Rebuttal to Paul Craig Roberts': 'Washington Arrogance has Fomented a Muslim Revolution'

December 06, 2008.
The following letter to editor was sent to the listed editors on Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:14 AM. Mr. Paul Craig Roberts' responses and followup rebuttal are appended.
December 06, 2008.
The only response I can give to this lame article being carried on your stellar website 'Washington Arrogance has Fomented a Muslim Revolution', is the letter appended below. Do you mind, Mr. Paul Craig Roberts, if you stopped blaming Muslims for all the black-ops' false-flag operations on the planet: “The attack on Mumbai required radicalized Muslims”? Thanks!
Zahir Ebrahim
An ordinary Muslim
Thank you for compiling these references in this analysis “THE NARIMAN HOUSE STORY”. The following astute observation made in the article still begs the forensic question who and why:
“This terrorist incident will most likely lead to much greater bloodshed unless the true culprits are found and convicted in a court of law. Some analysts say that this event could lead to a new world war.”
Red Herring: 'a smelly fish that a fugitive drags across the path in order to put the pursuing dogs off the trail'
Lest some very good peoples remain on the treadmill of red herrings, Project Humanbeingsfirst issued the following letter as comment for this excellent website Pak Alert Press. It is reproduced below.
The Real Terrorists – by Zahir Ebrahim
The atrocity in Mumbai last week, and the bizarre data that is emerging, will make more sense if one stops viewing this heinous terrorist act from the traditional Indian-Pakistan lens. It is urgent that people in both nations begin to appreciate what's at stake so that each may initiate proper self-defense against accurately identified hidden dangers from the overt 'katputli tamashas'.
The following News Flash is Project Humanbeingsfirst's position on this manufactured terror. To appreciate it, please study the methods of Rand Corporation, CFR, Zbigniew Brzezinski, et. al., and acquire an understanding of the notion of world-government. Political science runs the world, and the children of Machiavelli are deeply rooted in waging war by way of deception – a game of conquest “as old as mankind”. From the East India Company to Free Trade to the War on Terror – all enablers of pretexts for “imperial mobilization” and “full spectrum dominance”. In the West, typically, the smartest students study humanities and social sciences, and the think-tanks as well as the Pentagon are populated with scores of PhDs in political science and history. What do you think they do there? What do you think they do at the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, and the Carnegie Endowment for Peace? How about at CFR and RIIA? They are united in one common global agenda – world government. And they get there by shrewdly employing the overarching political science concept articulated by David Ben Gurion “what is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”!
Therefore, please don't blame the Hindus or ISI or Jihadis – patsies and mercenaries come in all stripes, ethnic origin, and social class. And the best recruits for patsies are always those who have grievances or are disgruntled. The best recruits for mercenaries are the ruling-elite, politicians, and military men. In both cases they know very little, in fact often zero, and are merely the 'trigger pullers' of average intelligence. Instead, look for those 'ubermensch' who employ them. To do so, one has to understand the agendas, and what scheme of things is really being enacted on the world-stage. That, according to the forensic reports of Project Humanbeingsfirst (available on its website), points to an entirely different motivation-space and entirely different criminals from the 'katputli tamashas' being enacted for public consumption.
News Flash:
Terrorist rampage in Mumbai, India – Watch for “Hindustan Patriot Act” being enabled shortly! The last bastion of democracy, the largest in the world, had to be converted into a police state as “World government could only be kept in being by force”. This isn't an isolated event. The monetary collapse, the Obama government, predictions of first year of horrible terrorist acts worldwide to be blamed on the manufactured 'Militant Islamists' – enablers of endgame. Stop blaming either the Indians, or the Pakistanis. This has been a mil-ops all the way – no different than the Marriott Hotel terrorist act in Islamabad. See Press Release WHAT'S TO BE DONE – Massive Bomb Blast in Islamabad Marriott September 20, 2008. The same applies to Mumbai.
Thank you.
Zahir Ebrahim

Mr. Roberts Replied with Cc to editors: Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 1:39 PM
Whoever wrote this letter cannot read. I wrote that the Muslims were revolutionaries, not terrorists, that they had been driven to revolution to throw off their Western oppressors.

Zahir Ebrahim responded with Cc to editors: Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 3:02 PM
Merely quoting you Mr. Paul Craig Roberts: “The attack on Mumbai required radicalized Muslims”.
Your article is nonsense. It is the work of a disinformationist, if not an outright simpleton. It ignores black-ops entirely. It ignores the reality-space of creating pretexts for incremental faits accomplis for world-government. It blames the Mumbai terror event as the blowback for America's excesses. The wanton and meaningless terror act was nothing of the kind. There is also no revolution brewing among the Muslims “to throw off their Western oppressors.” Far from it. Your essay is merely a devious attempt to resurrect a boogieman that doesn't exist – along the lines of “clash of civilizations”, but replacing Bernard Lewis' “Islamic Triumphalism” with your “radicalized Muslims” due to oppression. It isn't clear why one should rejoice in Muslims being called “revolutionaries” for acts which are entirely terroristic, wanton, take the lives of innocent, and outright criminal. If anything, it is maligning an entire peoples. Still works wonders when the enemy is kept external.
And the name of “whoever wrote this letter” is Zahir Ebrahim.
Thank you,
Zahir Ebrahim.

Mr. Roberts replied: Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 7:32 PM
From: Paul Craig Roberts
Subject: Re: Rebuttal: Washington Arrogance has Fomented a Muslim Revolution
To: "Project"
Message-ID: <404762 .10564.qm="""">
you are a completely stupid fool, a disgrace to humanity

To be sure that such rich munificence being heaped upon the Muslims is not from some ordinary ignorant fellow in the mainstream, Mr. Paul Craig Roberts' distinguished bio which accompanied his article reads as follows:
Paul Craig Roberts is an economist who served as an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration earning fame as the "Father of Reaganomics". He is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service. He is the author of Supply-Side Revolution: An Insider's Account of Policymaking in Washington; Alienation and the Soviet Economy: The Collapse of the Socialist Era and Meltdown: Inside the Soviet Economy, and is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of The Tyranny of Good Intentions: How Prosecutors and Law Enforcement Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name of Justice.
So, Project Humanbeingsfirst will graciously let him have the last word.
No big deal that a supposed dissent-chief and a great supporter of justice only heaped slander upon the Muslims in the guise of critiquing his own nation: “The attack on Mumbai required radicalized Muslims”. His masters have done much worse – bombed entire civilizations into smithereens. See Weapons of Mass Deception – The Master Social Science to understand the dialectics of deception, and the concept of manufactured dissent among the rebels to complement the manufactured consent among the mainstream, both of which retain all core-axioms of 'empire' intact! The difference is that for consent, the empire is projected as good. For dissent, the empire is projected as bad. But the same external enemy is retained, and only re-incarnated either as “jihadis” and “Militant Islam” (consent), or “revolutionaries” and “blowback” (dissent). Neither manufacturers will ever extend their discourse to covert-ops, to forensic analysis of overarching agendas, and to “inside job”!
Please send your letter to editor to Project Humanbeingsfirst, and to the above noted websites as well as others where his commentary has been published, letting them know your opinion.

The author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley (patents here), and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden 2003 book was rejected by six publishers and can be read on the web at He may be reached at Verbatim reproduction license at

First Published 12/06/2008 22:07:19 1495
Links fixed February 9, 2018 9:00 pm
Footnote February 9, 2018: Funny how none of the lauded 'dissent' websites who published PCR's speculative-disinfo op-ed piece, evidently just because he is a 'white man' and presumably a 'somebody', bothered to publish this humble Muslim's dissection of his imperial bullshit that attributed wanton acts of terrorism to Muslims in the guise of applauding them as “revolutionaries”! The sum total of the white man's dissent ostensibly in favor of the untermensch is usually motivated by other agendas and self-interests! With even a little bit of scrutiny, it tends to fall apart. And when called on their bullshit, they either ignore you, as most do, or shower invectives upon you as this m-fcking darling of Western dissent did. The template of their controlled and specious dissent is actually pretty straightforward. Virtually all Western dissent repeats this manipulative template with at best mild variations. And they have roped-in the best intellectual minds among house niggers to do the same to help control their own kind. These bastards are neither friends of any untermensch over there, nor over here, meaning, the white man's burden is no friend of the 'lesser peoples', regardless! They always have an angle as the 'uber alles'. Dissent among the white man is often just the petty quarrel among thieves when grapes are sour for the losing tribes. See: The Dying Songbird, for that Machiavellian dissent template.

Rebuttal to Paul Craig Roberts': 'Washington Arrogance has Fomented a Muslim Revolution'