Nuclear Security and Hectoring Hegemons

Nuclear Security and Hectoring Hegemons


October 30, 2009
Conclusion written for The Pakistan Decapitation Papers Section on Nuclear Security
The American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives1 is empirical and has been publicly known for a very long time. Well, certainly to its victims, and of course to its imperial harbingers, if not to its ordinary citizens kept perpetually busy with their 'American Dreams' as Prisoners of the Cave2. And its predatory nuclear first-strike imperative has also been publicly known without any room for ambiguity, at least since the White House's 2002 Nuclear Posture Review was 'leaked' to the Los Angeles Times. It is briefly covered in this article of March 11, 2002, by Patrick Martin US plans widespread use of nuclear weapons in war3. Writings of other contrarians which coldly make apparent the outright omissions in Zia Mian's column in Foreign Policy In Focus3.1 span the gamut from this WSWS report of September 07, 2007 by Bill Van Auken Why was a nuclear-armed bomber allowed to fly over the US?4, and their editorial of April 13, 2006 US threats against Iran—the specter of nuclear barbarism5, to Edward S. Herman's comprehensive deconstruction of America's primacy alliances with the European powers in NATO: the Imperial Pitbull6, dated January 23, 2009. Study after study6.1 has publicly revealed the preparations United States and its allies have been un-secretly making to preemptively attack Iran, and the superpower remains precariously perched at that very Rubicon crossing as ominously depicted in Heads-up warning to the American Peoples - Nuclear attack on Iran appears imminent!7. Among its murderous axis partners preparing for this monumental crime against humanity, are of course the Zionist state8, and NATO.
Indeed, taking an un-jaundiced look at NATO's self-ascribed imperatives makes the Atlantic alliance only appear as a proxy-service hegemon for the primacy of the entire industrialized Global North upon the resource-rich but impoverished Global South. Here is the 24 Apr. 1999 NATO report cited by Edward S. Herman in his imperial Pitbull article: The Alliance's Strategic Concept9. I also came across this December 31, 2007 proposal from NATO officials (by simply typing “NATO” with some qualifying filters into an internet search engine) on how to continue spreading Western primacy objectives (properly syntactically sugared of course): Towards a Grand Strategy for an Uncertain World10, subtitled: 'Renewing Transatlantic Partnership'. The following two penetrating analyses by Ben Hayes, of April 21, 2006 on 'The EU's Security Research Programme' titled: Arming Big Brother11 ; and the most recent one dated September 2009 with the Transnational Institute12 on the 'EU Security-Industrial Complex' ingeniously titled: NeoConOpticon13, show how the West is Machiavellianly conniving for its own primacy disguised as “preemptive” self-defense in an “uncertain world”. Project Humanbeingsfirst has shown, both in this book and in its many other reports, who is primarily responsible for making it an “uncertain world” and for what purpose. Succinctly put, but only in the choicest political science diction of David Ben Gurion, “what is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times.”
Therefore, daring to call a spade a spade, to omit such blatant doctrines of imperial predatory planning in one's purported “analysis” of nuclear security as a domain expert, and at a prestigious IVY no less, is to in fact be explicitly allied with the global aims and aspirations of the monumentally criminal hectoring hegemons themselves. The commonality in Zia Mian's implicit axioms14.0 with another 'whiteman' domain expert's is revealing: Letter to Matthew Bunn of Harvard on his risk assessment of Nuclear Terrorism14. The make-belief pretenses as a leftist and a peacenik aside, it is merely manufacturing consent and dissent15 to influence public opinion and fabricate justifications for empire's own axioms in its egregious pursuit of “Full Spectrum Dominance”15.1 in a Game as Old as Empire16. The import of crafty omissions for manufacturing sophisticated propaganda cannot be minimized, as was also commonsensically pointed out by the well known essayist Aldous Huxley:
“Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth. By simply not mentioning certain subjects... totalitarian propagandists have influenced opinion much more effectively than they could have by the most eloquent denunciations.”
Let no one mistake it – the Pakistani physicist turned nuclear disarmament specialist, Dr. Zia Mian's article is prima facie evidence that he is merely a paid propagandist (through the academic-respectability cover) for the same imperial forces that are today arrayed against his own native nation. One might understand the 'whiteman' carrying his or her own burden. One is however hard pressed to fathom a 'Negro' willingly doing it for them, the eloquent wisdom of Martin Luther King quoted elsewhere in this book notwithstanding.
Since there is surely going to be no Nuremberg17,18 (as the hectoring hegemons must perceive), nor any moralist's report from Jerusalem19, no Justice Robert H. Jackson20, and not even a victors' justice21, the fate awaiting the 'untermenschen' gives me the shakes! There is absolutely no apparent deterrence today for finally annihilating all the “undesirables” and other “useless eaters” from the planet as a world government at the barrel of a global police state is rapidly orchestrated by the hectoring hegemons and their vassals. Is there really a god(?), one must surely ponder at these existential moments. While the atheists might not think so, the victims, all victims, must believe so22. There surely must be one! And there surely must also be a Judgment Day too! For otherwise, where and how are hectoring hegemons ever to be paid back an eye for an eye, and their victims fairly recompensed? Dialectical hegemons like Zia Mian would only snicker at the sheep dreaming of its revenge as the Hegelian23 butcher approacheth!


[1] Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Grand chessboard - American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives, 1996,
[2] Zahir Ebrahim,
[3] Patrick Martin,
[3.1] Zahir Ebrahim, Response to Zia Mian's 'How Not to Handle Nuclear Security', December 20, 2007,
[4] Bill Van Auken,
[5] WSWS Editorial,
[6] Edward S. Herman,
[6.1] Plesch and Butcher, SOAS,
[7] Zahir Ebrahim, Heads-up warning to the American Peoples - Nuclear attack on Iran appears imminent!, March 29, 2008,
[8] Project Humanbeingsfirst Press Release: Holocaust Redux – Heads-up Warning to the Jews, June 30, 2008,
[9] NATO,
[10] NATO,
[11] Ben Hayes,
[12] Ben Hayes,
[13] Ben Hayes,
[14.0] Zahir Ebrahim, Letter to 'Foreign Policy In Focus' on Zia Mian's 'nuclear security', December 24, 2007,
[14] Zahir Ebrahim, Letter to Matthew Bunn of Harvard on his risk assessment of Nuclear Terrorism, April 02, 2008,
[15] Zahir Ebrahim, Manufacturing Dissent: Weapons of Mass Deception – The Master Social Science, June 01, 2008,
[15.1] DOD JV2020, Chapter 3, Full Spectrum Dominance, see excerpt in Zahir Ebrahim, Prisoners of the Cave, 2003, Chapter 1, Strategic Thinkers of the Empire,
[16] Zahir Ebrahim, Introducing A Game As Old As Empire, Feb. 4, 2007,
[17] David Irving, Nuremberg, The Last Battle, 1996,
[18] Zahir Ebrahim, Nuremberg: The grotesquely dancing trumpeting elephant in the newlywed's bed!, April 10, 2008,
[19] Hannah Arendt, Eichman in Jerusalm: A Report on the Banality of Evil, 1963,
[20] Justice Robert H. Jackson, famous moralizing-sermonizing Closing Speech at Nuremberg, Day 187, 26 July 1946,
Video clip:
[21] Mainly, the atrocious crimes committed by the Nazis/Axis-powers and not committed by the Allies were defined as War Crimes. Such as the HolocaustTM, and first aggression by invading Poland, Pearl Harbor, etc. In fact, the prosecuting powers defined the first-aggression to be a crime so heinous that Justice Robert H. Jackson called it “the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole”. In consequence of such artful definitions of war crimes, attrocious crimes committed only by the Allies, like burning down civilian cities of Dresden, Tokyo with sustained apocalyptic fire bombings night after night (David Irving, Apocalypse 1945: The Destruction of Dresden, ), and dropping of the A-Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki upon largely civilian population centers, were not defined as war crimes, either at the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, or at the Tokyo Trials.
In the case of similar crimes committed by both sides, the criminal cases against the Nazis/Axis-powers was argued to be weak, and ultimately not prosecuted. See for instance the well known case of Admiral Karl Dönitz in David Irving, pg. 156, Nuremberg, Ibid.
The most shocking aspect of victors' justice however, is the relatively lesser known case of the Nazi banker, Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, the singular financial genius behind the Third Reich – Reich minister of economics until 1937, Reichsbank president until 1939 – with deep connections to Wall Street (Antony C. Sutton, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, ), and to the Bank of England (David Irving, Nuremberg, Ibid.), and without whom the Nazi war machine simply could not have been financed, and therefore, no World War II waged. Hjalmar Schacht was actually set-free, just as he had boasted throughout the trial that he would be (David Irving, Nuremberg, Ibid. Also Zahir Ebrahim, “Monetary Reform: Who will bell the cat?”).
Sadly, as hypocritical, and as Edward Bernays' style shrewd public relations campaign that these war crimes trials were, even that level of victors' justice is not a deterrence for aggression today, nor available to the victims of World War IV. See Justice Robert H. Jackson's lofty closing statements at Nuremberg, ibid., for the clear criminality it established for today's war mongers, their vassals, state executers, philosophers, political scientists, shills, and other vulgar propagandists. Today, they all spin absurdities upon absurdities of 'war on terror' while committing the most egregious crimes against humanity with impunity! Who will stop them? Never mind stop, people aren't willing to even speak the truth, or even hear it when it's plainly spoken. The “banality of evil” has transcended Hannah Arendt's attribution of it exclusively to the 'Good Germans', to all the 'Good peoples' of the world! One is arguably more sickend by their pious apathy 'looking from the side', than by the hired mercenaries, paid assassins, and ideological circus clowns of empire who do their misanthropic wont mainly because good people let them.
[22] Zahir Ebrahim, About Me and My Little Jihad, April 2007,
[23] Zahir Ebrahim, Tutorial on The Hegelian Dialectics of Deception, May 21, 2009,

Nuclear Security and Hectoring Hegemons: Conclusion Zahir Ebrahim | Project