Letter to Editor: Understanding the Political Science behind Global Warming February 07, 2009

Letter to Editor: Understanding the Political Science behind Global Warming

February 07, 2009

As Noel Sheppard correctly surmises in the Newsbusters.org's oped of February 6, 2009 “Half the Nation Thinks Media Are Exaggerating Global Warming”, global warming does not appear to be going down well with the people.

This is an amazingly encouraging sign of a hitherto comatose public unquestioningly being sold on nonsensical mantras – from 'war on terror' to 'islamofascism', from 'wmd in Iraq' to 'Iran is the greatest threat', from 'without financial bailouts of banks the world will collapse' to the most recent 'Obama's gonna change it' – finally waking up to the Machiavelli 101 that James Jesus Angleton, the head of the CIA Counter Intelligence operations from 1954 to 1974, had candidly observed as “Deception is a state of mind – and the mind of the State”.

And the fact that Global Warming is just another mantra, is more than a public inkling, more than some subjective cynicism of a sufficiently ravaged people that they are once again being taken for a ride on the horns of gibberish by a criminally complicit media into further enslavement. The mantra has direct and incontrovertible basis in political science, and is the sine quo non impetus for depopulation and economic starvation of the 'untermenschen' in the new world order.

Even the respected Financial Times through its editorial staff managed to put out a feeler to check the public's temperature on December 08, 2008. I wrote a comprehensive response to Financial Times oped written by their veteran, Mr. Gideon Rachman, which also went into the demonic motivation of why global warming mantra has been made necessary. Below is a short excerpt from my response to the Financial Times. To their credit, Financial Times, like all the rest of the Times on the planet always do (NYT, LAT, Time, ...), did not show much interest in my commonsensical deconstruction of their disingenuous piece, staying truthful and duty-bound instead, to their own paymasters' mission of ushering in world government.

And that, is the profound Zeitgeist of our times which contrives and schemes, like Henry the VIII creating his own Anglican Church, to impose the ruling-elite's narratives on reality to remake it in their own image. This isn't particularly a classified secret, or a very profound natural discovery for which I might win the Nobel Prize, or even something that only used to happen in barbaric history and not any more. The full spectrum co-option to fabricate narratives was even accurately captured by W. Cleon Skousen – a preacher who once reportedly worked for the FBI – as far back as 1970, when he reviewed the seminal work of a relatively unknown professor of history at Georgetown University's prestigious School of Foreign Service, Dr. Carroll Quigley (1941 – 1969). The latter, it was later publicly acknowledged by Bill Clinton himself, was the former American President's key mentor, and also the mentor of most of the senior leaders of America's Diplomatic staff. Skousen had rather straightforwardly made the observation:

'The real value of Tragedy and Hope ... [is the] bold and boastful admission by Dr. Quigley that there actually exists a relatively small but powerful group which has succeeded in acquiring a choke-hold on the affairs of practically the entire human race. Of course we should be quick to recognize that no small group could wield such gigantic power unless millions of people in all walks of life were “in on the take” and were willing to knuckle down to the iron-clad regimentation of the ruthless bosses behind the scenes. As we shall see, the network has succeeded in building its power structure by using tremendous quantities of money (together with the vast influence it buys) to manipulate, intimidate, or corrupt millions of men and women and their institutions on a world-wide basis.' (W. Cleon Skousen, The Naked Capitalist, pg. 6)

The only reality behind the twisted mantra of Global Warming, and behind former Vice President Al Gore and the UN team winning a Nobel Prize for their narratives of it now being foisted upon humanity in the form of 'carbon-credits', is as follows:

Begin Excerpt: On Global Warming

And as is entirely obvious from Mr. Gideon Rachman's article why this is politically motivated, the reasons become clear why this confusion is deliberately being created. If you accept the Capitalist conspiracy for world government, as I have described it, and if you accept the NSSM-200 agenda for population reduction as I have also described it, tying in the hand of Rockefeller to the UN and their agenda for population reduction (citations for these statements are in my various essays), then you must realize why the ruling elite wants to control 'life activity', and carbon-credit is their architecture of control!

It is somewhat akin to acquiring control of a nation's money supply in the guise of managing the economy better. Few in the public understand why such a control is bad anyway, but those who do try to understand it are thrown layers upon layers of obfuscation. Something similar is happening here. Think of acquiring control of 'carbon-credits' almost equivalent to acquiring control of a nation's money supply! This will control every aspect of sustaining life, just as control of money determines every aspect of sustaining the economy. You name it, between the two of them, it will control it in a world-government. And the first recipient of these controls, the carbon-credit specifically, is the developing world, the Global South, because that is where development must be arrested, and populations thinned out! Just as control of money was first exercised where there was a superfluity of industry and commerce, control of 'carbon-credit' is intended to be exercised where there is a superfluity of populations aspiring to grow their nascent economies!

Now, whether there is planetary-level (solar-system level) global warming, or global cooling, is also an entirely orthogonal issue from human contribution to despoiling its environment. Both the former two factors, if they are dominant, tend to occupy the higher order bit relative to human contribution. Wit the Ice-age, followed by the Holocene age. No factories and polluting industries were present then. Unless we explode 10 hydrogen bombs in geostrategic locations to usher in a manmade nuclear winter (and I exaggerate, a smaller number will surely do it), the contribution from coal and cow's emissions (the latter, believe it or not, is also apportioned carbon-credit as I have humorously read somewhere) remain in the lower order bits. They are surely non-zero, and if planetary-level climactic changes in the solar system become normal, as they do between their cyclic extremes, then these lower order bits will become the new higher order bits for management. That's just common sense.

So there are two real issues. First is the following scientific measurement – which can be fairly objective – what is the temperature activity in the solar system. For instance, is Mars cooling down or heating up in the past decades. Since there is no known life or industry on Mars, that can readily answer the question quite accurately for earth too. But better and longer running data is available for earth as well, which is why scientists are dissenting as noted in the Senate Minority Report that I have cited in my response to Mr. Gideon Rachman! I do not know of a single lay person who has actually read that report as yet, or its 2007 predecessor report from last year. Most arguments are religiously being fanned out of sheer ignorance, rather than simply asking the quantifiable questions: what is the empirical measurement data (instead of the sociological one)? How was it taken, where was it taken, what time span does it measure, and what is the conclusion?

The second real issue is the sociological one ... , such as oil consumption, human activity, etc. Please apply those concerns to the Western world first, and specifically to the Americans, not to the entire world, as the affluent Global North is, and has been, the biggest pig. In the Global South, people can hardly make ends meet, they barely subsist on dollar a day wage. And 2/3rd of all humanity lives there. They are routinely harvested of not only what's under their soil, but also what's above it, trees! Thus notice how Rachman has employed the mantra of Global Warming. Even if one assumes for the sake of making the following point that it is the man-made coefficient which is dominant – Gideon Rachman does not advocate that the Western world create a protocol to reduce their gluttonous consumption, but jumps straight to world government! And as everyone knows, the biggest violators of Kyoto, were indeed the Americans themselves. They refused to ratify it! And that, is indeed the second real issue.

End Excerpt

For more information, please see:

Response to Financial Times Gideon Rachman's 'And now for a world government' ( http://tinyurl.com/bm2wkt )

On Global Warming ( http://tinyurl.com/cb74c6 )

Thank you.

Zahir Ebrahim

Project Humanbeingsfirst.org


Letter to Editor: Understanding the Political Science behind Global Warming February 07, 2009