrong with FDA (and pharmaceuticals) running the show? Well, they are beholden to many a corporate interest, atop of which, sit the Rockefeller interests which control much of the global pharmaceutical industry (see Eustace Mullins, Ibid.) and their research in drugs and in patenting life, which in turn plugs in seamlessly with the bioweapons research interests and primacy agenda of the national security state. [2] The interlocking is so complete among the various participants, from academia to industry to weapons labs, and also so opaque, that vaccines are like a cookie. One just can't know what's in them, or why different chemical/molecular formulations exist in a particular vaccine, or their long term impact, even if one is a well-intentioned scientist in a relevant discipline. Probably the only ones to really know are the those who perfected them in the research labs and they aren't gonna tell you – patents of course, but more pertinently, classified information. Even giving samples of bird flu vaccines to other nations deemed hostile to the United States and Western interests, is considered a threat to its national security! So vaccines can evidently be agents for both short and long term biowarfare as much as they can be antidotes for diseases. Under the best of circumstances, under non-mala fide intent as stated earlier, only its harmful side-effects and efficacy are rational determinants in the decision making of whether to take it or not. Religious beliefs are beyond the realm of this analysis.

Therefore, most people base their decision on trust in these governing bodies – that they would not deliberately harm them (inadvertently perhaps, for profit motive surely, but not calculatingly to implant an RFID chip inside them on contrived pretexts, or reduce the fertility rate among an ethnic group or entire population). This trust occurs for the same reason as the Americans' “United We Stand”.

Under such dubious circumstances, avoiding vaccination, especially of potentially biowarfare related pathogens, is minimally a double edged sword. Since one is not privy to what's in the vaccine, therefore, unless one can get it from the same batch as taken by the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, and Henry Kissinger, taking one's chances with the statistical odds becomes a commonsensical prudence for those not in that club.

Also see Zahir's comments of May 07, 2009 under Rich Nations Could Claim Most of Swine Flu Vaccine.

Footnotes

[1]: Eustace Mullins offers a rational counterpoint to this position in his carefully researched book “MURDER BY INJECTION The Story of the Medical Conspiracy Against America”, 1988, wherein he argues that vaccination (immunization) is outright responsible for many of modern systemic diseases, and that it was the Rockefeller interests who pushed it upon America (and through their control of the UN upon the rest of the world). That blanket position on vaccination being a poor medical practice ab initio, a quackery, stands on its own and is not considered nor challenged here. The point of focus in this note is decision-making under possible mala fide intent (not quackery) when people do follow and accept the conventional practice of vaccination – as I do. Perhaps a rethinking is required there too, but I haven't researched quackery as yet! This video documentary by Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz about medical madness, cloaked in bioterrorism preparedness, certainly leads in that direction. So does this video documentary Vaccination - The Hidden Truth made by the Vaccination Information Service. It is not clear to me if these opinions are confusing due process of medical science which does entail a complex cost-benefit-risk statistical analysis for public-health that is surely plagued by failings in commonsense and excessive greed when led by large pharma, with the political abuse of medical science in general to alias hidden war agendas on unsuspecting populations. My immediate concern is the latter which includes an entire gamut of political abuse, from eugenics to GMO foods to epidemics – which harvests justifications and techniques from science and technology – all for population culling and elimination. It's akin to abusing Islam to create the fabled enemy of 'Islamism' for a war-making agenda – whether or not there is some inherent deficiency in the religion is irrelevant and orthogonal to its political abuse for “imperial mobilization”.

[2] For the relationship between state sponsored terrorism and its instrument of biowarfare as silent-wars inflicted upon civilian populations, see Francis Boyle's Faculty Lecture on Bio/Warfare/Terrorism/Weapons, April 18, 2002, and his book Biowarfare and Terrorism, 2005; also see Stephen Lendman's excellent bird's-eye view in The Bush Administration's Secret Biowarfare Agenda, July 28, 2008. The fact that the “WHO is sending 2.4m courses of antiviral treatment to 72 nations around the world, Dr Ryan said, among them many developing countries” (BBC News, May 02, 2009), is cause for serious alarm given the primacy objectives of the national security directives of the United States Government coupled with its long standing agenda of population reduction in developing nations. The document NSSM 200 provides only a peak into the primacy thinking of hectoring hegemons, and while that has been declassified, what remains classified is hinted at by the impetus for full spectrum hegemony outlined in PNAC and evidenced in all the wars and global crises since 911. All leading to a New World Order of the globalists in which their nihilistic social Darwinianism will dictate both their universal morality to be enforced, and the universal imperatives by which to do so. Those very imperatives are being implemented unchallenged as I write this. This is the most bizarre aspect of this grotesque modernity – victim nations and populations willingly being led to the slaughter! Also see “Population control, US bio-weapons research, McNamara, Rockefeller, and AIDS”, especially Addendum3 where the following observation is noted:

... there are many many instances where the World Health Organization – which is again largely funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, and the Rothschild group in London – to absolutely control populations for specific political purposes worldwide, ... [fabricate] specific programs designed to kill large amounts of people, and it does this, in every single case, by means of vaccination introduction. We can see a pattern, a modus operandi, in this: Introduce a vaccine to unsuspecting population centers, cause massive sickness, massive death, massive panic, massive chaos, and then they step in and have the agenda completed. It's the same old problem-reaction scenario: They create the problem, they dictate the response, and then they have the prescribed action already made.”

Related Reports and Letters:



- ### -



Source URL http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/05/swine-flu-is-real-swine.html




The author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley (patents here), and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden 2003 book was rejected by six publishers and can be read on the web at http://PrisonersoftheCave.org. He may be reached at http://Humanbeingsfirst.org. Verbatim reproduction license at http://www.humanbeingsfirst.org#Copyright.


0313201012001312046


The Swine Flu Chronicles 2009 SWINE FLU PANDEMIC IS A REAL SWINE


The Plebeian antidote to Hectoring Hegemons

Home is Humanbeingsfirst.org

INDEX here.

Okay to copy, print, or post this document; verbatim reproduction only.
Comment
here. Full Copyright Notice
here.