The Real Unhidden Agenda
October 25, 2008.
This is a response to: The Federal Reserve Suck Machine is propelling US into 'Neocommunism'.
I would like to add to this analysis in a minor way to substantiate the point that its basis is indeed rooted in calculated pre-meditation. Thank you for putting it all together very well.
Norman Dodd confirmed this 'devilishly' calculated premeditation to G. Edward Griffin in 1982. For this revealing interview, and because of who Norman Dodd was, certainly not a 'kookish tin-hatted conspiracy theorist' – graduate of Andover and Yale, a banker and insider, and finally, a Congressional investigator – the world owes both Mr. Griffin, and posthumously to Mr. Dodd, a belated thank you.
transcript here: http://realityzone.stores.yahoo.net/hiddenagenda2.html
Here is what Dodd says of what he learnt as the lead investigator, Director of Research, for the Reece Committee, chartered by Congress to look into the tax-exempt foundations. But before going into that, it is instructive to hear what Dodd revealed of a conversation in 1930, between him and Morgan Bank high officials, his bosses, in the aftermath of the crash of 1929, when upon being asked to do so, he had “rendered” a critical report on the stock market crash to his bank's superiors. According to the paraphrase by Mr. Dodd of the Morgan bank official's statement:
“Norm what you're saying is we should return to sound banking. ... We will never see sound banking in the United States again. ... Since the end of World War One we have been responsible for what they call the institutionalizing of conflicting interests, and they are so prevalent inside this country that they can never be resolved.”
With that as the backdrop, this is what Norman Dodd says of a conversation he had with the President of the tax-exempt Ford Foundation in 1954 as part of his Congressionally mandated investigation of tax-exempt foundations:
“Mr. Dodd, we've asked you to come up here today because we thought that possibly, off the record, you would tell us why the Congress is interested in the activities of the foundations such as ourselves.” Before I could think of how I would reply to that statement, Mr. Gaither then went on and said: “Mr. Dodd, all of us who have a hand in the making of policies here have had experience operating under directives, the substance of which is that we shall use our grant-making power so to alter life in the United States that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”
ED GRIFFIN: Why do the foundations generously support Communist causes in the United States?
NORMAN DODD: Well, because to them, Communism represents a means of developing what we call a monopoly, that is, an organization of, say, a large-scale industry into an administerable unit.
ED GRIFFIN: Do they think that they will be the ones to benefit?
NORMAN DODD: They will be the beneficiaries of it, yes.
Another interesting thread is when Dodd reveals of what his lead investigator discovered in the minutes-books of Carnegie Endowment for Peace. The following was recorded on the old-fashioned dictaphone machine by Katherine Casey as she was browsing the minutes-books in the CEP library:
We are now at the year 1908, which was the year that the Carnegie Foundation began operations. In that year, the trustees, meeting for the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed throughout the balance of the year in a very learned fashion. The question is: “Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?” And they conclude that no more effective means than war to that end is known to humanity.
So then, in 1909, they raised the second question and discussed it, namely: “How do we involve the United States in a war?”
Well, I doubt at that time if there was any subject more removed from the thinking of most of the people of this country than its involvement in a war. There were intermittent shows in the Balkans, but I doubt very much if many people even knew where the Balkans were. Then, finally, they answered that question as follows: “We must control the State Department.” That very naturally raises the question of how do we do that? And they answer it by saying: “We must take over and control the diplomatic machinery of this country.” And, finally, they resolve to aim at that as an objective.
Then time passes, and we are eventually in a war, which would be World War I. At that time they record on their minutes a shocking report in which they dispatched to President Wilson a telegram, cautioning him to see that the war does not end too quickly.
Finally, of course, the war is over. At that time their interest shifts over to preventing what they call a reversion of life in the United States to what it was prior to 1914 when World War I broke out. At that point they came to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion, “we must control education in the United States.” They realize that that's a pretty big task. It is too big for them alone, so they approach the Rockefeller Foundation with the suggestion that that portion of education which could be considered domestic be handled by the Rockefeller Foundation and that portion which is international should be handled by the Endowment. They then decide that the key to success of these two operations lay in the alteration of the teaching of American history. ...
Project Humanbeingsfirst once again thanks both Mr. G. Edward Griffin, and posthumously, Mr. Norman Dodd, for their untiring efforts to uncover hidden agendas, even at the expense of being ignored. So was Socrates in his time.
The complex puzzle for the “Enduring Capitalist Conspiracy for World Government”  all comes together when viewed in this perspective, of socialism, communism, or 'Neocommunism' as the author of this article put it, that it is the not-so-hidden an agenda.
The agenda is empirical - and each time there is a bust, the banksters consolidate their grip on ownership. The WB-IMF [1a] tag team [through its structural-lending magic] owns pretty much all the developing nations' assets, including the Amazon Basin (as I have been told, I haven't actually confirmed the latter item, but indeed have numbers to substantiate the general claim). In the developed nations, the con is committed through the private central banks ending up owning all the real assets of the nation by owning the National Debt.
The agenda then, which is fully empirical and undeniable – except by the world's E-con-omists who win their Nobel Prizes that way by perpetuating gibberish  – is to manifestly own all the planet's resources and land, to manage it centrally in a world-government, and have all the peoples of the planet, except the owners, and perhaps the Ayn Rand's 'manager' class, become paid serfs, serving the interests of the real global land/wealth/asset owners.
That, my dear fellow travelers on Earth, is the end game!
But as a wise man once said – there is many a slip between the cup and the lip.
The author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley (patents here), and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden 2003 book was rejected by six publishers and can be read on the web at http://PrisonersoftheCave.org. He may be reached at http://Humanbeingsfirst.org. Verbatim reproduction license at http://www.humanbeingsfirst.org#Copyright.
The Real Unhidden Agenda